Sorry, I have had to take a mental health break for a couple of days. The same issues are raised and debated all over this state but nobody seems to learn anything. I hope Tom Pelham means what he says and does what he says he is going to do.

will add more news tonight 08/01/07

Developing a middle ground

By A TIMES EDITORIAL
Published August 1, 2007

Before Hometown Democracy becomes the next full-assault ballot-box war in Florida, the state's development watchdog deserves to be heard. Tom Pelham, secretary of the Department of Community Affairs, is calling for a reasonable middle ground on managing growth, and he brings undeniable credibility to the debate.

The pitch by Pelham is that somewhere between the extremes of development-by-referendum and development-by-bureaucratic-wink-and-nod lies a solution that may help guide Florida's growth. He's on the right track as he recognizes the complaints without embracing the extreme response.

"If you follow the movement, you see that the heart of their complaint is that local governments amend their comprehensive plans too frequently," Pelham told the Times editorial board last week. "In my view, their solution is an extreme, draconian approach that would create very real problems. But we cannot ignore what's driving this. Plan amendments should be rare, not willy-nilly."

Pelham's credentials are relevant here. He served as DCA secretary in the late 1980s, at a time when growth-management laws were first being enacted. He was so vigorous in rejecting overly permissive city and county growth plans that he achieved folk-hero status among environmentalists and land planners.

Upon returning to the DCA in January as an appointee of Gov. Charlie Crist, Pelham has shown no signs of letting up. Already, he is challenging rural "stewardship" plans that could create new cities, questioning transportation formulas that lead to more urban sprawl and restoring a sense of professionalism to an agency that had become the developers' lapdog.

Pelham: "Saying no is not easy, but we think it's important for the credibility of the agency for it to begin to assert itself again."

The lack of such state oversight, arguably, has helped stoke the Hometown Democracy movement. But the group's solution is to require voter approval for any change to a local growth plan, which is simply unworkable. Predictably, business and development interests are fighting back, with one recent plea for donations invoking the specter of "utter devastation." Consultants are predicting a war chest in the order of $65-million if the initiative makes it to the ballot.

The problem, politically, is that no one is venturing to step into the cross-fire. Few in government have been willing to even acknowledge the problem.

Now, each city and county is required to guide development through a "comprehensive plan." Those plans, which were subjected to exhaustive local and state review, were designed to serve as a blue-print but have been treated like a rough draft. If a contractor wants to build a high-rise condo in a place reserved for small farms, no problem. The city council or county commission just changes the plan.

Pelham says he wants to stop unwarranted plan amendments and require that the blueprints be changed only sparingly. He also says he is willing to consider whether certain types of amendments should be subjected to a local referendum.

The question now is whether the combatants on the two sides of this age-old development struggle are willing to lay down their arms.

The fight already has twisted the state Constitution, with business interests having persuaded voters last year to increase the threshold for approval of new constitutional amendments to 60 percent of the vote instead of a simple majority. The builders may be able to defeat Hometown Democracy, but the people who are fed up with overcrowded highways and overflowing landfills will not quit trying.

Campaign combat only polarizes this debate, and Pelham is offering a promising alternative. Restore the intent of growth laws so ballot fights are no longer necessary.

Abuse of the rural preservation laws are a problem, but I think the Times hit the nail on the head; If changes to comprehensive plans were not commonplace, if they were fewer and father between and required a compelling reason to achieve, growing numbers of Floridians would not be so distrustful of the system that they feel like they have to take matters into their own hands via the Florida Hometown Democracy Amendment.

Abuse Of Rural-Preservation Law Pushes Voters To Radical Remedy

Published: August 1, 2007

To understand the public frustration over how Florida's developers have bent growth rules to their advantage, take a look at the Rural Lands Stewardship Program.

Passed by the Legislature in 2001 as a limited pilot project to protect farmland and wildlife areas, stewardship zones have become a shortcut for savvy landowners to build new cities in remote areas while protecting little or nothing.

Tom Pelham, secretary of the state Department of Community Affairs, is right to crack down on applications under the new law. It's the state's duty to make sure the Legislature's worthy objectives are realized: to stop sprawl, preserve rural character, prevent development of environmentally significant land, and promote commercial and residential growth in appropriate areas.

If major landowners continue to get all they are asking for under the program, they'll corner the market on dense development in some rural counties, and leave tracts that the program was intended to protect vulnerable to future sprawl.

Schemes such as this are why voters are signing a petition for a referendum on a constitutional amendment called Hometown Democracy.

If passed, it would require local voter approval before any changes could be made in a local growth plan. It could make development difficult or impossible in many areas.

Supporters of the referendum accuse Florida's leaders of putting more value on future residents than current ones, who often get stuck paying the bills for growth. But holding elections on every land-use change would, as Pelham understands, 'throw the state into chaos,' with devastating consequences for the economy.

You don't have to be for Hometown Democracy to appreciate the frustration of its advocates. The rural stewardship law is a case in point. It was approved in 2001 to encourage a few pilot projects of at least 50,000 acres each.

After no one applied, the law was modified to make it more appealing. Its pilot status was dropped. The threshold was reduced to 10,000 acres. Projects within the approved zone were exempted from the rigorous review required of other large developments of regional impact.

Now the applications are pouring in from swamps and ranch lands. The sudden interest may be because the rules were relaxed, but more likely it's to get approval before the Hometown Democracy vote next year virtually freezes growth.

Once a stewardship area is set up, growth can occur outside most local and state restrictions. Under the change, selected environmentally sensitive areas are designated 'sending' areas and are given development credits far in excess of what is allowed elsewhere in the county. Areas where new towns are to be built are called 'receiving' areas. Developers buy and transfer credits from a sending area to a receiving area. How the valuable credits are awarded is a complex process that typically requires the assistance of expert consultants.

In theory, one landowner is given an incentive to preserve land while another is encouraged to build houses. But until all the credits are used up, which can take many years or might never happen, the owner of a 'sending' area can opt out of the program and develop the property at whatever densities were originally allowed, typically one unit per five acres.

So the community may well end up with a city in the middle of nowhere, surrounded by sprawling developments and the loss of most of its natural land - everything the law was designed to prevent. So much for stewardship.

Pelham is trying to stop the abuse, but lawmakers need to reform a planning effort that has gone off track.

Why the Chamber of Commerce Wants to Kill Hometown Democracy

Battle for the Soul of Florida

By ALAN FARAGO

The Florida Chamber of Commerce has announced plans to raise as much as $65 million to fight a constitutional amendment sought by citizens supporting Florida Hometown Democracy.

The FHD measure would require that changes to local zoning plansórequired by Florida law of each and every municipality and countyóto first run the gauntlet of local voters before being voted on by local legislatures.

This moment in Florida history is framed by the biggest housing bust since the 1920's.

The soul of Florida is at stake in the battle by Florida Hometown Democracy against the Chamber of Commerce and the building and development lobby.

Floridaís developed landscape did not become such a point of contention, by coincidence.

But for a mortgage industry that proliferated through the use of obscure financial derivatives, multiplied from the lowly consumer or commercial mortgage, there would be no incipient rebellion by citizens.

What is visible on the ground are for-sale signs, rising taxes, tightening credit, struggling production home builders and condo developers.

What is less visible, is how the last stage of the building boom, now in cinders, used financial engineering to sell distant investors on high returns pegged to pools of underlying packages of mortgages.

The trick, now being revealed in crashing financial markets--and not just homebuilders--was in mis-marking risk by laying off low quality development against higher credit quality debt.

What Wall Street persuaded investors of financial derivatives, (too complex for all but the most sophisticated analysts to understand), goes something like this. Imagine a mutual fund (remember, this is an imaginary example) comprised of many different mortgages. Now in this fund, there are a few dogs -- strip malls in bad neighborhoods, cheap, platted subdivisions two hours from any source of work-- but on balance, the risk of having some dogs is minimized by ret urns the fund will generate on better quality malls and higher priced subdivisions.

Now, more than a trillion dollars of real estate investment--across the United States--is based on this premise: that the value of the fund will not be affected by the risk of default, if the dogs fail.

Put another way: Florida's growth is shaped by financial engineering based on the performance, not of better quality community design, but by the lowest common denominator.

On the ground you see strip malls and platted subdivisions by the thousands. What you don't see is how the entire financial system that depends on diversifying risk, fails to account for what people want and what people need in terms of quality of life, the environment, and principles of "sustainability".

Builders complain about their critics: "we are only building what the market wants." It's a fallacy. Builders build what bankers can finance.

And bankers, in this case Wall Street, will finance whatever generates the most commissions and bonuses for top shareholders, absent regulation.

What Florida Hometown Democracy and its amendment says, in fact, is that Floridians no longer trust either government or business to lead the way in the design and plan for growth.

And with good reason: what has government or the growth machine done to earn anything but the anger and enmity of a majority of Floridians?

In the 1920's, Florida was a sleepy and relatively empty state. When real estate markets cratered, for the most part Florida itself was intact.

80 years later, Florida is a much different place. On the issue of water alone, Florida's growth has manifestly failed to protect both public health and the environment.

It is the pressure for more growth, for instance, that is the root cause of government agencies allowing benzene to contaminate the drinking water supply for Miami-Dade.

The pressure for growth is also what caused recommendat ions in the most comprehensive watershed study undertaken anywhere, anytime, to be shelved by Miami-Dade county commissioners who found the whole idea of restricting growth to serve people to be distasteful in the extreme.

These stories--how the unallocated costs of growth continue to pile up in multi-billion dollar increments, even to the point of putting people in the way of cancer--could be repeated anywhere in Florida: Tampa, Jacksonville, Orlando, Pasco County, Collier or the Florida Keys.

This time, as 'for sale' signs sprout like weedy species across the state, it is manifestly clear that business interests, led by the growth machine and building lobby, have no plan, no idea, and no interest in taming the costs of growth imposed on citizens and ordinary people.

There is little question that the Florida Hometown Democracy measure will pass the test of state voters, if enough signatures and be gathered and enough money raised to communicate with Floridians.

Alan Farago writes about politics and the environment. He lives in south Florida.

Who will buy the empty homes?

By Nadia Vanderhoof

Friday, July 27, 2007

A glut of new but vacant homes continues to dominate the landscape of the central and northern portions of the Treasure Coast, a housing report released Thursday suggested.

West Palm Beach-based Metrostudy, which tracks new-home starts, reported 2,391 homes were completed in St. Lucie and Indian River counties during the past three months — and they still have no occupants. At the current pace of people buying homes and moving in, it should take about nine months to fill the St. Lucie County inventory and 13 months in Indian River County, according to Metrostudy.

Martin County had 398 homes completed but remaining vacant during the second quarter.

"Martin County has always had a reputation for being anti-growth, anti-development, so at this point of the cycle, the market bodes well for them," said Jack McCabe, CEO of McCabe Research and Consulting a real estate consulting firm in Deerfield Beach.

Additionally, McCabe said subdivisions with an overabundance of vacant new homes and "For Rent" signs may be deterring renters from becoming home buyers — further pushing up local inventory levels.

"Some of the homes are sitting out there with weeds, without air-conditioning, maybe even growing some mold," McCabe said. "If I am buying a house, I want to buy in the community with swing sets and bicycles on the street, not where it's empty and I'd be taking a risk."

A year ago, of the 5,405 homes built during the second quarter on the Treasure Coast, 1,927 were considered part of a vacant supply. The estimated timeline to fill those homes was estimated at that time at more than 19 months.

"Although record high inventories and reduced starts and homes under construction are not something the construction community can jump for joy over, it is a positive sign that the move-in differential is causing the inventories to start a downward trend," said custom home builder Richard Hope, president of Hope Co., a general contractor in Vero Beach. "Now is a great time to buy, especially for the first time buyer or current renter, since this is the market where a majority of these inventories exist."

Don Santos, past president of the Treasure Coast Builders Association and president of Santos Construction, wasn't surprised at the statistics in the report.

"Unfortunately these are a high count, which reinforces the fact that builders overbuilt inventory," Santos said. "But there's never been a better time to buy."

The report noted 521 homes still were under construction in Indian River County during the second quarter, 205 in St. Lucie County and 39 in Martin County.

Sally Daley, owner of Daley & Co. Real Estate in Vero Beach, agreed this is a good sign of a buyer's market.

"After months of inventory outpacing buyer demand, inventory of vacant homes — many offered by mom and pop investors unsuccessfully trying to flip properties for profit — is finally reducing to meet buyer demand as exuberant sellers and developers ratchet down their expectations and in many cases seek to simply sell for little or no profit to simply unload the properties," she said. "Such activity is typical of a buyers' market and an essential, albeit painful, step toward more balanced market conditions between supply and buyer demand."

In St. Lucie County, builders have reduced starts by 73.5 percent since the peak of 775 units reported in the third quarter of 2006. There were only 205 starts in the second quarter, a level not seen since 2001. New home starts have dropped 20.5 percent between the first and second quarters in Indian River County. And Martin County's new construction is down 70 percent since the peak in 2005.

Contaminated Water Reaches Florida's Offshore Keys

Science Daily A new University of Georgia study finds that sewage-contaminated groundwater is reaching the offshore reefs of the Upper Florida Keys, possibly threatening corals and human health.

“The widespread use of in-ground waste disposal through septic tanks and injection wells appears to be leading to the contamination of submarine groundwater even up to six miles offshore,” said study author Erin Lipp, associate professor at the UGA College of Public Health. “When the contaminated groundwater mixes with surface water and reaches the reef, the corals as well as human health might be harmed.”

Lipp and doctoral student Carrie Futch, along with Dale Griffin of the U.S. Geological Survey in Tallahassee, sampled surface water, groundwater and corals from five sites from nearshore to offshore beginning outside of Port Largo Canal and ending near Molasses Reef. Their three-year study revealed common fecal indicator bacteria and human viruses.

The fecal indicator bacteria, which are not pathogens themselves but rather serve as surrogates for other disease-causing microbes found in sewage, declined with distance from shore but tended to be elevated in the surface layers of coral mucus relative to the surrounding water. High levels of fecal indicator bacteria from canals were also shown to move into the nearshore environment on outgoing tides. Lipp said the detection of these bacteria in predominantly nearshore stations suggests that land-based sources of sewage pollution such as cesspits and septic systems may be a significant contributor.

Genetic material from enteric viruses, which cause disease in humans but are only found in infected human feces and urine, also were commonly found throughout the sampled area, including ground water more than six miles offshore. The frequency of detecting viruses increased with rainfall in the summer months, when the viruses were most likely to be found in groundwater. Lipp cautioned, however, that the test used to identify the enteric viruses was not designed to determine whether the viruses were alive or dead.

“Until we actually know the level of risk, our findings are just an indication that there could be some level of sewage contamination offshore,” she said. “It doesn’t indicate that people need to change their behavior, but does show that the appropriate treatment of water through centralized sewage is needed.”

Bill Kruczynski, Florida Keys Program Scientist for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, said the installation of new wastewater management systems such as centralized collection and advanced wastewater treatment facilities, as recommended by the Water Quality Protection Program (WQPP) for the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary and required by Florida State Law 99-395, is essential to restore and maintain water quality in the Florida Keys. In addition, the WQPP recommended improved storm water treatment practices to further reduce pollutant loading to nearshore waters.

“The Sanctuary and Monroe County are taking the right steps to improve water quality by enacting no dumping ordinances and implementing centralized sewage,” Lipp said. “The next step is to ensure that it’s working and hopefully document an improvement in water quality.”

The findings were presented Tuesday at a meeting of the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Water Quality Protection Program Steering Committee in Marathon, Florida. The study was funded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Note: This story has been adapted from a news release issued by University of Georgia.

Increased development will result in higher taxes

By TCPalm Staff

Friday, July 20, 2007

Where will it end? What will it lead to? In my opinion, development of Martin County's rural land will lead to an end — an end to Martin County's way of life as we know and love.

It already has grown to a point that has taken away our small-town atmosphere, so why do we want to continue this so-called "controlled growth" that will only result in higher taxes and more congestion? We already have too many vacant homes, empty stores and crowded roads. Why do we want more? Who wants more (other than the developers)?

If anybody thinks that more development is the answer to relieving tax burdens, they are kidding themselves. The increased tax revenue will not cover the cost of the required roads, schools, fire stations and such. We will all face higher taxes as a result.

Martin County's comprehensive plan was an excellent plan, and is still a good one despite several amendment that allowed unneeded growth. Let's fight to preserve what we have. If someone owns or buys property zoned "agricultural," they should put cows on it, not townhomes! The comprehensive plan says "no," and probably the majority of residents agree. So why does the commission keep allowing developers to rape our land?

Regarding the purchasing of land for enviromental preservation, I don't understand why we have to keep buying land to protect it. The comprehensive plan already does it.

Contact the commissioners and let them know what Martin County residents really want!

Dana O. Bausch

Interesting commentary...

Battle for the soul of Florida by gimleteye

The Florida Chamber of Commerce has announced plans to raise as much as $65 million to fight a constitutional amendment sought by citizens supporting Florida Hometown Democracy.

The FHD measure would require that changes to local zoning plans—required by Florida law of each and every municipality and county—to first run the gauntlet of local voters before being voted on by local legislatures.

This moment in Florida history is framed by the biggest housing bust since the 1920's.

The soul of Florida is at stake in the battle by Florida Hometown Democracy against the Chamber of Commerce and the building and development lobby.

Florida’s developed landscape did not become such a point of contention, by coincidence.

But for a mortgage industry that proliferated through the use of obscure financial derivatives, multiplied from the lowly consumer or commercial mortgage, there would be no incipient rebellion by citizens.

What is visible on the ground are for-sale signs, rising taxes, tightening credit, struggling production home builders and condo developers.

What is less visible, is how the last stage of the building boom, now in cinders, used financial engineering to sell distant investors on high returns pegged to pools of underlying packages of mortgages.

The trick, now being revealed in crashing financial markets--and not just homebuilders--was in mis-marking risk by laying off low quality development against higher credit quality debt.

What Wall Street persuaded investors of financial derivatives, (too complex for all but the most sophisticated analysts to understand), goes something like this. Imagine a mutual fund (remember, this is an imaginary example) comprised of many different mortgages. Now in this fund, there are a few dogs -- strip malls in bad neighborhoods, cheap, platted subdivisions two hours from any source of work-- but on balance, the risk of having some dogs is minimized by returns the fund will generate on better quality malls and higher priced subdivisions.

Now, more than a trillion dollars of real estate investment--across the United States--is based on this premise: that the value of the fund will not be affected by the risk of default, if the dogs fail.

Put another way: Florida's growth is shaped by financial engineering based on the performance, not of better quality community design, but by the lowest common denominator.

On the ground you see strip malls and platted subdivisions by the thousands. What you don't see is how the entire financial system that depends on diversifying risk, fails to account for what people want and what people need in terms of quality of life, the environment, and principles of "sustainability".

Builders complain about their critics: "we are only building what the market wants." It's a fallacy. Builders build what bankers can finance.

And bankers, in this case Wall Street, will finance whatever generates the most commissions and bonuses for top shareholders, absent regulation.

What Florida Hometown Democracy and its amendment says, in fact, is that Floridians no longer trust either government or business to lead the way in the design and plan for growth.

And with good reason: what has government or the growth machine done to earn anything but the anger and enmity of a majority of Floridians?

In the 1920's, Florida was a sleepy and relatively empty state. When real estate markets cratered, for the most part Florida itself was intact.

80 years later, Florida is a much different place. On the issue of water alone, Florida's growth has manifestly failed to protect both public health and the environment.

It is the pressure for more growth, for instance, that is the root cause of government agencies allowing benzene to contaminate the drinking water supply for Miami-Dade.

The pressure for growth is also what caused recommendations in the most comprehensive watershed study undertaken anywhere, anytime, to be shelved by Miami-Dade county commissioners who found the whole idea of restricting growth to serve people to be distasteful in the extreme.

These stories--how the unallocated costs of growth continue to pile up in multi-billion dollar increments, even to the point of putting people in the way of cancer--could be repeated anywhere in Florida: Tampa, Jacksonville, Orlando, Pasco County, Collier or the Florida Keys.

This time, as 'for sale' signs sprout like weedy species across the state, it is manifestly clear that business interests, led by the growth machine and building lobby, have no plan, no idea, and no interest in taming the costs of growth imposed on citizens and ordinary people.

There is little question that the Florida Hometown Democracy measure will pass the test of state voters, if enough signatures and be gathered and enough money raised to communicate with Floridians.

Growth showdown bound for ballot?

nazzara@bradenton.com
A major green-versus-growth battle is brewing across the state, and the showdown may be coming soon to a ballot booth near you.

And like any other high-profile debate, millions of dollars are being spent to sway your vote.

Tired of seeing paradise paved over for parking lots, Lesley Blackner and 278,000 like-minded Floridians are ready to rein in the booming development industry that has dominated headlines in previous years. Their primary weapon is a proposed constitutional amendment that would require voters, rather than elected officials, to approve changes to land-use designations.

Business and development leaders shudder at the prospect of slowing growth to a snail's pace. They say providing more hurdles to development could be the dagger in the heart of a sluggish Florida economy. That's why they're willing to spend millions to fight the proposed ballot measure.

The vehicle driving the proposed amendment is Florida Hometown Democracy, which Blackner, 46, co-founded four years ago. Opinionated and outspoken, Blackner has lived in Florida for more than 40 years.

She's an environmental attorney who says she has seen Florida's natural habitats "go down the drain."

"Florida has embraced the model that developers want: If you build it they will come. But maybe if you don't build it they will go somewhere else," Blackner said. "Government seems to think the next 30,000 people who live here are more important than those who already live here."

Florida Hometown Democracy has collected almost half of the 611,000-plus voter signatures required to put a proposed constitutional amendment on the November 2008 ballot. And Blackner says the total is actually closer to 500,000, but many signatures have yet to be verified.

Either way, the group, with the backing of the Sierra Club and other environmental organizations, is inching closer to putting the question to the entire state.

"These things need to be put to voters because they determine the future of a local community more than anything else," Blackner said. "The current system has been stacked against the people."

To be adopted, the con- stitutional amendment would require the support of 60 percent of voters.

'Could kill growth'

Opposition to the amendment seems to be growing faster than the movement itself. Chambers of commerce across the state are asking members to "Stop the Scam." They say the cost and consequences of the amendment could be "astronomical."

"We live in a representative democracy and this amendment really works against that," said Neil Spirtas, a spokesman for the Manatee Chamber of Commerce. "I don't think we have any idea how much this is going to cost everyone in the time and effort involved."

If the amendment passes, developers could turn into stumping politicians, pushing hard for their proposed amendments - that is, their developments - to win voter approval. In addition, they say, longer ballots would further dampen voter turnout.

"I think it's going to add to the cost of construction tremendously because in order to get a comp plan amendment, we'll have to hold an election and run a campaign that costs money," said Lee Wetherington, president of Lee Wetherington Companies. "That's just cost added to any new house and new development out there."

Mike Rahn, senior vice president of Florida Homebuilders Association added, "It could affect private property rights and where hospitals, schools, churches and fire stations go in a community, along with take away the democratic process on what you want to do with your property. It could kill growth in the state of Florida."

The Florida Chamber of Commerce, the National Association of Homebuilders and other business groups have formed and raised close to $1 million for Floridians for Smarter Growth. The group is gathering signatures for a similar amendment that would have voters approve comp plan amendments only if first, 10 percent of registered voters sign a petition to hold an election on the change.

Brain surgery?

Changes to Manatee County's comprehensive plan usually occur twice a year in the form of comp plan amend- ments, but they can happen more often. Since 2000, Manatee has adopted 176 amendments, including seven so far this year. Many times, the changes amend zoning and density categories. Other amendments are designed to bring the local comp plan into compliance with state regu- lations.

Many times debates over future land categories can last hours at the county level, as commissioners try to balance private development rights with public safety concerns and objecting homeowners close to new projects. Throw in a few dozen comments from county staffers and land-use attorneys and the debate becomes downright dizzying.

There's little debate that the process is complicated and can be confusing.

County Administrator Ed Hunzeker put it this way: "I could do brain surgery, but it's going to take a while to train me. It takes a great deal of understanding on how the development process works. It's a very rigorous process."

But Blackner and her supporters say the intelligence of the electorate shouldn't be underestimated. Coincidentally, she said, comprehensive plan amendments are not brain surgery.

"I'm tired of being told voters aren't smart enough to know what they're voting for," said Betsy Roberts, chair of the Florida Chapter Sierra Club. "If most people know both sides of the story, they'll make a good decision. Voters are intelligent people."

Cost of elections

The Florida Supreme Court on July 12 interjected itself into the debate, striking down part of the financial impact statement that would go on the ballot with the proposed am- endment.

The Supreme Court objected to the second of five sentences in the original statement: "Over each two-year election cycle, local governments cumulatively will incur significant costs (millions of dollars statewide)."

The statement, drafted by the state's Financial Impact Estimating Conference, failed to indicate the estimate depends on how many times local governments have to hold special elections to adopt or amend land-use plans, the majority wrote in the unsigned opinion.

On Friday, the conference, made up of legislative and executive branch economists, revised the offending sentence to highlight that costs "cannot be determined precisely." It also reworked a following sentence to indicate the potential costs include such expenses as ballot preparation and election administration.

The commission has separately said the minimum cost of holding special elections within a two-year period would be $2.4 million assuming elections are held by mail - the cheapest method - and ballots are sent to 25 percent of Florida's 10.5 million-plus vo- ters.

In a letter to the commission earlier this week, a lawyer for Hometown Democracy argued local governments could pass election costs on to developers and other parties that request planning amendments and piggyback referenda on other special or regular elec- tions.

The attorney general's office next will submit the new financial statement to the Supreme Court.

- The Associated Press contributed to this report.• Florida Hometown Democracy must gather 611,000 verified voter signatures by Jan. 31, 2008, in order to have the amendment on the November 2008 ballot. The group now has 278,000 verified signatures, including 1,800 from Manatee County and more than 7,000 from Sarasota County.

• Local, state and national business interests have formed Floridians for Smarter Growth to oppose Florida Hometown Democracy. The new group is proposing a similar amendment that would require voter referenda on comp plan amendments when 10 percent of registered voters want to hold one.

House Rejects Farm Bill Overhaul
Effort to Revamp Traditional Subsidies Is Defeated, 309 to 117

By Dan Morgan
Special to The Washington Post
Friday, July 27, 2007; A04

Farm state lawmakers, allied with House Democratic leaders, last night easily defeated a proposal for a major overhaul of traditional farm programs that would have pared subsidies to big growers and spread benefits more broadly.

The 309 to 117 vote came on the first day of debate on a multiyear farm bill that was heading for final action today.

Republican support for the bill was in doubt last night because of a dispute over a provision that would tighten rules on the use of tax havens by U.S. subsidiaries of foreign companies.

But key farm state Republicans joined Democrats in opposing the amendment, sponsored by Rep. Ron Kind (D-Wis.). "It rips out the safety net for American farmers and ranchers," said Rep. Robert W. Goodlatte (Va.), ranking Republican on the House Agriculture Committee.

The amendment was billed as this year's major challenge to an entrenched farm-subsidy system. The defeat was a setback for a coalition of environmental organizations, anti-hunger groups and religious leaders who favor shifting more funds to conservation, nutrition and other priorities while creating a more level playing field in world markets for unsubsidized poor farmers abroad.

"Change is tough in this place," Kind said. The current subsidies to farmers, he said, raise farmland prices to the disadvantage of young farmers trying to rent or buy land, while making big farmers dependent on "a government paycheck, not the marketplace."

Environmental Defense, an advocacy group, produced a study showing that more than 300 congressional districts would be eligible for increased funding under Kind's bill, but to no avail.

Kind's vision in recent months came into conflict with the pragmatic politics of Democratic leaders seeking to rebuild the party's rural-urban bonds. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) urged Democrats to support the farm bill.

Recalling that a similar Kind amendment garnered 200 votes in 2001, the Agriculture Committee loaded the bill with billions of dollars for nutrition programs, conservation, black farmers, and the Florida and California fruit and vegetable industries, in an effort to attract broad support. As late as 1 a.m. yesterday, Democratic leaders were adding money for nutrition programs.

About $840 million in mandatory spending was added for the McGovern-Dole food aid program, after nearly $1 billion was shifted out of government payments to private crop insurance companies to offset the cost.

The new funding was sought by Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.), a key member of the House Rules Committee. McGovern said it was "a good thing" that the crop insurance industry would be contributing to feeding hungry children abroad.

The program is named for two former senators, not for the congressman.

The revamp effort by Kind, whose western Wisconsin farm grows corn and soybeans on 60 acres, made him few friends on the agriculture panel.

Committee Chairman Collin C. Peterson (D-Minn.) said last week that Kind and his allies are "out on a limb, and I'm trying to cut if off."

Peterson suggested that Kind "was being used by the Bush administration," which favors some of the same changes.

"There was no collusion," Kind responded. "I've been working on this for six years."

Morgan is a contract writer for the newspaper and a fellow with the German Marshall Fund, a nonpartisan public policy institution

Neighborhoods, dirt mining proposed for Mecca Farms in Palm Beach County

County administrator calls for a mix of homes, agriculture and waterways

By Andy Reid

South Florida Sun-Sentinel

July 28, 2007

Taxpayer-owned land once intended to house a high-tech science "village" featuring The Scripps Research Institute could instead become a mix of homes, agriculture, dirt mining and waterways, according to a proposal for Mecca Farms released Friday.

Palm Beach County Administrator Bob Weisman on Friday called for jump-starting stalled discussions on uses for the 1,919 acres of former orange groves north of Northlake Boulevard, which cost taxpayers $60 million to buy and another $60 million to get ready for Scripps.

Environmental concerns last year moved Scripps' planned research labs and headquarters to Jupiter. Since then commissioners have had on-again, off-again discussions about what to do with the property.

Weisman's proposal calls for:

•Offering up to 750 acres of Mecca Farms for sale to developers by early next year. He suggested allowing as many as 1,500 homes but said proposed changes to development guidelines for western areas could push that to 2,400 homes.

•Selling 100 acres to the Solid Waste Authority of Palm Beach County. Storing hurricane debris, recycling yard waste and excavating dirt to cover mounds of trash at the county landfill are among proposed uses for the property.

•Set aside land for the "flow way," a man-made filter marsh, envisioned in the Scripps plan. The flow way would help clean and deliver water that could replenish the Loxahatchee River. County officials on Friday met with representatives from the South Florida Water Management District to discuss the flow way and other water cleaning features that could be included on Mecca Farms.

•Keep at least 750 acres to use for agriculture, environmental improvements, water treatment or other needs.

The idea was to offer commissioners "max flexibility" but also to start taking action on what to do with Mecca Farms, Weisman said.

"I'm just laying out a plan to start talking," he said. "It depends where the board wants to go."

Commissioner Burt Aaronson welcomed Weisman's proposal. Aaronson has called for allowing about 2,400 homes and commercial development on Mecca Farms in order to boost its sales value.

In addition to the money spent to acquire Mecca Farms and plan for Scripps' construction, paying the debt service on the deal costs the county between $5 million and $8 million a year.

"We should get the taxpayers' money back." Aaronson said.

Commissioner Jeff Koons said he was "intrigued" by Weisman's proposal to reserve land for agriculture.

Koons said he supports carving out a portion of Mecca Farms for the Solid Waste Authority. Pits left from digging out dirt for the landfill could become water storage areas that help with Everglades restoration efforts, he said.

"We have been kind of ducking on it," Koons said about deciding Mecca Farms' future. "I think we need to take a look at it."

No price has been set for the 100 acres Weisman proposed selling to the Solid Waste Authority, but the agency would be ready to "move quickly," the authority's chief administrative officer, Marc Bruner, said. Opponents to developing Mecca Farms have argued that allowing thousands of homes there would cost too much for the roads and community services required when suburbia spreads to rural land.

They have called for returning Mecca Farms to its natural state and leaving it as open space. The county could sell its development rights to builders elsewhere who are willing to pay for the chance to build more homes than otherwise allowed.

"Why are they so gung-ho to develop it right now?" asked Joanne Davis, spokeswoman for the growth watchdog group 1,000 Friends of Florida, which opposed building Scripps on Mecca Farms. "They have got all these grandiose ideas. ... They have jumped way ahead of themselves."

Andy Reid can be reached at abreid@sun-sentinel.com or 561-228-5504.

Rediscovered documents 'flush out' history of Estero Bay preserve

Saturday, July 28, 2007

There is no mystery to what makes Estero Bay a fisherman’s paradise.

Take away the jagged, mangrove-lined shore and the seagrass beds and the fish will follow.

The bay is a massive seawall and dredging project away from looking like, and fishing like, many of Florida’s once productive estuaries.

With the Estero Bay Aquatic Preserve in place, the area is safe from the scenario that made so many bays in Florida barren.

But the protection didn’t come without a fight.

A developer had purchased waterfront property along the bay and drew up plans to develop it. Then, locals took a stand.

The documentation of exactly how local fishermen and residents saved Estero Bay from dredging and a concrete lip was recently uncovered.

Searching for material for a video for the preserve’s 40th anniversary, a researcher uncovered 21 nearly forgotten boxes of records stored in the Southwest Florida Museum of History.

“If this stuff were lost, it would be a loss of local history,” said Neil Ayers, a resource management specialist for the Estero Bay Aquatic and State Buffer Preserve who created the video based on much of the information.

An archivist is working to index and catalog the information so it one day may be put on display or digitized and placed on a Web site.

The files document in full detail the history, the lawsuit and the personal struggles to save Estero Bay by creating the state’s first aquatic preserve.

It all started in 1958 when Barry C. Williams and Investors purchased 5,500 acres along the northern and eastern coast of Estero Bay for $1.6 million.

Robert Troutman, an Atlanta attorney representing investors, drew up a plan to expand a seawall deep into Estero Bay along 18 miles of coastline.

The seawall, called a bulkhead, would straighten out the jagged coastline by using 17 million cubic yards of fill. Along the way it would swallow up submerged lands and islands, creating 1,100 acres that previously was under water. For fill, Troutman proposed dredging a 12-foot channel through the seagrass beds around his bulkhead.

The same technique had been employed along the east coast and in areas to the north, such as Tampa, St. Petersburg and Sarasota.

The results were well-documented. Some of the most productive estuaries in the state turned barren when developers removed the mangroves and seagrass beds that served as a nursery for fish, shrimp, mammals and birds.

Determined to keep Estero Bay from the same fate, local residents and fishermen formed the Lee County Conservation Association.

“This was a homegrown effort by local citizens interested in preservation,” said Matt Johnson, general manager of the Southwest Florida Museum of History. “They battled some pretty large developers and corporations interested in development and won.”

At one point during the 1960s, it’s estimated that about 50 percent of the registered voters in Lee belonged to the association.

Lee County Commissioner Frank Mann was a state legislator when the association still was active.

“That group lived in my office for two years,” Mann said. “That little committee was very active and very loud and they single-handedly beat Troutman.”

Up until the creation of the Lee County Conservation Association, residents had quietly tolerated local developers mowing down mangroves to create small communities along the waterfront, said Wayne Daltry, director of Smart Growth for Lee County.

But Williams’ plan was destruction on a much larger scale.

“There was a casual tolerance of the little things,” Daltry said. “But there became an awareness, a realization that if they didn’t have protection, it was going to be toast.”

The members of the association wrote letters, engaged politicians and used their voting bloc to change leadership in Lee County.

They argued that submerged lands belonged to the state and tried to create the Estero Bay State Park.

The law clearly states that any land above the high tide mark can be owned privately but property below it belongs to the state.

Their efforts led to the creation of the first aquatic preserve in Florida.

The state eventually would use the preserve as a model to create 41 others along Florida’s coastal waters.

“We now have over 2 million acres in the program protected from dredging and habitat loss and damage to resources,” said Larry Nall, environmental administrator for the Florida Department of Environmental Protection’s Office of Coastal and Aquatic Managed Areas.

Johnson is working with members of the Estero Bay Aquatic and State Buffer Preserve to find grants so the historical data can be preserved and archived.

Knowing about Southwest Florida’s history is important as the environmental battle rages on, Johnson said.

“This is the cornerstone of a success story in preserving our environment, which down here is a major issue,” he said. “The battle between development and preservation is not something that’s gone away.”

As deadline looms, Lee eyes Weeks property

County is interested, but can't make promises, in a last-minute deal for land that includes one of the few boat ramps on eastern Estero Bay

Friday, July 27, 2007

Lee County and state officials are looking hard at Weeks Fish Camp, and the historic home of one of the area’s oldest families may yet become a county-owned boat ramp.

Current owner Michele Pessin of the 131 Group is staring at a Tuesday deadline to get a deal done — or at least started. A bankruptcy court judge has held off creditors that long.

Pessin bought the waterfront portion of the old fish camp in 2003. Many members of the Weeks family, who carved the little community they called Coconut out of the scrub in the 1940s, still live there on streets named for pioneer couple Draine and Mamie Weeks.

Some of them welcomed Pessin as a savior when she bought the land, but it hasn’t worked out that way. Legal, land-use and financial hurdles drove her into Chapter 11 early in 2006.

Part of her plan was always to keep the marina open to the public, and she and bankruptcy receiver Gerald McHale have been talking to the county about a sale or at least an easement agreement.

Commissioner Ray Judah said he’s interested.

“I’ve indicated I can’t make any promises,” Judah said. “It takes a whole board and a vote.”

Judah said he has met with McHale and with Tom Gilhooley. Gilhooley isn’t invested in the property, but he and Pessin live together and have children. The county’s Conservation 2020 environmental lands program is negotiating to buy another Pessin property, but the same program balked at the asking price for the marina property.

Judah said there are concerns about water depth and what an increase in boat traffic could mean to the shallow bay.

“There is a channel,” Judah said, “but it’s a very shallow channel. Obviously, the state and the county would be very concerned about the amount and the type of boat traffic.”

Estero Bay is the first Aquatic Preserve in Florida, so designated in 1960. Preserve Director Heather Stafford has also been involved in discussions, but she couldn’t be reached for comment.

Steve Boutelle, marine science director for the county, said the state’s most recent check found about 3½ feet of water in the channel.

“As far as the site goes, the channel now severely limits the use,” he said. “That’s the main part of why we recommended to commissioners it wasn’t a good opportunity for a public boat ramp.”

That was several months ago, when Pessin and Gilhooley first approached the county. Boutelle said the state found deeper water than he expected, however, and the last complete engineering assessment was done in 1999.

“My opinion is there will clearly be boating impact from any facility,” Boutelle said. “But there are boating impacts from the use now.”

Judah and other commissioners are hearing from boaters, hundreds of whom have signed petitions urging the county — or someone — to keep the ramp open. One of them is Capt. Ron Kowalyk, who’s been fishing Estero Bay since 1978.

“Sure, there’s more use,” he said. “But there’s a demand for it.”

Kowalyk said the county would have to balance the increased boat traffic with the prospect of boaters hauling their trailers down 41 and out Bonita Beach Road and Hickory Boulevard to reach the Lovers Key/Carl E. Johnson State Park boat ramp, the next closest public ramp on the bay. He said the channel is shallow, but good local knowledge is always the key to boating back bays.

“There’s plenty of water to get in and out of there, usually,” he said. “You can get a boat drafting 24 to 30 inches in there. Like with any boat ramp, you have to know what you’re doing.”

Kowalyk described Weeks as unique, situated as it is on the eastern shore of the bay. There’s a ramp on the Imperial River a few miles down 41, but launching there means a long slow ride down the river to reach the bay. There’s also a ramp at the Koreshan State Historic Site, but it’s also designed for smaller boats like canoes and kayaks.

“It’s the only area that’s reasonable on the entire east coast of Estero Bay,” he said. “I really think it’d be a disaster if it disappeared and we didn’t have access.”

North Collier development deal reached, fight moves to federal level

Saturday, July 28, 2007

A deal between a developer and a local environmental group has put a controversial development in northern Collier County a step closer to breaking ground, but opponents are vowing to keep up the fight.

Saturnia Falls is one of three projects — the others being Parklands and Mirasol — that environmental advocates are working to defeat to save what is left of a natural flowway that is being choked off by development southwest of Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary.

A series of legal challenges to the projects have focused on their effects on wood stork habitat and wetlands north of Immokalee Road and west of Collier Boulevard. Now, one of the challenges has run its course.

Earlier this month, the South Florida Water Management District approved a deal between Saturnia Falls developer G.L. Homes and the Conservancy of Southwest Florida by which the district would issue the Saturnia Falls permit when the developer transfers 154 acres to the district as mitigation.

G.L. Homes vice president Rick Elsner said Friday that the company is working to close on the purchase of three parcels to satisfy the requirement. The parcels could be in district hands within weeks, he said.

The developer is paying some $3 million for the acreage in Lee and Collier counties within the boundaries of the Corkscrew Regional Ecosystem Watershed preservation project.

G.L. Homes then would sell the land to the district for $713,000, the amount of money the developer paid the district as mitigation for a 2004 permit for an earlier version of the Saturnia Falls project.

The district was supposed to use the money to buy land for mitigation for Saturnia Falls, but the district never spent the money. G.L. Homes paid another $547,000 to the district for restoration and management of the land.

In 2006, the district issued a modified permit for Saturnia Falls to reflect changes to the project’s water management system, and the Conservancy challenged the permit.

In May, an administrative law judge issued a recommended order siding with G.L. Homes on issues of water quality and wood storks but found that the $1.26 million payment for the 2004 permit was inadequate “as a result of the passage of time and market forces” and that the district shouldn’t issue the Saturnia Falls permit.

Conservancy President Andrew MacElwaine said the deal with G.L. Homes resolves the issues with the district permit and sets up the next legal fight in federal court over a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permit for Saturnia Falls.

“That’s the next battle,” he said.

The Conservancy, the National Wildlife Federation, the Florida Wildlife Federation, the Collier County Audubon Society and the National Audubon Society filed the federal lawsuit against the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the corps and the Interior Department in April. The case has been on hold awaiting the outcome of the challenge to the district permit.

Elsner called it “unfortunate” that environmental groups are continuing to challenge the Saturnia Falls project in light of the Conservancy’s failure to stop the project from getting the district permit.

“We feel very confident we’ll be successful (in federal court),” he said.

Environmental groups lost a second administrative challenge this past week, when a different administrative law judge issued an order recommending that the water management district issue a permit for Mirasol.

The corps rejected an earlier version of the Mirasol project, citing worries that a manmade flowway proposed to wrap around the golf course community would damage the environment. The corps has said it will issue a permit for a new version of the project, without the flowway. The environmental groups have pledged a federal lawsuit if that happens.

The corps settled a federal lawsuit over the Parklands project by agreeing to take another look at its permit for Parklands. That review is ongoing.

Parklands, Mirasol and Saturnia Falls would destroy some 1,100 acres of wetlands in the Cocohatchee Slough, but developers say the wetlands are degraded and their projects will help the environment.

© 2007 Naples Daily News and NDN Productions. Published in Naples, Florida, USA by the E.W. Scripps Co.

Old, old Florida: Academics trace Florida's geography over eons

Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

Sunday, July 29, 2007

Even though their offices are just down the hall in the geography department at Florida Atlantic University, it's a wonder that Edward Petuch and Charles Roberts ever found each other, let alone collaborated on a book.

Petuch, a geology professor whose specialty is ancient oceans, is happiest digging fossils out of phosphate quarries and canals.

"I'm really a field person," says Petuch, who has been at FAU since 1987. "That's me with the hard hat and the hammer and work boots."

He shuns answering machines, e-mail and writes his first drafts on lined paper in a meticulous hand.

He gazes at his cellphone.

"Fifteen missed messages, and I don't know how to listen to them," he says.

By contrast, Roberts, a geography professor, spends his days studying satellite maps and teaching his students to morph them for a variety of practical uses, from land management to spycraft.

His huge map collection makes the FAU computer servers groan like rusty locomotives.

"My world is digital," Roberts declares. "I haven't used a pen since the 1980s."

But Roberts knew that Petuch had 30 years of fossil study in Florida, making him perhaps the most knowledgeable person on the state's geology.

Their book, The Geology of the Everglades and Adjacent Areas, published this month, combines Petuch's knowledge of the past and Roberts' ability to translate that knowledge into vivid and accurate visualizations.

Their target audience is students and teachers of geology and other environmental sciences. The book includes a DVD that can be used in classrooms.

"This book gets the discussion going," Roberts says. "Anyone looking at this, their view of Florida will be changed."

Collaboration and synergy

The first two people whose views were changed were Petuch and Roberts.

As soon as he looked at Roberts' first digital map, Petuch adjusted some of his calculations about land and sea formations.

Roberts always wondered why certain Florida plants were located in isolated pockets, half the state away from one another. The computer reconstructions clearly showed that those pockets formed when the ocean inundated all of the state except those spots.

Roberts, who arrived at FAU in 1990, specializes in "geovisualization," which can turn old-fashioned one-view maps into dynamic three-dimensional computer scenes. Roberts' students have used geovisualizations to make practical animations of flood patterns and potential terrorist footpaths across the Mexico-Texas border.

For the 13 geovisualizations they collaborated on, Roberts started with Petuch's verbal descriptions of ancient Florida terrain.

"I would take a space shuttle image of South Florida and use it as a base map," Roberts says. "Then, when he told me that the Immokalee Rise used to look like Andros Island, I would draft (a geovisualized map), reconstructing past environments."

Petuch would suggest a few corrections, and Roberts would adjust his map.

Each map took 20 to 40 hours to produce, often with another 20 hours each for changes and additions.

On the DVD, Roberts created an animation showing 30 million years of Florida ebbing and flowing beneath the sea until it emerges in its modern-day shape.

The geovisualizations include seas and subseas that existed for a few hundred thousand years and then disappeared.

At one point, Florida was 300 miles wide, more like a square than the sinuous peninsula it is now.

In Roberts' geovisualizations, the varying depths of the primordial sea are rendered in shades of green and blue. He carefully sampled colors from satellite photos of similar formations and pieced them together.

Fossils chart changes

Roberts has an almost photographic recall for where to find just the right scrap of land shelf or inlet to portray the ancient landscapes.

Petuch, who lives in Lake Worth, has such encyclopedic knowledge of the Florida fossil record that he could tell Roberts exactly how deep the water was in a certain area, based on which mollusks lived there a million years ago.

Every flat surface in Petuch's FAU office is covered with shallow boxes holding neatly sorted conchs, cowries and clamshells that look new but are as old as time.

"Every one of them has a story to tell about water temperature, depth and salinity," Petuch says.

He could tell Roberts to digitally sketch a coral reef near what is now Sarasota, based on the fossil corals he collected from that area.

Or he could show Roberts a piece of shell that indicated an ancient mangrove, estuary or bed of turtle grass, and Roberts would add those to his maps.

"It was an interesting synergy," Roberts says. "He would change his definition of what the past was, and I would change my image of what the past was. Geovisualization is moving beyond the static paper map, which is a series of frozen thoughts."

Thirty million years ago, the Florida peninsula was a mere stub of land, a geological afterthought poking into the vast primordial sea. A few hundred thousand years later, if someone were looking down from the heavens, he could see what would eventually become Florida's southern tip, delicately outlined as a barely visible shadowy curve of islands.

In the intervening eons, a delta of sand began to fill in the central and southern parts of the state. The animation ends with a 1985 real-life satellite photo, one of the first to be widely used outside the space community.

Roberts long ago explained to his 5-year-old son, Sean, that their home in Royal Palm Beach had once been under 50 feet of salt water, near where Petuch and his students found fossil evidence of sea turtles and whales.

The boy already knew that the seashells in their back yard may have come from that ancient ocean, "but it didn't really click until he saw the sea come in and go out" on the animation, Roberts says.

So their collaboration has a potential new partner.

This week, Petuch presented Sean with a collection of fossils, including 3 million-year-old giant scallops and the mold of a prehistoric turtle from Nebraska, preserved in volcanic ash.

"His eyes were bulging out of his head," says Petuch, who got his own first fossil as a gift when he was 4. "That'll always mean something to him."

Planning amendment statement revised after justices rejected it
By BILL KACZOR
Associated Press Writer
  
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. - State economists on Friday revised a financial impact statement that would go on the ballot with a citizens initiative designed to give voters a say in local planning and development decisions.


sponsored links
buy a link here
The Florida Supreme Court ruled the initial statement was misleading in a 5-2 opinion July 12.

The proposed Hometown Democracy Amendment to the Florida Constitution would require local governments to hold elections so voters can decide whether to adopt new comprehensive land use plans or make changes in those designs. The impact statement is required to give voters an idea of how much an amendment may cost.

The Supreme Court objected to the second of five sentences in the original statement: "Over each two-year election cycle, local governments cumulatively will incur significant costs (millions of dollars statewide)."

The statement, drafted by the state's Financial Impact Estimating Conference, failed to indicate the estimate is dependent upon how many times local governments have to hold special elections to adopt or amend land use plans, the majority wrote in the unsigned opinion.

The conference, made up of legislative and executive branch economists, revised the offending sentence to include a statement that "probable" costs will depend on the frequency and method of the elections. It also reworked a following sentence to indicate the potential costs include such expenses as ballot preparation and election administration.

Portions of the statement saying local costs cannot be precisely determined and state expenses would be negligible were left unchanged.

The commission has separately said the minimum cost of holding special elections within a two-year period would be $2.4 million assuming elections are held by mail - the cheapest method - and ballots are sent to 25 percent of Florida's 10.5 million-plus voters.

The attorney general's office next will submit the new financial statement to the Supreme Court.

Florida Hometown Democracy so far has collected about 45 percent of the about 611,000 signatures from registered voters that it will need to get the amendment on the November 2008 ballot.

Neither the group nor its lawyer, Ross Burnaman, immediately returned calls seeking comment on the language change.

In a letter to the commission earlier this week, Burnaman argued local governments could pass election costs on to developers and other parties that request planning amendments and piggyback referenda on other special or regular elections.

___

On the Net:

Office of Economic and Demographic Research: http://edr.state.fl.us

 

Report: More than 5,600 new homes still sit unsold in the Orlando area

Jerry W. Jackson

Sentinel Staff Writer

July 27, 2007

The number of individuals and families moving into new homes in Orlando-area subdivisions plunged 26 percent during the second quarter, and home builders continued to slam on the brakes.

Starts, or new homes getting under way in the region, fell more than 41 percent in the period ending June 30 compared with the same time a year ago, a report by Metrostudy showed Thursday.

And despite efforts by builders to entice buyers with discounts and deals, more than 5,600 new homes still sit empty in the Orlando area, a number that's virtually unchanged from a year ago, the Houston-based research company reported.

Unsold inventory did fall overall, a helpful sign for the health of the industry, but it was mostly in the under-construction category, said Anthony Crocco, director of Metrostudy's Central and Northeast Florida divisions.

"The Orlando MSA [metropolitan statistical area] is experiencing the same problems many Florida markets are experiencing -- large new- and existing-home inventories," Crocco said in his quarterly report, which goes out to builders, researchers, academics and other professionals in the housing industry.

"The high percentage of finished, vacant inventory remains a major concern," Crocco said. "On the upside, the Orlando MSA continues to add jobs and housing demand remains strong relative to most other markets in the state."

In the four-county Orlando metro area -- Orange, Seminole, Lake and Osceola counties -- 3,299 single-family homes were started in subdivisions during the April-through-June time frame. That was down 41.4 percent from the same period a year ago when 5,631 units were started. On an annual basis, local housing starts are down 38 percent.

Closings, or the number of homes sold and physically occupied in the Orlando area, totaled 4,004, or 25.9 percent lower than a year ago, Metrostudy found in its survey. On an annual basis through the second quarter, closings were down 8.2 percent.

The survey data are considered valuable to the industry because Metrostudy, which charges fees for its reports, physically drives through subdivisions to verify whether new homes remain vacant or are occupied, a more reliable third-party measure of closings.

 

One of the Orlando area's top retail-property brokers said Thursday that the slowdown in home construction in the suburbs means retail construction also will slow, particularly in outlying areas.

"Retail follows rooftops," and the trend now toward urban in-fill development means that retail construction will shift from suburbs to downtown, said Martin Forster, a director with Cushman & Wakefield of Florida Inc., and a partner in his own firm of Pocklington, Pocklington & Forster Retail Investment Group.

Forster spoke during a monthly meeting for the Central Florida Chapter of the National Association of Industrial and Office Properties.

With residential construction slowing nationwide, commercial construction has been taking up the slack, absorbing unemployed residential construction employees in many cases and generating ongoing economic impact.

Forster and other local experts who spoke, including top brokers Ron Rogg of CB Richard Ellis and Bo Bradford of GVA Advantis, said that strong global capital flows and low interest rates have kept commercial properties in hot demand and construction in high gear.

"Money drives the juggernaut," Forster said, and financing has shifted from residential construction to commercial.

Jerry W. Jackson can be reached at 407-420-5721 or jwjackson@orlandosentinel.com.

County bottled up over water plants

By TONY BRITT tbritt@lakecityreporter.com
Thursday, July 26, 2007 11:15 PM EDT

Columbia County officials have sent letters of concern to local and state representatives regarding several applications which have been filed to draw water from the Santa Fe River for use by bottled water plants.

Copies of the letter were sent to Gov. Charlie Crist (R), State Sen. Debbie Boyd (D-Dist. 11), State Rep. Will Kendrick (R-Dist. 10), State Sen. Steve Oelrich (R-Dist. 14), State Sen. and Charles Dean (R-Dist. 3).

Lisa Roberts, assistant county manager, said the letter was sent to state officials July 18.

“They usually respond in writing,” Roberts said of the letters.

The letter, which was signed by all five county commissioners, indicates that the commission has concerns regarding the issuance of new and renewal permits for the extraction of water for bottling plants from the aquifer underlying the Santa Fe River .

“The bulk removal of water will prove to be detrimental to this fragile ecosystem and sustainability of Florida 's groundwater and springs is essential,” it says.

According to the letter, new applications for water withdrawal at July and Santa Fe , LLC Springs in Columbia County and at Lily Springs in Gilchrist County were submitted in early 2007.

“This means that five applications for water withdrawal on the Santa Fe River have been applied for or approved by the Suwannee River Water Management District,” it states. “If these permits are granted, the amount of water approved for extraction from a three-mile area would total over one billion three hundred and fifty million gallons (1.35 billion) per year. This is in addition to water that is removed for existing residential and agricultural purposes, which would eventually be returned to the aquifer; water removed by bottling plants is not.”

Jon Dinges, Suwannee River Water Management District Director of the department of resource management, confirmed that several applicants have applied for permits to draw water from the Santa Fe River . He said the Suwannee River Water Management District has received at least five permit applications for water bottling facilities on the Santa Fe River .

The applications and their status:

n Lilly Springs - Permit applied for;

n July Springs (in Columbia County ) - Permit applied for;

n Ginny Springs - Active; (owned by Coca Cola); withdrawing an estimated 350,000 gallons of water per day.

n Blue Springs (in Gilchrist County ) - Not active; permit issued in 2003;

n Santa Fe Springs “Saw Dust Springs” (in Columbia County ) - Permitted to withdraw 150,000 gallons per day, but currently not in operation.

Dinges said the proposal from the permits are to drill a well,

or wells, and access ground water for bottling purposes.

“The water would normally flow through the spring into the river,” he said.

Water Management District officials have scheduled Minimum Flows and Levels testing on the Santa Fe for 2008. Minimum Flows and Levels testing are scientific studies used to determine the minimum amount of water necessary for the optimal health of the river.

The Water Management District has budgeted more than $250,000 in its 2007-08 tentative fiscal year budget for minimum flows and levels testing on the lower Santa Fe River and its springs as well as the upper area of the river.

“We urge you to take the necessary action to preserve our valuable water resources until such time as there is a completed scientific study essential to determining the minimum amount of water necessary for the optimal health of the river and springs,” Commissioners urged in the letter. “Without establishing this scientific basis for our future water use, Florida 's valuable resource, it's aquifer, will be permanently depleted.”

High Springs decides what areas of the city will remain rural

By Rachael Anne Ryals

Herald Staff Writer

HIGH SPRINGS -- The line in High Springs designating what area in the city can be developed to a higher density and what area in the city will remain rural has been drawn.

The High Springs Plan Board and the High Springs City Commission approved a long awaited Urban Service Area boundary that will guide the city as it approves development in the future.

The Urban Service Area approval from the joint meeting of the Board and the Commission on July 24 separates the city into two areas.

The Urban Service Area is the area in the city that will be served by utilities and be more highly developed, while the Rural Fringe will only be allowed to have a maximum of one unit per five acres.

To view the map and zoom in to see street names, click here: http://www.highspringsherald.com/content/current/multimedia/pdf_072607/urbanservicearea.pdf

The approval of the Urban Service Area is not a final designation; rather, the approval allows the planning staff to move forward with an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, a guide that the city will use to plan projected development for the next 20 years.

The approval comes after more than a year of meetings and workshops that allowed the public to voice their opinions on what area in the city should be included in the Urban Service Area, City Manager Jim Drumm said. 

The Urban Service Area and the final Comprehensive Plan Amendment will not change any of the zoning designations that city currently has -- the amendment will simply designate what area in the city can be more highly developed and what will remain a rural area.

The Rural Fringe does have two clauses that allows subdivisions in the rural area.

A "conservation subdivision" may be developed in the Rural Fringe, with a minimum of one-acre lots and 50 percent of the land must be protected conservation land.

A "cluster subdivision" may be developed in the Rural Fringe, with a minimum of one-half acre lots and 20 percent of the land must be protected conservation land.

The plan also designates protection of open spaces and primary and secondary conservation lands, meaning that land with sinkholes, wetlands or otherwise environmentally sensitive land will be protected from development.

The boundary was drawn with consideration of residents who gave input at public meetings, as well as the consideration of future traffic patterns, future annexations and protection of environmentally sensitive land near the Santa Fe River .

The meeting lasted for more than two hours with both the Plan Board and the City Commission making changes to include pieces of land not on the initial map.

And that was the point of the meeting, to get the input of the Board and the Commission on the map that the planning staff designed.

"The outcome of this meeting is a consensus from the group to see what they like or don't like," High Springs City Planner Christian Popoli said.

The members were given markers to draw changes on the map.

Two changes that were approved included one area proposed by Plan Board Member James Forrester concerning a tract of land in the northeast area of the city.

The area included several large tracts of land that Forrester said the owners may one day want to annex into the city and develop the land with city utilities and a higher density than the Rural Fringe designation would allow.

The other change was brought forth by Commissioner Jim Gabriel, who said that a large tract of land in the southwest corner of the city, near the railroad tracks and the sewer plant, could have the potential to be a good industrial area.

"Are we providing an adequate place for industry in this core zone?" Gabriel asked. "We can't just say we are going to have a community of little cottages with white picket fences. That is not going to sustain itself."

Commissioner Larry Travis and City Planner Gene Boles agreed that the area should be included.

The two additions were all that the Board and the Commission chose to change because the plan has to start somewhere, members said.

"We could sit here all night changing lines, but we have to start somewhere," Forrester said.

The planning staff said they were happy that the Urban Service Area was approved so that they can move forward with the Comprehensive Plan Amendment that may include up to eight new zoning designations that will be added to the current zoning designations.

These new zoning designations may include conservation, rural residential, residential subdivision, residential mixed, mixed use, commercial, business industrial and public.

The staff will spend the next few months working with the state Department of Community Affairs to get its approval of the plan.

Boles said he is happy with the plan.

"People may have different ideas of where the boundaries should be," he said. "But we took many peoples' ideas into consideration as well as professional expertise."

Coal-fired plants among nation's dirtiest

Big Bend, Crystal River on non-profit report's hit list for pollution, lack of efficiency

By NINA KIM

Published July 27, 2007

Tampa Electric Co.'s coal-fired Big Bend power plant in southern Hillsborough County is one of nine U.S. plants to rank in the top 50 for carbon dioxide emissions both in sheer tonnage and in amount per megawatt of electricity, says a new report.

From the movie An Inconvenient Truth to Gov. Charlie Crist's recent Climate Change Summit in Miami , greenhouse emissions, such as carbon dioxide, and global warming have received unprecedented publicity - and pressure for change.

The nonprofit Environmental Integrity Project report - Dirty Kilowatts: America 's Most Polluting Power Plants - issued Thursday ranked 378 U.S. plants based on their total output of carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide and mercury. The ranking was based on data reported to federal agencies by the utilities. Nationwide, power plants produce 40 percent of carbon dioxide, about two thirds of sulfur dioxide, 22 percent of nitrogen oxides and about a third of mercury, according to the report.

"We do not need to take this dirty route for our energy needs," said Valerie True, spokesperson for the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy. "Most southern states have a lot of energy-efficiency potential, some even up to 40 percent."

While high in the carbon dioxide ranks, Tampa Electric's Big Bend plant overall ranked 45th out of the nation's 50 dirtiest power plants.

Progress Energy's Crystal River coal-fired plant ranked 21st as the only other Florida plant on the list. But it ranked 3rd in tons of nitrogen oxide emitted - 35,412.

The Big Bend plant generated 30,714 tons of nitrogen oxides and produced 11.7-million tons of carbon dioxide.

"The global warming debate is over," said Dean Hulse of the Clean Electricity Committee of the Dakota Resource Council. "We are heating up the earth, and the burning of coal is one of the biggest contributors of global warming pollution."

Carbon dioxide pollution could rise 34 percent by 2030 if large, old and inefficient power plants continue operating unchecked, according to the report.

To address some of the concerns over traditional coal-fired power plants, Tampa Electric recently proposed to the Florida Public Service Commission building a so-called "clean coal" or IGCC baseload plant in Polk County , said Rick Morera, Tampa Electric spokesman. IGCC, or integrated gasification combined cycle, technology gasifies coal before it's burned to cut the amount of pollutants.

"The current technology to deal with carbon is just in the developmental stages and is not ready for application in a coal-fired plant," Morera said. "If the requirements are that we have to capture a certain amount of carbon, this new technology will allow us to be able to do that."

The Big Bend plant, which sits on the shore of Tampa Bay, already has scrubbers to manage pollutants and has installed one of four catalytic-reduction technology units, which control nitrogen oxide emissions. The company will install one a year until 2010.

"After all four have been installed, we should come off this dirty plants list completely," Morera said. "By 2010, just Big Bend alone will have reduced sulfur dioxide by 84 percent, nitrogen oxide by 85 percent and particulate matter by 61 percent."

In the ranking of dirty plants based on the emission rate of the pollutant sulfur dioxide, Progress Energy's Anclote power plant in Holiday was No. 41. And in the rankings for nitrogen oxide, Florida plants of Progress Energy, Tampa Electric, the Seminole Electric Cooperative and the Jacksonville Electric Authority were cited.

Nina Kim can be reached at nkim@sptimes.com or (727) 893-8913.

Angry crowd defends wetlands

By BILL VARIAN

Published July 27, 2007

TAMPA - They came wearing green and seeing red.

An overflow crowd filled the commission chambers at Hillsborough County Center on Thursday to blast the board's tentative vote to eliminate its Environmental Protection Commission's wetlands protection program.

They placed a tip jar on the lectern, with speaker after speaker depositing 60 cents - the cost, they said, of the wetlands program per resident. And they voiced outrage at the 45 minutes set aside for public comment - one minute per speaker.

"You're a mockery," said Roger Stewart, former head of the EPC, as his time expired. "If your time is so valuable, get the hell out and do something else."

The crowd dispersed not knowing the fate of the wetlands office. That decision, plus another public hearing, is scheduled for Aug. 16.

The audience was left to interpret the general silence of the commissioners it's dubbed the "gang of four" - Republicans Brian Blair, Jim Norman and Ken Hagan, and Democrat Kevin White.

The three other commissioners -Republicans Rose Ferlita, Al Higginbotham and Mark Sharpe - did most of the speaking from the dais, voicing support for what the EPC dubs a "hybrid plan" to streamline its $2.2-million wetlands permitting program.

In a preliminary vote, county commissioners voted 4-3 last month to kill the wetlands division. The majority said the county can no longer afford the division, given budget cuts being mandated by the state.

"We're getting the same vibrations we got in the 1980s, when three commissioners were taken away in handcuffs" for selling land-use votes, said Cam Oberting, a longtime activist and president of the Taylor Road Civic Association.

Grand jury hears Sunshine testimony

By BETH KORMANIK,

The Times-Union

 

The Jacksonville City Council auditor and a top official in the city's planning department testified Thursday before the grand jury investigating the council's compliance with the state's open meetings law.

Council Auditor Kirk Sherman and John Crofts, deputy director of the Planning and Development Department, were accompanied by Cindy Laquidara, the city's chief deputy general counsel.

They refused to discuss their testimony. The oath they took prohibited them from doing so.

State Attorney Harry Shorstein described the proceedings as "an introductory session" for the grand jury, which decided at its last meeting two weeks ago to investigate the council.

"It's important to educate the grand jury on issues of government in the sunshine and issues related to the operation of government," including the responsibilities of the planning department, Shorstein said.

Land use and rezoning decisions often draw controversy and have been the subject of several lawsuits, some of which allege Sunshine Law violations.

A Times-Union investigation published last month uncovered a deeply flawed system of public notification, dozens of meetings about public business held without public notice or written minutes and several meetings in private places, a violation of the city's ethics code.

Shorstein said the grand jury will meet again on the issue Aug. 23.

beth.kormanik@jacksonville.com (904) 359-4619

Water worries: When and where is it safe to go in for a dip?
By Bruce Ritchie
DEMOCRAT STAFF WRITER

Mary Ann Lee says if there's an advisory against swimming at St. George Island because of bacteria, she won't go.

But that doesn't mean she doesn't have questions about the advisories.

The state this week reissued an advisory against swimming at the island's Franklin Boulevard test site. Other beaches in Franklin, Wakulla and Taylor counties also remain under advisories.

The swimming area at Ochlockonee River State Park was reopened on Wednesday after being closed for the first time because of bacteria, park manager Kevin Patton said.

With the recurring beach advisories, Lee said she wonders: What's causing the bacteria? How far away is it safe to swim? And why don't they test inside St. George Island State Park?

"I like to go to the park - it's beautiful," she said. "But I haven't gone swimming when they said there is an advisory against it."

State health officials say they don't have all the answers.

But the Franklin County Health Department in August does plan to begin sampling at St. George Island State Park, said Bart Bibler, bureau chief for water programs at the Florida Department of Health.

While the Franklin Boulevard site on St. George Island had continued high bacteria levels, that wasn't the case at two other test sites at 11th Street East and 11th Street West .

The advisories only apply to the test sites, Bibler said. So there is no scientific way to determine whether it's safe to swim a block away or a mile away or to go snorkeling offshore.

"We only have the information at the sample stations that we are sampling from," he said.

The bacteria - enterococci and fecal coliform - are indicators of human or animal waste, Bibler said. Scientists say it's impractical to test water for all of the harmful bacteria and viruses found in waste.

There is no obvious source of the bacteria near most test sites - such as a sewage treatment plant, Bibler said. Other possible sources include septic tanks, livestock farms, wildlife and dirty stormwater runoff.

But a new University of South Florida study found data that "strongly indicates" human waste in the Ochlockonee River is the source of bacteria at Mashes Sands park in Wakulla County . The report points to septic tanks upstream along the river and malfunctioning toilets at the beach and boat ramp at Mashes Sands as possible sources.

Other studies are underway to examine nearshore and offshore currents in the Gulf of Mexico . They could show whether currents prevent bacteria from being carried away from beaches, Bibler said.

"We are hopeful that will start to help us understand things much better in this region," he said.

It should be safe to eat fish and shellfish caught near beaches with advisories as long as it is cooked, Bibler said. Other advisories are in place for limiting fish consumption because of mercury.

Lee said she hasn't always known about the beach advisories. She wonders whether she suffered health problems as a result.

"Do you get the flu?" she said. "If you have an open cut do you get a sore?"

Infections or stomach upset and more serious ailments are possible from swimming in the water, Bibler said

Carrabelle Mayor Mel Kelly said people may not know about the advisories. She points out that other states use more visible signs or flags to notify the public.

"There is a high percentage of people who use that beach who come from a distance," she said. "Warnings are not as obviously placed as public interest might demand."

Bibler said he has no way of knowing how many people heed the warnings or whether beach visitors actually are aware of them.

The minimum requirement for local health departments is posting a sign at the beach sampling location.

The Florida Department of Health also posts the advisories on its Web site. The department encourages also encourages local health officials to publicize advisories through the news media.

"We are doing it to protect public health at the beaches," Bibler said.

Scientists puzzled over catfish dying in Santa Fe River
By Jennifer Keil
For The Herald

Several of the meandering, tea-colored rivers of North Central Florida have recently been marred by the unsightly, and currently unexplained, appearance of dead fish floating in the water.

The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) is investigating a recent rash of reports of dead fish in the Suwannee, Withlacoochee and Santa Fe rivers.

The commission has been receiving reports of dead catfish for the past five to six weeks, according to Gary Byerley, fishery biologist for the FWC. Reports have spanned from northern Florida , where the Withlacoochee meets the Suwannee, down to the intersection of the Suwannee and the Santa Fe rivers.

"I've never seen fish dying for an extended time like this," said Byerley, who has worked for the FWC for 28 years.

Byerley has been out to the rivers several times to sample fish. Some of the dead fish have been sent to a lab for analysis, but the results are not all in yet.

Although channel catfish make up the vast majority of affected fish, he said six mullets and two largemouth bass have also been found dead. The sick and dying fish had lesions and patches of fungus growing on them.

The cause of the fish kill remains a mystery.

 

Originally, Byerley said he thought it was because of algae. With the overall lack of rain the past few years, the rivers are shallower than usual, and that allows sunlight to penetrate deeper into the water.

This encourages the rapid growth of blue-green algae, which releases toxins that are harmful to fish. The toxins do not affect humans. The algae tests, however, came back negative.

Now the FWC is looking into the possibility that the fish might be suffering from Channel Catfish Virus Disease, an illness usually connected with commercial catfish farms.

 

 

With little rain and shallower water, the catfish have been crowded together, an environmental stressor that could aid in the contraction and spread of the disease.

"It's like having a group of people in a room where one of them is sick. Everyone gets it," Byerley said.

He said the North Central FWC office has never tested for the disease before, so the samples are being sent to an out-of-state lab where the samples will be compared to samples of fish from the St. John's River .

A similar outbreak is happening there. Even if the tests come back positive, there isn't a way to treat the virus, Byerley said.

There is also a possibility, though slim, of it affecting humans.

"I don't foresee, at this point, that happening," he said.

Jim Wood, owner of Santa Fe Canoe Outpost in High Springs, said he hasn't seen or heard anything about dead fish in the local portion of the Santa Fe River yet, but he wouldn't be surprised if the low water levels had something to do with it.

He said with little rain, the water flows slower and is thus much clearer than its normal tea color. Similar to shallow water, the clear water allows plants to grow thickly, which depletes much of the dissolved oxygen needed by fish to survive.

The recent rains that broke the drought from earlier this year didn't help very much, Wood said.

"It's like spitting in the ocean," he said. "We really need a three to five day tropical storm to start getting water levels up in the aquifer."

Annette Long, president of the environmental activist group Save Our Suwannee (SOS), echoes Woods concerns on the lack of rain.

"This is one of the worst droughts we've had," she said. "The river being low stresses everything in it."

Long said members of SOS have been performing their own tests on the water to determine why the fish have been dying, but have not been successful.

"It's kind of baffling," she said. "I hope the FWC and the Suwannee River Water Management District manage to figure it out."

Despite the mysteriously sick and dying fish, Byerley said he doesn't expect the event to be catastrophic.

He said that as a part of natural selection, the stronger fish will survive and spawn, creating a more resilient species for the future.

"There's still a good number of catfish out there that are healthy," he said.

To report dead, dying or sick fish, call the Fish Kill Hotline at 1-800-636-0511 or visit the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission at http://myfwc.com

Muck removal to begin
by Terry Witt


A state agency has selected a contractor to remove tons of muck from the Duval Island Board Ramp near Floral City , County Commissioner John Thrumston said Thursday.

Pospiech Contracting Inc., will meet with officials of the Florida

Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission on Monday at the boat ramp to discuss

the $73,800 project, Thrumston said.

The muck removal project comes at a time when water levels in the Floral City Pool are low and heavy equipment travel in areas where water once stood. The plan is to scrape the thick black muck from the bottom and haul it away to a pre-approved disposal site.

Thrumston lobbied for the project after giving officials from several agencies a helicopter ride over the Floral City Pool on May 5 to show them how accumulated sediment and the growth of small hardwood trees has filled areas where water once flowed.

In the case of the boat ramp, sediment has added several feet of muck to the boat ramp floor.

Thrumston said the removal project will improve navigation and the local fishery.

“This is a baby step toward improving the health of the lake system,” Thrumston said.

Thrumston said FWC scientists are also looking at the intrusion of hardwood trees into marshy areas at the edge of the Floral City Pool in the area of Moccasin Slough and the Dead River areas.

 

Buried trash could taint water in Forest

BY FRED HIERS

STAR-BANNER

OCALA NATIONAL FOREST - The water that comes from Debra Thompson's well is as good as any that bubbles out of Marion County 's springs.

The 50-year-old restaurant worker has enjoyed that water from her home - just a block away from the Ocala National Forest in Shockley Heights - for the past 10 years.

But for the same period, the Forest has served as some people's dumping ground for garbage, abandoned cars, boats and sometimes even hazardous materials such as used motor oil.

Two months ago, U.S. Forest Service rangers found a dump site abutting Thompson's subdivision, which is just over the border into Lake County .

The site, just a stone's throw from Thompson's house, is 3 acres of vehicles, engine parts and even a makeshift hog kennel with a dilapidated septic system.

Most of the trash has been removed. What scares Thompson is the waste that rangers and Environmental Protection Agency officials suspect is underneath the ground, potentially affecting the groundwater.

There is evidence that people dug several pits many feet wide and deep and buried additional waste, including petroleum-based chemicals, before covering them again.

"You can actually dig around a little bit and smell it," said District Ranger Rick Lint, who oversees the 384,000-acre Ocala National Forest .

 

"Usually the dumping is on the surface and not buried. It's definitely unique and potentially very big," he said of the site. "I've never had anything this extensive."

U.S. Forest Service spokeswoman Denise Rains said the investigation was still in its early stages.

"Until more testing is done, all we know is it's on the surface soil. Whether it's permeated into the drinking water, we don't know yet," she said.

The area off Lake County Road 445 is cordoned off with yellow tape. Mostly trailers line the National Forest property. Old cars, boats, motor parts and broken household appliances are scattered in backyards and up to the Forest .

Authorities have made no arrests. They said it's too early to estimate the cost of cleaning the area if, as they suspect, oil and other chemicals were buried there.

They still do not know if only one person was responsible for the dump site or if more families participated.

Meanwhile, Thompson continues to wait and suspiciously examine her water to see if its taste changes for the worse.

"They're ruining nature and everybody's way of life out here," an angry Thompson said of the dumpers.

"You can't repair the damage they're doing," she said. "Eventually it's going to seep down into our well and drinking water. But it's also going to seep down into their drinking water, too."

Misty Miller, 29, has lived two years in her home only two blocks from the dump site. Like all her neighbors, she gets her water from a well.

Miller said she didn't understand why people, probably many of whom lived in the area or knew people who did, would throw garbage in the Forest when the subdivision already had waste pickup service.

In addition, there is also a county waste transfer station just a 10-minute drive away, she said. Miller also wants to know what will become of her groundwater.

"It would concern anybody," she said.

"We like it here," Miller said. "I moved here because it's quiet and they can't over develop it because of the national forest right here. Now we find out they dump their trash in it."

Fred Hiers may be reached at fred.hiers@starbanner.com and 352-867-4157.

State utilities: Florida no California
By Aaron Deslatte
FLORIDA CAPITAL BUREAU

When it comes to harnessing the sun or wind for powering homes and offices, Florida is no California .

But it does have lots of crops.

That was the overwhelming theme from Florida 's utilities and growers, who urged regulators Thursday to tread carefully in deciding how to respond to Gov. Charlie Crist's renewable energy goals.

The Public Service Commission gave its first public airing to Crist's executive order asking it mandate that utilities draw 20 percent of their energy from renewable sources ''with a strong focus on wind and solar energy.''

Crist's directives signed at his Miami climate change summit don't set a date for when utilities should meet that goal, but does set targets for cutting carbon emissions from utilities to 2000 levels within a decade.

But any leap into the world of renewables will be financed on the backs of consumers, utility officials warned.

''At the end of the day, it's the consumers that are going to pay the price for electricity,'' said Vincent Dolan, a vice president with Progress Energy.

Solar and wind power could help, but with 27 million acres of forest, farm and pasture lands that could be used partially for energy production, Florida should keep its renewable strategies grounded on the crops.

Gus Cepero, with sugar giant Florida Crystals, told PSC members that using sugarcane and other crops would keep more money paid for energy within the state instead of shelling it out to outside companies.

''You pay for transportation, or you pay to the company in Texas ,'' he said. ''Biomass in Florida is local.''

Even Agriculture Commissioner Charlie Bronson's office distanced itself from mandating any level of renewable energy sources.

''Generally speaking, Commissioner Bronson prefers reasonable goals for incentives over mandates,'' said Deputy Commissioner Jay Levenstein.

''We need to insure our ability to produce and deliver this energy is not out paced by our desire to meet this goal.''

The meeting coincided with Crist's announcement that St. Petersburg-based Progress Energy was building a wood waste power plant in Liberty County . Crist used the news to brush aside skepticism of his greenhouse goals coming from conservatives in his own party like House Speaker Marco Rubio, who called it ''European-style big government mandates.''

''I love a healthy debate,'' Crist told reporters. ''I think it's important for Florida and I'm encouraged ... that he realizes what a big, bold, important issue this is.

''It's innovative and we have to continue to look for ways for Florida to do better.''

Rubio said Thursday he wasn't opposed to the goals of carbon reduction.

''The only question is how do you get there, with a mandate or with incentives that create technological innovations?'' Rubio said.

''If you get there with a mandate, it is going to raise utility rates.''

Utilities and energy experts testified that California was already halfway toward its goal of drawing 20 percent of its energy needs from renewable sources when it inked the requirement, and can draw renewable energy from surrounding states.

'' Florida doesn't have that capacity,'' said Paul Barber, a consultant with Salt lake City-based Energy Strategies, which works with Florida Crystals.

''We have a better chance of having electricity beamed down from the Starship Enterprise than from some of the technologies we see today.''

Concern for patriarch oak tree moves couple to avoid demolition
By Jennifer Jefferson
DEMOCRAT STAFF WRITER

Soon after Marty and Angie Sipple moved into their home on Woodside Drive , the family noticed that the beautiful yellow house was not as perfect as they thought.

The house, which has a large patriarch oak tree in the front yard, was falling down. They decided against tearing down the house and rebuilding because it might have harmed the old and beloved tree.

“Our concern was always the oak tree,” said Angie Sipple.

They decided to gut the house and renovate it instead. They've gotten advice from arborists and taken other steps to protect the tree, including pruning the tree by hand.

The time and money spent trying to protect it is adding up. And the renovation is expected to stretch to August, more than a year after it began.

"It's been a project that's about to give us a nervous breakdown," she said.

Neighbors are concerned, too. Sandler Dickson, president of the Waverly Hills Neighborhood Association, remembers when the tree was named a patriarch oak. It was 1974, the same year the city turned 150.

“I love this tree,” Dickson said. “It's my favorite tree.”

Oaks in Tallahassee are are called patriarchs if they were around when the city was founded in 1824, said Stan Rosenthal, an extension agent with the University of Florida IFAS Extension in Leon County. They have a diameter of six feet or more.

Some 91 patriarch oaks are located in the county, Rosenthal said. The trees can live for 400 years. The tree in the Sipples' yard is believed to be at least 183 years old.

Construction Is Halted At The Grove

By LISA A. DAVIS The Tampa Tribune

Published: Jul 27, 2007

WESLEY CHAPEL - The classic quote "If you build it, they will come," from the 1989 film "Field of Dreams," took on a new meaning Thursday at The Grove at Wesley Chapel when the fire marshal issued a stop-work order.

Construction was continuing on the 736,500-square-foot retail and restaurant complex despite numerous warnings that the project lacked the proper emergency vehicle access road, county officials said.

"They had been forewarned several times before," lead fire investigator Mary Jo Short said. "We don't like to do that and put people out of work, but our primary concern is safety."

Fire Marshal Larry Whitten stopped by the massive construction site off Oakley Boulevard near Interstate 75 and saw that the road still didn't make the grade, Short said. As Whitten was about to red tag the project, he saw crews pouring a concrete slab for a building.

If construction workers other than a road crew are found on the site before getting the proper clearance, fines could be imposed.

Once the slab was finished, the workers were ordered off the site until a road that can carry up to a 32-ton vehicle is completed, Short said.

"They have a dirt road now and it's a total puddle," she said. "The water is about ankle deep."

Whitten's inspection determined no emergency vehicle could use the road without trouble, she said.

"If one of their workers fell from steel or something, we wouldn't be able to get to them," Short said.

Elizabeth Vocke, spokeswoman for The Grove, said Thursday evening the problems should be smoothed out by today.

"They've corrected the situation and they expect to be up and running by 9 a.m.," she said, though she couldn't provide details about how the problem was resolved.

Pittsburgh-based Echo Real Estate Development began construction on the plaza in the spring and it is supposed to open in the fall. Best Buy, Dick's Sporting Goods and a 16-screen Cobb Theatre are signed as tenants.

Reporter Lisa A. Davis can be reached at (727) 815-1083 or ldavis@tampatrib.com.

Legacy Development Wins Approval For 860 Homes

By KEVIN WIATROWSKI The Tampa Tribune

Published: Jul 27, 2007

ODESSA - County officials on Thursday approved the newest development in the shadow of the Suncoast Parkway .

The Development Review Committee signed off on a residential project proposed by the Behnke family for land it owns about a mile west of the toll road.

The 534-acre project, known as Legacy, will build 860 single-family homes and town houses. Committee members approved the proposal despite a still-unresolved lawsuit filed landowner Carl Behnke filed against the county over the rezoning of a neighbor's property.

The property includes a 1,100-foot-wide wildlife corridor and 178 acres of wetlands.

Legacy is bounded on the north by a 142-foot-wide corridor the county plans to use to build a four-lane western extension of Tower Road . Long-range plans call for using an overpass above the Suncoast to carry Tower Road from Starkey Boulevard to U.S. 41, making the road an east-west alternative to State Road 54.

Legacy's developers will have to pay $3.1 million to build their part of Tower Road , a sum attorney David Smolker said "breaks the camel's back."

Also on Thursday, committee members:

•Approved construction plans for Wilderness Commons South, a shopping plaza on the south side of the entrance to Wilderness Lake Preserve in central Pasco County . The plaza will include two retail buildings and a bank, totaling about 27,000 square feet.

•Approved a six-building medical office complex in the Trinity Oaks Professional Center at Welbilt Boulevard and Photonics Drive .

Reporter Kevin Wiatrowski can be reached at kwiatrowski @tampatrib.com or (813) 948-4201.

North Port finds no strength in numbers

By JEREMY WALLACE

H-T POLITICAL WRITER

jeremy.wallace@heraldtribune.com

NORTH PORT -- At 103 square miles, this sprawling city is hard to miss on a map. It is also near the top of the census charts for Florida 's fastest-growing cities, with a population that recently passed 50,000.

North Port 's leaders predicted that such growth would make their city a political powerhouse.

It has not.

It has been more than 10 years since a North Port resident was elected to an office outside the city limits.

Fewer than half of the city's residents are registered to vote, and only half of them turned out for the latest major election. In neighboring Venice, registered voters cast ballots at nearly three times the rate that they do in North Port.

North Port has also proven barren ground for political fund-raising, as well.

During the 2006 governor's race, North Port residents gave $6,100 to the four major candidates. Venice -- with less than half North Port's population -- gave six times as much.

Even residents in rural towns such as Wauchula and Arcadia, which combined have less than 12,000 residents, were able to muster $16,000 in donations.

And while North Port is not giving much to candidates, it is not getting much back, either. A recent city study showed it will cost $6 billion to update North Port's failing infrastructure -- a cost that dwarfs the city's annual $160 million budget.

City leaders say the state and, particularly, Sarasota County has not offered enough support.

"Nobody cares about us," said retiree Ray Corbin.

But political experts see it differently, saying North Port must become more engaged in voting and campaigning.

"They've taken themselves out of it," said Mac Stevenson, a Republican political consultant based in Manatee County.

Most politicians have found it easier to simply ignore North Port.

None of the current presidential candidates have visited North Port. Charlie Crist, who bills himself as "the people's governor," did not campaign once in North Port.

When White House senior adviser Karl Rove came to the region in May to stump for the GOP, his motorcade traveled through North Port -- without stopping -- on the way from Sarasota to a Port Charlotte fundraiser.

In his campaign for the Republican presidential nomination, Mitt Romney has made Florida a virtual second home. Over the past eight months, Romney has stopped in Bradenton, Osprey, Venice and Sarasota. But not North Port, despite pleas from local Republicans there.

"Nobody comes here," said Levko Klos, president of the North Port Republican Club.

Lack of identity

This was not how it was supposed to be.

As North Port annexed thousands of acres, leaders predicted, without a hint of mirth, that the county seat would move south one day, to the city that is on track to become the most populous municipality in Manatee, Sarasota and Charlotte counties.

Now, residents are frustrated that clout has not followed growth.

North Port could certainly use some more influence. Hundreds of miles of roads need of repair. Schools are crowded. Parks are few. Much of the city lacks sewers and city water. Nort Port does not have a hospital, YMCA or movie theaters.

Political influence will not solve all its problems. But in decisions made at the state level, such as permitting a new hospital (North Port was rejected), influence is important. Influence in county government is even more important, and North Port leaders regularly complain that they are not getting the city's fair share of county funds and services.

Undoubtedly, North Port would get more political attention if more residents voted and donated to political campaigns.

Sarasota Supervisor of Elections Kathy Dent said age is a big factor in North Port's low electoral turnout. The city's median age, around 40, is more than 20 years younger than it is in neighboring communities. Younger voters tend to participate at a far lower rate than older voters.

At the same time, few outside efforts have been made to engage North Port voters.

Dent's office has no program aimed specifically at raising North Port's voter registration and participation.

The county's political parties have also been distant.

In September, for the first time ever, the Sarasota County Democratic Party will hold its countywide meeting in the city. Republicans have held their countywide meeting in North Port once in the last two years.

While political parties say they will try harder, North Port's sheer vastness makes it hard.

Another challenge is the city's large group of Ukrainian immigrants, now estimated at 3,000.

Klos, of Ukrainian heritage, who has twice run for North Port City Commission and lost, said many immigrants distrust government because of experiences back home.

Because North Port does not have many high-paying jobs, many younger residents are forced to commute to work, cutting down on time for civic involvement.

It is hard to stay involved in politics or the community when you are always on the road to get to work, said Evelyn Kivlen, who has lived in North Port for seven years. Kivlen is in the medical profession and said, like a lot of others that make up the city, she has to commute to other cities in the region to find work.

"They're too busy raising their families," added Yvonne Marconi, a voter and mother of two who has lived in North Port for three years.

With more of a say in county and state politics, many North Port residents are convinced they could get money for schools and parks.

But the slighting of North Port by county, state and national leaders has gone on for so long, residents say, that even older voters have become convinced their votes do not matter.

Sarasota County commissioner Jon Thaxton said he is baffled that North Port has not been able to exert more power in politics. If the city's residents flexed their political muscle by voting and getting involved in political campaigns, Thaxton said, they would find the system very responsive to their needs.

"But you have to vote," Thaxton said. "If you don't vote, you don't get heard."

Joe Fink, a former North Port city commissioner who now lives in Arcadia, said the city's residents still think like a small town, despite the population explosion. Instead of acting like a city that is close to the same size as Sarasota and Bradenton, their political involvement is more similar to small rural towns.

"They don't realize how powerful they could be," he said.

Jeremy Wallace can be reached at 361-4966 or jeremy.wallace@ heraldtribune.com

Plans underscore long road to a green Florida

By LLOYD DUNKELBERGER  

TALLAHASSEE -- Gov. Charlie Crist on Thursday announced plans for the nation's largest waste-wood biomass power plant, which will be built in rural Liberty County.  

He could not have picked a better symbol for his far-reaching energy plan -- or, perhaps, one that better illustrates how far the state has yet to go.  

As a means of reducing greenhouse gases in Florida, Crist wants the state's utility companies to generate 20 percent of their power from renewable energy sources, like biomass or wind or solar power.  

With the Liberty County power plant, which should begin operating in 2011, Progress Energy Florida president Jeff Lyash said his company will have added the potential for 200 megawatts of renewable energy to its system in the last year. But he also said Progress Energy only generates about 5 percent of its power from renewable sources.  

The lack of renewable energy was highlighted in testimony before the Florida Public Service Commission on Thursday, where experts said Florida only has about 1,000 megawatts of renewable energy generation. To reach the governor's goal, it would have to increase renewable sources tenfold to account for 20 percent of the roughly 50,000 megawatts of power generated in the state.  

In contrast, California, which has set a similar 20 percent goal, already generates about 11 percent of its electricity from renewable sources.  

Nonetheless, Crist said the new biomass plant represents the "tremendous opportunities in going green."  

Progress Energy, the state's second-largest private utility company, will buy enough electricity from the 75-megawatt plant to power 46,000 homes. The plant, which will burn waste wood, yard trimmings and paper mill byproducts, will be built by Biomass Gas & Electric, an Atlanta-based company.  

"Government can't do it alone," Crist said. "These companies have stepped up to the plate. They're doing the right thing."  

But later in the day, utility representatives were raising some cautions about the governor's energy plans.  

Bob McGee, a representative for the Gulf Power Corp., said the state has to set realistic goals and timetables.  

"I encourage us to be careful about how ambitious we are in setting that goal," he said. "It would certainly be a disincentive to set it too strongly."  

The utility representatives also urged the PSC to consider nuclear power as a "carbon free" renewable energy source. Florida Power & Light, the state's largest utility, and Progress Energy have advanced plans to build more nuclear plants in the state. And Crist has said he sees nuclear power as a "clean" energy source.  

Tom Hartman, an FPL representative, said wind, solar and energy efficiency initiatives should "play prominent roles" in meeting the governor's goal of reducing greenhouse gases, like carbon dioxide. But he said nuclear power may be the key.  

"Our analysis showed that only by including large amounts of carbon-free electric generation made possible by nuclear energy does Florida have a realistic prospect of achieving the greenhouse gas emissions targets that we all want to achieve," he told the PSC.  

In addition to nuclear, utility officials said the state should also consider energy efficiency programs as another factor in meeting the greenhouse gas reductions.  

Over the last 25 years, Lyash said, Progress Energy has initiated energy savings programs -- such as encouraging the use of more energy-efficient appliances -- that have saved consumers $825 million and eliminated the potential for 7 million tons of carbon dioxide emissions.  

"None of these solutions by themselves are adequate," Lyash said about the renewable energy options. "But a combination of those solutions will get us where we need to be."  

Barry Moline, representing the 34 public power companies in the state, said programs that save a kilowatt of electricity should be considered as valuable as a kilowatt generated by wind or solar energy.  

"Why not go after both?" he asked. "Why not go after every tool in the box?"  

Under the governor's executive order, the PSC must begin developing a rule on renewable energy sources by Sept. 1.  

And highlighting the governor's keen interest in the issue, Chris Kise, one of Crist's top aides, appeared before the PSC.  

Offering a rebuttal to criticism launched earlier this week by House Speaker Marco Rubio, who asserted Crist's energy initiatives could be bad for consumers and businesses, Kise cited the newly announced biomass plant in Liberty County.  

He said it represents "an extraordinary opportunity economically and environmentally" for the state.  

Kise also said Crist believes the goals outlined in his executive orders earlier this month are achievable.  

"It can be done," he said. "All of it can be done."  

And some of the PSC members appear ready to act. Commission Nathan Skop dismissed a suggestion that a study should be conducted on the renewable energy issue.  

"Let's stop the excuses and start putting some stuff in the ground," he said. 

Uproar silences plan for kennel

Commissioners turn down Sheldegren Pet Resort's request to add 30 more dog runs.

By EILEEN SCHULTE

Published July 27, 2007 

They are rich. They are organized. And they got what they wanted.  

Several residents of the swanky Signature Estates neighborhood helped persuade the Pinellas County Commission on Tuesday to defeat plans to expand a dog kennel in Safety Harbor.  

In a 6-1 vote, elected officials decided they would not permit Sheldegren Pet Resort's owners to build 30 additional enclosed dog runs because the racket would bother the neighbors.  

"It was like a reverse O.J. Simpson trial," said Mary Ann Engelmann, who owns the kennel with her husband, Jes Engelmann. "The noise concerns they talked about were unfounded."  

She was disappointed in the commission's decision because there is a great need for facilities like hers in Pinellas County, she said.  

Most of the people who spoke against the project live next door to the pet resort in the upscale Signature Estates community that comprises more than a dozen million-dollar-plus homes.  

"The noise levels are insane," said Donna Carollo, a Signature Estates resident. "You can't open your windows ... you can't enjoy your porch."  

Said her husband, Santo Carollo: "We have 5 feet between us and (the kennel). We want quality of life ... we don't want (the kennel) intruding on our life."  

Opponents said the cacophony ruins neighborhood barbecues and parties, and that the yipping and yapping can be heard even through closed windows.  

Engelmann said she plans to install soundproofing materials throughout the kennel.

Signature Estates homeowner William Schumacher called the Engelmanns' expansion plans "unneighborly."  

The pet resort was built in the 1960s; Signature Estates was built about a decade ago.  

The Engelmanns bought the 1.7-acre property at 3440 Enterprise Road in 2003.  

The kennel averages about 35 guests a day; capacity is about 70 dogs. If the Engelmanns had been allowed to expand, that would have increased to 120 animals.  

Gary Borland, who boards his pet at the resort, is one of their supporters. He said people shouldn't "move next to an airport and then complain about the planes flying overhead."  

Likewise, he said, they "shouldn't move next to a kennel and complain about" dogs.

In case you didn't have enough to worry about:

Killer bees aren't here yet

Despite news report which seems to suggest otherwise

By Robert Bridges, Editor

Contrary to what you may have heard, killer bees are not terrorizing the local landscape. Some viewers came away from a TV news report on WJXT Channel 4 Monday believing Africanized bees had killed a horse in Live Oak. However, the incident actually occurred in Hendry County in southwestern Florida .
According to an online transcript of the WJXT report, "experts to the west of Jacksonville in Live Oak said killer bees killed a horse." The expert was Jacksonville entomologist Linda Prentice. Contacted Thursday by the Democrat, Prentice said she told the WJXT reporter she "thought" the incident had occurred in Live Oak, but wasn't sure. She said she told the reporter it may have happened downstate. She was right. In 2004 a 900 lb. horse died in LaBelle after swallowing the insects.
Nonetheless, Prentice said residents throughout Florida should be aware of the danger Africanized bees pose. She offered some pointers on how to recognize killer bees and how to protect yourself from them.
"Unusually aggressive behavior in high numbers -- that's going to tell the story," she said. She noted that small children, the disabled and the elderly are most at risk.
As for how to escape a swarm of the bees? For one thing, Prentice said, do not dive into the water. She said the bees hover overhead, and when their prey surfaces and gasps for air they rush into the victim's mouth.

Killer bees have a well-established presence in Texas as well as in south and central Florida . They have also been spotted in Jacksonville . Prentice said the bees will eventually establish populations throughout Florida.