Keeping America's Wetlands Safe
The Tampa Tribune
Published: April 5,
2008
Congress
this month is considering legislation
that would ensure the survival of the
Clean Water Act, one of the nation's
most successful environmental laws.
Several recent court rulings have
undermined the law, raising questions
about whether its protections apply to
wetlands not directly connected to
navigable waters. And the Bush
administration has seemed eager to
retreat from the guidelines that have
been in place since the law was created
in 1972.
Protecting only wetlands directly
connected to navigable waters would
jeopardize key watersheds that filter
and store water, and sustain fish and
wildlife, particularly waterfowl.
Consider: Conservationists estimate
about 30 percent of Florida's streams
and 800,000 acres of wetlands could be
lost if federal agencies only protect
water accessible to boats. About 59
percent of the nation's streams would
lose protection if the government goes
with the narrower interpretation.
The Clean Water Restoration Act would
affirm the bill's original intent: To
protect all waters of the United States,
not just those next to shipping lanes.
William Ruckelshaus, who headed the EPA
when the law was adopted, confirms that
was the original law's intent.
The bill is designed to conserve
natural resources, prevent pollution and
avoid public clean-up costs. It deserves
strong bipartisan support.
|
Keep Mine Approvals Local
Orlando Sentinel editorial -
In Tallahassee, the phrase "home rule
authority" is practically a punch line for
any number of bad jokes. Year in and year
out, state lawmakers think nothing of
infringing on the authority of local
governments when it suits their purposes.
So it should come as no surprise that
legislators, either for the sake of
expediency or at the behest of special
interests, are considering a handful of
bills that would restrict the ability of
counties to have a say in the permitting of
mining operations.
The issue is of special relevance now
because a massive limestone mining operation
has been proposed in Levy County. The King
Road Mine would dig up nearly 10,000 acres
of land, impact more than 1,000 acres of
wetlands, withdraw 7.5 million gallons of
water a day from the ground and add 1,000
vehicle trips daily to Levy roads. It will
require both federal and state approval.
The mining operation would create new jobs
and economic opportunity in Levy, but it
also raises substantial water use,
infrastructure and quality-of-life issues.
And because the mine could be in operation
for 100 years, it is reasonable to argue
that Levy residents and local officials
deserve to have some formal say in the
permitting process.FAST-TRACKING PERMITSBut
one bill in the Florida Senate would give
counties just three months to decide on
mining permits. Another would eliminate
local approval altogether if the proposed
site is already designated for mining or
even assessed as mining land.
State Sen. Mike Bennett, sponsor of that
latter bill, told The Gainesville Sun
recently that his legislation is necessary
because of the rising cost of
road-construction materials. For
expediency's sake, in other words. But that
seems a lame excuse for gutting a local
government's land-use authority.
"We feel like local government provides an
added layer of environmental protection to
their communities," Cragin Mosteller, of the
Florida Association of Counties, said last
month.
Mining operations tend to be large, noisy,
disruptive operations that have a measurable
impact on their host communities. It is
inappropriate for legislators to tell local
officials and residents that the process of
mining approval is none of their business.
Hillsborough Needs Administrator To Push
Hard For ELAPP
The Tampa Tribune
Published: April 5,
2008
Hillsborough
County Administrator Pat Bean insists
she supports continuing the county's
program to buy environmentally valuable
lands.
But she's been strangely reluctant to
take the steps necessary to keep the
conservation effort going after it
sunsets in January 2011.
Supporters would like to hold a voter
referendum on extending the
Environmental Lands Acquisition and
Protection Program - or ELAPP - in
August, but Bean put a stop to a poll
that would have gauged public support.
"We've bought over 48,000 acres,"
Bean told the Tribune's Mike Salinero.
"At a time when people are struggling to
put food on their tables, struggling to
pay their property taxes, do we ask them
for more money to keep buying land?"
That doesn't sound like someone who's
enthusiastic about keeping more
woodlands, shorelines and river
corridors in their natural state.
The poll might have told Bean that
the public is more enlightened about the
value of land conservation than she
thinks. Without question, Hillsborough
residents are frustrated with sprawling
development, traffic and water shortage
problems.
No one is suggesting an increase in
the slight levy that funds land
preservation. The goal is to get voter
approval to extend the program another
10 years. If levied at the full
quarter-mill, the program costs about
$50 a year for a $225,000 house with a
homestead exemption. Since it's levied
at .2219 mills now, the figure is only
$44.
That's a pittance to pay for
preserving the area's rapidly
disappearing natural lands
and avoiding
the high costs - traffic, water
shortages, crime, pollution - that
taxpayers bear when these tracts are
paved over.
Bean also frets that with the county
focused on spending more than $500
million on transportation projects,
streamlining the budget and other
issues, her staff doesn't have time to
create a campaign.
"We've got time ... what's the
necessity of doing this in August?" she
asks. She would prefer to hold the vote
in 2010. "We don't want to move too
fast. We don't have a team put together.
We don't have a strategy."
But why wait for the program to reach
its final months before re-upping it?
Doesn't good planning require knowledge
about future resources?
A team and strategy could be
developed if ELAPP were a priority.
Citizens groups led prior campaigns. And
they didn't face a hard sell, either.
Voters have overwhelmingly supported the
program in two prior votes.
ELAPP has been a smart deal for
taxpayers. It allows the county to
maximize its purchasing power by
partnering with a state and even a
federal program. Over 20 years, the
program has spent about $187 million on
43,600 acres in the county, but $76
million - or 40 percent - came from
other sources.
Citizens essentially run the program.
A committee of volunteers oversees its
policies. A group with environmental
knowledge helps select sites and a group
with real estate expertise helps oversee
the negotiations. Public hearings are
held throughout what's been a
scandal-free process.
The program even helps developers,
increasing the value of surrounding
lands.
Despite its success, many significant
wilderness tracts in Hillsborough remain
threatened. The citizens' group has
identified another 44,000 acres that
should be protected.
Bean seems to want to minimize the
need to save these lands by
characterizing them as "disturbed."
Portions of some have been farmed or
ranched. But if being "disturbed" by
humans disqualifies a wilderness for
preservation, then little of Florida's
natural lands, including most of its
state parks and the Everglades, would
have been saved.
Perhaps Bean is right that with the
economy in trouble, now is not the best
time for the vote. But the poll she
squashed would have made that clear.
No poll is necessary to realize that
rapidly urbanizing Hillsborough badly
needs a land preservation program - and
a county administrator committed to its
preservation.
Approved State tax and budget
ballot proposals at a glance
WATERFRONT TAXES:
Marinas, commercial fishing facilities
and other "working waterfront"
businesses would get a property tax
break by being assessed according to
their current use rather than their
"highest and best," or potential use.
- CONSERVATION
EXEMPTION: Land held in perpetuity for
conservation purposes would be exempt
from property tax.
- CONSERVATION
ASSESSMENTS: Other conservation lands
would be taxed based on their current
use rather than their "highest and
best," or potential, use.
Everglades take a hit from GOP in
House
Published Friday, April 4, 2008 7:37
PM
Until House Republican budget writers
were handed sharp pens last month, land
preservation and Everglades cleanup
enjoyed enduring bipartisan support in
Florida. Now, as far as the House budget
is concerned, preservation is
yesterday's news.
House leaders are casting their
decision to delete the entire
$500-million allocation for Florida
Forever land-buying and Everglades
cleanup as an agonizing choice in a
difficult budget year. But state revenue
has dropped by 7 percent, not 100
percent, which suggests that
belt-tightening is not the only
motivation.
House Speaker Marco Rubio has
publicly questioned the state's role in
environmental regulation, even hinting
recently that the Department of
Environmental Protection could be
abolished. His chamber's proposed
budget, aside from the cuts to
land-buying and Everglades cleanup,
would also remove $175-million from
trust funds designed to support
environmental causes.
The Everglades portion already has
caught the attention of Congress, which
agreed in 2000 to share cleanup costs.
"Florida's congressional delegation has
been outspoken in support of ...
increased federal funding," a bipartisan
congressional group wrote to Rubio. "We
believe that if the state ... now
chooses to stop funding its share of
this historic agreement, it will
undermine the ability to secure federal
funding now and in the future."
The Senate is unlikely to agree to
the House's radical approach on the
Everglades and land conservation. But
the House Republican proposal should not
be easily forgotten. It speaks to an
ideological opportunism and an
environmental hostility that voters
might want to remember in the fall.
Orange, Seminole GOP bosses in $8M
land tussle
As the suing persists, can Orange
and Seminole chiefs unite the party?
Rene Stutzman
Sentinel Staff Writer
April 5, 2008
In a normal election year, the
Republican Party chairmen of
Orange and Seminole counties would
be working together to elect a slate
of Republican candidates.
This year, though, Orange's Lew
Oliver and Seminole's Jim Stelling
are at war in court, fighting over
an $8 million land deal that has
fallen apart.
One of Stelling's companies bought a
70-acre Oviedo plant nursery in
2006, intending to develop a housing
subdivision.
Oliver served as Stelling's lawyer
and helped put together the deal. He
also formed a partnership with other
investors and lent Stelling's
company $1.7 million, the down
payment plus closing costs,
according to court and land records.
Stelling later discovered that the
property was so tainted with arsenic
that it could not be developed.
In November, Oliver's company sued
Stelling and his development company
in circuit court in Orlando,
demanding repayment of the $1.7
million.
The case turned ugly last month.
That's when Stelling and his
company, Metro Orlando Development
Group LLC, filed court papers
accusing Oliver and his partners of
being loan sharks. The loan by TG&O
Holdings LLC, was illegal, according
to those pleadings, because it
charges more than 100 percent
interest.
That same paperwork accuses Oliver's
law firm, Granet and Oliver PLLC --
the one that handled the land
purchase -- of being sloppy. It
failed to dig up information about
how much arsenic was in the soil,
according to those pleadings.
Those allegations are false, Oliver
said, but because he's the lawyer
who helped put together the deal, he
can't talk about it. If he did, he'd
be disclosing attorney-client
secrets, he said.
"It's very awkward," Oliver said.
The important thing, he said, is
that he has done nothing wrong.
Stelling would not discuss the
dispute.
Despite the allegations, both men
say they can work together for the
GOP.
"I would say that we're good
friends," Oliver said.
Said Stelling, "Lew is a dear
friend."
Able to work together?
At a GOP gathering in Palatka three
weeks ago, Oliver voted to send
Stelling as a delegate to the GOP
National Convention in
Minneapolis-St. Paul in September.
"I take for granted that my duties
and obligations for the party, as
well as Jim's, will be unaffected,"
Oliver said.
Is it a good thing to have two
county chairmen engaged in an ugly
court fight, one accusing the other
of unethical and illegal business
practices?
"If I were a Republican inSeminole
County or
Orange County, I'd be a little
worried that the county chairs
wouldn't be able to play nice and
work together," said Aubrey Jewett,
associate professor of political
science at the
University of Central Florida.
But they may be able to, he said.
Much of the work done by county
chairmen is within the counties they
serve, he said.
State Sen.
Lee Constantine, R-
Altamonte Springs, represents a
district that includes both Orange
and Seminole counties.
"It's not unique for county party
chairmen to dislike one another," he
said. "Inside the political parties
and the political-party structure,
there's a great deal of infighting."
Still, he predicted Stelling and
Oliver, longtime political veterans,
would work hard to support GOP
nominees.
Who knew what, when?
The 70 acres at the center of the
dispute, formerly Gateway Gardens
Nursery on Oklahoma Street in
Oviedo, is vacant. Stelling's
company had planned to transform it
into Hammock Reserve, 240
single-family homes and town homes.
In June, Stelling's company sued the
seller, Charles H. Cox of
Winter Park, accusing him of
keeping secret how serious the
arsenic problem was.
Cox would not comment, but in
paperwork filed by his attorney he
alleges he provided Stelling's
company with plenty of details,
including a chart that makes clear
arsenic levels exceeded state
standards and that Stelling's
company would need to clean it up.
Last week, Stelling's company gave
up that legal fight. Its attorney,
Damon Chase, said the two sides had
settled but would not discuss their
terms. Neither would Stelling.
Still pending, though, is Cox's
counterclaim. He had lent Stelling's
company $6.5 million -- everything
but the down payment -- to finance
the land purchase, according to
county land records. In court
pleadings, Cox alleged that
Stelling's company was in default.
Cox has asked a judge to sell the
land at a public auction at theSeminole
County Courthouse. He also has
asked that Stelling's company pay
his $48,000 in attorney fees.
Stelling's partner in Metro Orlando
Development is hisSeminole
County GOP prot�g� Chris
Dorworth, 31, of Heathrow. Dorworth
was elected to the Florida House in
a special election Nov. 6.
The very next day, Oliver's holding
company filed suit, alleging that
Metro Orlando was in default of the
$1.7 million loan. The suit names
Metro Orlando as well as Stelling
and Dorworth. The two men and their
wives personally guaranteed the
loan, according to court records.
Dorworth would not answer questions
about the dispute. But by e-mail, he
said he looks "forward to the day we
are vindicated in court."
Rene Stutzman can be reached at
rstutzman@orlandosentinel.com or
407-324-7294.
3 Orlando-area lakes new
battleground in water-source
struggle
David Damron
Sentinel Staff Writer
April 5, 2008
Opening a new front
in Florida's water wars,
Orange County and
St. Cloud are
fighting with state
officials over proposals
to draw water from a
trio of lakes in the
ecologically sensitive
Kissimmee River
basin.
The lakes that the two
Central Florida
governments are seeking
to tap into help make up
the headwaters for
Florida's
Everglades. Some
environmentalists fear
that siphoning from them
might hinder billions of
dollars in
public-restoration
projects in the massive
South Florida swampland.
As a result, state water
managers refused both
requests for drawing a
combined 12 million
gallons of lake water
daily, asking each
government to wait for
studies to show it would
cause no harm.
Frustrated local leaders
say they're only
following state
directives to look to
rivers and lakes to ease
the strain on the
Floridan Aquifer.
Orange County
recently set aside a $1
million war chest to
fight the battle over
lakes Hart and Mary Jane
in southeast Orange. St.
Cloud, meanwhile, is
seeking to draw water
from East Lake
Tohopekaliga just south
of the Orange lakes.
Environmentalists say
the legal fights waste
taxpayer funds that
could be better spent on
conservation efforts and
further erode shaky
accords on regional
water sharing.
'Battle lines'
"They've chosen to draw
battle lines," said
Charles Lee,
advocacy director for
Audubon of Florida, an
environmental group.
"Their action is the
antithesis of the
cooperation we need.
They want to go to war
and spend money on
lawyers."
Lee conceded, however,
that a key problem is
the mixed signals being
sent by the state. The
St. Johns River Water
Management District
based in Palatka is more
open to drawing water
from rivers and lakes,
he said.
But the
South Florida Water
Management District
in
West Palm Beach is
taking a more cautious
approach. It's the South
Florida district that
Orange and St. Cloud are
challenging.
The fight mirrors a
dispute between Central
and Northeast Florida
over drawing water from
the north-flowing St.
Johns River.
Jacksonville and several
nearby communities are
teaming up against that
proposal, saying it
would harm the river and
its wildlife.
In the latest conflict,Orange
County wants to draw
7 million gallons a day
from canals tied to
lakes Hart and Mary Jane
in southeast Orange. It
would mainly go to
supply the Orlando
Utilities Commission
with water for its new
power-plant-cooling
tower due to open in
2010.
In refusing Orange's
permit, South Florida
district officials said
it's too soon to know
whether the drawdown
would harm the lakes and
other nearby wetlands
and water bodies. They
questioned whether
lower-quality water
sources are available,
such as treated
wastewater, to supply
the cooling tower and
for irrigation needs.
Orange Utilities
Director Mike Chandler
said that's not what the
district said just
months ago.
"You told us there's
water here," Chandler
said. "Now you're saying
there's no water."
Orange County, which
serves about 180,000
customers, is just one
of the regional
utilities that pumps
nearly a combined
half-billion gallons a
day from underground.
Looking for sources
But regulators warn that
by 2013, different
sources must be tapped.
That's why local
governments were told to
look to the Kissimmee
River basin and, to the
north, the St. Johns
River.
"This is the direction
we were pointed in,"
said Todd Swingle, St.
Cloud's utility
director.
St. Cloud wants about 5
million gallons a day
from East Lake
Tohopekaliga, mainly for
irrigation. District
officials refused the
request, and like
Orange, St. Cloud is
asking for a state
hearing to overturn the
decision.District
officials say they have
not misled local
governments about where
to get future water.
Instead, Orange and St.
Cloud, along with other
major regional
utilities, agreed last
year to work together on
future needs and wait
for research on how much
can be safely drawn from
the basin, they said.
There is a bigger
picture at stake,
district officials say.
It's vital to ensure the
Kissimmee River
Restoration Project, a
$578 million partnership
with the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers, is not
hurt by lake
withdrawals, they say.
That system flows south
to Lake Okeechobee and
on to the Everglades,
where a separate
restoration effort is
costing billions of
dollars.
"Orange
County is an entity
that seems confused"
about the process, South
Florida district
officials said in a
statement on the lake
permit.
Vote Could Change Dade
City Priorities
By
JEFF SCULLIN
The
Tampa Tribune
Published: April 5, 2008
DADE CITY - The
political mantra of
"change" is being
chanted here, of all
places, where small-town
traditions are both a
way of life and a
commodity.
Those who talk about
politics in Dade City -
and that seems to be
just about everyone
these days - are
painting Tuesday's
municipal election more
as a referendum on the
course the city should
be following than as
three separate city
commission races.
Change is inevitable
and already is under
way. The city manager
and police chief are
new, and with Mayor
Hutch Brock choosing not
to seek re-election, the
new city commission will
elect someone else to
fill that largely
ceremonial post. More
importantly, with three
of the commission's five
seats up for grabs,
there's a chance the
priorities of city
government could shift.
All this is happening
at a critical time. The
city is facing at least
a $300,000 drop in
revenue, thanks, in
part, to the tax-relief
amendment Florida voters
approved in January.
Civic leaders want to
make sure recent
vacancies downtown don't
sap Dade City's strength
as a tourist draw, and
the city's wish list -
including a new city
hall and upgrades to an
aging utilities system -
is growing.
"Our city is at a
crossroads,"
Commissioner Steve Van
Gorden, one of two
incumbents on the
ballot, said during a
candidates forum last
month.
Van Gorden, 32, cites
his experience as a
school administrator and
on the commission in
dealing with an
increasingly tight
budget, which most
candidates say is the
biggest challenge facing
the commission. Van
Gorden is principal of
Hudson Middle School and
was elected to the
commission in 2004.
To balance the
budget, the city may
need to reorganize
operations, and some
workers may need to take
on additional
responsibilities, Van
Gorden said.
His opponent,
53-year-old Robert
Avila, a technology
service specialist with
Ricoh Corp., has yet to
publicly discuss his
ideas for dealing with
the fiscal problems the
city faces. He skipped
last month's candidates
forum and has not
responded to numerous
phone calls and e-mail
messages. In a news
release, Avila said his
focus is the "proper
spending of citizens'
tax dollars" and fiscal
responsibility. In part,
that means cutting back
on the "excessive" use
of consultants and
making sure the city
properly evaluates
property purchases,
according to his
release.
The other incumbent
up for election, Eunice
Penix, 67, faces an
opponent for the first
time after 14 years on
the commission. Like Van
Gorden, the retired
teacher said the
commission needs input
from residents to set
spending priorities.
With so many people
financially strapped,
the city needs to look
beyond taxpayers to fund
needed improvements,
such as recreation
facilities for youths.
Maybe local
philanthropists will get
together, donate land
and build it themselves,
she suggested at the
candidates forum. And
although Penix conceded
that Dade City's dirt
roads ought to be paved,
she said not everyone
wants to pay the
assessments to make that
happen.
"We can't tax, tax,
tax the citizens for
everything," she said.
"Citizens are already
taxed enough."
Her opponent, Osceola
Tavern owner Mike
Agnello, has stressed
fiscal responsibility,
despite running into
trouble last year for
not paying sales and
property taxes.
Commissioners need to
learn to live within
their means and to
"stretch a nickel" -
applying for federal
grants, for example,
that could pay to build
sidewalks and exploring
the possibility of
upgrading dirt roads
with gravel or lobbying
the county for more
tourist tax dollars.
On his Web site,
Agnello, 47, even
advocates renovating the
existing City Hall
rather than building a
new one as a cheaper
alternative.
"The first step is a
coat of paint," he says
on his Web site. "That
one initiative would do
wonders for the place."
The race to fill
Brock's seat pits local
businessman Curtis
Beebe, who led the
effort to recall
Commissioner Camille
Hernandez, against Jim
Shive, who ran
Hernandez's campaign in
2006.
In his campaign,
Beebe, a technology
consultant, has stressed
the need for the city to
live within in its means
and to involve residents
in setting priorities.
The city needs to do a
better job of educating
people about the issues
- maybe by improving its
Web site so people could
track matters from start
to finish, maybe by
changing the meeting
times so more working
people could attend,
maybe by sending out
mass e-mail messages
about important matters.
"We're going to have
to redefine the role of
city government if we
are going to live within
these constraints,"
Beebe, 45, said in an
e-mail. "I believe the
first step to addressing
the issue is to involve
more of the public, so
we have a clear
understanding of
priorities."
Shive, 50, a
utilities worker who was
fired in 2005 after 27
years with the city, has
made upgrading the
city's utilities, and
stormwater and drainage
systems, a focal point
of his campaign. In a
recent interview, Shive
also said the city needs
a full-time grant
writer, needs to spend
less on consultants and
must provide incentives
for businesses to move
here.
"This is a critical
time for the city," he
said.
Although Hernandez's
name won't appear on the
ballot Tuesday, she has
been a major factor in
the campaign. Candidates
fielded questions at
last month's forum about
how they would work with
Hernandez and try to
unify the commission.
Things have been
contentious since
Hernandez sent a letter
to Gov. Charlie Crist in
July accusing Brock and
former City Manager
Harold Sample of
corruption. That sparked
the recall effort Beebe
spearheaded.
That contentious
spirit has carried over
into the campaign, in
which candidates have
been dogged by
misinformation and
smeared by anonymous
fliers.
With so much at stake
for Dade City, though,
several candidates say
it's time to work
together.
"We need to have
unity in this town," Van
Gorden said at the
forum. "No matter who
wins this election, we
need to have unity."
THE CANDIDATES
Curtis Beebe
AGE: 45
FAMILY: Married,
three sons
EDUCATION:
Bachelor's degree,
University of West
Florida
OCCUPATION:
Technology consultant
RELATED EXPERIENCE:
Served on
planning commission and
the code development
review board; led the
recall effort against
City Commissioner
Camille Hernandez.
Jim Shive
AGE: 50
FAMILY:
Information unavailable
EDUCATION: Pasco
High School
OCCUPATION:
Utility Plan operator,
Hernando County
RELATED EXPERIENCE:
Spent 27 years
working for the city;
worked on the campaigns
of Hernandez,
Commissioner Steve Van
Gorden and Mayor Hutch
Brock.
Eunice Penix
AGE: 67
FAMILY:
Information unavailable
EDUCATION:
Information unavailable
OCCUPATION:
Retired teacher
RELATED EXPERIENCE:
Has served on
city commission since
1993.
Mike Agnello
AGE: 47
FAMILY: Married,
four children
EDUCATION:
Bachelor's degree,
Almeda University
OCCUPATION: Owner
of Osceola Tavern
RELATED EXPERIENCE:
Ran
unsuccessfully for city
commission in 2006;
member of the Dade City
Redevelopment Advisory
Committee and the Dade
City Charter Review
Committee.
Steve Van Gorden
AGE: 32
FAMILY: Married,
two children
EDUCATION:
Bachelor's degree,
University of South
Florida; master's
degree, Saint Leo
University
OCCUPATION:
Middle school principal
RELATED EXPERIENCE:
Elected to the
city commission in 2004.
Robert Avila
AGE: 53
FAMILY:
Information unavailable
EDUCATION:
Pasadena Community
College
OCCUPATION:
Technology service
specialist, Ricoh Corp.
RELATED EXPERIENCE:
None
Editor
Jeff Scullin can be
reached at (813)
779-4614 or
jscullin@tampatrib.com.
|
Fish
Beckon
Blacksmith
By
GEORGE
WILKENS
The
Tampa
Tribune
Published:
April 4,
2008
LAND
O' LAKES
- It's a
couple
of hours
past
sunrise,
and Dirk
Braak is
holding
court
beneath
the
trees at
a
community
stable
in Land
O'
Lakes.
A
lifelong
farrier
as adept
at
entertaining
customers
as he is
at
handling
half-ton
horses,
Braak is
shoeing
one last
animal
before
hanging
up his
apron
for
good.
The
self-employed
68-year-old
Plant
City
resident
could
call it
quits
whenever
he
wants,
but has
targeted
a
specific
date for
his
unceremonious
retirement.
"Yes
sir, I'm
done
April 8,
that's
40 years
to the
day that
I
graduated
from
horseshoe
school,"
said the
certified
journeyman
farrier
and
founding
president
of the
Florida
State
Farriers
Association.
Braak
pilots
his Ford
F-250
pickup
on a
circuit
covering
Hillsborough,
half of
Polk and
some of
Pasco
counties,
a
schedule
allowing
him to
visit
each
customer
every
six
weeks.
This
morning,
at Lake
Padgett
Estate's
community
stable,
Braak
amuses
the
crowd of
four
waiting
for
horses
to be
shoed or
have
hooves
trimmed.
"You can
discuss
politics
and
religion
because
you've
got a
captive
audience,"
Braak
quips.
He
touches
on those
two
traditionally
taboo
topics,
tells
some "of
my
daddy's
favorite
jokes"
and
offers
humorous
commentary
on
life's
little
problems,
like
traffic,
which is
why he
quit
serving
Pinellas
County.
It's
a sore
subject
in Pasco
County,
but
Braak
manages
to get
today's
group to
laugh
when he
announces
he
discovered
why
highway
construction
on State
Road 54
near
Interstate
75 is
moving
so
slowly:
"They've
pushed
all the
dirt
around
so much
they've
worn it
out -
and
they're
waiting
for a
new
shipment
to come
in."
Since
early
1975,
Lake
Padgett
has been
on
Braak's
route,
so he
serves a
stable
of
longtime
regulars.
"Dirk
always
has some
political
commentary
when he
comes,"
said
Cherie
Cunningham
as Braak
nailed a
shoe
onto
William,
a
quarter
horse
she has
owned
for five
years.
"And he
always
brings
jokes.
It's
never
boring,"
said
Cunningham,
a
retired
Hillsborough
County
schools
media
specialist.
Braak,
she
adds,
"is a
high-tech
farrier,
always
telling
me what
I should
check
out on
the
Internet."
He is a
wealth
of
information
about
all
things
equine,
right
down to
the
horse's
skeletal
system.
"He's
very
well
educated
in that;
he's no
country
bumpkin,"
said
Cunningham,
a
two-horse
owner
and
customer
since
moving
to Lake
Padgett
in 1981.
Braak
also
knows
the
horses'
names -
and
ailments.
"William
has had
a leg
injury
and is a
little
bit
contrary
about
his back
feet,"
Braak
explains
as he
gingerly
coaxes
the
15-year-old
former
cutting
horse to
raise
its
right
rear
hoof.
"Give me
your
foot,"
Braak
says
with
some
tenderness
in his
voice.
"You can
pick it
up this
high, I
promise."
Braak
learned
his
trade at
a
farrier
school
in
Martinsville,
Va. "I
wanted
to be a
farrier
real
bad" but
could
not
afford
the
dormitory,
he said.
He made
arrangements
to use
the dorm
bathroom
and, for
three
months,
slept in
the
topper-covered
bed of
his
pickup.
Interest
in the
ancient
trade
was
sparked
by the
findings
of a
two-day
battery
of tests
administered
in high
school
to
determine
Braak's
occupational
leanings.
"It came
out I
liked
work of
a
mechanical
nature
and
liked
working
outdoors,"
he said.
After
serving
in the
Navy, he
returned
to the
family
farm
near
Wilmington,
N.C.,
began
working
with
ponies
and
horses,
training
them,
opening
a
boarding
stable,
selling
tack and
feed.
"It
kind of
mushroomed
from
there,"
he said.
He chose
the
farrier
school
because
the
$1,200
tuition
was
almost
affordable.
He
laments
that
today's
farrier
education
methods
emphasize
speed
more
than
quality
work.
Although
Great
Britain
has a
five-year
farrier
apprentice
program,
"In
north
Georgia
you can
go take
a
two-week
course
and call
yourself
a
farrier."
Hold
Your
Horses
Braak's
four
decades
of
experience
have
spawned
a
farrier
creed,
of
sorts:
"You
have to
be a
self-starter."
"You
have to
have the
ability
to get
along
with the
horse,
and the
customer."
Be
courteous
to the
customer.
"Arrive
10
minutes
early so
you're
ready to
go" at
the
scheduled
time of
the
appointment.
Buy
quality
tools,
maintain
them
between
jobs
"and it
will
make
your job
a lot
easier."
"Sometimes
the
customer
has to
hold the
horse's
head
while
you
work, so
you've
got to
have a
good
line of
bull" to
entertain
them.
Like
any
other
business
that
endures,
Braak's
has seen
many
changes.
Rarely
does the
self-proclaimed
"simple
blacksmith"
need to
fire up
the
small
forge he
still
carries,
as
customized
horseshoes
are
mostly a
thing of
the
past.
"You
can go
to a
shoe
store
for
horses"
to find
virtually
every
size and
type
needed
for $20
to $35 a
pair, he
said.
In
earlier
days,
Braak
burned
coal in
his
forge,
an
understandably
hard-to-find
fuel in
Florida.
He
recalls
his
initial
search
for coal
when he
came to
the
Tampa
Bay area
in 1975.
In the
Yellow
Pages he
found a
Tampa
Coal Co.
listing
and
drove to
the
company's
downtown
office.
"Some
what?"
asked an
incredulous
employee.
"We
don't
sell
coal
here,"
only
gravel
and
decorative
rock for
the past
25
years,
Braak
was
informed.
"I guess
they ran
out by
the time
I got
there,"
Braak
said.
Braak
found a
source
in
Jacksonville
and
another
in
Marietta,
Ga. He
suspects
the
Georgia
mine
owner
sold
"bootleg
coal"
from an
operation
closed
by
federal
authorities.
Today's
forge is
propane
powered.
Birth
Of An
Association
Informal
regular
meetings
with two
other
Tampa
Bay area
farriers
led to
Braak
organizing
the
first
statewide
meeting
of what
became,
in 1976,
the
Florida
State
Farriers
Association.
Braak
served
eight
years as
president
and
remains
a member
of what
he said
has
become a
very
successful
nonprofit
group (www.FloridaStateFarriers.com).
Fellow
members
may be
interested
in
Braak's
farrier
tools,
some of
which he
says
have
antique
value. A
tool
sale is
planned
after
retirement.
"There's
some
fishing
in my
future,"
said
Braak,
who
makes
his own
rods.
"I've
got a
nice
boat I'm
going to
start
rigging
out to
go
fishing,"
starting
with a
vacation
at a
rented
waterfront
house in
Hernando
Beach.
He
and his
wife of
31
years,
Lee, a
designer
of
costumes
for
dancers,
live in
an
A-frame
the
couple
built in
1977 on
10 acres
off
Bruton
Road
north of
Plant
City.
Gardening
on the
property
will
absorb
some of
Braak's
time
during
his
fast-approaching
retirement.
For
now,
there
are
still a
few
horses
to be
tended
to.
After
affixing
"the
last
shoe of
my life"
to
Cunningham's
horse,
Braak
stops to
rest,
and
offers
his Lake
Padgett
customers
a final
quip:
"You
know,
it's
unprofessional,
but I'm
starting
to sweat
a bit."
Reporter
George
Wilkens
can be
reached
at (813)
865-4433
or
gwilkens@tampatrib.com.
Keyword:
Farrier,
to
listen
and
watch
Dirk
Braak at
work
with
horses
in Land
O'
Lakes.
|
Lakewood Ranch
envisions new 'heart'
Published Friday,
April 4, 2008 at
4:30 a.m.
MANATEE COUNTY —
Glenda Robertson, like
many Lakewood Ranch
residents, heads to
Sarasota and sometimes
Tampa when making her
big shopping runs.
She and other
residents here have
little choice. Lakewood
Ranch's current
commercial centers, such
as Main Street and San
Marco Plaza, offer
mainly boutique stores
and some upscale dining.
But in the coming
years Lakewood Ranch
plans to triple its
retail offerings by
building Lakewood Centre
-- billed as the
community's future
"downtown" -- located on
a 700-acre site at State
Road 70 and Lakewood
Ranch Boulevard.
Current plans call
for nearly 1.8 million
square feet of retail,
1.5 million square feet
of office space, 3,675
homes, 300 hotel rooms
and a 4.3-acre park.
Roughly 400 homes
will be priced as work
force housing.
Robertson, for one,
is all for the project.
"As the county grows,
I think we need to grow
with those needs," said
Robertson, who lives in
the Country Club
Village subdivision.
Schroeder-Manatee
Ranch, the developer of
Lakewood Ranch, gave its
first project pitch to
county commissioners on
Thursday. But the main
event will not come
until August, when
commissioners formally
consider the plan.
Lakewood Centre would
be the commercial
centerpiece of SMR's
planned development of
its now-vacant land
north of S.R. 70.
Todd Pokrywa, SMR's
vice president of
planning, predicted it
would eventually become
"the very heart of the
Lakewood Ranch community
and the
surrounding community."
Currently, all of
Lakewood Ranch has about
2 million square feet of
office space and 600,000
square feet of retail.
Unlike the specialty
shops currently
dominating the retail
scene, Lakewood Centre
will likely offer more
standard shopping fare:
big-box retailers and
other chain businesses,
according to SMR.
SMR has long planned
for extensive commercial
development in the area
once it became
economically feasible.
Despite the current
down market, SMR
planners now believe
that time is
approaching. The
master-planned community
currently has an
estimated population of
14,000 and is now
largely built out
between Interstate 75,
University Parkway,
Lorraine Road and
S.R. 70.
Another 8,000 homes
are planned for the
surrounding area.
The largest piece of
that is the 4,400-home
"Northwest Sector,"
development, which
commissioners approved
in November.
Lakewood Centre would
include an already
approved
60,000-square-foot
bowling complex near the
northeast corner of
Lakewood Ranch Boulevard
and S.R. 70.
The site of a stalled
hockey arena sits in the
middle of the property.
Though work on it
stopped in early 2005,
Schroeder-Manatee has
vowed to eventually
complete the
sports venue.
High Springs gives
least-intensive form of
commercial zoning to
lots near Winn-Dixie
By Michelle Stuckey
For The Herald
HIGH SPRINGS -- Ron
Dickson does not want a
gas station in his
backyard.
He does not want a car
dealership or a factory,
either.
Dickson and other
residents of the River
Run neighborhood spoke
out against large-scale
businesses near their
homes at the most recent
High Springs City
Commission meeting.
After hearing from the
residents, the
Commission passed an
ordinance allowing only
single- and
multiple-family homes,
offices, and other small
businesses to be built
on the empty lots across
U.S. 441 from Winn Dixie
in High Springs.
The city originally
recommended that intense
commercial activity be
allowed on the empty
lots that border the
River Run neighborhood.
During the discussion
about the project, Vice
Mayor Jim Gabriel said
that he would like to
see less intense
development there, but
he worried about what
the decision would mean
for the future.
“My only concern is that
a lot of times a really
good thing falls in your
lap and you find
yourself up against a
code,” Gabriel said.
Many residents asked if
the property, which
borders U.S. 441, had to
be commercial at all.
The homeowners of River
Run signed a petition
against heavy commercial
activity on the lots,
according to Todd
Treiber, River Run
Homeowners Association
president.
“Any kind of commercial
activity would be
detrimental to the
family environment,”
Dickson said.
Mayor Larry Travis said
that the decision to
change the lots from
agricultural to
commercial use was made
last year and could not
be easily changed.
“This is in the backyard
of people living there;
there is nothing between
that property and our
neighborhood,” Treiber
said. “It is our
preference to keep it
residential.”
According to the High
Springs land development
code, buffers are
required between
residential and
commercial lots.
“I think the people who
bought houses in (River
Run) bought with the
understanding that the
land around it would be
residential,” said Peter
Werner, a River Run
resident. “I know I
did.”
One of the lots being
rezoned is owned by Ford
Brewer, who said he
plans to make his 2.57
acres of land part of
Heritage Heights, a
planned townhouse-type
neighborhood.
Robert’s Land and Timber
owns the other lot.
Jeremy Miller, a
representative for the
company, said that he
would be happy with
residential zoning.
“We built River Run and
sold every lot,” Miller
said. “We take quite a
bit of pride in that.”
While the owners had
some ideas of what they
want to build on the
properties, the type of
zoning was ultimately up
to the Commission.
“This is our opportunity
to really shape what we
want to have happen on
this property,”
Commissioner Kirk
Eppenstein said.
This was the first of
two meetings to be held
about the zoning
designation of the lots.
Toward the end of the
meeting, one River Run
resident, Scott Jamison,
questioned whether the
Commission cared more
about tax dollars or
community environment.
“Talk is cheap,” Jamison
said. “How you vote is
your message to the
city.”
Both lots were
unanimously passed as
residential and small
business zones.
|
Is the 'green mansion' a
contradiction?
Published Saturday,
April 5, 2008 at 6:37
a.m.
Can a 14,000-square-foot
house really be green?
That's what one colleague
asked me, in no uncertain
terms, after last Sunday's
story, "Green Giant," about
the mansion that developer
Peter Laughlin built on
speculation on Sarasota Bay.
Actually, the house is
more like 7,500 square feet.
The ground floor is below
FEMA flood elevation, so it
doesn't count as
air-conditioned square
footage, although it does
boost the under-roof figure.
Still, my colleague
pointed out, it's one big
honking house, and unless a
platoon or a really large
family will be taking up
residence, just how green
can it possibly be?
I tried to explain that
it would not be economically
feasible to build a
2,000-square-foot house --
the size limit for receiving
points toward a
green-building certification
-- on a bayfront lot that is
worth $2 million. You'd have
to spend $1,000 a square
foot on the construction
just to bring the finished
property to a 50-50 ratio
between land value and
improvement value -- and
such properties are
difficult to sell,
especially on the water.
Small houses on the bay are
considered tear-downs.
Mansions are the order of
the day on the water, and
this one is priced at
$9,950,000 by Laughlin's
Luxury Lifestyles.
It may be really big for
two people, but at least it
has some legitimately green
features, such as spray-foam
insulation in the attic,
low-flow plumbing fixtures
and xeriscaping.
So the embarrassment of
space aside, that is better
than not being green at all.
"I believe the very first
step in building a green
home is to build it just the
right size for the way you
want to live," writes Sarah
Susanka in the foreword to a
new guidebook called "Green
Building Products" (New
Society Publishers, 2008,
$37.95). Susanka is the
architect who became
prominent in the
green-building industry
through her series of "Not
So Big" books, including
"The Not So Big House."
And people who live on
the bay or Gulf want to
live big.
Laughlin envisions the
house as ideal for one
well-known female athlete,
who currently has lots of
money but no husband or
children. Would such a buyer
need 7,500 square feet?
"It's a legitimate
question, but it's also a
matter of personal choice,
and that's why we live
here," said Debbie Smith,
whose company, Two Trails
Inc., advises builders on
green-building issues and
certifies structures
as green.
"Green is not a matter of
how big the house is.
Everyone wants to do their
part to save money and help
the environment. Our
philosphy is, we don't care
how big the house is -- we
can help them.
"If you're going to build
the house anyway, I want the
house to be as
energy-efficient
as possible."
Grading the waters
County's report card
is a plus for policymakers
and the public
Published Friday, April
4, 2008 at 4:30 a.m.
Sarasota County residents
soon will receive a report
card providing more
information and a wider
perspective on the health of
local waters.
The county already
deserves an "A" for effort
and attitude, no matter what
grade its watersheds earn.
Up to now, there has been
no clear way to measure the
overall health of Sarasota
Bay, Little Sarasota Bay,
Lemon Bay, Roberts Bay and
Dona Bay, or of the
wetlands, rivers and creeks
that feed into the bays.
Policymakers are
entangled in largely
unconnected statistics
compiled through a
good-faith effort to comply
with the federal Clean
Water Act.
The federal law has
achieved much to improve and
protect the nation's waters,
but regulators, policymakers
and the public often lack a
solid, broad measurement of
the impacts on
water quality.
Sarasota County is about
to put together a report
card based on a design by
William C. Dennison, a
professor and research
administrator at the Center
for Environmental Science at
the University of Maryland.
Dennison designed a
report card for the federal
Chesapeake Bay Program that
provides an annual
assessment. It is based on
13 indicators that show
whether progress has been
made toward goals set after
the previous report card.
With the information,
policymakers can prioritize
and choose which problems to
try to solve.
The Chesapeake Program's
second report card was
released Thursday, showing
that the bay's health, while
a little better than in
2006, is still far
from acceptable.
Sarasota County officials
are smart to shift to the
same sort of comprehensive
assessment. The holistic
philosophy and approach
should lead county officials
to cast a wide net when
looking for indicators of
environmental health.
For example:
The federal Sarasota Bay
Estuary Program has data
dating to the mid-1990s on
conditions in the bay and
surrounding waterways.
Measurements taken in
Manatee and Charlotte
counties and in other
communities in the region
could be useful.
Mote Marine Laboratory's
research on marine life such
as sea turtles, sharks and
red tide can indicate
environmental health issues
linked to waterways and
land-based activities.
The county also has
access to environmental data
compiled by the group
Sarasota County Openly Plans
for Excellence as part of
its Community Report Card.
Audubon Society members
conduct an annual bird count
-- another way of measuring
environmental health.
From this range of
information, Sarasota County
s can come up with an
easy-to-read report card
that will let policymakers
and the public know how
local waters are doing and
how to help them improve.
That's progress.
Liquid assets – that
aren’t
Published
April 4th, 2008
By John Johnston
Managing Editor
Commissioner Karen Marcus
looked quizzically at South
Florida Water Management
District (SFWMD) Service
Center Manager Fred Rapach.
Echoing the sentiments of
much “email,” Marcus asked
rhetorically:
“We’re in a drought, but
flushing water (out to the
Atlantic), and now I’m
paying more,” she queried?
Rapach said nothing, but
shrugged agreement.
The dialogue came during
consideration Tuesday by
Palm Beach County
commissioners of a 15
percent surcharge on current
water users – about 40,000
of whom live in western Boca
Raton and western Delray
Beach. The surcharge
would total a little more
than $5 per month for the
average customer.
Those same water users
are using less water, owing
to usage restrictions
imposed by the South Florida
Water Management District
(SFWMD) in March 2007.
Which leads back to the
rate increase. Because
the rate structure is based
on the presumption of
selling a certain amount of
water – and because those
sales are now down owing to
the SFWMD restrictions, “we
cannot maintain our assets
in a proper fashion, nor
continue to provide safe
water,” County Water Manager
Bevin Beaudet told
commissioners.
The county's utility has
lost more than $6 million
since SFWMD restrictions
were approved. Water
officials have estimated the
county could lose an
additional $8 million if
one-day-a-week restrictions
continue for a full year.
And County Administrator
Bob Weisman believes the
restrictions are going to
become “permanent.”
Rapach didn’t disagree.
“Silly”
At the same time, and
even though the SFWMD
continues to complain about
the level at Lake
Okeechobee, the county has
more than enough water to
serve its customers, said
Beaudet.
Bringing the matter full
circle finds the same water
users who are using less --
and who are about to be
charged more -- must also
watch as billions of gallons
of water are sent out to
sea, arguably to prevent
flooding.
The entire scenario “is
silly,” says Commissioner
Robert Kanjian – and in the
best tradition of
politics-makes-for-strange
bedfellows, picked up
agreement from Commissioner
Marcus.
Charging more money for
using less water boils (no
pun intended) down to the
reality that the county has
fixed costs associated with
debt service, operating and
maintaining its
infrastructure –and a
surcharge needed to offset
reduced water sales.
Pressed by Commissioner
Mary McCarty to “make it
clear” that the 15 percent
surcharge was a one-year
fix, Beaudet said his
department would submit a
new rate structure in 2009,
one that would be based on
infrastructure cost needs,
not based on usage.
“Studying It”
And despite calls from
Commissioners Marcus,
McCarty, and Burt Aaronson
for a more definitive plan
to reduce and eventually
eliminate shipping billions
of gallons out to sea --
while at the same time
proclaiming a drought and
imposing usage restrictions
-- no one offered any
solutions.
The SFWMD is “in a
quandary – we have no place
to store that water,” Rapach
said.
“We’re studying it,” he
added.
What was approved Tuesday
was an April 15 public
hearing at which citizens
will have an opportunity to
persuade commissioners to
reduce or block the proposed
15 percent surcharge. The
hearing will be at the
Governmental Center, 301
North Olive Street, West
Palm Beach; 6th floor, at
9:30 a.m.
Builders, citizens challenge Clay fee
By BETH
REESE CRAVEY,
The Times Union
The Northeast Florida
Builders Association and a
group of area landowners
have filed a court challenge
to the Clay County road
impact fee, created to help
pay for an estimated $450
million in road improvements
needed by 2020.
On Friday, the builders
and landowners filed a
Circuit Court lawsuit to
overturn the fee, which is
scheduled to take effect in
January.
They say the fee is a
land development regulation,
which state law requires be
reviewed by the county
Planning Commission, an
advisory board. However,
that review did not occur;
county officials insist the
fee is not a land
development regulation.
"We don't think procedure
was followed correctly,"
said association president
Mark Downing. "Just because
we don't like it [the fee]
doesn't mean it's not going
to happen. But there is a
process that should be
followed."
The fee, approved by the
county in February, would be
imposed on new development.
The amount would vary,
depending on the type and
location of the development.
Single-family residential
fees will range from $4,341
in the southwest part of
Clay County to $5,814 in the
northeast. Fees vary widely
for different
non-residential projects,
including industrial,
warehouse, retail,
restaurants, golf courses,
schools, hospitals, marinas
and movie theaters.
Also, the builders and
landowners intend to seek a
state administrative hearing
on conflicts between the
ordinance and the county's
comprehensive land use plan,
according to documents filed
with the county by their
attorney, T.R. Hainline.
When the fee was
approved, county officials
said the ordinance
acknowledged the conflicts
and delayed implementation
to give staff time to
resolve those issues.
County Commission Vice
Chairman Rob Bradley said
Friday that the challenges
were to protect the
builders' and developers'
interests in case the
conflicts were not resolved
by the time the fee takes
affect.
"I don't see this as
ending up in a big court
battle," he said.
The full commission may
discuss the challenges
Tuesday.
The developers joining
the association challenges
are AY Ventures, Creek Farms
Corp., Brannan Field
Properties Ltd., Peter D.
Bailet, William R. Blackard
Jr., Bradley Creek Trust, ZZ
Studios Inc., Delta Shamrock
Farms Inc. and Wisteria
Gardens Dairy Ltd.,
according to Hainline's
documents.
beth.cravey@jacksonville.com,
(904) 278-9487
|
|
| |
|
Downtown street project riles Dade City residents
By
Helen Anne Travis, Times Staff Writer
Published Thursday, April 3, 2008 8:47 PM
DADE CITY — Don't mess with Dade City's parking.
That was the overwhelming message of a disorganized
and confrontational meeting Thursday evening regarding
upcoming construction on a main city thoroughfare.
April 21, the Florida Department of Transportation
will begin a six-month makeover of Meridian Avenue, the
portion of State Road 52 that runs through downtown.
Plans call for a new bike lane and multiuse path along
sections of the road. But to accommodate these
pedestrian-friendly components, the FDOT wants to switch
some of the city's street parking from angular to
parallel, knocking out 17 spots in a downtown cramped
for parking spaces.
"Parking is already a huge issue for our town and
this is going to make it worse," said Allison Todd,
owner of the downtown cafe, the Coffee Mug.
Todd's thoughts were echoed by about 30 angry
residents and merchants who attended Thursday's meeting.
They yelled at FDOT officials, saying that the reduced
parking would mean fewer customers and visitors to the
town's antique shops and restaurants. They painted
pictures of bikers crashing into walking tourists.
City officials had to shush the crowd several times.
What's unclear is whether the shouts and tirades will
have any effect onFDOT's plans.
Florida leads the country in pedestrian fatalities,
according to FDOT. All of the agency's projects now
include accommodations for bikers and walkers.
Shopkeepers wanted to know how many of those
fatalities occurred in downtown Dade City and whether
there were other roads in town that could be fitted for
pedestrians and bike riders.
FDOT officials passed out comment sheets at the
meeting and said they would consider all suggestions.
The city plans to meet with FDOT to appeal the bike lane
so the current angular parking can stay.
Construction begins in less than three weeks, but
FDOT officials said the parking matter can be addressed
later in the project.
Helen Anne Travis can be reached at
htravis@sptimes.com or (352) 521-6518.
Bill undermines state growth laws
Published Wednesday, April 2, 2008 7:11 PM
The duplicity is too rich not to observe with some awe. ¶
After all, the Florida Legislature doesn't trust mayors and
city commissions with their own tax dollars, thinks county
property appraisers need to prove the validity of their
assessments and could care less whether a school principal
deems certain teachers worthy of extra pay. So when a House
council considers writing into law that city and county
officials should be "presumed to be correct," one has to
wonder what has left legislators so smitten.
The answer is as obvious as the bulldozers and
construction cranes that dot the local landscape:
developers.
That's right. In a bill being offered by the House
Economic Expansion and Infrastructure Council, lawmakers
would turn the 1985 Growth Management Act upside down. The
reason the law exists is because cities and counties were
giving green lights to almost every developer who wanted to
build condo towers or shopping strips. That's why the state
is required to make sure that new developments are
consistent with city, county and state plans.
The council's bill, though, actually says that "the local
government's determination that the plan amendment is in
compliance is presumed to be correct." In other words,
neither the state nor the local citizens need bother to
challenge the developer. As state Department of Community
Affairs secretary Thomas Pelham puts it: "That's a virtually
impossible standard for us to meet."
The House Economic Council is led by Winter Park attorney
Dean Cannon, who is in line to become speaker in 2010. As
such, this bill is tied to the House leadership, and it
represents a frontal assault on growth management.
Aside from the presumption of correctness, the bill also
would: loosen standards for intensive development on
existing rural lands, weaken requirements to upgrade
overburdened roads before allowing new construction, and
give cities and counties three more years to prove their
development plans are financially feasible.
Pelham was among the last to see the draft of the House
bill, and his attempt to create a citizen planning bill of
rights is uniformly ignored. So is his approach to
protecting the Everglades and making smarter development
decisions in coastal high hazard areas.
A bill that so radically undermines state growth laws is
not likely to pass through the Senate and certainly would
deserve a veto if it did. But citizens who are fed up with
overburdened highways and water restrictions may want to pay
close attention to Cannon's bill. Those in the House who
would vote in favor are placing the desires of developers
above the needs of their constituents.
Permit Issues Halt Work On Cypress Creek Mall
By KEVIN WIATROWSKI
The Tampa Tribune
Published: April 3, 2008
WESLEY CHAPEL - The developers of Cypress Creek Town
Center have stopped construction of their regional mall
until they can resolve permitting issues with federal
regulators.
"The only construction going on today is site
stabilization," said Deanne Roberts, spokeswoman of
Cleveland-based Richard E. Jacobs Group.
"We're preparing the site for the rainy season,"
Roberts said.
Crews spent Wednesday sowing grass seed and taking
other measures to prevent erosion over the coming
months, Roberts said.
Roberts also said that it is unclear when work on the
mall will restart.
"We don't have a time element," she said. "We know
we're not going to be opening in October."
Jacobs told commercial real estate brokers two weeks
ago it was stopping work on the mall until it can
resolve the drainage problems that flooded Cypress Creek
with mud in January, said Michelle Seifert, an associate
vice president at Grubb & Ellis/Commercial Florida.
Seifert represents several retailers that have signed
on to the Jacobs project.
She declined to name her clients, but said that the
ongoing delays are causing problems for at least one of
her smaller clients.
"The major tenants out there will probably not be
open before this holiday season," Seifert said.
Seifert said she doesn't expect the mall won't be up
and running in full until late 2009 at the current pace
of work.
"It could be a blessing in disguise," Seifert said of
the delay. "It will give them time to attract more
tenants."
|