Control of growth at issue

By REBECCA CATALANELLO
Published April 5, 2007

TALLAHASSEE - House Republicans unveiled a plan Tuesday that could limit the state's power to oversee community growth.

Lobbyists for cities, counties and a growth watchdog group cautioned the legislators to slow down before stripping the state Department of Community Affairs of its role reviewing local-level zoning changes.

"We would urge you not to rush into this process," said Community Affairs Secretary Tom Pelham, who had a day to review the plan.

The plan arose suddenly this week from the House Committee on Economic Expansion and Infrastructure, chaired by Rep. Dean Cannon. R-Winter Park . Rep. Dick Kravitch, R-Jacksonville is vice chair.

The proposal places some oversight in the hands of 11 regional planning councils - a system critics worry would provide more lax regulation.

"The proposals, while provocative and worthy of a lot of thought, are exactly the kinds of issues that should not be dealt with in a hasty manner, beginning halfway through a legislative session," said Pelham, a recent appointee of Gov. Charlie Crist. "If we're not careful, we'll make the situation worse than it is."

Wade Hopping, a lobbyist for developers who support many of the ideas behind the bill, called the concept a "fascinating and complex idea."

But even he suggested that if lawmakers go forward with the process, they contain it to a pilot.

Citing time constraints, Cannon cut the committee discussion short Wednesday, saying Kravitch would meet with interested parties in a publicly noticed meeting on Monday.

Giuliani: New Gulf Oil Drilling Needs Discussion

By BRENDAN FARRINGTON
The Associated Press
TALLAHASSEE - Republican presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani on Wednesday said everything has to be considered if the United States wants to break its reliance on foreign oil, including more drilling off Florida 's coast.

Calling the energy supply a major domestic problem, Giuliani said the nation needs to focus on nuclear power production and renewable energy sources. In the meantime it also needs to see what oil can be tapped, he said.

"Energy independence means everything has to be open for discussion," Giuliani said when asked about offshore drilling. "The idea of having more oil under our command, so to speak, or within our orbit probably for some period of time is going to be important. The ultimate goal, however, should be renewable sources of energy."

Florida 's congressional delegation has been fighting attempts to open more of the Gulf of Mexico to drilling, saying they are concerned spills could damage the environment and tourism.

During a discussion with Republican state lawmakers, the former New York mayor cited Brazil 's use of ethanol as an example the United States should follow.

" Brazil 's a wonderful country, wonderful economy, wonderful scientific community - it's not the United States of America . Why should they be ahead of us on ethanol? We should be ahead of them. That should be our goal," he said.

If the United States concentrates on new or improved technologies for energy production, it can then turn around and sell them to countries like India and China who have a growing demand, he said.

"That's the way America grows in global trade," Giuliani said. "Energy independence is a great industry for us. Let's think about this like business people."

Giuliani also criticized Democrats for pushing a deadline for a military withdrawal from Iraq , saying it "lacks common sense."

"When in the history of war has a retreating country or army printed out a schedule of their retreat and handed it to their enemy? Forget politics and forget all of this, does that make any sense?" Giuliani said while addressing Republican lawmakers.

Giuliani said Congress should either cut funding for the war, or support President Bush's new strategy in Iraq, which includes sending 21,500 new troops and thousands of additional military personnel to help stabilize Baghdad. Withdrawal deadlines only help the Iraq insurgency, Giuliani said.

A bill passed by the U.S. Senate calls for most U.S. combat troops to be out of Iraq by March 31. An even stronger House-passed bill demands a September 2008 withdrawal.

Bush has threatened to veto both.

Giuliani later addressed about 500 supporters at St. Petersburg High School , where he continued on the Iraq theme.

"You have to be on offense against terrorists," Giuliani said. "We can never, ever go back to the way we used to be before Sept. 11. And I believe that if this election in 2008 goes the other way, we will be right back playing defense, because that's what the Democrats are doing."

While in Tallahassee , Giuliani met privately with Gov. Charlie Crist. Giuliani praised Crist as a "new Republican" who reaches out to all people and who has gotten off to a great start as governor.

Sand tubes approved in House bill
By Paige St. John
FLORIDA CAPITAL BUREAU

Working against approaching deadlines, the House's chief environmental committee powered through bills Wednesday to allow more beach armoring and reduce gambling-ship sewage.

Trying to bridge the gap between beach developers and environmentalists, the House Environment and Natural Resources Council amended legislation permitting greater use of coastal armoring.

The bill permits one type of technology - huge sand-filled textile tubes - in areas of Florida shore where they are not now permitted.

Among those supporting the bill is the Seaside development in Walton County , where erosion is pervasive but not yet close enough to standing buildings to qualify for current state permits.

In return, it requires property owners who install the expensive systems to post financial bonds, get federal permission to protect endangered sea turtles, and keep the tubes covered beneath a bed of sand. Alabama-based Advanced Coastal Technologies, which makes the systems, has lobbied heavily for the bill.

Reports to the Department of Environmental Protection show existing tube systems in Gulf and Brevard counties require repeated monitoring and reburying, and in some cases increase nearby erosion.

In the same marathon committee meeting Wednesday, Rep. Bob Allen won narrow passage of a bill to require day cruise ships to bring their sewage back to shore for landside treatment.

Gambling boats could still dump their sewage at sea, because Florida cannot regulate what they do in federal waters. Whether they bring sewage back to shore or not, they would have to pay dockside pumping fees.

''That's the Tallahassee two-step,'' said Allen, R-Merritt Island .

Lobbyist Ralph Haben, speaking for the 13 day-cruise gambling ships that operate in the state, contends the industry is being singled out from foreign vessels, pleasure, tourist and fishing boats that also dump their waste.

''We ain't hooking up,'' Haben said. ''It goes to the issue of federal jurisdiction and what we do in international waters.''

A companion bill in the Senate requires only a state study of the pollution from the gaming ships.

''These ships have proven to me that they have done everything they need to do,'' said Rep. Faye Culp, referring to onboard systems that pulverize the waste and add chlorine before release into the ocean.

''That is not wastewater treatment,'' countered Rep. Trudi Williams, R-Fort Myers.

County to appeal water-use permit
Residents fight plan to pump water for bottling

BY SUSAN LATHAM CARR
STAR-BANNER

OCALA - Ruth Kansier said she does not attach her name to many issues.

"But water, it's a passion," Kansier said.

So, when the St. Johns River Water Management District was considering giving a permit to pump a half million gallons of water a day from the aquifer to supply bulk water to commercial water bottling companies, Kansier, a Marion County resident, objected. Her objection, however, was for naught.

The district's governing board issued a 20-year permit in March to allow C. Ray Greene III and Angus S. Hasting to pump 182.14 million gallons of ground water a year.

"I can't see them taking water out of the springs to have two people making money on it," Kansier said in a telephone interview with the Star-Banner on Wednesday. "They are just giving out these permits all over the place - like there's a renewable source of water, which it is, but we are using it so much faster than it's going back in [the aquifer]."

Neither Greene nor Hastings could be reached for comment on Wednesday afternoon.

Another Marion County resident, Margaret Morosko, also objected to the permit.

"I can't understand the water management districts being irresponsible," Morosko said. "Both of them - whether St. Johns or Southwest - both of them are giving away the water and telling the homeowner you should not be using it."

In Florida , water is owned by the state. The water in Marion County is regulated by two water management districts - the Southwest Florida Water Management District west of Interstate 75 and St. Johns east of I-75. Both have issued water restrictions.

"If we are actually losing our aquifer, if we are losing the water in our streams, and they want us to believe that, then why are they making these bad judgments? Why are they giving the water away?" Morosko asked.

Marion County officials are wondering the same thing.

The county filed for an administrative hearing trying to stop the permit but lost its argument. The water district said that the permit meets the criteria for being a reasonable beneficial use, for being in the public's interest, and it does not interfere with any presently existing legal use of water.

The county now has until 5 p.m. April 12 to appeal the final order to the 5th District Court of Appeal in Daytona Beach . Assistant County Attorney Tom McNamara said he will file the appeal next week.

"Generally, the county's position is that [the water district has] imposed water restrictions on the eastern half of Marion County for the purpose of conserving water," McNamara said. "And they are making a determination that that applies to everybody but one property owner who could pull out a half million gallons of water a day. And that's 'in the public interest.'Ê"

But the permit causes another snag.
The land is zoned agricultural. In order for the property to be used for water distribution to bottling companies, the county would have to issue a special use permit, and none has been requested.

He said that the County Commission , which is an elected body, will have to make that land-use decision, but the district, which is an appointed body, has disregarded that.

McNamara has another concern.
"They are going to make one property owner a multimillionaire, and if his neighbor waters his lawn three times a week instead of two times a week, he's in violation. There's just something wrong with that," McNamara said.

Because of the large draws on the aquifer, the city of Ocala 's Water and Sewer Director Henry Hicks said his request for a 20-year permit is in jeopardy.

"If they are going to allow a company to sell water and give them a 20-year permit to do it and then restrict cities or counties for ground water withdrawals within that same 20-year period, how is that right?" Hicks asked.

Morosko does not hold out hope that the county will win its appeal.

"The water management district is a political entity," Morosko said. "Anything the politicians want, they will get. So, Marion County - you pray [the county] will win, but they won't. It's a foregone conclusion. It's political."

Susan Latham Carr may be reached at susan.carr@starbanner.com or 867-4156.
DeBary allows marina, homes

The upscale project on the St. Johns River wins approval despite concerns about manatee safety.

Denise-Marie Balona
Sentinel Staff Writer

April 5, 2007

DeBARY -- The City Council late Wednesday unanimously approved a controversial land-use change that will allow a ritzy marina and million-dollar homes on the St. Johns River despite concerns about manatee safety and an outcry from environmentalists.

Elected leaders allowed the change but capped the number of homes that may be built in the upscale housing development at 250 and said there can be no more than 50 docks at the marina. They also required developers to work with the school district to accommodate the additional students who eventually would live there.

"This is the future of the city," Councilman Christopher Carson said.

Residents young and old and a variety of Central Florida environmental groups packed the Florence K. Little Town Hall to speak their minds about how such a project, dubbed Estates at River Bend, would impact this growing city and the critical waterway that runs through it.

Agencies such as The Nature Conservancy and Seminole Audubon Society argued that building on the river and opening a marina would ruin wildlife habitats, hurt water quality and make the river less safe for animals such as manatees and wood storks. Some opponents traveled from as far as Texas .

Residents seemed split on the issue, with some hating the idea of a housing development on the river and some loving the idea that, along with the buildings would come new water lines and a paved road in their neighborhood.

"I truly believe the city of DeBary will benefit by having another upscale neighborhood," said Vance Scott, a resident who owns a real-estate company.

Author Fredrick Hitt, who lives on the river in DeBary, predicted disaster.

"At the moment, we feel like we're looking upstream into the barrel of a 500-boat ecological disaster," he said.

The development originally called for a 500-slip "wet-and-dry marina."

Wednesday night was scheduled as the final hearing to change the land use for the 330-acre tract.

The Estates at River Bend would be built north of the Meadowlea-on-the-River mobile-home park near Konomac Lake .

In December, DeBary officials endorsed the plan. They were excited about building an exclusive niche in this southwest Volusia city. They liked the developer's plan to extend sewer lines, pave Fort Florida Road and provide a property-tax windfall.

In addition to a marina, the proposal called for a private island dedicated to recreation and stretches of boardwalk overlooking the river. There also would be a restaurant and DeBary's first private yacht club.

As many as 250 multimillion-dollar, single-family homes would go up on nearly 120 acres, while the rest -- about 210 acres, including wetlands -- would be preserved.

The project is proposed to span two properties owned by William Eagan and Murphy Investment Group.

The county had considered buying the land in recent years with money from its land-preservation fund, Volusia Forever. But the price, nearly $17 million, was too expensive.

Although the developer, Joseph Krzys of St. Johns Partners LLC, promised to be environmentally friendly by preserving as many trees as possible, environmentalists focused on the potential harm to manatees and their habitat.

The St. Johns River is home year-round to the rambling, gray creatures. The leading cause of death in Florida for manatees is watercraft strikes, said Pat Rose, an aquatic biologist and executive director of the Save the Manatee Club in Maitland.

"This is much too large and ambitious a project for that habitat," Rose said in an interview before the meeting. His group lobbied the City Council to reject the proposal.

The Florida Department of Community Affairs, the state's top planning agency, recently objected, too. It was not clear Wednesday afternoon whether the developer had yet made changes to alleviate the state's concerns.

The Volusia Growth Management Commission, an independent oversight panel, had asked the council not to vote Wednesday because it had not been able to decide what kind of impact the change would have on other cities and areas.

The commission, which has the power to shoot down such land-use changes under Volusia's home-rule charter, and DeBary clashed over Wednesday's meeting.

The commission said DeBary is moving too fast. DeBary says the commission is moving too slow.

Officials for the commission said DeBary's vote should not come before their public hearing, which is set for 7 p.m. April 25 at the Volusia County Council chambers, 123 W. Indiana Ave. in DeLand.

The city claims the countywide agency took too long to review the proposal, a process that should take no more than 90 days, said Paul Chipok, assistant general counsel to the management commission.

Chipok said the 90-day period has not expired because the city has not responded to the commission's request for additional information.

Chipok urged the city to hold off on a vote.

Denise-Marie Balona can be reached at dbalona@orlandosentinel.com or 386-851-7916.

Survey: Community concerned by potential path of toll road

By Terry Witt

Results from a March survey in Crystal Oaks showed attitudes have soured toward Suncoast Parkway 2, with nearly eight of 10 residents now opposed, a civic leader said Tuesday.

Gus Krayer, chairman of the Civic Concerns Committee, said the results demonstrate a dramatic shift in community opinions from a “quick survey” five years ago when the community was evenly split between those supporting the project and those opposed.

In the most recent survey, 78 percent of the participants did not want Suncoast Parkway II extended through Citrus County .

Survey questionnaires were distributed at a March 12 community meeting organized for the purpose of discussing the parkway. Residents were disappointed when parkway official Joanne Hurley did not attend. Hurley had turned down an offer to speak at the meeting, but a Chronicle story indicated she would be there.

Krayer said that Hurley has since called him to express concern about a March 28 Chronicle editorial that made it appear FTE was unresponsive to legitimate citizen concerns.

“In fact, she made it clear that, were we to have another meeting regarding SCP-2 like that on 3/12, she would be willing, if not eager, to attend even without ‘new information’ regarding the project,” Krayer said in a written release.

Hurley responded Wednesday that she was indeed disappointed by the Chronicle editorial because it failed to state that FTE communicates constantly with the public through e-mails and by responding to phone calls and letters, but instead focused on the allegation that the agency was unresponsive.

She said it was her fault that she told Krayer and a Chronicle reporter she did not attend the March 12 meeting because FTE had no new information.

She said the invitation had come on short notice. But she said Krayer is correct that FTE will attend any future community meeting, regardless of whether it has new information.

“I indicated we could not make that meeting, but we will come to the next meeting to hear their concerns regardless of whether we have any new information,” Hurley said. “We will be happy to come whenever we are invited.”

Hurley said Krayer supplied her with a copy of the survey results and she forwarded the information to every official involved with the Suncoast II project. She said the information will become part of the information base FTE uses to evaluate the project.

Concerning the survey, 95 people registered for the meeting, and 74 participated in the survey.

The survey also found that 96 percent of surveyed residents were opposed to having an interchange built near the main entrance to Crystal Oaks. The approved route for the 26-mile toll road would have an interchange built just east of Crystal Oaks Drive, the community’s main entrance.

According to the survey, 86 percent wanted the interchange moved farther east. Eight-eight percent of those surveyed said they are interested in receiving more information about the toll road project.

Krayer said the survey also ranked the degree of concern residents had concerning issues related to the parkway. The survey asked residents to rank the level of concern from not very concerned to very concerned.

In the category of very concerned, he said:

* 96 percent listed increased traffic on Crystal Oaks Drive, the main entrance road;

* 96 percent listed Crystal Oaks Drive becoming four-laned;

* 92 percent listed decreasing property values;

* 90 percent listed noise pollution;

* 89 percent listed air pollution;

* 89 percent listed increased crime as a result of the toll road being built.

Krayer noted that not every person who participated in the survey responded to every question and not all the surveys distributed were returned. He said 74 surveys were counted.

He said where people placed check marks instead of giving numerical responses, the check marks were ignored.

Homes deal shifts builders

After an agreement with KB Home fails, Minneola will wait for another developer to step in.

Robert Sargent
Sentinel Staff Writer

April 5, 2007

MINNEOLA -- The builder of the upscale Palisades Country Club may pursue the same deal that the city failed to reach with another developer for hundreds of new homes.

City Council members were scheduled Tuesday night to cancel a development agreement with KB Home, which walked away from a project planned in Minneola despite weeks of negotiations. Instead the city voted unanimously to remove KB's name from the contract to allow another builder to step in.

On another front, the city also agreed to negotiate a new garbage contract that could raise bills for residents.

If the KB deal had been approved, the builder could have put 485 homes on 206 acres east of U.S. Highway 27. In return, KB would have provided the city 3 acres of land and about $1 million to help the city build and maintain public facilities and infrastructure.

KB also would have had to build a two-lane road from U.S. 27 east along the southern boundary of the proposed site and give Minneola $130,000 to offset initial impacts to fire, law-enforcement, emergency-medical and parks-and-recreation services. The city also would have been given another $50,000 to help cover costs of reviewing the project.

Representatives for KB never closed the deal -- a sign of the area's dramatically declining home-construction market.

City Council members were poised Tuesday to cancel the development agreement until Claude Smoak, a former Clermont mayor and Lake County commissioner, who owns the 206 acres -- asked them to hold off for a few weeks.

Smoak asked the city to remove KB Home's name from the development agreement and to hold it up so he can see if another company, Palisades builder The Metrontario Group, would take up the offer.

"I can see no detriment to the city to do this," Smoak said.

The council complied, voting unanimously to remove KB from the contract, which will be delayed until July to see if Metrontario is interested.

Representatives for Metrontario say they are just beginning to look at a deal with Smoak and Minneola. The developer must decide whether the project is worth the money and effort, considering the local housing slowdown.

"We're going to put our heads on this thing and go the best we can," said Paul Mondell, director of planning and development for Metrontario.

Council member Joe Teri said he is content to give Smoak what he wanted: "It was a reasonable request from a longtime landowner and resident who I have a great deal of respect for."

Metrontario has several Central Florida developments including Palisades , which is approved for 519 homes. Urbana in Hunter's Creek in Orange County is proposed for more than 230 condominiums. The company also has projects in Canada and Israel .

In other business Tuesday night, council members voted 3-2 to pursue a seven-year contract with a new garbage-collection company. Mayor David Yeager and council member Ed Earl dissented.

Minneola is looking to end a longtime partnership with Houston-based trash hauler Waste Management. Officials recently got offers from competing companies for more than $21 a month per home -- more than the $18.78 currently charged by Waste Management, officials said.

After negotiations with Minneola, Waste Pro of Longwood could start out with $18.52 a month. That cost would go up $3 by the seventh year of the contract only if Waste Pro gets an exclusive contract to collect Minneola's commercial garbage as well.

Minneola can't provide the company an exclusive contract unless residents vote to change the city's charter. Without the change, residential fees could go up about $6 within seven years, according to reports.

Earl opposes Waste Management but said he could not support increasing garbage bills for residents.

Yeager said he likes Waste Pro, but he voted against pursuing a contract because he wanted a different service option that required the company to provide residents with 96-gallon garbage cans that could be picked up with semi-automated trucks. The council instead opted for residents to provide their own garbage cans and bags.

A contract offer from Waste Pro is expected to come back to the council later this month.

Robert Sargent can be reached at rsargent@orlandosentinel.com or 352-742-5909.

Western growth blueprint progresses

By Mitra Malek

Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

Thursday, April 05, 2007

WEST PALM BEACH — The drawn-out process of finalizing a growth plan for Palm Beach County 's central-western communities has gained some strength.

It's also offered a few surprises.

County commissioners on Wednesday resumed discussions they had started a week ago with planning staff. The kernel of the debate was how much density and open space should wind up on mainly farmland spread across 54,000 acres near The Acreage, Royal Palm Beach and Palm Beach Gardens , among other municipalities.

If this sounds familiar, that's because it is. The sector plan, which the commission adopted in 2005, addressed those issues.

But the state still hasn't signed off on the plan, and with a May 1 deadline looming to negotiate a settlement for it, the county needs to resolve issues such as density and open space.

During the Wednesday workshop, commissioners told their staff to return April 18 with a proposal that keeps the same density as the sector plan, one unit per 1.25 acres. The proposal should cluster those homes, about 10 percent of them workforce housing, surrounded by 60 percent open space, commissioners directed. Open space means wetlands and conservation-oriented uses. Developers could jump to a density of one unit per acre through changes such as increased workforce housing.

The county's recommended density contrasts sharply with proposals from Callery-Judge Grove and GL Homes, which want about 2.5 units per acre for their massive projects.

Commissioner Jess Santamaria, who for three decades has lived in the sector plan area, said his primary concern is preserving quality of life for the 150,000 or so people who live there - not massaging circumstances for developers.

Santamaria, a former developer, said any development tends to increase crime and taxes.

"If you're going to talk about revenue, you have to talk about expenses," he said. "Growth does not pay for itself."

Right now, density for the sector plan area is one unit per 10 acres.

"We're already giving an 800 percent increase in density" through the sector plan, Santamaria said. "Isn't that enough?"

Santamaria and Commissioner Karen Marcus, who represents a district near the sector plan area, said feedback from residents indicates most would be comfortable with a density of one unit per 1.25 acres. After all, that's what public consensus had set for the sector plan.

But Commissioners Warren Newell and Mary McCarty weren't as sure. Both said they're more comfortable sticking to one unit per 10 acres until they have more information regarding the clustered projects.

"I want to see what this hybrid will bring," McCarty said. "At the moment, I'm not convinced."

Newell said he wanted assurance from environmental groups and neighboring municipalities that the clustering proposed Wednesday was OK with them.

"When you create something forced by politicians, it may not be the best," Newell said.

Several large property owners in the sector plan area want to build, including EB Developers, GL Homes, Lion Country Safari and Callery-Judge Grove.

GL Homes recently submitted plans for about 12,000 homes on 5,000 acres and is subject to the sector plan. Callery-Judge Grove, however, submitted its project before the commission adopted the sector plan. The citrus grove hopes to build a 10,000-home clustered community with businesses, schools, restaurants and many other facets. Commissioners are scheduled to cast their final vote on the project May 7.

South Florida 's population booming despite challenges

Fueled almost entirely by immigration, the South Florida metropolitan area continues to attract new residents in numbers that rank in the top 10 nationally.

BY LISA ARTHUR

larthur@MiamiHerald.com

Related Content

·/548/story/63951-a63763-t4.htmlPopulation on the rise in Florida

Spiraling housing costs. Congested highways. Hurricane anxiety. All these things are supposed to be making South Florida a less attractive place to live.

But new Census estimates released today show the region continued to be a people magnet, drawing 455,869 new residents -- primarily immigrants-- between April 2000 and July 2006. That's the ninth-largest metro area increase in the country during that time.

The U.S. Census Bureau defines the region's metro area as Broward, Miami-Dade and Palm Beach counties. The new report shows a 9 percent increase in population the past six years.

''That's a lot of people, and that's major growth for an area already as large as we are,'' said Ted Leonard, senior planner for Broward County .

MYRIAD PROBLEMS

It's also a significant enough increase to ratchet up the urgency for solving problems like traffic congestion, the affordable-housing crisis and other growth-related concerns, planners say.

''That amount of growth brings consequences,'' said Richard Ogburn, assistant to the director of research and budget at the South Florida Regional Planning Council.

``That's a lot of roads we should have built, but we're not building new roads, so that's a lot more cars on the roads we have. We've known for a long time our transportation system hasn't kept up with the growth. That's a lot of school seats and a lot of hospital beds.''

And there is no end in sight.

A slowdown in population gains during the past two years is a momentary lull, planners said. Census numbers released last month showed that between July 2005 and July 2006 the number of people moving into Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach counties from other states -- known as domestic migration -- was less than the number moving out. South Florida 's growth is fueled almost entirely by foreign immigration, a trend the new Census report says is happening in large metro areas across the country.

Without immigrants pouring into the nation's big metro areas, cities like New York , Los Angeles and Boston would have shrinking populations as native-born Americans move out of big cities.

In the South Florida metro area, there were 409,426 new immigrants during the period covered by the Census report.

Statewide, Florida metro areas continued to grow, with only Key West-Marathon registering fewer residents -- down 4,852. Orlando was the state's fastest-growing larger metro area, with a 21 percent estimated increase, according to the Census report.

WEST COAST GROWTH

Among smaller metro areas, Cape Coral-Ft. Meyers had the third-fastest growth rate in the nation; and Naples-Marco Island ranked seventh.

''We don't see that Florida will stop growing rapidly,'' said Stefan Rayer, research demographer for the Bureau of Economic and Business Resources at the University of Florida in Gainesville .

State and regional demographers are also predicting net domestic migration will bounce back and return South Florida to more rapid growth.

''The slowdown or plateau we've seen in the domestic migration is not a break,'' said Leonard. ``I wouldn't be surprised if we see it for another year or so until the housing market straightens out and housing costs and income achieve more equilibrium. But it's just waiting to take off again, and it will happen.''

And the region will still have huge increases in immigrants to go along with it.

''They come here because they have relatives and friends who have come before them and made the transition and established a community,'' Ogburn said. ``And the places they are leaving often have more congestion than we do. Just because things have gotten a little bit tougher here, it's not like they are going to change their mind about coming.''

Miami Herald database editor Tim Henderson and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Green housing gains ground

Green home building doesn't have to be complicated, experts say. Simple steps can make houses more environmentally friendly.

BY BREANNE GILPATRICK

bgilpatrick@MiamiHerald.com

Related Content

·        Pros and cons of going green

The Hidden Hollow townhomes in eastern Davie look a lot like the other developments popping up around South Florida .

Few people see the fluorescent light bulbs, the energy-saving dishwashers or the special air-conditioning filters that help make these buildings among the first truly green homes in South Florida .

The green movement has taken a long time to spread to homes, because of everything from cost to wariness among both builders and buyers. But now, with the rising price of energy and a more crowded real estate market, some small architects in South Florida are banking on green home building as a way to stand out.

''You don't have to get really exotic,'' said architect Jeffrey Evans, standing in the kitchen of one of the Davie homes. Evans already has the go-ahead for another such project in Davie . ``All the things that make the development green are readily available.''

Until recently, going green evoked solar-paneled homes for granola-eating buyers. It didn't help that Florida lacks many of the financial incentives for green building offered in other parts of the country.

And so most advances in green building were for commercial properties, government-funded projects or academic sites, where costs could be spread out. Any green residential development tended to be in North and Central Florida .

Now the cost equation is changing. Green builders argue that although a green home might cost 3 to 5 percent more upfront, the long-term financial and health benefits are worth it. They say the extra $1 or $2 for the monthly mortgage payment pales next to the 25 percent or 30 percent saved on energy and water bills.

Also, some green home builders want an edge in a market where state home sales were down by almost a third in 2006.

''Builders are realizing they need to differentiate themselves to the masses,'' said Roy Bonnell, executive director of the Florida Green Building Coalition. ``And one way to do that is to go green.''

In August 2005, the U.S. Green Building Council launched a program to certify homes as green, called Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, or LEED.

About 345 builders nationwide representing roughly 5,800 homes are taking part, and 150 homes have already received the certification, according to numbers released this week. The program is expected to double within the next six months, acting director Jay Hall said.

FLORIDA FALLS BEHIND

But, so far, few of those homes have been in Florida . Only 11 builders with nine projects have registered with LEED for Homes.

Builders also have sought certification from the Florida Green Building Coalition. About 775 Florida homes have received it, but the only one in Broward or Miami-Dade is Hidden Hollow.

Builders in Hollywood and Miami Beach are now looking to extend green building to affordable homes. Miami Beach wants to integrate green practices into two affordable housing projects along Collins Avenue . And Broward Housing Solutions is hoping to work green development into the rehabilitation of seven affordable housing units in Hollywood and two in Pompano Beach .

Martin Bell, energy specialist for the Miami Beach Community Development Corp., said it's about time South Florida took a closer look at green development.

''Why should Florida lag behind?'' said Bell , who is also the architect for the project. ``And these features, it's not like they're very difficult to install. They're just simple, basic changes that can make a huge difference.''

Green building can also be adapted to South Florida to emphasize mold and moisture control, energy-efficient air conditioning and hurricane safety.

''There's no one shade of green,'' said Sara Gutterman, CEO of Green Builder Media. ``What's a viable solution for one part of the country might not be viable for another part of the country.''

SMALL PLAYERS

The steps toward green homes are small, with most developments listing fewer than 50 units. Giant builders Lennar and GL Homes have no green projects in the pipeline. Even Bonita Springs-based WCI Communities, which has among the most green-certified homes, has fewer than 500 green units.

Also, it's still too early to tell how home buyers will react -- a big issue for large home builders who worry that they can't sell houses unless costs are kept low.

But experts say environmentally friendly home building could become more efficient as more South Florida home builders learn what it takes to go green and smaller developers help test the waters for larger companies.

''A green home really doesn't look any different than any other home,'' Bonnell said. ``The look of the home, the feel of the home, shouldn't be any different. These things don't stick out.''

Deal puts a hospital in Chiefland

By CINDY SWIRKO

Sun staff writer

A settlement approved by the state Tuesday has cleared the way for construction of a 60-bed hospital in Chiefland by a Tennessee-based company.

Robert Bauer, president of Ameris Health Systems of Nashville, said he is not certain when construction will start but added it must be within 18 months of receiving a certificate of need from the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration. That is expected within 30 days.

"We are satisfied the fight is over and the disagreements are all settled. Now the real work starts," Bauer said.

The approved settlement is between Ameris, the Health Care Administration and North Florida Regional Medical Center .

A certificate of need had twice been turned down by the administration, prompting the administrative appeal by Ameris.

Meanwhile, North Florida Regional intervened to press for the new hospital to have a 24-hour emergency room, obstetric and pediatric services, and agreements for patient transfers to other hospitals if needed.

While the hospital will be in Levy County , a key advocate has been Dixie County Commissioner Buddy Lamb. He said Wednesday the hospital will be welcomed by residents of Levy, Dixie and Gilchrist counties who will now have a shorter distance to go for many types of medical care.

"We'll be transporting patients that can be seen at that hospital at literally half the distance. From Cross City it is 50 miles to Gainesville and from Suwannee it is 70 miles," Lamb said. "This has caused our Tri-County community to really pull together. It has caused a level of camaraderie that I have not seen in the six years that I've been on board. I haven't seen a joint effort as strong as this."

Bauer said the hospital will provide a range of services including emergency care and general medicine.

The population of the area is growing yet isn't served by a hospital, Bauer added.

"Basically Chiefland is 45 miles from a full-service hospital. What we are proposing is in between a full-service and a tertiary hospital," Bauer said. "Cancer centers and open-heart programs - all the high level stuff - we won't be doing. We're going to do bread and butter services. We'll have a 24-hour ER, general surgery, OB - basic stuff that meets 75 percent of your needs."

The hospital will be on 20 acres behind the Wal-Mart Supercenter. Ameris has facilities in Arkansas, Georgia, Alabama and Mississippi.

Cindy Swirko can be reached at 352-374-5024 or swirkoc@gvillesun.com.
Couple, city at odds over pond growth

Longwood wants them to cut down vegetation. They like the privacy and don't see the city's point.

Robert Perez
Sentinel Staff Writer

April 5, 2007

LONGWOOD -- Bill and Connie Adams are growing weary of fighting city hall.

The couple just want to know why the city is so intent on making them cut down the cattails, willows and other vegetation in a quarter-acre section of a pond that borders their back yard.

In less than two weeks, they may be forced to chose between giving the city the property, paying nearly $11,000 to have the city clean it up or doing the clean-up themselves.

City officials say the reason is simple. The mucky land on the west end of the pond is within the city's stormwater system, and the growth could impede flow.

The problem, as the Adamses see it, is that there are no plans to dredge the pond, so cutting down the vegetation won't improve flow. What it will do is take down the lush buffer that provides a little privacy and intimacy to the couple's well-kept backyard.

"We just want to be left alone," Bill Adams said.

The couple's property is tucked at the end of unpaved East Jessup Avenue, less than a quarter-mile from the CSX Corp. railroad tracks and a few blocks east of downtown. They built their cozy home on the property in 2000.

Their frustration has grown as the dispute has dragged on for more than five months, especially because state environmental officials agree with the couple.

"You are not required by [state] laws or rules to remove any aquatic plant material from this lake," wrote Amy L. Giannotti, a state Department of Environmental Protection biologist.

State officials may not require removing plants from the pond, but the city's stormwater rules do, said John Drago, city administrator.

Three other property owners around the pond have agreed to clean up their sections, with the Adamses being the lone holdouts, he said. Last month, Longwood's Code Enforcement Board found the couple in violation of the city's stormwater rules.

They wouldn't be the first to be cited for overgrown ponds, Drago said, noting that the owners of properties on East Bay and Myrtle avenues about four blocks away had to clean up their land.

The Adamses say they haven't decided what to do next. They have already spent money on an attorney and appealing the code enforcement board ruling requires filing a lawsuit in Circuit Court.

Bill Adams works hard to keep the ditches and storm culverts cleared on and around his property. Connie Adams has spent many hours nurturing shade plants and butterfly gardens on the property.

"It's just an insult to be told our property isn't being maintained," Bill Adams said.

"We just want to be good neighbors," Connie Adams added.

The dispute may be resolved without either side coming out ahead. The Florida Department of Transportation has informed the Adamses that their property may be needed for parking at a planned commuter-rail station. If that happens, the state would condemn and buy the property.

Robert Perez can be reached at 407-322-1298 or rperez@orlandosentinel.com.

 

Developer pulls plug on lakeside project

By CHUIN-WEI YAP
Published April 5, 2007

LAND O'LAKES - Richmond American Homes has pulled out of a contract to develop 85 lakeside homes on Lake Patience Road.

The proposed development, called Sweetbriar at Lake Patience, was a sister project to another 205-acre Richmond American proposal across the street, which the developer also recently canceled.

"We're not involved in that project any more," said Michael Murphy, who handles land sales at Richmond American. "The development cost just became too high. The deal just didn't work for us."

The pullouts came amid signs that the housing market still has not bottomed out. Inventories grow. Tampa Bay area home sales still struggle, falling 23 percent in February compared with a year earlier, according to the Florida Association of Realtors.

Recent problems in the subprime mortgage market, which lent to high-risk home buyers, have sparked a wave of foreclosures and hundreds of lost jobs at Tampa mortgage firms.

Developers have apparently tapped the brakes on even big projects like the 5,000-acre Wiregrass Ranch in Wesley Chapel.

Work started Dec. 13 on the first 1,999 homes but recently appeared to have stopped. An attorney for the development said they were slowing the project, even as they continue to negotiate with the county for permits.

As if last year's dismal market performance wasn't bad enough, the number of residential permits issued in Pasco County continues to slide this year.

Pasco sent out 552 permits in the benchmark category up to April this year, compared with 1,870 this time last year. Foreclosure suits rose 87 percent last year in the county.

Both Richmond American proposals, just west of U.S. 41 in Land O'Lakes, were residential projects.

The larger one was to have been built on former county Commissioner Curtis Law's citrus groves.

In October, Law told the Pasco Times that Richmond American Homes was pulling out of its contract with him. The move prompted him to revive his citrus groves.

Across the street, Richmond American Homes had planned to build Sweetbriar on 30 acres of pine woods belonging to Guy and Deborah King.

The property runs in a narrow parcel from Lake Patience Road northward to the edge of West Lake Ellis.

Richmond American is a label owned by MDC Holdings Inc., a 34-year-old publicly-listed builder based in Denver.

The company earned net income of $214-million last year, less than half compared with 2005. It wrote off $18-million worth of projects last year.

The builder began expanding in Florida in 2003 and has projects in Hernando and Hillsborough counties, but its Web site shows that it has no presence to date in Pasco. The Kings could not be reached for comment Wednesday.

Chuin-Wei Yap can be reached at 813 909-4613 or Pasco's"cyap@sptimes.com.

Pasco's housing blues

 

 

2007

Single-family housing permits

January

127

February

175

March

250

 

 

2006

 

January

531

February

548

March

791

Source: Pasco County Central Permitting Division

 

New housing plan for Belleview gets first OK

BY AUSTIN L. MILLER
STAR-BANNER

BELLEVIEW - Belleview city commissioners on Tuesday approved one of two draft developer agreements for new housing.

In the first discussion, three commissioners - Mayor Tammy Moore and City Commissioners Wilma Loar and Michael Goldman - felt developer Kirk Boone should be exempt from the city's traffic study guidelines adopted in December 2006. The trio said Boone had approached them roughly a year and a half before the implementation of the city's guidelines and therefore should not be subjected to those rules.

"It was ethically the thing to do. We knew the project was out there," Goldman said.

Commissioner Christine Dobkowski disagrees. To her, all Boone has done is purchase the property and annex it into the city. In her opinion, there's been no construction.

"His contention is he's in the middle of the project and I don't agree with that," Dobkowski said.

Boone said he met with city officials and they had "an understanding" about his plans. Initially, Boone said the idea was to build 901 units. He said city officials wanted him to include commercial property, so he decided to add 25 acres for that design. Last April, the property, a little more than 223 acres located off Baseline Road, was annexed into the city. Then in July, Boone, manager of BR Belleview Development LLC, bought the land for $13.1 million.

Since then, Boone said the city decided to implement a traffic guideline. Before Tuesday's ruling, Boone said they did a traffic study, which was conducted by Kimley-Horn & Associates Inc.

With 500 units and no commercial, the study recommended three improvements: Install a two-way turn lane on a portion of Baseline Road, install a northbound right-turn lane by the project off Baseline Road, and adjust the timing of the traffic light at the intersection of Baseline Road and Southeast 92nd Place Road and Baseline Road and State Road/County Road 25.

With 500 units and 25 acres of commercial, aside from the three improvements, Kimley-Horn suggested a westbound right-turn lane at Southeast 67th Avenue on CR 25 and a northbound right-turn lane along Baseline Road.

"My ultimate goal is to make everyone happy," said Boone, who has reduced the housing density to 700 units.

In the meantime, both the city and Boone will try to hammer out their differences.

On the issue of whether to inform other entities - such as the county - about the project, Moore said maybe in the future, but on this project, no.

"This is something we already started," Moore said.

On another issue, by a 4-1 vote, city commissioners gave their blessings for a five-acre, 36-unit, condo-style development that would be located off Southeast 52nd Court. Before approving the plan, commissioners wanted language for either an escrow account to build sidewalks or for the developer to build the sidewalks.

Austin L. Miller may be reached at austin.miller@starbanner.com or 867-4118.

Will port get 585 acres for $1?

A lawmaker leads the push for Port Manatee.

By CRAIG PITTMAN
Published April 5, 2007

For eight years, Port Manatee has been tied up in a long, expensive fight over a state permit to expand its facilities at the mouth of Tampa Bay.

Now a state lawmaker has proposed simply giving the port the 585 acres of state-owned submerged land that surround it.

What do the state's taxpayers get in return? $1.

Handing over the state land to the port will make it easier and cheaper for port officials to work on expansions, state Rep. Ron Reagan, R-Bradenton, explained Wednesday. A port official said the change would also enhance the port's security as well as improve its ability to be an environmental steward.

But HB 847 may be unconstitutional, according to a House committee staff analysis. The state Constitution says all the submerged land around Florida is "held by the state ... in trust for all the people," and only a vote by the governor and Cabinet can transfer it to someone else.

The state Department of Environmental Protection is opposing the bill. "We prefer that state-owned lands remain in the ownership of the state of Florida," explained DEP spokeswoman Sarah Williams.

But so far Reagan's bill has passed two committees without any dissenting votes, debates or discussion. After one more committee stop it will be headed for a House vote.

Both Reagan and port special projects director Steve Tyndal say giving the port control over the submerged land is not intended to exempt the port from environmental regulations over dredging. The bill, however, says the port alone would have "the right to regulate the improvement of any and all submerged lands" it controlled.

The port's location between two environmentally sensitive aquatic preserves, Cockroach Bay and Terra Ceia, makes expansion difficult. In the mid 1990s, port officials estimated they were losing $3-million a year because they could not accommodate larger ships.

In 1998, port officials proposed launching the biggest dredging project to hit Tampa Bay in three decades. They wanted to add a 40-foot-deep turning basin to the 400-foot-wide channel connected to the bay's main shipping channel. They also wanted to widen the spot where the channels connect and create two berths for big ships.

Dredging 88 acres of bay bottom would wipe out about 12 acres of sea grass. So port officials hired sea grass expert Roy "Robin" Lewis to oversee scooping up the sea grass beds and transplanting them.

State scientists questioned whether the transplanting would work, but DEP officials said they were won over by the port's promise to make sure the transplanting succeeded before using the new berths.

In 2002, despite obvious problems with the transplanting, port officials wrote a glowing report that made it sound like a success. Lewis resigned in protest and became a critic of the port. Another DEP consultant concluded the report was "faith-based, i.e., the reader just has to have faith" that it was accurate.

Meanwhile, the dredging contractor accidentally dumped clay and silt over 7 acres of bay bottom, wiping out another 2 acres of sea grass.

Port officials have lobbied to change their permit so they no longer have to wait to use the new berths. Last year the DEP announced it would modify the permit. Lewis and an environmental group, ManaSota-88, sued.

Two months ago a judge found that "the evidence established that the upfront transplantation ... failed and had not been remediated." So now the DEP is requiring the port to submit a "remedial action plan" for fixing the problems with the transplanting before it can use the new berths.

Times researcher Angie Drobnic Holan contributed to this report.

Wal-Mart digs up trouble with turtles

By TERRI BRYCE REEVES
Published April 5, 2007

 

TARPON SPRINGS - When a work crew tried to unearth some gopher tortoises on the site of a proposed Wal-Mart recently, it stirred up more than soil.

Instead, workers unleashed the ire of local activists who gathered Tuesday night on the steps of Tarpon Springs City Hall and waved banners and flaunted photos of a backhoe.

The group's hand-painted signs said, "Bury Wal-Mart, not the turtles," "Wal-Mart is an environmental predator" and "First the turtles, next 800 trees, then our heritage and way of life."

"We're asking the Board of Commissioners to find the will and compassion to intervene," said Dory Larsen, a member of Friends of the Anclote River, which opposes the Wal-Mart project.

In response, the mayor recommended that the city write regulatory agencies and Wal-Mart to put its concerns about the incident on record. Two other commissioners also criticized the company, which said it made an innocent mistake.

Wal-Mart and its consultant, Lotspeich and Associates of Winter Park, had obtained a permit from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission to relocate up to 10 tortoises from the site, which is on U.S. 19 near the Anclote River.

But before disturbing the animals, the retailer was first required to secure all of its other permits from other government agencies. And when the tortoises were removed, some permits were still pending, officials have said.

On March 23, state wildlife enforcement agents were called after activists spotted a backhoe on the property. When a Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission officer arrived, the tortoises were already loaded in a truck headed for a mitigation bank in Volusia County. The officer ordered they be released back into starter holes.

Members of the Sierra Club, the Friends of the Anclote River and the Wal-Mart Alliance for Reform Now organized Tuesday's rally at City Hall to bring attention to the matter.

After the protest, the dozen or so activists filed into City Hall to express their frustration and concern for the creatures during the public comment portion of the meeting.

Speakers asked the commissioners to investigate and see if the eight turtles were still alive.

One critic said this was just one more example of Wal-Mart's disregard for the environment, fair trade and labor laws.

Larsen called for the city to write letters to Wal-Mart and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission.

"Let them know that you do not approve of the laws being broken within the city of Tarpon Springs limits, that you do not approve of a developer having wanton disregard for Tarpon Springs' permitting procedures, and that you hope that they enforce the strictest penalties allowable, including, but not limited to, revoking the permit entirely," she told commissioners.

Mayor Beverley Billiris recommended the city attorney draft a letter from the board to Wal-Mart and regulatory agencies to share their displeasure with the violations.

Commissioner Robin Saenger said the actions of the nation's largest retailer show a pattern of disingenuousness.

And Commissioner Peter Dalacos suggested passing a resolution to condemn Wal-Mart's actions.

On Wednesday, Wal-Mart spokesman Michael Mills said it was all an innocent mistake.

"We had an incidental take permit which allows us to move or kill the turtles," he said. "But Wal-Mart decided the right thing to do was to move the turtles to a conservation area where they will hopefully lead happy and healthy lives."

He said factors such as the weather and that the mitigation area was "filling up with other tortoises" caused the retailing giant to act prematurely.

"In our effort to do the right thing for the community and the gopher tortoises, we may have moved ahead of some paperwork or process," he said.

No tortoises died in the move, he said.

"Someone has been there since and all eight are fine," he said.

Terri Bryce Reeves can be reached at "treeves@tampabay.rr.com.

The 'duh' factor of mass transit

By HOWARD TROXLER
Published April 5, 2007

Okay, everybody's talking about mass transit for Tampa Bay, louder than ever.

The mayor of Tampa got sworn in for her second term on Sunday and stressed it.

All the area's elected pooh-bahs got together in February to hold a summit. It was a veritable United Nations.

A bunch of business groups got together in March and agreed mass transit is essential to our future.

Our legislators are working on creating an agency to oversee the whole region.

A couple weeks ago, the state Department of Transportation even chimed in with possible major routes:

- St. Petersburg to the Gateway area, across to Tampa's West Shore and downtown, and east to Lakeland.

- Tampa to the University of South Florida, east Pasco and Brooksville.

- West Shore to northwest Hillsborough, central Pasco and Brooksville.

- St. Petersburg to north Pinellas and New Port Richey.

- St. Petersburg south to Bradenton and Sarasota.

(I would get around to Lakeland and Brooksville a little later, but you get the idea.)

Okeydoke. Let's pretend that we are designing a system. I propose a Golden Rule, and a Necessary Corollary.

The Golden Rule: People have to want to ride it.

You might say: Duh! But the history of failed mass-transit systems is instructive: It has always been easier for government planners to design the system that is possible, instead of the system that works.

Let's say the Mass Transit Fairy magically gave us a rail system tomorrow that linked downtown Tampa, St. Petersburg and Clearwater and nothing else. It would be a colossal failure.

What, am I going to hop off at the corner of Kennedy and Westshore and trudge six blocks north to work on an August morning? Or dodge highway traffic on foot across Roosevelt Boulevard? Or get off at Fort Harrison in Clearwater and walk over the bridge to the beach?

I have to be able to get to the Bucs or Yankees or Devil Rays game as well. I have to be able to get to International Plaza, and Raymond James, and USF and, let's see ... oh, right. The airport. It would be nice, too, if I could hop off within walking distance of the dry cleaner on the bus home, and then hop on the next one.

This brings us to the Necessary Corollary: Rail or not, mass transit requires reinventing the bus.

Tampa's mayor, Pam Iorio, talks about a system of downtown "circulators" constantly taking people exactly where they want to go. St. Petersburg's mayor, Rick Baker, will talk to you about the concept of bus rapid transit - frequent, fast buses that do the same.

It has to be that way. Even if we had rail, it would be useless if it just dumped riders onto the Marion Street transitway in Tampa, or at the Williams Park hub in St. Petersburg, and abandoned them to the current bus systems.

Look, everything is up in the air. We don't know yet who's in charge, what we want, or how to pay for it.

But the goal has to be a system that people want to ride, and that takes them where they want to go - else the critics are right, and we should just build more highways.

- - -

Every day Howard Troxler posts extra commentaries, updates and interaction with readers online. Go to TroxBlog by clicking on the "Blogs" link from TampaBay.com, or by typing the Web address blogs.tampabay.com/troxler.

To protect preserve, must 75 trees fall?

By TAMARA EL-KHOURY
Published April 5, 2007

 

March 13, 2006: A citizens advisory board, after three public meetings, proposes a conceptual plan for the beach area including a 40-space parking lot. The aim: To keep cars from the shoreline or damaging the preserve.

June 6, 2006: The City Council unanimously approves the final site plan, including sidewalks, restrooms, four covered shelters, five fitness stations, 20 benches and sidewalk lighting.

Tuesday: Clearing of the beach area began, shocking Vice Mayor Suzanne Vale. At that night's council meeting, she said she'd been told by city staff that just "a few" trees would be cleared.

"I do not consider 100 trees a few," she said. "That is absurd. It is disgusting and I object."

Mayor Jim Ronecker said the city should plant double the number of trees that were cleared.

Wednesday: In an interview, Oldsmar's parks director, Lynn Rives, said the city is already planting 488 trees citywide.

Adding a parking lot and restrooms at the southern entrance of the Mobbly Bayou Wilderness Preserve in Oldsmar is aimed at protecting the preserve. So who's cutting down all the scrub oaks, pines, palms? A total of 75 trees? The city. That came as a surprise to the City Council Tuesday, even though it's approved the $800,000 plan several times. A recap:

Today's Letters: It's wrong to ruin protected land

St. Pete Times  LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Published April 5, 2007

The county has proposed using the land that was leveled for an over-priced water blending plant - land within the boundaries of Brooker Creek Preserve - as an alternative site for the much-needed north county ball fields.

With that logic, they could go tear up any piece of protected land and then say "Oops" and use it for development.

Just too convenient and, as others have said, "Two wrongs do not make a right, no matter how it is presented."

The county needs to bite the bullet here and buy some land, tear down the concrete that is already there, and build the ball fields that their constituents need.

And with property taxes as they are, especially in the affluent areas of the north county, I don't want to hear about financial woes. Not having enough money to do the right thing just doesn't cut it with me anymore.

Jane Williams, Clearwater

No development on preserved land

Every time you introduce a new activity in heretofore designated "preserved lands," you require parking for automobiles. (By the way, this includes Brooker Creek Preserve if no athletic fields were constructed.)

I just returned from San Francisco, where the issue du jour on the San Francisco Chronicle front page was the hullabaloo raised by the "public" over a proposal to close the famous Golden Gate Park to all automobiles on either a Saturday or Sunday. It seems that the "public" is demanding that the SUVs and Hummers have access to a park that is being overrun with people. It is sad that the vision of Frederick Law Olmsted is being ruined by too many people and not enough new parks of that stature to lessen the load on Golden Gate Park.

We in Tampa Bay are not very far from this condition. There are already lines of cars almost to Alt. U.S. 19 waiting to get into Honeymoon Island State Park. Yet, I am told that our state wants more revenue from admissions. More revenue for what purpose? To expand the bureaucratic staff? To build more parking lots and erase fragile lands in doing so?

I stood on the concession deck recently at Honeymoon Island, where my view was blocked by a "temporary" tent erected for a wedding reception. The neat rows of cabanas for rent lining the beach smacked of a concessionaire attitude run amok.

How long will it be before the Ferris wheel returns and a new generation of nitwits will appear, demanding that a boat ramp and marina be constructed? Is it any wonder that people are described as "environmental whackos" that actually want to prevent the drilling for oil in the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge? You can deal me in with that crowd any time.

Oh yes, and there is the issue of Saemangyuem, a 90,000-acre estuary in South Korea that is a major migratory flyway for birds, where developers want to drain the wetlands to create a huge city with more than 600 holes of golf. There goes the natural neighborhood!

Richard M. Selleg, Palm Harbor

Stalled Development On The Move?

DCA May OK 24 New Subdivisions, Industrial Parks

By Gary Pinnell of Highlands Today

Published: April 5, 2007

SEBRING - SEBRING — For three years, the Florida Department of Community Affairs has held up two dozen comprehensive plan amendments, which would have allowed new subdivisions and industrial parks to be built in Highlands County.

But on March 29, a sea change took place: the DCA didn't approve the 24 amendments, but they agreed to the county's methodology, according to Jim Polatty, Highlands County's development services director.

The amendments would have overburdened U.S. 27, the DCA has contended in the past. The 13 new county housing additions will add 2,125 units, according to a summary provided by Highlands County planner Don Hanna.

"This will absorb the population we anticipated," Hanna said.

The Highlands County Profile 2006-2007 predicts 150,000 permanent and winter residents by 2017. The current population is about 100,000.

Those 24 developments include 10 industrial or commercial developments, one of which is the planned regional mall at the corner of U.S. 27 and S.R. 66. All were held up by the state, said Hanna.

Polatty, Hanna, County Administrator Carl Cool, Engineer Ramon Gavarrete, Commissioner Barbara Stewart and Bob Wallace, the county's consultant on impact fees, met March 29 with the DCA staff, during Highlands County Day at the Capitol. County Attorney Ross MacBeth, developers and their attorneys listened in on a conference call, Hanna said.

The DCA reviewed a traffic study by Rhon Ernest Jones, which showed the impact of the 24 developments on U.S. 27, Hanna said.

And that was the key to the agreement, Hanna said. The county agreed to phase the developments over a period of years, which would give the county time to build new roads to remove the burden from U.S. 27.

Two road projects include Sebring Parkway. Phases 3 and 4 could eventually extend the bypass from Stryker Road in Avon Park to Lorida.

"So long as they showed future improvements," said Michael Joachim, planning consultant for the city of Sebring.

Concurrence

"They accepted the concept, that the new concurrence management system would take care of the traffic on U.S. 27," Hanna said.

Concurrence is a concept advanced in SB 360: as new subdivisions and shopping centers go up, new roads, schools, water, sewer and other infrastructure must be built to accommodate the growth in population and automobile trips.

The DCA had other issues too, like need, sprawl and adequate public facilities. More telephone meetings with Highlands County and state officials are scheduled on Thursday mornings in the coming weeks, Hanna said.

"We hope this will be wrapped up in a month," Hanna said.

County Administrator Carl Cool said the commissioners took all the steps required by the state: they adopted impact fees, a fully funded long range transportation strategy, and the maximum allowable sales tax and gas tax.

"Over the last year, Highlands County has taken some substantive steps to address growth management," said State Rep. Denise Grimsley, R-Lake Placid. "These steps should lead to the adoption/approval of most of these properties."

Joachim said the city and county will submit a written settlement agreement to the state.
The DCA agreed some of the sewer and water needs could be solved with community package plants, which will be built by developers to city and county standards, and then turned over to the government.
Residential, Commercial, Industrial.

The projects are spread from Lake Placid to the Polk County line, Hanna said, but there are none inside Lake Placid or Avon Park city limits. The four Sebring developments include 1,241 acres. One, the Viscaya Lakes property, will be an industrial and commercial park.

"We were short on industrial services," Hanna said. Three of the 24 developments are "good-sized industrial parks."

After DCA approves the 24 amendments from 2004-2006, there are another two dozen amendments waiting for state approval, Hanna said.

"These are all signs of progress," said Joachim. "They will increase the tax base."

Road Official's Deals Revealed

By JOHN W. ALLMAN The Tampa Tribune

Published: Apr 5, 2007

TAMPA - The Tampa-Hillsborough County Expressway Authority last month, in a letter to a state senator, reiterated a position it has maintained for eight months: that a board member who sold steel to an authority contractor only did it once.

Since August, the authority and Robert Clark Jr. have said there was only one sale to PCL for $365,950 and that sale was completed in January 2003, before he joined the board.

Clark acknowledged Wednesday that after he joined the authority's board in February 2003, he sold $198,405 in additional materials and pursued another contract with PCL, the authority's main contractor on its elevated lanes project for the Lee Roy Selmon Expressway.

In a March 14 letter to Sen. Victor Crist, R-Tampa, the authority conceded some of the sales came after Clark joined the board, but said they were part of the same contract.

Clark, however, said his company, Tampa Steel Erecting, was bidding on new PCL work in June 2003, four months he was appointed to the board by then-Gov. Jeb Bush. Tampa Steel did not win that project.

The agency's former general counsel, Steve Anderson, had advised Clark when he joined the board about the potential conflict of interest in doing business with authority contractors.

Crist, an outspoken critic of the agency, had written authority officials March 5, asking specifically about any other business deals between board members and contractors.

The authority's answer: "There have been no instances found."

Crist, who has introduced a bill to change the authority's board, said Wednesday that he was disappointed to learn of the other purchases.

"I'm very disappointed, but not surprised. It seems like there's been a whole lot of miscommunication, inaccuracies and here we go again," he said. "The bottom line is it's about public perception."

Crist said that given the authority's power to levy fees and tolls on drivers to pay for projects, "there should be better accountability and a further arms-length distance between its board members and business dealings."

Authority's Response

Expressway spokeswoman Honey Rand said many of the agency's top officials from 2003 are no longer there. Since August, when a controversial competitive bid process sparked two state and one federal investigation, the agency has lost its former general counsel, executive director and board chairman.

"Any response to this is firstly and rightly directed at them," Rand said.

The investigations found widespread mismanagement and little oversight over how millions of dollars had been spent by the authority on consultants and lobbyists. And they caused several legislators and Crist to introduce bills aimed at making the authority more accountable.

Rand said any work done by Clark's company for PCL was part of one contract, which was finalized in January 2003. She acknowledged that change orders for additional work were issued after Clark joined the board, but said the materials being purchased had been previously discussed as part of the original contract.

Those purchases are detailed in PCL documents that the authority recently obtained as part of an ongoing lawsuit over problems during the construction of the elevated lanes.

They show a change order for additional materials from Clark's company being issued in February for $19,488 and a second change order in April for $25,664 - all coming after Clark joined the authority board.

The documents also show an April 7 purchase by PCL from Clark's company for $153,253. That purchase is not identified as a change order. It has a different project number than the other purchases.

Both Clark and Rand said Wednesday that it was actually a third change order and that PCL mistakenly gave it a new project number.

"Why someone changed the number on the purchase order, we have no way of knowing," Rand said.

"It was basically part of the same contract," Clark said.

A March 19 letter from Clark to PCL about the materials purchased April 7 suggests that the sale is for a new contract.

"The opportunity to quote on this work is greatly appreciated," Clark wrote in the letter offering a description of product, price and labor for new materials.

Documents Researched

Rand said additional steps were taken by the authority to ensure the accuracy of the letter to Crist.

The agency's interim general counsel, Rhea Law, researched the new documents and interviewed Clark before writing to Crist.

She also had Clark read the letter "to make sure it was accurate" before it was mailed, Rand said.

"The question was asked and answered," Rand said. "Is there anything else we need to know about? The answer was no."

Rand, however, cannot explain a June 18, 2003, fax from PCL to Clark.

The document is signed by a PCL employee and reads: "Bob: I am attaching some basic info regarding our requirements for the second set of erection girders. As you can see, we really want to get a price by the end of the day Friday. Please see if you can rearrange your schedule to do this. If not, please let me know when you can provide a quote - specifically what date and time?"

An undated e-mail included with the fax sheet, from the same PCL employee, says that the company was providing information "to the companies bidding" on the girders.

Asked specifically Wednesday about the fax and whether it concerned a new project, Clark said, "That's correct."

Clark said he gave interim Executive Director Stephen Reich information about all of his dealings with PCL except the April 7 purchase, which he has said his staff did not provide.

Rand said Clark had not given any documents to Reich.

Clark said nothing he did interfered with his ability as a board member to oversee PCL's handling of the elevated lanes project.

"The things that I furnished them with had absolutely nothing to do with my oversight as a board member," he said.

He said he could not recall whether he voted on any PCL-related issues during the time his company served as a subcontractor.

But he said the board knew of his business relationship with PCL and that it was discussed openly during board meetings. He said no one, including former general counsel Steve Anderson, ever discussed his relationship with PCL before last summer.

Anderson disputed that Wednesday.

Anderson said he spoke to Clark in February 2003, after he joined the board, about the initial purchase contract. And he said he talked to Clark again a year later about the need to be careful about doing business with contractors.

"It does in fact create a conflict situation with PCL," he said.

Anderson said he never knew about the two change orders or the April purchase that Clark said was also a change order. And he disputed that other authority officials knew either.

The authority has since changed its policies and procedures to prohibit such relationships with board members, Rand said.

The board recently approved language that prohibits board members and employees from doing business with any entity "which is subject to the regulation of, or doing business with, the authority."

Rand said Clark was made aware by general counsel Law that any future sales of materials would be "highly scrutinized and, based on the new policies, there would be issues with it."

Reporter John W. Allman can be reached at (813) 259-7915.

Debris Landfill Gets County OK

By Tom Palmer
The Ledger

BARTOW - County commissioners voted 5-0 Wednesday to approve modified conditions for a construction debris landfill near Haines City.

The vote, which Commissioner Randy Wilkinson tried unsuccessfully to postpone to the April 18 meeting, followed a five-hour hearing.

The 120-acre landfill on Bannon Island Road was approved in 2003 but had been brought back before the commission to resolve inconsistencies in previous conditions. It is located just west of the former county landfill.

However, Haines City officials, who had not opposed the pro- ject at the 2003 hearings or at February's Polk County Planning Commission hearing, belatedly objected to the pro- ject.

They argued it was incompatible with their efforts to attract high-quality clients to an adjacent industrial park.

Landfill representatives argued the concerns were baseless and that the landfill, which already has a county develop- ment permit and a state environmental permit, should not be hamstrung by last-minute restrictions.

DeLand sticks with conservation plan

By KARI COBHAM
Staff Writer

DELAND -- The city's bid to secure 121 acres of recreational land through the Volusia Forever program could have hit a snag Monday.

But the City Commission forged ahead despite a proposal from some state lawmakers to reform the property tax system, which could cut city and county revenues.

"You can only take one day at a time," Mayor Bob Apgar said. "It would be a wonderful opportunity and we would be remiss not to move forward."

Commissioners approved the application with Volusia Forever to acquire the site east of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Beltway and next to Lake Moore.

The Volusia Forever program, funded with an extra tax approved by voters in 2000, buys and preserves environmentally sensitive land. The 121 acres was assessed most recently at $2.3 million and is owned by Volusia Groves and Cattle Co. Appraisals will be required before purchase.

City Manager Mike Abels expressed concern that the cost to the city of contributing 25 percent to the project might be difficult to bear if proposed property tax reforms are approved by the state.

The county will fund 25 percent through Volusia Forever, with the remaining 50 percent to be financed through various community partners, said Larry Nordman, the city's parks and recreation director.

The potential park site is next to more than 200 acres of conservation area and near an undeveloped 13-acre city park. Most of the 121 acres would be used for trails and passive recreation opportunities, but Nordman said he hopes to have possibly 20 acres of active recreation areas there, too, such as playing fields. Both sites are covered in pine, palmetto and small, seasonally wet prairies.

The 13-acre park site fronts on Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Beltway, just north of Taylor Road. It was purchased from developers of Victoria Park a few months ago for $725,000, nearly twice the assessed value of $388,000, Nordman said in March.

Plans for the 13 acres are still in the early stages, he said, but there will be a master plan and community involvement process to find out what citizens think ought to be there.

"The original concept was for ball fields, but we also wanted to include passive recreational options like walking trails. Nothing is set in concrete yet, and the opportunities are far and wide as to what can be developed," he said. "It won't be just our ideas, either, we definitely want to include the community."

The small park will provide city residents, and specifically the southeast DeLand area of the growing 1,859-acre Victoria Park, another community amenity and access to city-sponsored activities. When city officials expressed interest in a park site in that area, Victoria Park developers thought it was in everyone's best interest to help find a site, said Jeff Gersh, Victoria Park's vice president and project manager.

Gersh said more than 1,000 homes have been sold in the development, which got its first residents in 2001 and is expected to have 4,200 homes when it is complete.

There are few parks in that area of the city and, with the exception of a small playground a mile away, the nearest parks are almost 2 miles away. That is one reason the city is seeking the larger acreage, Nordman said.

kari.cobham@news-jrnl.com

Correspondent Tori Gibbs contributed to this report.  

House bill may loosen DCA control over growth issues
By Jim Ash
FLORIDA
CAPITAL BUREAU CHIEF

Conservative House leaders today roll out a complex proposal late in the legislative session that critics worry would strip the Department of Community Affairs of much of its power to regulate growth.

''That sounds bad,'' Gov. Charlie Crist said Tuesday. ''I'm an optimist. I hope this won't reach my desk in that version.''

Crist issued another veto threat earlier this week about a House plan to make it harder for local governments to protect wetlands.

''I'm an environmentalist,'' Crist declared on Tuesday.

The latest plan, backed by developers and builders, would allow larger counties and cities to skip state review of zoning changes in urban areas and leave oversight to a network of 11 regional planning councils.

''The Legislature finds that local governments that are significantly built out and those that have a staff that represents a broad range of expertise, should be exempt from unnecessary state oversight,'' a draft version of the bill states.

The House Economic Expansion and Infrastructure Council will begin hashing over the proposal at a workshop today. No votes are scheduled.

The draft language also calls for the creation of a 19-member task force to study what lawmakers consider to be a looming shortage of concrete, asphalt and road base materials that threatens ''overall health, safety and welfare.'' State officials would be forced to consider that before denying mining permits.

Council Chairman Dean Cannon, R-Winter Park , said the idea is to free the department to focus its growth management oversight on more rural and pristine areas where development poses the biggest threat.

''If you are a good faith actor in an area  that is already built out, then there's not a lot of need for the state to be reviewing your comp plan changes,'' Cannon said. ''The goal of this proposal is not to undercut the traditional protections we already have in place, but to make the wisest and best use of limited sate resources.''

Wade Hopping, a veteran lobbyist who represents the Association of Florida Community Developers, said the legislation is crucial for an industry battered by a slumping economy and hemmed in by a backlog of road construction projects.

The 30-page draft calls for reworking the way developers pay for road ''concurrency,'' making it clear that they are not responsible for backlogs of too few roads.

Environmental groups complain that the proposal is an attempt to make an end-run around Department of Community Affairs Secretary Tom Pelham, and his efforts to address some of the issues.

Environmental advocates applauded four months ago when Crist picked Pelham to run the state's premier land planning agency.

Pelham served as secretary from 1987-1991 under former Gov. Bob Martinez, implementing the milestone 1986 Growth Management Act. He said he wants to wait until next year before proposing another major overhaul of growth management laws.

''We have some very serious concerns,'' Pelham said Tuesday. ''Every local government in the state would be exempt from review the way that draft is written. Growth management is important and we need to approach reforming the system in a very careful and deliberative fashion.''

But next year may be too late, Hopping warns.

''The homebuilding and development industry is in the ditch,'' Hopping said. ''The real estate development market will crash and everyone will look around and wonder what happened.''

Climate conversation urges conservation
Scientists talk to Cabinet, Crist about threat
By Bruce Ritchie
DEMOCRAT
STAFF WRITER

Climate change and sea-level rise is real and is threatening Florida's coastal property and natural areas, scientists told Gov. Charlie Crist and the Cabinet on Tuesday.

At the first of four ''Conversations on Climate Change,'' the Cabinet also was urged to help Florida become a leader in energy conservation and renewable energy technology.

''I'm here to argue (clean energy) is the 21st-century investment option,'' said Ken Locklin, principal in the Clean Energy Group of Washington , D.C. , which provides support for investment in new technology to address climate change.

The series of Cabinet workshops follows Gov. Charlie Crist's inauguration address in January in which he said climate change is an important issue facing the state. He reiterated his concerns on Tuesday.

Chief Financial Officer Alex Sink and Agriculture Commissioner Charles Bronson organized the session.

Sink said 75 percent of Florida 's population lives in coastal counties.

''We'll listen, we'll learn and then we'll decide about doing - because I'm a doer,'' she said.

Bronson invited climate-change skeptics to consider the effects of changes in weather patterns.

''Insurance rates depend on weather patterns,'' Bronson said. ''Food supplies depend on weather patterns. So when you put all that together, it means a lot to everybody.''

Stephen Mulkey, climate-change science adviser to the Century Commission for a Sustainable Florida, said global temperatures rose 1.4 degrees in the past 100 years.

The National Academy of Sciences, he said, has urged people to focus on reducing greenhouse-gas emissions in addition to preparing for the consequences of climate change.

But Attorney General Bill McCollum, saying he was playing the devil's advocate, raised questions about whether Florida , the earth and its oceans were going through fluctuations as they have in the past.

Mulkey said computer models have taken into account natural influences and show that humans now are driving the rate of climate change.

''We know that adaptation is expensive,'' Mulkey responded. ''We know there will be warming. ... The issue is how bad do we want it to get?''

Sawgrass in the Everglades already is giving way to saltwater marsh even as the state and federal governments spend billions of dollars to restore the ''river of grass,'' said Stephen Leatherman, director of Florida International University 's International Hurricane Research Center and Coastal Research lab.

''Climate change and sea-level rise is already happening,'' he said.

Climate change, along with increasing hurricanes that some scientists are blaming on climate change, are increasing uncertainty within the insurance industry, causing companies to increase rates or drop coverage of coastal property, said Tim Wagner the Nebraska insurance commissioner and director of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners.

After hearing several presentations on the situation, Sink said, ''I'm depressed enough as it is.''

But Locklin said 28 states, most of them outside of the South, have created accounts to invest in projects that promote investment in clean energy.

''This state could be a major game-changer in the equation if the leadership comes from the top,'' he said.

Florida puts focus on climate outlook

By DINAH VOYLES PULVER
Environment
Writer

TALLAHASSEE -- Expect to hear more in the coming months about how Floridians can try to improve the long-term outlook on climate change or make the most of it rather than just waiting for the ocean to start reclaiming the state.

Even simple things such as solar hot water heaters and energy efficient appliances could make a difference, a handful of experts told Gov. Charlie Crist and the Cabinet Tuesday. Other, more complicated changes also are needed, they said, such as standards for energy production and efficiency and more incentives for using solar energy.

The workshop was the first of four "conversations on climate change" planned this year for the state's top officials. It featured impassioned pleas from several top scientists who talked about rising seas and a warming atmosphere, the economic impacts and potential ways the state could affect the outcome.

The governor called the workshop "a great new beginning for Florida ."

The experts' basic message?

Floridians can either make money now by becoming energy efficient and taking advantage of new economic opportunities such as attracting new "green energy" industries to the state, or spend later trying to catch up and react to the effects of climate change.

While state officials have been working to improve energy efficiency and promote green fuels made from crops such as corn, other states are far ahead.

Arizona, for example, has come up with a list of 49 recommendations, expecting to cut its emissions in half by 2020, resulting in $5.5 billion in net savings to the state's economy, said Stephen Mulkey with the University of Florida's School of Natural Resources and the Environment.

Big changes are needed -- and fast -- in order to reverse the trends scientists are seeing in rising temperatures and sea levels, Mulkey said during his remarks. That can be achieved by reducing the use of fossil fuels, to curb the amount of carbon dioxide being released into the environment.

"We need an overarching plan that takes us far into the future," Mulkey said. "There needs to be a cut in emissions by 60 percent by 2050."

Additional possibilities mentioned by the state's chief financial officer, Alex Sink, include investing part of the state employees pension funds in the new green industries and ensuring that companies where the pension funds are invested are preparing for the future.

The changing climates around the world already are affecting Floridians, said Charles Bronson, commissioner of agriculture and consumer services.

"You don't have to believe in global warming," he said. "But if you believe in eating food and you care about forest fires, you'd better start paying attention to weather patterns."

dinah.pulver@news-jrnl.com

Experts paint grim future with warming

By ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published April 4, 2007

TALLAHASSEE - Canceled insurance policies and skyrocketing rates plaguing the state since the active hurricane seasons of 2004 and 2005 are a premonition of Florida 's future under a warming climate, an insurance expert told the state Cabinet on Tuesday.

Rising sea levels, stronger hurricanes and the need for renewable energies were some of the topics a half-dozen experts touched on at the Cabinet's first of four climate change workshops. And despite a recent special session to address insurance woes, one predicted a gloomy future for insurance unless proactive measures are taken.

"What we have seen in recent years in terms of insurance losses are but a harbinger of things to come," said Tim Wagner, co-chairman of the Climate Change and Global Warming Task Force for the National Association of Insurance Commissioners. "Insurance is priced based on statistics and probability. What climate change has done is create ambiguity and uncertainty in the pricing scenario."

While he favors a national catastrophe fund to back up coastal states in the event of a major disaster, Wagner said it would be a tough sell for many interior states that don't want to subsidize overbuilding on the coast.

The true costs of insurance along the coastlines need to be transparent, not artificially lowered by government subsidies that encourage building in fragile areas, he said. The state can strengthen the insurance market by tightening development rules and requiring tougher building codes, he said.

That theme - that despite strong evidence of a warming planet, there are specific actions Florida can take to counteract the danger - was a recurring one during Tuesday's nearly four-hour meeting.

Gov. Charlie Crist echoed the sentiment, telling the Cabinet it has a real impact on climate change policies. The Cabinet's management of coastal lands and natural resources, conservation efforts and choice of power plant locations all have an effect, he said.

Experts told the Cabinet that sea levels in Florida have risen 6 to 8 inches over the last 100 years because of expanding ocean water due to the melting of Arctic ice. Those levels could rise 7 to 23 additional inches by 2100, seemingly small changes that have large consequences, they said.

The Cabinet will hold its next climate workshop June 12.

Key Cabinet Members Meet With Global Warming Experts

By KEVIN BEGOS The Tampa Tribune

Published: Apr 4, 2007

TALLAHASSEE - Experts say it was a "momentous" day - the first time the four most powerful leaders in the state came together solely to discuss global warming.

"This issue of climate change is vastly significant to us," said Gov. Charlie Crist, who on Tuesday took part in a three-hour special meeting on the subject along with Chief Financial Officer Alex Sink, Agriculture Commissioner Charles Bronson and Attorney General Bill McCollum.

Under former Gov. Jeb Bush, global warming was rarely a topic of discussion and never a priority.

" Florida has turned the corner. We're finally willing to talk about climate change," said Stephen Mulkey, a professor in the University of Florida 's School of Natural Resources and Environment.

Mulkey, who was skeptical about climate change 20 years ago, said the day felt "momentous."

Sink said the first goal of the meeting was education but added that quick action is possible.

"What we're hoping for today is we get the conversation going and we raise the level of awareness," she said, noting that Bronson already has been very active in promoting ethanol production from agriculture.

Asked if she thinks serious action will have to wait until next year, she disagreed.

"I really don't," she said. "I've got a list of a few things just out of today. I think we're not going to wait."

There was plenty of grim news delivered by most of the seven experts who spoke to the Cabinet, though on many of the issues the scientists stressed that serious international action could slow the worst impacts of climate change.

Mulkey and other scientists outlined the growing body of data on carbon dioxide emissions, sea level rise, and weather patterns, all of which point to changes not seen in the Earth's climate for thousands of years.

There wasn't much of a bright side in the presentation on property insurance. Tim Wagner, Nebraska Insurance Commissioner and Director of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, predicted that the current crisis of losses, rate hikes and dropped policies "are but a harbinger of things to come."

Canary In Coal Mine

"The insurance industry is our canary in the coal mine," he said, adding, "There are no short term fixes."

Wagner expected many questions on that issue, but Sink suggested coming back to focus solely on insurance at another session.

Crist asked for details about the problem of coral bleaching. Reefs around the world, including some in the Florida Keys , are showing signs of damage, in part because of rising acidity in oceans connected to global warming.

"We can expect the loss of the vast majority of our coral reefs worldwide" by 2100, Mulkey told the governor.

There were several questions about near-term possibilities.

"Tell us about timing," Sink said, asking about projections for the next 10 to 40 years.

Stephen Leatherman, director of the International Hurricane Research Center at Florida International University , said that recent data indicate sea levels are rising just less than 1/8 inch a year.

That doesn't sound like a lot, but levels in Texas and Louisiana are rising at a far higher rate. Leatherman said one of the most worrisome findings is that the rate of increase seems to have been speeding up in recent years.

Beach Erosion Worse

Beach erosion is getting worse around the nation, he said, and renourishment projects that have rebuilt beaches in the past face a new problem.

"We're running out of sand in South Florida ," Leatherman said.

Rising sea levels also threaten the Everglades . "The river of grass is being displaced," he said. Asked what the future holds, he replied, "I'm not sure anybody knows."

Throughout the presentations, McCollum repeated questions raised by global warming skeptics. But the scientists said the overwhelming majority of research points to humans having a significant impact on the situation, mostly by injecting billions of tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.

Bronson said research has shown that dramatic climate shifts took place in the past.

"The Sahara desert was once a forest," Bronson said, adding that significant change "can happen here."

The historical data are sometimes hard to visualize. According to the U.S. Department of the Interior, sea levels were almost 400 feet lower 18,000 years ago, and large parts of the Gulf of Mexico were dry.

There was some good news. Kenneth Locklin of the Clean Energy Group said he thinks green energy such as solar, hydroelectric and ethanol will be among the best investment opportunities of the 21st century.

Bronson agreed. "It'll be a major addition to the economy of the state," he said.

Reporter Kevin Begos can be reached at (850) 222-8382 or kbegos@tampatrib.com.
State halts access to Everglades water

The Associated Press

WEST PALM BEACH - The tap on the fragile Everglades ecosystem has been clamped as officials warn cities across South Florida to find other ways to quench the thirst of a growing population, the state announced Tuesday.

The new Regional Water Availability Rule prevents water users from tapping the River of Grass for any new or additional water supplies and means utilities will now be forced to develop alternative means of production, according to the South Florida Water Management District.

It is the first time in history that Everglades water has been deemed off-limits.

South Florida water suppliers in Miami-Dade, Broward, Palm Beach and Monroe counties currently depend on an estimated 500 million gallons each day from the Everglades .

"The water that is being withdrawn today, that's it, we're capped off,'' district director Carol Wehle said Tuesday. "It sends a message to the utilities that if you want to grow, there are many sources of water that you can access that are environmentally sustainable.''

Under the new rule, existing water supply permits will not be revoked, but new permits for Everglades water to meet the needs of population growth won't be approved.

The rule also provides a grace period to prevent water shortages but only if water suppliers can show they are actively developing alternative techniques.

Wehle said regional utilities would have to begin reusing water on a larger scale and may have to look at desalination techniques.

"The good news for Southeast Florida, unlike, say, Las Vegas , is there is an incredible amount of water available to continue to serve future growth. It's just not going to be the Everglades ,'' Wehle said.

The state is currently in the midst of a 30-year, $10.5 billion effort to restore the Everglades , the largest such wetlands restoration project in the world.

Curt Levine, head of the political committee for the Sierra Club's Florida chapter, called the rule "a wake-up call to local governments'' to contain urban sprawl and better prepare for growth.

"Water is not infinite anymore,'' Levine said.

Miami-Dade County took a proactive step and agreed last year not to seek additional water permits that would draw from the Everglades , said Doug Yoder, deputy director of the county's wastewater department.

"What this rule does is formalize the system for everyone in South Florida so all the utilities are on the same, level playing field of planning for future water supply demands,'' Yoder said.

He said the county was considering $2 billion worth of projects over the next 20 years to create alternative water supplies.

"People will need to adjust to the idea that water rates and wastewater rates are definitely going to go up,'' Yoder said, adding that Miami-Dade plans to cut back on consumption through conservation measures and to enhance reuse of wastewater.

Meanwhile, Florida is experiencing one of the driest spells on record with the situation only expected to get worse.

"We have never experienced such a rapid depletion of our water supply as we have this year,'' Wehle said.
Red tide likely to blame for dead manatees

FORT MYERS - State officials are suspecting that red tide may have killed some of the 26 manatees whose bodies were found in Lee County waters throughout the past two weeks.

Scientists are awaiting results from toxin analyses to determine for certain whether red tide caused their deaths, said Wendy Quigley, a spokeswoman for the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission.

Four of the threatened sea cows were found dead Monday.

Red tide is caused by a bloom of the single-celled alga Karenia brevis, which contains a powerful toxin that kills fish and other marine life.

When manatees come up for air, they inhale the toxin at the water's surface. They also eat seagrasses that have absorbed the toxin.

Forty manatees have died in Lee County since the beginning of the year. Across the state, 72 deaths had been reported as of March 23.

Last year, 417 manatee deaths were recorded, the deadliest year on record for manatees.

Other major causes of death for the endangered creatures include boat injuries, stress from being in cold waters or human contact, and natural causes.

Nelson discusses efforts to restore lagoon

By Cara Fitzpatrick

Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

Wednesday, April 04, 2007

Looking out over the Indian River Lagoon, U.S. Sen. Bill Nelson told city and county officials Tuesday about his efforts to pass a massive water projects bill - a bill that has languished in Congress for several years and includes about $1.4 billion for restoration of the lagoon.

"This bill has had a torturous past," he said.

Nelson, D-Fla., held a press conference at 11 a.m. at the Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institution near Fort Pierce to discuss that past and current efforts to move the bill forward. U.S. Rep. Tim Mahoney, D-Palm Beach Gardens , and state Sen. Dave Aronberg, D-Greenacres, also attended.

Congress has not passed a Water Resources Development Act since 2000. Last year, the House and Senate each passed a different version of the bill, but failed to reach a compromise. The bill would provide funding for water projects throughout the country, including $95 million for restoration of the Everglades and $362 million for the Picayune Strand ecosystem in Southwest Florida .

Committees in both the Senate and the House have already voted on their respective versions of the bill and may reach the full bodies sometime between now and mid-June, Nelson predicted.

The Indian River Lagoon has been susceptible to pollution because it has limited water movement, reaches an average depth of only 5 feet and has had massive discharges of water from Lake Okeechobee that have turned its ordinarily brackish water nearly fresh, according to data released from Harbor Branch.

The build-up of pollutants and change in water quality can threaten native species of plants and animals and act as an incubator for algae and bacteria, Nelson said. Those changes, in turn, can damage other ecosystems connected by local waterways, including the Everglades .

"It's started to alter what Mother Nature intended," he said. "The good news is that we are now going to pass the water bill."

Faucet turned off in fragile Everglades

A new rule marks the first time water in the vast wetland has been deemed off-limits.

Brian Skoloff
the Associated Press

April 4, 2007

WEST PALM BEACH -- The tap on the fragile Everglades ecosystem was clamped shut Tuesday as officials warned cities across South Florida to find other ways to quench the thirst of a growing population.

The new Regional Water Availability Rule prevents water users from tapping the Everglades for any new or additional water supplies and means utilities will now be forced to develop alternative means of production, according to the South Florida Water Management District.

It is the first time in history that Everglades water has been deemed off-limits.

South Florida water suppliers in Miami-Dade, Broward, Palm Beach and Monroe counties currently depend on an estimated 500 million gallons each day from the Everglades .

"The water that is being withdrawn today, that's it, we're capped off," district director Carol Wehle said Tuesday. "It sends a message to the utilities that if you want to grow, there are many sources of water that you can access that are environmentally sustainable."

Under the new rule, existing water-supply permits will not be revoked, but new permits for Everglades water to meet the needs of population growth won't be approved. The rule also provides a grace period to prevent water shortages, but only if water suppliers can show they are actively developing alternative techniques.

Wehle said utilities would have to begin reusing water on a larger scale and may have to look at desalination techniques.

"The good news for southeast Florida , unlike, say, Las Vegas , is there is an incredible amount of water available to continue to serve future growth. It's just not going to be the Everglades ," Wehle said.

The state is in the midst of a 30-year, $10.5 billion effort to restore the Everglades , the largest such wetlands-restoration project in the world.

Curt Levine, head of the political committee for the Sierra Club's Florida chapter, called the rule "a wake-up call to local governments" to contain urban sprawl and better prepare for growth.

"Water is not infinite anymore," Levine said.

Miami-Dade County agreed last year not to seek additional water permits that would draw from the Everglades , said Doug Yoder, deputy director of the county's wastewater department.

"What this rule does is formalize the system for everyone in South Florida , so all the utilities are on the same level playing field of planning for future water-supply demands," Yoder said.

He said the county was considering $2 billion worth of projects during the next 20 years to create alternative water supplies.

"People will need to adjust to the idea that water rates and wastewater rates are definitely going to go up," Yoder said, adding that Miami-Dade plans to cut back on consumption through conservation measures and to enhance reuse of wastewater.

City offers solution to swale issue

By JEANNINE GAGE
Correspondent

SOUTH DAYTONA -- When attempting to keep up with the Jones's, having a big ditch and a "latrine-like" hole in the yard may not be the best way to go about it. But having a flooded yard and street won't work either.

Therein lies the conflict between some Palm Grove subdivision residents and the city.

"Aesthetically these things are horrible," homeowner Jeff LaCour said. "There are all kinds of people in this neighborhood upset."

City officials have said that the deeper swales, or ditches, and concrete outfalls with large openings were needed to overcome problems with the original drainage system from the 1970s and to meet St. Johns River Water Management District regulations.

Since then, however, they have been able to work with the agency to redesign and replace about 40 percent of the deepest swales.

The homeowners who were not part of that redesign felt left out and said the city was dragging its feet on getting permission to fix all of the swales.

"They told us last year they would try to get a permit from St. Johns to fix this," LaCour said, "but they never did."

That application was submitted last week, said South Daytona Assistant Public Works Director Les Gillis.

"We have some new ideas about how to get around the drainage issues without having such deep swales and the large openings," Gillis said. "I think this will make the homeowners happy."

The problems began about four years ago when the city decided to run water and sewage lines into the approximately 260-home subdivision on the west side of the city.

Since Palm Grove had had some flooding issues in the past, the decision was made to redo the stormwater drainage system at the same time.

But they came up against some problems with the original system that was put in by home builders when the neighborhood was still in unincorporated Volusia County .

"Regulations back then weren't what they are now," Gillis said. "It was a mess in there, every swale was different and some people had filled them in."

The city originally wanted to put in underground pipes, but pipes only fulfilled two of the three requirements for a drainage system, Gillis said.

"You have to collect, conduct and treat the water," he said. "Pipes only collect and conduct. Swales act as a filtration system, thus treating the water."

Another idea was to curb and gutter the neighborhood, but that takes a retention pond and Gillis said that wasn't feasible.

"The whole neighborhood was already built out," he said, "and the residents didn't want a retention pond anyway."

After the swales went in, the city immediately began receiving complaints from residents.

Gillis said what looked good on paper didn't translate into real life.

"We did deem that some of the deeper swales presented a safety hazard," he said, "so we called St. Johns out there to see what we could do."

Gillis said the agency gave the city permission to rework some of the deepest swales. They are shallower and have a smaller outfall opening that is flush to the ground. That $1 million project is going on now.

As for the other homes that still have the swales, Gillis said he has come up with an idea that he thinks the agency will approve.

"We think we can offset the swale, so it doesn't have to sit right on top of the pipes," he said. "They will not be as deep and get rid of the ugly outfall."

Gillis estimates the cost of the project at $1.6 million. It would begin immediately if approved.

The agency must reply to the city within 30 days of receiving the permit application.

"This plan should meet their regulations," Gillis said, "If we're successful, I think we'll get a very positive reaction."

Citizens push for growth controls

By PATRICK WHITTLE

patrick.whittle@heraldtribune.com
SARASOTA COUNTY -- A pair of growth-control measures that seem headed for a November vote could hamstring developers' ability to build dense residential projects on rural land here.

The measures, proposed by a local citizens group, would make it much more difficult for developers to gain approval for building projects in the county's undeveloped eastern reaches.

Supporters, including environmentalists and slow-growth advocates, say the measures would force developers to shift their focus away from isolated residential projects and toward mixed-use urban redevelopment.

That attitude falls in line with several high-ranking county officials who have trumpeted the need for infill redevelopment rather than suburban sprawl.

But opponents, including building industry forces, say the measures would harm the county's economy and ultimately promote the sprawl they seek to curtail.

Here's how the measures work: If the first one passes, residents will have the chance to vote on any plans that increase the size of the county's urban service area. The service area is an invisible line that straddles Interstate 75 and represents a boundary for dense building projects. Expanding that line would require voter approval.

The other measure, if passed, would force the County Commission to approve certain changes to the county's comprehensive plan by a minimum 4-to-1 vote. The comprehensive plan prescribes how dense developers can build on lands around the county. A 4-to-1 vote to approve a dense building project is highly unlikely because two of the county's five commissioners are outspoken opponents of suburban sprawl.

The citizens group, Citizens for Sensible Growth, needs to collect 12,525 signatures per measure to get the items on the November ballot. The group has collected about 9,000 signatures per measure.

Bill Zoller, a member of the citizens group, said the group hopes to collect the required signatures by July.

"We get people who are living out east and they say, 'I'll sign it because we don't want sprawl moving out here,'" Zoller said. "People see just unending rooftops a la what you see in South Florida ."

But Larry Anderson, executive vice president of the Home Builders Association of Sarasota County, thinks the opposite is true.

Anderson believes the measures, if passed, would raise the price of land west of the urban service area. Builders would have less options for building and demand for housing would result in higher land costs, he said.

That scenario would ultimately lead to more residents forced to commute to Sarasota from neighboring counties, Anderson said.

Moreover, Anderson said the measures could harm one of Sarasota 's primary economic engines: the building industry.

"One of the fundamental drivers of Florida and this area is development of growth," Anderson said. "Demand continues to be very high and what will happen is the infill will become very expensive."

The County Commission could take a position on the measures before or after the citizens group finishes collecting signatures.

That happened last year when Sarasota County sent a citizen-driven initiative about land annexations to the voters. The March referendum question, which gives Sarasota County more control over rural lands annexed by cities such as Venice and North Port , passed by a more than 2-to-1 ratio.

County Commissioner Jon Thaxton said it is too early to say if the commission would take a position on the growth measures. He said he supports the plan to require a 4-to-1 vote for a comp plan change.

However, he believes allowing citizens to vote on changes to the urban service area could be misguided because "explaining those kinds of minuscule details to hundreds of thousands of voters is a task."

The citizens' group is proposing the ballot issues during a time of some of the most explosive growth in Sarasota County history. The county's population grew from 325,957 to 369,535 between 2000 and 2006. That is almost as much as the county grew during the entire 1990s.

The growth measures would also come as Sarasota County voters are exerting themselves as supporters of land preservation. A November 2005 referendum question allowed the county to spend up to $250 million to preserve natural habitat and neighborhood parks.

But the measures would also happen in a time when the area's real estate market has slowed down considerably.

"This is not about saving pristine land. It's about economics," said Anderson, the builders association official.

County Commissioner Joe Barbetta, who won election to the commission last year on a slow-growth platform, thinks the referendums will help fulfill his goal of fostering mixed-use redevelopment of the county's aging, urban strip malls.

"We have an urban growth area and I really believe in redevelopment," Barbetta said. "Let the voters decide."
Appellate court affirms Feb. 1 petition deadline

By ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published April 4, 2007

TALLAHASSEE - A group challenging a shorter deadline for submitting citizen-initiative petitions was undecided Tuesday if it would appeal a court ruling upholding the new limit, about six months earlier than the old one.

A three-judge panel of the 1st District Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court's decision upholding the Feb. 1 deadline in an election year. The unanimous opinion was posted on the court's Web site on Tuesday.

Voters in 2004 approved a state constitutional amendment offered by the Legislature to set the new deadline. The appellate court rejected arguments the amendment's ballot language was misleading and that the state failed to meet requirements for advertising it.

The challenge came from Hometown Democracy, a group established to collect signatures for a proposed amendment that would give voters a bigger voice in local planning and development.

Hometown Democracy lawyer Ross Burnaman can asking the panel or full 15-member appellate court for a rehearing or certification that would send the issue to the Florida Supreme Court.

Judge James R. Wolf wrote for the district court that the ballot summary told voters exactly what the new limit would be even though it failed to explain that would mean less time to collect signatures.

Dead Panther found on I-75

NAPLES , Fla. (AP) -- A 3-year-old male panther was found dead on Interstate 75 on Tuesday, authorities said.

A Florida Highway Patrol officer discovered the dead panther in the median at mile marker 98 near the Alligator Alley toll plaza. It is the sixth panther fatality on a Florida roadway this year.

Wildlife officials said it may be the same cat that killed five goats and wounded a miniature donkey in a nearby area last year. They won't know for sure because DNA samples were not taken from the attacked animals.

 

Developer receives OK for project

By BARRY FLYNN
Staff
Writer

BUNNELL -- Despite the weak local housing market, a developer won approval Monday for an intensive combined residential-commercial project in The Hammock.

With the blessing of a civic group in the area, the Flagler County Commission unanimously approved a proposal for 26 single-family houses and two commercial buildings on 8.6 acres between State Road A1A and the Intracoastal Waterway .

Rich Smith, owner of Lighthouse Development Group Inc., said he expected to begin construction on the planned-unit development within 18 months.

He acknowledged the slowdown in home sales here, but was still optimistic. He said the project's nine planned waterfront houses and one of the two commercial buildings would likely sell first.

The commercial component is planned as two two-story buildings facing A1A, each of 15,000 square feet.

As for completion of the project, Smith said, "Let's talk about a five-year building out on the entire plan."

The civic group, Scenic A1A PRIDE, endorsed the plan after negotiating with Smith, said Dennis Clark, chairman of the group's site review committee on the project.

"They made a few concessions . . . They worked with us," Clark said of Smith's company.

Clark said Lighthouse could have gotten approval for even more intensive development if the project had been townhouses or condominiums.

Panel Rejects Huge Fee Increases

By JULIA FERRANTE The Tampa Tribune

Published: Apr 4, 2007

Saying the burden would be too great on builders, an advisory panel rejected a plan to double or triple one-time construction fees for new roads.

The 10-member Impact Fee Advisory Committee suggested appointing a subcommittee to find other ways to pay for an estimated $500 million in road improvements over the next five years.

The committee is slated to review the findings Monday and forward suggestions to the county commission the next day.

Among the subcommittee's suggestions for paying for new and improved roads:

•Raise property taxes by $1 for every $1,000 of valuation for an estimated $25 million a year in additional revenue. The proceeds would pay only for transportation needs.

•Increase the gasoline tax from 6 cents to 11 cents a gallon for an estimated $55 million during the next five years.

•Phase in higher construction fees for roads for an estimated $424 million over the next five years. Developers building in areas where roads are able to handle additional traffic could be given a discount.

The county commission in the past has been open to raising gas taxes and construction fees - also called impact fees - but as a matter of policy has not endorsed using property taxes for road projects.

County officials are proposing putting off many projects because of a lack of money, but the advisory panel wants many of those projects to continue. Members agreed raising the tax rate could help accomplish that.

The subcommittee plans to continue meeting in coming months to discuss road project priorities and funding mechanisms, including special taxing districts.

"Because the [proposal] only takes care of a small amount of the Transportation Capital Improvement Plan, they want to look at other funding options," said Michele Baker, program administrator for engineering services. "They realize the county's got big issues in front of them, and they want to tackle them."

The subcommittee's proposal does not cover the estimated $250 million for state road projects in the Florida Department of Transportation's long-range plan. Nor does it include money for county projects totaling $951.7 million.

An estimated $62.3 million to be collected from the Penny for Pasco sales tax is earmarked for specific projects approved by voters. Plans for those projects will not change, Baker has said.

Many of the road improvements in the county's plan are needed because of the burgeoning population, which increased to more than 451,000 in 2006, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. Residential building has slowed, but retail developments are filling in the gaps, providing services and amenities for new residents.

As a matter of course, developers pay their "proportionate share" for road improvements, but how much they contribute and which projects they complete are a matter of negotiation.

Commissioner Ted Schrader and others have said they prefer impact fees to other forms of revenue boosters because the fees essentially make growth pay for itself.

A county-commissioned economist, Hank Fishkind, has warned the subcommittee not to overcharge developers, lest the county scare away desirable businesses.

Fishkind suggested breaks for certain kinds of businesses and gradual increases in impact fees overall. The committee supported those recommendations.

WHAT'S NEXT

•The Transportation Impact Fee Fact-Finding Committee will meet at 2 p.m. today at Hudson Regional Library, 8012 Library Road , to discuss ongoing needs for road projects.

•The Impact Fee Advisory Committee meets at 10 a.m. Monday at the West Pasco Government Center , 7530 Little Road in New Port Richey.

•The county commission is to consider the recommendations at a meeting starting at 10 a.m. Tuesday at the historic Pasco County Courthouse, 37918 Meridian Ave. in Dade City .

Reporter Julia Ferrante can be reached at (813) 948-4220 or jferrante@tampatrib.com.

County to hold hearing on building moratorium
No drainage at Rainbow Park poses problem


BY SUSAN LATHAM CARR
STAR-BANNER

OCALA - The Marion County Commission voted unanimously Tuesday to conduct a public hearing this month to discuss implementing a building permit moratorium in the Rainbow Park subdivision.

The vested subdivision, which was approved in 1960, has no drainage, and the commission fears there will be increased flooding as new homes are built.

A moratorium would give the commission time to consider how best to fix the problem in the 4,500-platted-lot subdivision that is north of State Road 40 and east of Dunnellon.

Several options are being explored.
Meanwhile, Rainbow Park residents are wondering how much it will cost to fix it and who is going to pay for it.

"Right now, half of everybody out here is on a fixed income," said Angelita Rosier. "They are scared."

A number of those residents are planning to meet with the county's Municipal Services Taxing Unit (MSTU) Department on Thursday at 1:30 p.m. to express their concerns.

Before the county started looking at the flooding that occurs on some of the lime rock roads and in some residents' yards with the increase in new home construction, a small group of people went to the county to ask if they could have their road paved.

At that time, it was determined if the majority of the people responding to a petition agreed to pay for the road through an assessment, it would cost property owners about $3,000 per lot.

Then the problem of the flooding came to light. Myra Tedder, director of the MSTU Department, said she could pave the roads and fix the drainage for about $6,500 a lot.

So, the MSTU Department sent out petitions asking the lot owners if they would agree to pay the $6,500 per lot plus interest during a 10-year-period.

And that is what has upset residents, some of whom own more than one lot.

"It's going to cost me $50,000," said Rosier, who has lived there for 29 years. "Ouch!"

Wesley Knight said he has lived in Rainbow Park for 18 years.

"If they don't build, there won't be a problem," Knight said. "Looking at the entire situation within Marion County , the entire county is growing altogether too fast. All of their services are going to be stretched and we are going to be taxed to death to pay for it."

Knight, who will be 82 years old within a few weeks, owns three lots, so he is looking at a bill of about $20,000.

"I have lived on dirt roads all my life and it doesn't bother me a bit," he said. "Put it on the backs of the builders. Don't put it on our backs."

Laurie Watson, too, is concerned about the cost. Her husband has not been able to work for 17 years because of medical problems, she said. The couple has lived in Rainbow Park for about 26 years.

"Our total income is about $20,000 a year," Watson said. About a quarter of that goes for medical insurance, co-payments and deductibles.

"It doesn't give us very much to live on," she said. Since gas prices have risen, she has tried to do all her errands in two trips a week to save on gas.

The Watsons, too, own eight lots.
"We are talking somewhere between $50,000 to $60,000 for us," she said about a possible assessment. "Nobody is trying to be uncooperative. On the other hand, with eight lots, we have our hands tied."

Commission Chairman Stan McClain said after Tuesday's meeting, that the county owns about 50 lots in Rainbow Park . He said the county might be able to swap some of its lots on high ground for lots people own in low areas. Then the county could use the low areas for retention ponds to collect the storm water.

He said if the people do not vote for the MSTU assessment, the county could assess the amount anyway because it is a problem threatening the health, safety and welfare of the residents.

The commission set the hearing for the moratorium at 10 a.m., April 17, in the commission auditorium at the McPherson Governmental Complex, 601 S.E. 25th Ave. , Ocala .

Susan Latham Carr may be reached at susan.carr@starbanner.com or (352) 867-4156.

Boynton passes ordinance requiring affordable housing

By Will Vash

Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

Wednesday, April 04, 2007

BOYNTON BEACH To stem the high cost of housing, city commissioners unanimously passed an ordinance Tuesday night effectively requiring workforce housing in new residential developments.

The ordinance requires developers of new communities to supply a percentage of affordable homes in exchange for more units per acre. Mayor Jerry Taylor said it was important to move forward on the new law because the city was in desperate need of lower-priced homes.

"Right now, nothing is happening. Let's get this thing off the ground," Taylor said. "Every December we can reevaluate and see what's going on."

The ordinance would address housing needs of moderate-income families - those who make between 80 and 120 percent of the federal government's median household income for Palm Beach County , which is $64,400. It also would help some low-income households, those that make below 80 percent of that median. For example, a family of four making less than $77,280 would be eligible for the affordable units, according to federal guidelines.

The new rule provides that:

• Developers seeking higher densities set aside 10 percent to 20 percent of their projects' residential units as affordable.

• Both homeowner and rental units remain affordable for 30 years through liens and deed restrictions.

• Developers of projects where 80 percent of the home prices in a new development exceed $500,000 be given the option of donating land for affordable housing, paying for the workforce housing units to go somewhere else or building the affordable units on another site in the city. City commissioners voted to amend the ordinance 4-1 to set those in-lieu-of prices between $60,000 and $100,000 depending on unit size. Commissioner Mack McCray dissented.

CRA planning director Vivian Brooks said the ordinance would be one tool to help workers afford their own home.

"The housing has not come down where most workers are even able to afford a home," Brooks said. "The gap is huge. It's a very daunting thing, but we are making a major step."

A family making $45,000 a year could reasonably afford a house at $138,500, according to a report by the area's planning and regional council.

Indian bones dispute spurs suit to void property deal

By Gretel Sarmiento

Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

Wednesday, April 04, 2007

HIGHLAND BEACH — American Indian remains have become a $5.8 million bone of contention for the Brooklyn resident who bought property in this tiny beachfront town without knowing it was the site of an ancient burial ground.

Yitzchok Schwartz bought the land at 4521 S. Ocean Blvd. in 2005, thinking he could fix the home and move in. Instead, he discovered skeletal remains and a burial mound that could date to historic groups that existed even before the Seminoles, Schwartz contends in a lawsuit filed in Palm Beach County court last week.

The previous owner, Bibb Latané, knew about the bones but didn't mention them when he sold the beachfront property, according to the lawsuit. That would have halted the sale, said Ubaldo Perez, one of Schwartz's attorneys.

Latané, a psychologist and owner of Social Science Conferences Inc. in North Carolina, was aware of the remains as early as 2003 and failed to notify Schwartz, who now wants his money back, as well as attorney fees, Schwartz's attorneys claim.

"The only way to fix this one is to undo the transaction, to put everybody back in the place where they were before this," said Schwartz's attorney, Howard DuBosar.

If the bones have archaeological significance, the discovery could delay any plans Schwartz had for the property.

"If human remains are found on a site, the state has very strict rules," said Christian Davenport, Palm Beach County 's archaeologist. "There would be added steps, that the bones are not destroyed, that they are relocated or avoided."

Davenport has worked on ancient sites in Lake Worth , Boynton Beach and Jupiter, as well as throughout the East Coast. Typically, he said, bones and artifacts are found when developers move in and the water level is reduced.

"We don't go digging in looking for them," he said.

The battle between development and preserving history in South Florida intensified after the Miami Circle was uncovered in 1998. The 2.2-acre site, believed to have been used by Tequesta Indians, sits on waterfront property on the south bank of the Miami River .

A New York development firm had agreed to buy the site for $18 million. But after the bones were found about a foot below the surface, ending plans for two 40-story condo towers, the state and county eventually bought the site for $26.7 million.

In Palm Beach County , most archaeological findings point toward early Indians, such as the Glades and the Jeagas, who settled before the Seminoles.

"We know very little about them," Davenport said. "They have distinctive cultural traits such as differences in pottery."

Indian bones don't have to scare off developers.

"Some parts of the parcel could be developed," said archaeologist Robert Carr, who helped discover the Miami Circle .

For a burial mound, the boundaries of the cemetery would need to be located and preserved. If the bone fragments are scattered, determining those boundaries could be difficult.

If that's the case, the landowner has two choices.

"Leave it as it is or relocate them" with the help of an archaeologist, said state archaeologist Ryan Wheeler.

Regarding the lawsuit, Latané's attorney, Roderick Coleman, said it was no secret but rather common knowledge that the property had an Indian burial mound. The 2003 discovery of a human bone while Latané was building an addition to the home received media attention, he said.

Coleman said the law protects an owner from having to disclose a homicide, suicide or death on the property when selling it.

"This has got nothing to do with bones," Coleman said. "They are using the bones to get out of not-such-a-good real estate deal now that the market has gone south."

Latané, who at one point was chairman of the Department of Psychology at Florida Atlantic University and director of the Institute for Research in Social Science, dismissed the claims against him. He noted the irony of the timing.

"I just got back from a conference in London on the evolution of human behavior," he said. "Come to think about it, bones were discussed."

Property case upholds owners' rights

Judge sides with Olympia owners on case that tests state eminent domain law.

By ANTHONY CORMIER

anthony.cormier@heraldtribune.com
PALMETTO -- Joel and Cindy Jarvis, husband-and-wife developers who dabble in small-time projects in Palmetto, bought the Olympia Theatre from the city in 1995 for $1 and promised sweeping changes to the historic building.

Twelve years later, though, the Olympia is still in bad shape. It's rarely open to the public. There is no indoor stage. The once glorious movie house is a shell of its former self.

Frustrated with the pace of renovations, Palmetto officials tried to take it back through eminent domain and do the renovations themselves.

But a judge ruled this week that the Olympia is private property -- and the city cannot take it back -- in a case that some observers are calling the first of its kind for Southwest Florida .

The Olympia decision is this region's first test of a new law that protects property owners and limits the government's ability to take land for redevelopment.

It also underscores the complex debate over individual rights and public goals, which took hold during a controversial U.S. Supreme Court ruling two years ago.

"There is no reason governments should step in when they see a property they like and say, 'We'll take it from here,'" said Bill Moore, a Sarasota land attorney who represented the Jarvises.

Moore's firm helped lobby the state Legislature in 2006 to tighten eminent domain laws, which came under fire after a Supreme Court decision that gave wider discretion to governments and developers.

Eminent domain cases are rarely noticed, and most often are tools that help widen roads and build sidewalks. In many cases, the government buys property from a landowner and uses that property for the greater public good.

But in February 2005 the federal Supreme Court ruled that New London , Conn. , officials could take private property that had fallen into disrepair and give it to a developer who wanted to build a shopping center and business plaza.

The decision shocked many observers and drew near universal scorn. For Florida legislators, the worry was potential for abuse in cities where wealthy and well-connected developers could eye valuable waterfront properties for redevelopment into condominiums and shopping plazas.

So legislators changed Florida 's laws and said that governments could not use eminent domain for their own economic or redevelopment goals. Essentially, legislators made one thing clear: The government cannot take property in order to turn a profit.

"They looked at the law and found it very skimpy," Moore said.

In this case, Palmetto leaders wanted to turn the Olympia into a municipal auditorium -- for public and private community use, such as senior nights, holiday gatherings, even wedding receptions. Many in the city felt the Jarvises, who paid $1 for the title in 1995 and were recently offered as much as $600,000 by the city, were not holding up their end of the deal to refurbish the Olympia .

The auditorium would be the centerpiece of a downtown renewal, which could transform 10th Avenue West back into " Old Main Street " with quaint shops and restaurants surrounding the Olympia . So, after negotiating for months with the Jarvises, the city filed suit against the couple in July 2006.

In Florida 's eminent domain cases, the burden is on the government to show two things: a public purpose and reasonable necessity for the taking. Circuit Judge Peter Dubensky agreed that Palmetto had a public purpose in mind, but that they didn't need to have the Olympia .

In fact, the judge said that Palmetto never did traffic or demand studies, didn't budget for a new auditorium and never mentioned the building in long-term development plans. Officials were "clearly disturbed" at the slow pace of renovations, Dubensky wrote, but "declared the theater a public necessity -- out of necessity."

For Tanya Lukowiak, director of the Community Redevelopment Agency, this week's decision is not a surprise -- but is certainly a disappointment. The CRA, a tax arm of the city government, paid for nearly $30,000 in repairs in what some feel was a bad investment.

"It was always our intention to finish the theater as a theater," Joel Jarvis said during a February hearing.

With the Jarvises' job unfinished, the city wanted the building back. But even staffers such as Lukowiak admit that eminent domain is tricky -- and the questions are nearly always the same:

How far should a government go to spur change? And what role do private property owners have in public renewals?

"It's a touchy subject," Lukowiak said Tuesday. "It's about public benefits and private property rights. But the city's position has always been: 'If you can't do it, we'll do it for you.'"

So, more than a century after the Olympia opened in 1916 as one of the first movie houses on Florida 's west coast, the history-rich building will not be a symbol of the city's downtown renewal.

At least not for now. City officials have not decided whether to appeal the ruling, and the Jarvises' attorneys say they want to work on a public-private partnership that would restore the Olympia to its former glory.

Mayor Larry Bustle says he is all for a solution, and the city could appeal the decision, refile another eminent domain petition or go back to the drawing board with the Jarvises.

"I'm really open to any option," Bustle said. "I do feel, though, that we would do a great job of turning what is a shell of a building into a fantastic multi-use structure for our citizens. That's what this has always been about."

Residents to protest plans to sell park

CORTEZ -- Cortez Trailer Park residents will protest the pending sale of their five-acre community by holding up signs condemning the deal Saturday along Cortez Road .

More than 80 households could face eviction if property owner Harry "Butch" Howey goes through with the $10.8 million sale to Bradenton developer Carlos Beruff.

Residents, who include Howey's parents, have offered to match Beruff's offer.

Howey has refused them, they say.

The protest will be between 10 a.m. and noon Saturday on the south side of Cortez Road .

Howey did not return an interview request Tuesday. Beruff said he will not comment on his plans.

Mobile-home evictions draw pleas for help

By Jason Schultz

Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

Wednesday, April 04, 2007

STUART — Martin County commissioners on Tuesday grasped for ways to help low-income mobile-home park residents like Annita Richards find a place to live as their communities continue falling victim to more-expensive housing.

"We're all hard-working Americans," said Richards, one of about three-dozen residents being evicted from Bloomfield Meadows, a 55-and-older mobile home community in Hobe Sound. "Unless I'm going to live in a shed, I don't know what I'm going to do."

Residents there found out last month they were being evicted after the owner announced he intends to build townhomes on the site. Bloomfield Meadows joins a growing list of mobile-home parks in Martin County being sold for more upscale development.

County commissioners Tuesday discussed the housing problem, tossing around the idea of a moratorium, but did not make any policy changes.

Cheryl Bass, director of the county's community services department, said she organized a "strike team" of county officials and nonprofit agencies after learning of the plight of Bloomfield Meadows residents.

Although many of them own their mobile homes, the structures are too old to move.

"It's going to be a lifestyle change big time for these people," Bass said. "No matter what the options, I don't see how we're going to maintain that community. That's a real loss."

The county receives state money that could help lower-income residents put down first month's rent on new mobile homes, Bass said, but most of the Bloomfield Meadows residents would not qualify because they do not make enough money to pay the rent at other parks.

Richards said she made $10,000 last year as a massage therapist and still owes money on the mobile home she'll have to leave behind. Even if residents can move to another lot, several other parks have also been redeveloped, Richards said.

"How long are we going to be there before we get put off of that land?" Richards asked.

Art Madsen, a resident of the Indianwood park in Indiantown, agreed.

"We have a lot of people living in fear," Madsen said.

The task force, which will meet with Bloomfield Meadows residents on April 13, will probably become a permanent board working to relocate residents from other redeveloped parks, Bass said.

"The situation is not going to end with Hobe Sound," Bass said. "It's going to be something that's repeated over and over again."

Commissioner Lee Weberman said he has asked the developers of a proposed 650-home project in Hobe Sound known as the Atlantic Ridge to contribute about $375,000 to a fund the county could use to relocate mobile-home residents.

That project is not involved in the mobile-home developments, and Weberman said the developer has not agreed to a contribution.

Weberman also suggested that county officials should investigate whether they could legally impose a moratorium on rezoning mobile home parks for development.

Commissioner Susan Valliere suggested creating a "no net loss" policy for mobile home parks where new spaces would have to replace redeveloped ones. Commission Chairman Michael DiTerlizzi agreed, pointing out that the county has an existing "no net loss" policy for boat slips.

"If it can work for marinas, it can work for mobile-home parks," DiTerlizzi said.

Trailer-park crunch leaves poor in lurch

BREANNE GILPATRICK

Less than a year after bulldozers forced Brandy Caradonna and her three sons out of their Davie mobile home, the family needs to move again. They just can't afford to stay.

''One paycheck goes to pay the rent,'' she said in January, standing in the living room of the three-bedroom Hollywood home she shared with her sons, two parents and grandmother. ``One paycheck goes to pay the car payment and day care, and that's it. I don't even have enough extra money to help with my share of the bills.''

Throughout Florida , pressure to redevelop the state's mobile- home parks has left families like the Caradonnas searching for a place to live. Many end up in crowded or shabby housing, or with none at all.

Mobile home redevelopment has spawned its own housing crisis. A study by the Florida Manufactured Housing Association estimated that between January 2005 and June 2006 about 7,600 mobile-home lots were lost when 58 parks closed.

As the parks disappear, a nagging question arises: Whose responsibility is it to step in?

That question is at the heart of a proposed bill that would shift more of the burden to local governments by requiring cities and counties to help relocate displaced mobile-home residents and provide incentives to keep parks open.

The House Committee on Infrastructure voted 7-1 in favor of the bill late last month. And it continues to move through the Florida Legislature.

Local governments have questioned plans to shift responsibility to them the same year the state wants to cut property taxes and limit local spending. But as legislators argue, it's local governments that benefit from higher tax revenue every time a mobile-home park becomes a high-rise or subdivision.

''You're going to make a net income,'' said Rep. Frank Attkisson, the bill's House sponsor. ``You're going to displace the poor. Don't you have a moral obligation to help them out with your windfall?''

Cities and counties shouldn't look to the state or park owners to provide housing for their residents, said Frank Schnidman, a senior fellow at the Center for Urban & Environmental Solutions at Florida Atlantic University . Moving responsibility to the local level also allows governments to find a solution that fits their housing market.

''The bottom line is government has to bite the bullet and decide maybe this is a regional function,'' he said. ``It's not the private sector's responsibility. It's the government that has to look at the cost of providing housing.''

Some South Florida municipalities have tried to deal with the problem.

In Davie , more than one-fourth of residents live in mobile homes. The Central Broward town has more mobile-home residents per capita than anywhere in South Florida, and some parks, like the Stirling Mobile Home Park where Caradonna lived until August, have already closed.

Late last year, more than 200 residents packed Davie Town Hall pleading for relief. In February, the town finalized a one-year moratorium on mobile-home park redevelopment. A town Mobile Home Task Force created to search for other affordable housing solutions met for the first time last week.

In Dania Beach , city leaders also worked with developers to help relocate residents when several local mobile-home parks were rezoned over the past couple of years, city attorney Tom Ansbro said.

But cities say outdated state statues don't give mobile-home park residents enough money to find a place to live in South Florida . And they argue they need more state and federal aid for affordable options.

Under the current law, mobile-home residents can receive $3,000 for a single-wide mobile home and $6,000 for a double-wide to help cover moving expenses. If a mobile home can't be moved to another park, residents receive $1,375 for a single-wide and $2,750 for a double-wide. The money comes from the state's Mobile Home Relocation Trust Fund, funded mostly by mobile-home park owners.

''It helps,'' said Suzanne Fejes, assistant director of Broward County 's Housing and Community Development Division. ``It's better than nothing. But it's not sufficient.''

The average rent in Broward is roughly $1,100. And the median single-family home price is nearly $400,000, according to a recent study by the Broward Housing Partnership.

But other areas of Florida are less expensive, and Attkisson said a statewide change in the formula isn't fair.

''Should Pensacola or Gainesville or Jacksonville pay for the problems of Davie in a sales tax?'' he said. ``I don't think so.''

The money in the mobile- home trust fund was never meant to be more than ''a leg up in terms of moving on,'' said Jim Dale, who owns Rexmere and Paradise Village mobile-home parks in Davie .

After all, argues Jim Ayotte, executive director of the Florida Manufactured Housing Association, mobile-home park residents don't own the land their homes occupy -- the park owner does.

''Where does it end?'' he said. 'If you own a strip shopping mall and you decide, `By the way, I'm going to turn it into something else,' you don't need to pay your residents. You just tell your tenants, 'Hey, you're outta here.' ''

Meanwhile, Caradonna prepares to move.

''I am so sore and tired just of painting places and moving furniture and packing,'' she said Monday. ``And Saturday, I had to explain to my kids that we were moving. Try explaining to a 10-year-old that we don't own where we live, we rent, and we can't afford to stay.''

Towering Hopes

By SHANNON BEHNKEN The Tampa Tribune

Published: Apr 4, 2007

TAMPA - For two years now, commuters into the city have watched towers grow.

They've navigated dusty streets, passing cranes and construction workers dangling high above what will become thousands of new homes.

When that happens, commuters will tangle with a species that has become rare in Tampa 's downtown: the urban resident.

The first six of two dozen condo projects planned in the downtown area are expected to open by August, and pioneering condo dwellers are moving in. The combined 1,495 residential units promise a lot: a boost in downtown's population, a flock of retailers willing to serve those residents, and a bustling atmosphere of night life, cafes and thriving restaurants to draw outsiders.

Is this the year Tampa 's downtown blossoms? City planners and developers think so. But how long will the transformation take, and will the slowing real estate market postpone their dreams, as it has for developers who have already pulled their projects?

And will it all happen soon enough for new residents such as Matt Schuck and Lindsey Snyder?

The pair are among the first to move into the first of the six projects to open its doors. Both 25 years old, they moved in July from Charlotte , N.C. , and failed at suburban life in New Tampa. So in December, they bought a 1-bedroom, 820-square-foot unit in Grand Central at Kennedy for $265,000, a sum that could have purchased a nice three-bedroom home on a cul de sac.

They moved in three weeks ago and say they're paying for an urban lifestyle, not space. So far, it's not quite what they're looking for. There is one other tenant on their floor, they say, and it's lonely. But they have faith that will change soon.

"We were hoping there would be people moving in just like us so we could make friends," Schuck said. "We're excited. We feel like Tampa is going through a revitalization, and we want to be part of it."

The couple enjoy walking their dog, Simon, on the ninth-floor pool deckand hope dry cleaners, coffee shops and bars will come to the neighborhood. They enjoy riding the trolley to Ybor City and Channelside.

But they do worry about their growing neighborhood. Will there be enough residents living in their tower, or will investors leave units dark and empty? The couple want to enjoy urban life for a few years, then sell their condo and possibly move back to the suburbs.

"It's in the back of our minds," Schuck said.

Just Be Patient, Experts Say

The experts offer hope to Schuck and Snyder. Commercial real estate firm Cushman & Wakefield forecasts 5,000 total residents in the downtown areaby the end of 2008 and 7,500 by the end of 2010.

About 600 people currently live downtown, according to the Tampa Downtown Partnership.

Christine Burdick, president of the partnership, said she's excited to see years of planning start to pay off.

"This is the year that it will really be obvious that things are changing," Burdick said. "We will start to see things happening."

During the recent real estate boom, developers pitched 30 condo projects for the downtown area. With the real estate market slowdown, some developers have canceled projects, are without financing or are still looking for buyers.

Trump Tower Tampa , for example, is stalled. The original developer, which has a licensing agreement to use Donald Trump's name, has had trouble securing financing to move forward on the project. A New York hedge fund is negotiating to provide financing. The project faces $3.3 million in construction liens, and it's unclear when vertical construction could start or when the project would be completed.

Such slowdowns are normal and Tampa is on the right track, said Bill Hudnut, senior fellow at the Urban Land Institute in Washington .

"The problem is people want to seeinstantaneous results," Hudnut said. "It will take 10 years or more to see how it will all come together."

The first residents will need to be patient, Hudnut said. They may have to live without some of the services they moved to the city to be near, but those luxuries will come.

Some condo developers may have a difficult time selling all their units, especially to full-time residents instead of investors, but people will move in over time.

" Florida is growing so much that I have no doubt those condos will fill up," Hudnut said.

Retailers Cautious But Coming

Ken Stoltenberg is a developer with Mercury Advisors, which is working on the second building of Grand Central at Kennedy and is developing The Martin, a 22-story tower at 1115 E. Twiggs St .

The majority of sales at Grand Central have closed on time, he said. Others haven't been able to close, for various reasons. Some are investors who can no longer afford their purchases.Some people can't close because of life changes. One buyer has since died after reserving a condo.

Several blocks south are the twin Towers of Channelside. The first tower is scheduled to open in July, said Michael McGuinness, a partner in the project, and he expects a full house. His company did a random sample of buyers, and everyone reached said they were poised to close on their units. But if some aren't, he said, it could mean more money for the developer.

"On average people have $50,000 down," McGuinness said. "Even in today's market, they probably have another $50,000 in equity. We'll take that if they want to walk away."

The retail space in the towers was sold, and McGuinness said he has been told retailers include a health club, pizza parlor and sushi restaurant.

Many of the condo developers opening buildings this year are selling some of the retail space and leasing the rest. National retailers tend to want to wait for more residents to show up before they take a chance on Tampa , some developers say.

McGuinness said he is so confident of what Tampa will become that he and his wife plan to open a day care center, Carlton Academy Day School , this fall at 205 Brush St .

New downtown resident Schuck said he's happy to wait - as long as he gets to live in the urban environment he's paying for.

"If there is ever a time to live in a place like this, it's now, when you're 25 and single," he said.

Reporter Shannon Behnken can be reached at (813) 259-7804 or sbehnken@tampatrib.com.

Plans change for Punta Gorda development

By DEVONA WALKER

devona.walker@heraldtribune.com
PUNTA GORDA -- The developers behind City Marketplace, the 520,000-square-foot hotel, retail and residential project planned for downtown Punta Gorda, are heading back to the drawing board.

Changing market conditions -- namely the huge slowdown in Southwest Florida 's condominium and residential housing market -- has prompted developers to rethink the design and makeup of the project.

Rather than building the project all at once as originally planned, the massive mixed-use development will now likely be built in phases, said Ron Oskey Jr., head of the Charlotte County Development Corp.

"The market has changed. The concept we had before -- we had to design the whole thing and build it at once," Oskey said. "Now phasing is really important."

The developers might start on the retail component of the project first, waiting out the lull in residential real estate before working on the condos planned for City Marketplace.

Charlotte County Development Corp. also might go for taller -- or shorter -- buildings.

The height variance that had been granted to the developers by the city that allowed for buildings to be two stories higher than originally proposed expired on Sunday.

Depending on what the market demands, Oskey said he would likely be back to the city government for another variance.

The impetus for all the action on City Marketplace is that, on Monday, developers settled a long-standing suit that they had with Bradenton-based Bealls Outlet Inc. for an undisclosed sum.

That cleared the way for them to seek financing.

Punta Gorda's elections in November also might have cleared the way for Oskey to get a smoother ride from city government.

The city has three new council members, all former members of TEAM Punta Gorda who are largely considered pro-business.

"A number of us have been in touch with both Ron Sr. and Ron Jr. and he's shared with us his latest plans," said Harvey Goldberg, Punta Gorda's vice mayor and former government relations liaison to TEAM Punta. "And I think they are on the right track."

Goldberg says they will definitely be working more collaboratively with the business community than the previous council "to help revitalize" Punta Gorda.

"This is a critical sector of our community, and for the health of our community it's important that we work in a collaborative way," Goldberg said.

Other council members are waiting to see more specific about what the Oskeys will propose.

"He lost his height variance on Sunday. Now, he's going back to square one," said Councilwoman Marilyn Smith-Mooney, who was re-elected in November. "I think he's going to try to push it a lot further next time."

Smith-Mooney says she has not seen any updated plans for the project.

"I'm hoping we don't have -- not just on the council but also in the community -- such impatience that we just say, 'Build it,'" Smith-Mooney said. "What is built will be there for many years and we will have to live with it, whatever positive or negative. I hope they won't just say, 'Let him do it,' just to have something built."

Oskey already has invested too much in the project to just throw up his hands and walk away, and the City Council members thus have some leverage upon which to make sure their interests are met.

"He would do what we want and build something that pleases us," Smith-Mooney said. "Or he will sell it."

Oskey had been entangled in a legal dispute with Bealls Outlet Inc. dating back to 2004, shortly after Hurricane Charley destroyed the old Punta Gorda Mall.

Since then, Oskey has been trying to develop the property. He would not say specifically how much it cost to settle the dispute, only that it was about "50-50."

"Because of that, everybody walks away happy," Oskey said. "In the business we're in, you never know, we might just run into them again someday."

Oskey said he is confident now that he can complete the delay-dogged project.

"When you work on something long enough, you know you are going to find a solution if you keep working on it."
Emergency order to restrict flow into drainage districts

By Kimberly Miller

Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

Wednesday, April 04, 2007

A coast-to-coast drought that could drop Lake Okeechobee water levels to record lows had water management administrators asking residents Tuesday to voluntarily reduce watering now before official orders are expected next week.

With no substantial rainfall in sight and Lake Okeechobee just 1.3 feet above the 2001 record low of 8.97 feet above sea level, South Florida Water Management District Executive Director Carol Ann Wehle also said she will sign an emergency order today restricting water flow from the Everglades into local drainage districts.

The move, which she said was necessary in the face of "really difficult times," will dry up canals, ponds and wetlands areas used by western Palm Beach County residents and some municipalities to water plants and lawns.

Less water flowing into the canals and ponds means a greater chance saltwater will seep into the water supply, making it harder and more expensive to treat.

In the worst-case scenario, the district could be required to provide bottled water to residents.

Local wildlife also is expected to be hurt by the restrictions.

"There is no water to give to the drainage districts," Wehle said.

"The well fields could become saltier than they are today and if the water is not replenished, we probably couldn't drink it," she said. "We are doing everything we can to avoid that situation."

Wehle said the current water shortage is the first major drought to affect the entire South Florida region.

"We have not been in a situation where the Kissimmee (River), Lake Okeechobee and water conservation areas have all been in drought conditions at the same time," said Deputy Executive Director Chip Merriam. "We need rain at the right times in the right places. We have a long way to catch up."

The board of the South Florida Water Management District will consider recommendations April 12 to tighten current water restrictions.

If approved, residents of Martin and St. Lucie counties could water their yards only three days a week. Most of Palm Beach, Broward and Miami-Dade counties would be cut to twice-weekly watering, and Lake Okeechobee areas would be allowed to water only once a week.

Nearly half of all drinking water goes to irrigation, district officials said.

Under the recommendations, which Wehle expects to be approved, city and decorative fountains that don't recycle their water would be shut down.

Car washes could remain open, but residents would be restricted to washing their cars during the same hours they are allowed to water.

Golf courses, which now must prove they have cut their water use by 15 percent, would have to cut by 30 percent.

"They've been reporting to us on a weekly basis their water use," district spokesman Jesus Rodriguez said of the golf courses.

Water managers also opened their Emergency Operations Center full time and have created 15 teams to monitor specific situations such as enforcement and wildlife impact.

Wehle said part of the problem in managing water levels is that weather forecasts have been inaccurate, including less rainfall last summer than was predicted.

"The drought today was not predicted by NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), it was not predicted by the National Weather Service or by our own meteorologists," Wehle said. "Mother Nature has a way of doing what Mother Nature is going to do no matter what weathermen predict."

County considers partnering with city

By TONY BRITT tbritt@lakecityreporter.com
Tuesday, April 3, 2007 11:58 PM EDTColumbia County officials are looking at the possibility of obtaining water from the City of Lake City to feed the proposed Ellisville utility.

County officials met for more than two hours Tuesday during a commissioner's workshop. They discussed the proposed Ellisville utility project and a proposed unincorporated area utility.

Commissioners decided to ask city officials if they would be willing to provide the county with a connection to the city's 20-inch water main being fed from its new wellfield that is near Lake City Community College .

“If they give that permission, the county will consider supplying the (proposed) Ellisville utility with water from that source,” said Dale Williams, county manager. “At the same time, the stand-alone wellfield at Ellisville, is being pursued. That way we don't lose any time.”

Commissioners spent close to an hour discussing the proposed Ellisville utility before they asked Scott Reynolds, general manager of the Greater Lake City Regional Utility Authority, to relay their request to city officials.

During the discussion about the proposed Ellisville project, county officials listened and viewed a power point presentation by representatives of Eutaw Utilities, Inc., the consulting firm the county hired to work on its utility facility needs.

Eutaw Utilities, Inc., representatives said the project's engineering phase would be approximately

270 days.

The plan is for the facility to be able to handle water-related needs up to 2029 and beyond with expansion.

The proposed Ellisville utility is being designed to handle water and wastewater needs because in the past, benzene and chloroforms have been found in the Ellisville water supply.

The projected cost of the drinking water component has been listed as $2.1 million, which is coming from the state revolving loan program and legislative

appropriations.

The projected cost of the wastewater project has been listed at $5.4 million, which includes $2.2 million for a collection system and $3.2 million for wastewater treatment and disposal.

For the wastewater project, the funding source has been listed as the Florida Department of Environmental Protection's state revolving loan fund, legislative appropriations and a portion of state revenue sharing entitlement.

Officials hope to have the wellfield at Ellisville completed for water supply purposes by April 2008 and sewer facility requirements there completed by November 2008 or early 2009.

“This is very realistic,” Williams said. “We had already met with the engineers to discuss the delivery dates and everything we disclosed tonight, we believe to be good

information.”

The Ellisville utility system is being designed to service a three-mile radius of the Interstate 75 interchange as its service area.

The distribution of services may increase in the future beyond the theoretical three-mile perimeter if population and business growth dictate a market for the water service. Currently, there is a large undeveloped area at the Ellisville interchange that officials believe may grow once the presence of a utility service is established.

“The intent and idea is to put the utility in and as expansion is necessary in the three miles, then expand,” Williams said.

“We have to expand when we can afford to expand, otherwise we will be subsidizing with general taxpayers' funds and that's a no-no.”

Eutaw Utilities Inc. representatives are scheduled to give another presentation of the Ellisville water and wastewater facilities plan during Thursday's county commission meeting.

Once adopted, those plans will be submitted to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection.

No relief in sight as region dries up

By JONATHAN ABEL
Published April 4, 2007

Day after day this winter, Gordon Mosteller has watched the water level drop 2 feet in Strawberry and Crystal lakes outside his house in Lutz.

The canal connecting them is bone dry, too.

"Our lake is not a spring-fed lake," he said apologetically. "It depends entirely on rainwater to keep it full."

The rain hasn't come this year, not just to Lutz's lakes. The whole Tampa Bay region is dry, with some parts receiving less than half the normal rainfall.

Forecasters blame a high-pressure system, which diverted the rains normally associated with El Nino and kept southwest Florida largely dry.

Rivers are running below normal, and the forest fire index keeps growing. Water restrictions - which the Southwest Florida Water Management District, also known as Swiftmud, recommended in January - have caused lawns to wilt.

With only a quarter-inch of rain predicted in the next week, the forecast holds no relief for the parched region.

"Keep in mind that we're also going into the dry season," said Nick Petro, a forecaster at the National Weather Service in Ruskin. "It is going to get worse before it gets better."

In South Florida , water management officials ranked this as the third worst dry season on record.

In west central Florida , it is the 15th worst in the last century, according to Granville Kinsman, manager of the district's hydrologic data section.

"We probably need above normal rainfall throughout the summer to make an improvement," Kinsman said. "We are not at the same stage as we were back in the really bad drought in 2001. What I've been telling people is to me the signals look like the year prior to that. Things are getting bad, but we're not really in the heart of it."

So how dry is it? Rain gauges tell part of the story.

In Tarpon Springs, a National Weather Service gauge measured 5.6 inches from November to March, about a third of normal.

A gauge at Tampa International Airport showed just over 4 inches from Jan. 1 through April 1, about half what it should be.

In Tampa , the rainfall shortage is forcing the city to buy water.

The city gets most of its water from a reservoir on the Hillsborough River . But demand is beyond the permitted withdrawal of 80-million gallons a day. Tampa turned to Tampa Bay Water to boost supply.

That's costing the city about $66,000 a day and could top more than $9-million over the dry season, said Sandra Anderson, deputy director of the Tampa Water Department.

No water has flowed over the Hillsborough River dam since October. Last year, water flowed over the dam until March.

The fire danger is up throughout the region, too.

On Tuesday afternoon, a brush fire broke out near the Plant City Municipal Airport in eastern Hillsborough County , burning 5 acres.

Forestry crews and local firefighters were positioned on the perimeter, waiting for it to burn itself out, said Hillsborough Fire Rescue spokesman Ray Yeakley.

With dry conditions and strong winds, "a little fire can become big quickly," Yeakley said, so firefighters take extra precaution this time of year.

Chris Kintner, a spokeswoman for the Division of Forestry, said that without rain the fire danger would go up later this spring when the lightning strikes arrive.

"We expect to have a very serious fire season," she said.

Staff writers Janet Zink, Ben Montgomery and Bill Coats contributed to this report. Jonathan Abel can be reached at "jabel@sptimes.com.

WATER SHORTAGE

Tighten the tap: Record cutbacks coming

As drought conditions persist in South Florida , water managers have called for a new round of emergency cutbacks to take effect late next week.

BY CURTIS MORGAN

cmorgan@MiamiHerald.com

South Florida faces its toughest water cutbacks ever, and brown lawns and wilted flowers could look like minor worries soon.

In the coming days, canals and ponds in western suburbs will drop fast and shallow ones may dry up. In weeks, municipal wells near the coast -- particularly in Broward County -- could pump water too salty to drink. In months, wetlands may wither and Lake Okeechobee could recede to the lowest point since the dike was built around it more than 70 years ago.

That's the dry-as-a-bone scenario regional water managers painted Tuesday as they called for a new round of emergency cutbacks, expected to take effect April 13.

Homeowners in Miami-Dade, Broward, Monroe and Palm Beach counties will be restricted to only two days a week of landscape watering instead of the current three. Golf courses, nurseries and other industrial users face a 30 percent reduction, double the current restriction. The supply to sugar growers and other farms around Lake Okeechobee , already watching crops wilt, could be cut nearly in half.

Carol Ann Wehle, executive director of the South Florida Water Management District, said drastic steps were needed to limit long-term effects on everything from wildlife to drinking water.

''This is one of the worst droughts we have ever seen,'' said Wehle, whose agency oversees the water supply from just south of Orlando to Key West .

Unlike in 2001, the last time a drought forced mandatory restrictions on South Florida , the entire lower third of the state is parched. With water literally evaporating from Lake Okeechobee to the Everglades , managers said they have no reserves to tap and little room to maneuver -- other than ordering more cutbacks.

The ramped-up restrictions must be approved by the district's governing board. The board doesn't meet until April 12, but water managers expect support and urged users to start tightening taps now -- beyond the first rules imposed just two weeks ago.

''I don't want to be an alarmist on this,'' said Chip Merriam, district deputy executive director, but ``people need to be concerned. This is the time when conservation is extremely important.''

EMERGENCY MEETINGS

Water managers planned emergency meetings Monday and Tuesday with local drainage districts and major utilities to detail the rapidly deteriorating outlook.

Lake Okeechobee, the region's water barrel, is so low -- at 10.34 feet Tuesday -- that water managers worry whether they can pump enough to meet the anticipated 45 percent reduction to surrounding farms.

If the dry spell continues through June, the traditional start of the rainy season, the lake could plummet a foot below its historic low of 8.97 feet, Wehle said -- a level that could prove devasting to wildlife and the aquatic system as well.

Wehle said she would sign an unprecedented order today to end releases from the water conservation areas into the Everglades, which fringe the suburbs from Palm Beach to Miami-Dade and are sometimes tapped to replenish well fields and groundwater levels.

At the same time, drainage districts and utilities will be asked to keep canals higher along the coast in an effort to create a freshwater ''head'' or barrier to prevent saltwater intrusion, which could exceed the treatment capacity of some water plants.

District maps show Broward wells at risk in Hallandale Beach, Dania Beach, Fort Lauderdale, Pompano, Hillsboro Beach and Deerfield Beach, as well as in Palm Beach County. Miami-Dade is also being asked to shift the bulk of its pumping to western well fields and hold groundwater high along the coast.

The result of shifting the water eastward will be drier western suburbs -- most noticeably in Broward and Palm Beach .

''In some cases, there will be a pretty immediate drop,'' Merriam said -- possibly by several feet, meaning the muddy bottoms of some drainage ditches or ponds may soon be baking in the sun.

ALTERNATIVE SOURCE

The district is seeking a variance from federal environmental regulations to draw more water from the conservation areas, which it received in 2001 from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Merriam said that would add only ''a little flexibility'' and a few weeks cushion.

But there are now tougher limits on the Everglades as a resource.

The district coincidentally adopted a rule, in development for a year as part of the $11 billion Everglades restoration effort, to cap withdrawals -- a policy that has forced Miami-Dade, Broward and other counties to invest billions in developing ''alternative sources'' such as treated wastewater.

Water managers and the Corps dumped several feet of excess water from Lake Okeechobee after the record 2004 and 2005 hurricane seasons. But the agencies blame the current shortage on nature.

Only 40.75 inches fell across the region in 2006 -- nearly a foot less than normal -- making it the district's sixth-driest year on record. This year has started well below normal as well.

Now it may take record downpours to right things.

''We truly need above-average rainfall this summer to recover from this deficit,'' said Wehle. ``If not, we may be talking about this again next year.''

Year could set record for drought

By TONI WHITT

toni.whitt@heraldtribune.com
The drought that has gripped Florida for more than a year is worsening into one of the most severe in the state's recorded history, draining major rivers and prompting severe water restrictions.

Since 2006 began, 13 fewer inches of rain than normal has fallen in Southwest Florida . With no rain on the horizon, officials say this year could be on track to compare with 2000-2001 as driest on record.

While the winter months are typically dry in Florida , just four inches of rain has fallen in this five-county region since January, about half of normal.

"Hope for rain and for a lot of it this summer," said Granville Kinsman, manager of hydrologic evaluation for the Southwest Florida Water Management District. "If that doesn't happen, we could be seeing levels as bad as they were in 2000 and 2001."

Shortages are so severe across south Florida that this week the Miami area issued an emergency order severely restricting the amount of water the Everglades can supply to nearby areas, meaning residents are likely to have problems with water pressure as surface water levels fall.

In Arcadia , the Peace River , which usually flows at 300 cubic feet per second at this time of year is flowing at one-third its normal rate, at 98 cubic feet per second.

Only a temporary suspension of rules has allowed the water authority to continue pumping water from the Peace River at levels never before allowed or tested.

Without the change, the water authority -- which provides water to Sarasota , DeSoto and Charlotte counties -- would have to further drain the aquifer or find water from other areas. As it is, environmentalists worry the depleted Peace River will take a toll on the state's largest estuary, which the river feeds. Not enough fresh water reaching the estuary could severely upset the ecological balance, killing fish and plants.

The stress on water resources is forcing the Southwest Water Management District to look for new ways to conserve, particularly in fast-growing North Port.

The district has given North Port more than $58,000 to to help residents retrofit their homes with low-flow toilets, showerheads and rain sensors. It is also helping them plan to use reclaimed water for homeowners' irrigation needs.

Without rain soon, it is likely that the Peace River Manasota Water Supply Authority and the Tampa Bay Water Authority will ask for even more stringent water restrictions, said Lois Sorensen, the district's coordinator for water demand.

Such restrictions could include eliminating all nonessential water uses.

Average rainfall last year for this region was at 42 inches, a little less than in 1999, the year that ushered in what hydrologists call Florida 's drought of the century. Average rainfall the following year was just above 37 inches -- prompting water shortages, emergency orders and talk across the state of trucking in water across the state.

In two weeks, Sorensen will again evaluate rainfall, aquifer levels and streamflow, especially for rivers that supply public water, and the drought index to determine whether southwest Florida should be under more stringent conservation measures.

"Whenever there is a drought especially in an area that has been or is experiencing significant growth, that is a concern," Sorensen said "Wholesale suppliers are reviewing contingencies to ensure there is enough potable water."

Lake Jackson erosion controls ready
February storm overwhelmed area's defenses
By Daniela Velazquez
DEMOCRAT
STAFF WRITER

The new, green grass on the eastbound ramp of Interstate 10 near Lakeshore Drive isn't for looks - it's for erosion control.

People living near Lake Jackson and I-10 are waiting to see whether new erosion controls will prevent sediment and trash from washing into the lake during the next big storm. Erosion controls failed during a downpour in early February, and dirty stormwater rushed into the lake.

Since the storm, the Florida Department of Transportation has spent $400,000 on erosion prevention, said Tommie Speights, spokesman for DOT District 3. New controls include a stormwater pond, which was under construction during the last big rain, straw bales and rock-filled baskets in the median.

"I wish they had done all this work before that event," said Nancy McGrath, president of Friends of Lake Jackson. "I'm hoping for rain this week. We'll be able to test and see what the results are."

Speights said the area also was sodded, seeded and mulched to prevent erosion.

"We're increasing the measures," he said. "Hopefully we (won't) have another storm like we did."

Commissioner John Dailey said the project needs to be monitored.

"We do need to make sure we do stay on top of it to make sure it doesn't happen again," he said.

I-10 construction in the 1970s caused sediment to pour into the lake. The county later spent millions of dollars to clean it up.

Tallahassee parks to get trail rehab
By Gerald Ensley
DEMOCRAT
SENIOR WRITER

Forget the swimming pools and basketball courts and community centers. When surveys ask Americans what they want most in their parks, the No. 1 answer is always good trails for hiking and biking.

"When I'm sitting there listening to this I realize, 'That's what I like in a park, too,' ” said David Chapman, director of the Tallahassee Parks and Recreation Department.

That's why TPRD is renovating the 50 miles of trails in its 61 parks. Last year it redid Lafayette Park trails. Now it's rebuilding San Luis Park trails. Next on the refurbishing list is Myers Park . Eventually all park trails will be redone.

The rehab program is mostly about water. In a less sophisticated era, park trails were blazed up and down hills without much thought about how they fit into the land around them. Over time, rain washed down the trails, creating networks of exposed tree roots, holes and gullies. That created maintenance problems and made it difficult to walk and bike on the trails.

So now park officials are redesigning those trails with the knowledge they've gained. Long downhills are being eliminated. Trails now weave back and forth across a slope so water runs across a trail but doesn't wash it out.

Crushed limestone is used to cover the dirt, replacing the wood chips that are unstable and wash away too easily. Some might raise an eyebrow at what sounds like paved roads in the woods. But crushed rock is more reliable than dirt and better than wood chips. In time, leaves and pine straw will cover the limestone, creating a woodsy look while leaving the trails with solid footing and longer life.

"It's like your house: If you've got wood siding you might want to change to vinyl siding so you don't have to paint it every year," Chapman said.

Of course, when you've been named the best rec department in the nation (2004), you're after more than just lower maintenance costs. Chuck Goodheart, the TPRD specialist who heads up the redesign, wants to create "the best trails in the Southeast. We want people to say, 'We're going to Tallahassee because of the trails.' ''

He's hiring professional trail designers for some parks. He studies "flow and mo," which is how proper trail design can provide good flow and momentum for bikers. He's rebuilding long-neglected exercise stations in Lafayette, San Luis and Myers parks.

He has hired a photographer to illustrate proper use of those exercise stations. He'll combine those photos with redesigned signs - as well as workout programs that can be downloaded to an iPod - so everyone from beginners to advanced exercise buffs can get the most from the trails.

"To have good trails, they have to be sustainable and environmentally sound," Goodheart said. "But they also have to be fun and functional."

Lake Ruby docks debate draws big crowd

By Jessica Levco

News Chief staff

WINTER HAVEN - Some people wore fishing T-shirts and others wore business suits to the Winter Haven Planning Commission meeting Tuesday night, providing a standing-room-only crowd of residents concerned about overnight boat parking on Lake Ruby .

The Planning Commission heard a request from Ruby Lake Development LLC to amend a city ordinance so the company can construct six piers and docks with 35 boat slips on Lake Ruby , located in southeast Winter Haven , south of State Road 540 and north of Thompson Nursery Road .

With the proposed amendment, the developer wanted all 35 boat slips to be used for overnight mooring of boats. Members of the city planning staff recommended that 25 boat slips be used for overnight parking.

Bing Hacker is the senior vice president of community facilities for Lennar Homes, a third-party purchaser of home sites within Traditions of Lake Ruby. Hacker said that two years ago, the city approved all 35 boat slips without any restrictions, meaning all 35 slips could have been used for overnight boat parking.

The issued was revisited during a February Planning Commission meeting because commissioners were trying to develop an ordinance dealing with multiple boat slips. At the February meeting, commissioners voted 5-2 to limit overnight mooring to five slips.

At Tuesday night's meeting, the Planning Commission recommended unanimously that 20 of the 35 boat slips be used for overnight boat parking

The debate between homeowners, the developer and lawyers went on for about two hours before the Planning Commission reached its decision, which will be presented too the Winter Haven City Commission in May.

Two petitions were started about the issue. One petition represented about 70 people from Traditions of Lake Ruby Phase I. They wanted to have all 35 boat slips for overnight use, which they said they were promised by the developer. Another petition was signed by 200 residents from Mallard Point, Lake Ruby Estates and on West Lake Ruby Road . They wanted the overnight slips limited to five.

Planning Commissioner April Spencer asked if the decision would set a precedent for future development on lakes. A city employee said that it would not set a precedent legally, but this response was met by a loud outburst by the audience, with one man yelling, "Are you kidding me?"

Since the ordinance in question was related to a planned unit development, the city planning staff said future issues would be developed on a case-by-case basis.

Hacker said he was not pleased, calling the Planning Commission's decision "unfortunate."

John Bader, who represents residents on lakes Ruby and Bess, said the Planning Commission's decision could have been worse. He said he was glad the commissioners didn't approve the developer's request for 35 overnight boat slips.

"I still feel like it's an incorrect decision," Bader said. "We're going back to the City Commission and asking them not to take the recommendation of the Planning Commission. We wanted them to go back to their original decision of having five overnight boat slips."

jessica.levco@newschief.com

Developer To Control MacDill Housing

By WILLIAM R. LEVESQUE
St. Petersburg Times

TAMPA - Staff Sgt. Randy Redman won't complain about his family's housing at MacDill Air Force Base. It's got a great view of Hillsborough Bay . And he can't beat the three-minute commute to work.

Still, it's typical, no-frills military fare: plain, unexciting, old.

But a makeover is afoot.

MacDill is joining a quiet revolution that over the past decade has transformed life on military bases as the government turns over most of its family housing - nearly 200,000 units nationally by the end of next year - to private developers. They rebuild or rehabilitate most of it, serving as owner and landlord for the next half-century.

The military says the private sector, driven by the old-fashioned profit motive, can do what Uncle Sam can't: quickly replace antiquated housing and maintain it better than the government.

Supporters see the effort as a vitally important way to retain personnel in wartime.

"If you're happy at home, then you're probably happy at the job," said Redman, 32, who lives with his wife and two children in an apartment of 1960s vintage.

Privatization has attracted surprisingly little criticism around the nation, given the usual storm surrounding such plans. Early fears that developers wouldn't maintain housing or might erode the close-knit sense of community in military neighborhoods by renting to outsiders haven't been realized, some say.

"When they first started privatizing, I think there was a good deal more skepticism among military families than we see now," said Michelle Joyner, a spokeswoman for the National Military Family Association in Alexandria, Va. "The quality of the housing has really been extraordinary."

The Air Force says it intends to award MacDill's privatization project to Clark Realty, a Bethesda , Md. , developer, which will demolish 512 homes and build 331 new units. Another 240 homes built by the military in recent years require no work. Once final contract details are worked out, probably by July, demolition may begin several months afterward.

It could take as long as six years for all work to be completed. The project, officials say, is paid for entirely by Clark , which declined to comment.

The 571 homes will be owned by Clark under a 50-year lease, with military personnel paying their housing allowances to the developer.

"We own a lot of bad housing" around the country, said Lisa Tychsen, a senior analyst at the Defense Department office overseeing privatization. The department has "traditionally underfunded housing maintenance. The money's stolen for a new tarmac or a new tank. So housing's gotten the short end of the stick."

Old, poor housing has long plagued the military. The oldest housing at MacDill, for instance, dates to 1941, and some other base housing dating to the 1950s and 1960s stands abandoned, awaiting demolition.

In 2001, five years after Congress enacted privatization, the Pentagon estimated that nearly two-thirds of all military housing needed to be replaced.

"Sustaining the quality of life of our people is crucial to recruitment, retention, readiness and morale," Philip Grone, a deputy undersecretary of defense, told Congress last month in a report on privatization efforts.

One Pentagon study found that retention rates for recruits at bases with higher-quality housing are 15 percent higher.

Grone said that 71 projects had been awarded nationally with a total private-sector investment of more than $20-billion.

Defense officials say it would have taken the government 30 years to do the work itself under existing budgetary constraints.

A few critics have worried that developers may have incentives to skimp on repairs, especially if occupancy goals aren't met and revenue slides.  

DeBary plans to move on marina

County could seek legal action to counter city action

By BOB KOSLOW
Staff
Writer

DEBARY -- Land-use changes to allow a large marina and subdivision on the St. Johns River have been under review for too long by a county board, city officials say.

So the city plans to move ahead with a vote on the project Wednesday. To stop or overrule the vote, the Volusia Growth Management Commission would have to take the city to court.

"Their time expired and we're moving on. We're sending them a letter today (Monday) telling them that," City Manager Maryann Courson said.

Naples-based developer Joseph Krzys has a contract to buy 330 acres along 2.5 miles of the St. Johns River and Fort Florida Road . He proposes to change the agricultural/rural residential and environmentally sensitive land-use designations on 127 acres at the north end.

If approved, up to 250 homes could be built on 117 acres. Another 10 acres would be used for a 500-slip marina, private yacht club, restaurant, fueling and wet/dry boat storage.

While some nearby residents back the project because it would bring water and sewer lines to the surrounding area served by wells and septic systems, others are opposed.

"I like the peace and quiet of a canoe ride on the St. Johns River near my home," resident Larry Bates said. "To allow the destruction of the scenery along the river in this or any area on the river is criminal."

In its first step toward approving the project, the City Council voted in December to seek review and comment from the Growth Management Commission and the state.

The state objected to the marina and commercial elements because it would be too close to a manatee sanctuary and aquatic preserve.

Also, a county manatee protection plan that covers the proposed site restricts the number of new and expanded marinas.

But Krzys argues that his plan would address a shortage of boat slips. He also contends that his land is not subject to restrictions on marinas.

Under Volusia County 's charter, the Growth Management Commission reviews proposed land-use changes to determine whether they are legal under comprehensive land-use plans all cities must maintain.

Growth Management Commission attorney Paul Chipok said the city cannot vote on the proposed land-use changes until his agency has ruled that they're legal.

But City Attorney Kurt Ardaman said the amendments have been approved by default because the commission missed a 90-day deadline to review the proposal, request additional information, hold a hearing if necessary and issue a ruling.

The commission countered that the clock has not started yet because the application is not complete. Information it has requested was not provided from the city and developer, Chipok said.

The Growth Management Commission has received more then 30 requests for a hearing from as far away as St. Augustine and include Volusia County , Save the Manatee Club and Seminole Audubon Society.

One of the people requesting a hearing, Colleen Chamberlain, on Monday said, "I don't know all the legalese. I am emotional and I just know in my heart that this is wrong. Putting 500 boats on the river, t