Mass Transit Backers Seek Funding To Get Agency Off Ground

By RICH SHOPES The Tampa Tribune

Published: Jun 6, 2007

TAMPA - Supporters of a proposed regional transportation authority say they'll turn to businesses and local governments for startup costs if they can't get money from Gov. Charlie Crist.

The governor two weeks ago cut a request for $1 million from the state budget that would have paid for an executive director, secretary, legal costs and office space.

That prompted the Tampa Bay Partnership, a coalition of businesses that lobbied to create the authority, to send "A Call to Action" to its 175 company members, urging them to send letters and e-mail to Crist last week to ask him to reinstate the funding.

"Other regions have gotten hundreds of millions of dollars for transportation. Now it's our turn," partnership spokesman Joe Smith said. "This is just a huge opportunity to work together."

The partnership has pushed for three years to create the agency, called the Tampa Bay Regional Transportation Authority, after business executives cited transportation as the No. 1 obstacle to economic growth.

The authority would develop intercounty plans for toll roads, rail and express bus systems.

State legislators last month passed a bill to create the authority, and now all it requires is the governor's signature.

The partnership expects that to happen in the next couple of weeks, even though the funding issue remains up in the air.

If Crist won't come up with startup cash, the partnership and local legislators are running through some backup scenarios.

First, it would ask the Florida Department of Transportation to donate technical assistance to create the authority's regional transportation plan by July 2009, the deadline for the plan.

Don Skelton, secretary for the state transportation district that includes Tampa , said Friday that shouldn't be a problem.

DOT engineers are developing a master plan for roads and transit. The department also can arrange meetings, he said.

Next, the partnership would turn to businesses to donate office space and possibly pro bono legal advice to cut costs further.

At least initially, the authority might have to get by without an executive director and secretary, which shouldn't be a problem, Smith said.

"We may not need them anyway until later on," he said. "You have to understand this funding was for the first year of operation. Next year, we could come back with another funding request."

A spokesman for Crist said the governor vetoed the request because it was made under the Transportation Trust Fund, which pays for bridges and roads, not authorities' administrative costs. Funding Tampa 's authority wouldn't be fair to other authorities that relied on local governments for their startup costs.

The bill's sponsor in the House said he hasn't given up on asking the governor for funding this year. Rep. Bill Galvano, R-Bradenton, said he might request money from a fund that aids communities.

If Galvano doesn't succeed, he said, he will turn to local governments in areas covered by the authority - Citrus, Hernando, Hillsborough, Manatee, Pasco , Pinellas and Sarasota counties - and ask them to pitch in.

"If this issue is that important, then we need to show the governor and others in Tallahassee that we support it, and we'll support it by making some independent contributions," he said.

Reporter Rich Shopes can be reached at (813) 259-7633 or rshopes@tampatrib.com.



Growth Headed For The Hills?

Published: Jun 6, 2007

DADE CITY - The next 50 years could prove to be a busy time for the Pasadena Hills section of Pasco County .

The region between San Antonio and Zephyrhills is known for its rolling hills and scenic landscape. But with suburbia stretching north from Wesley Chapel and Tampa, county officials worried the best things about Pasadena Hills could vanish beneath haphazard growth.

On Tuesday, planners for the first time revealed to county commissioners their vision for the 22,000-acre region - a vision crafted over the past few months with the help of local residents.

The plan, as laid out for commissioners, sets aside about 12,000 acres of wetlands and development "rural enclaves." The remaining land would be developed by concentrating future growth in about a dozen villagelike centers spread from Prospect Road to Eiland Boulevard .

The scale and scope of the project will mean adding miles of new roads, sewer lines and other utilities to an area largely devoid of them.

That, planners said, will be expensive.

No one offered a price tag for the work, but for the first time planners laid out ways the county, landowners and developers might pay for the new infrastructure.

The most likely way would be to create special taxing districts to draw the funds for construction from the areas that will benefit directly, said Bob Nabors, a consultant hired to analyze the project's financial feasibility.

The region could also benefit from an impact fee created specifically for it and from assessing existing residents to help pay for road improvements.

With no dominant landowner to focus growth, the project could benefit from having several smaller landowners join forces to build a few of the future town centers as a way of inspiring others, Nabors said.

"My experience is, people have a hard time visualizing these concepts," Nabors said.

Nabors was quick to remind commissioners that the financing plan is flexible.

"These are all ideas to generate thinking about how to get from here to there," Nabors said. "They're not set in stone."

The Pasadena Hills plan has drawn little, if any, opposition from residents, hundreds of whom gave their input on what should be done with their area.

Critics from northeast Pasco have blanched at the prospect of adding 45,000 new residents to Pasadena Hills by 2057. Nowhere in the planning process has anyone said how the county will provide water to all those extra homes, Trilby resident Richard Riley said after Tuesday's workshop.

County Commissioner Ted Schrader, who attended the public workshops that helped craft the proposal, praised the document as an example of smart growth that could make Pasadena Hills a place people can thrive at every stage of their lives.

"This is something Pasco County ought to be proud of in the long run," Schrader said.

Reporter Kevin Wiatrowski can be reached at (813) 948-4201 or kwiatrowski@tampatrib.com.

With plan, county can take control of growth

St. Pete Times editorial
Published June 6, 2007

 

Take a look at east Pasco , the portion north of Wesley Chapel's congestion and south of San Antonio and St. Leo. It has hills and lakes, agriculture land and rural homesteads.

Now, take a look into the future. The same area could be 28, 000 homes on 5- and 10-acre lots. It would be cost prohibitive to provide central water and sewer utilities so wells and septic systems, and the accompanying environmental problems, would prevail. The road network to serve all those vehicles driving 10 miles just to get a gallon of milk at the nearest commercial outpost would require eight lanes of traffic on Handcart and Curley roads and U.S. 301. It is the definition of sprawl.

Or, it could grow as much of the county has. There would be 45, 000 homes amid a sea of subdivisions on former farmland that has been rezoned to allow up to three homes per acre. We've seen that already and it is not particularly appealing.

Still better is an area with the same 45, 000 homes clustered among 14 villages amid the pleasing landscapes that draw people there in the first place. Residents would shop and dine and, hopefully, a few of them would even work, at the central business districts within each town center. Instead of walled communities and streets ending in cul-de-sacs, homes would line connected streets leading to open spaces at the edge of each village. The planned grid system eliminates the need for widening existing highways to six and eight lanes.

That is the vision for the Pasadena Hills study area, 20, 000 acres between State Roads 54 and 52 from Curley Road on the west to U.S. 301 on the east. Protecting the rural corridor along Fort King Highway , preserving Lake Pasadena and leaving out three previously approved planned developments in Wesley Chapel cuts the actual planning area to about 10, 000 acres. Developed by Pasco County in conjunction with the same consultants who rewrote the county's comprehensive land use plan, the Pasadena Hills project is an attempt to project 50 years of growth over rural acres already targeted for some development. Most of those immediate development ideas stalled, however, when commissioners declined to amend the existing land use plan.

The resulting Pasadena Hills plan is a much more palatable way to turn old Pasco into new urbanism. There are still plenty of details to finish, most notably: How do you pay for all the infrastructure in an area without a single, dominant landowner?

One idea is the tax increment financing method usually reserved for redevelopment. The county could designate the Pasadena Hills area as its own special district, persuade property owners to commit their land, and then ship back a portion of growing property tax revenues to pay off bonds that financed the improvements.

But even before the nuts and bolts are worked out, the private-sector landowners and public governments (already acquiescence from the city of San Antonio is needed for part of the plan) will need to agree on a long-term collaboration. County attempts at earlier rural protections in northeast Pasco sparked litigation from residents protesting the trampling of their property rights. A repeat would be inopportune.

Here's an idea to help build that collaborative spirit. Drive around south-central Pasco or the U.S. 19 corridor on the west side and ask the interested parties: Is this the legacy you want for east Pasco , too?

Pasco County has plenty of cookie-cutter housing developments occupied by people driving to other counties for employment. Meanwhile, the private sector's experimentation with traditional neighborhoods around town centers is still in its infancy at Connerton and Longleaf.

Mapping out a different long-range plan for Pasadena Hills is smart. East Pasco County will continue to attract new residents because of its proximity to Tampa , and commissioners are wise to define how they want the area to grow instead of waiting for piecemeal developments to land in their laps.

Charlotte leaning toward water wells

By ZAC ANDERSON

zac.anderson@heraldtribune.com

CHARLOTTE COUNTY -- Frightened by the severe drought and intrigued by possible cost savings and better tasting water, Charlotte County officials are leaning toward digging their own wells and not relying solely on the regional water authority to expand.

If they follow through, it would be a major change from last year when the commission was ready to relinquish control of water resources to the regional water authority.

A consultant identified four prime locations for new wellfields during a presentation to the County Commission Tuesday.

The wellfield proposal was embraced by commissioners, who have blamed the Peace River/Manasota Regional Water Supply Authority for water quality problems and wonder if the large regional agency would be nimble enough to quickly develop new sources for overstressed areas such as the Cape Haze peninsula.

But a decision to develop county water sources could have consequences if state officials view the move as a rebuff to their regional approach.

"I think I'm regional and I think our board is still regional, but love starts at home," Commissioner Tom Moore said.

The county currently gets 95 percent of its water from the Peace River/Manasota Regional Water Supply Authority, which draws water out of the Peace River near Arcadia .

The water authority recently began a major plant expansion, and Charlotte County is guaranteed a percentage of that new water.

But county officials said Friday that it makes sense to have alternative sources of drinking water, especially in light of the recent drought, which found the water authority struggling to meet water quality standards.

"When I was pressing for" the water authority "to be our sole provider, we weren't in the worst drought in recorded history," said Commissioner Tom Moore.

Moore was careful with his words Friday, and for good reason.

State water officials have been pushing a regional approach to future water supply issues, and have threatened to withhold grant funding from counties that do not follow that approach.

A spokeswoman for the Southwest Florida Water Management District said agency officials understand why some of the wellfields might be needed.

"We anticipated they'd be doing a project like this because they're quite a distance from the regional system in some places," said Swiftmud spokeswoman Robyn Hanke.

The water authority always will be a major water provider in Charlotte County , said County Administrator Bruce Loucks. But Loucks said there may be some projects that are better handled locally.

"We can move quicker on some of these projects than the water authority can," he said.

And timing is important, especially in growing areas such as the Cape Haze peninsula.

Charlotte Utilities Director Jeff Pearson estimated Tuesday that the Cape Haze area will start experiencing water shortages around 2012.

It will take about that long to develop new supplies if the county starts now, officials said.

"We need to make a decision fairly quickly, and this is something we have control over," Moore said. "There's a lot of uncertainty with the water authority and their history addressing Charlotte County issues is abysmal."

Handling the project locally also could increase water quality. Because the Water Authority's Arcadia plant is designed to treat only surface water, water quality suffered when the Peace River shriveled up during the drought and the authority had to rely on mineral-rich storage wells.

And the well water might actually be cheaper because it would be piped shorter distances and require less treatment chemicals, Pearson said.

"Chlorine's not cheap," he said.

Charlotte 's consultant did not have firm numbers Tuesday on what it would cost to develop the new water sources. That information will be available in about three months when the two-year, $600,000 study is completed.

If the numbers look good, some commissioners want to move ahead immediately.

"I say go for it," Commissioner Adam Cummings said. "The clock is ticking."

Officials: 'No' to paying for study on water sources

Payment may be given later

BY CHRISTOPHER CURRY

STAR-BANNER

OCALA - Marion County Commissioners say they are not ready to help pay for a proposed alternate water sources plan they believe will allow pumping the Ocklawaha River to pipe water to other areas of the state.

"It's like we're buying an axe to cut off our own head," County Commissioner Andy Kesselring said.

The St. Johns River Water Management District asked the county for up to $585,816 over three years to participate in the study to identify future sources for drinking water other than groundwater withdrawal. Those proposed sources include surface water from the Ocklawaha in Marion and the St. Johns River . In a 4-1 vote, commissioners said they wanted to participate in the planning discussions, but will not pay for the study at this point.              

Kesselring dissented. He said the water management district seems to already have concluded the Ocklawaha is a source for future water supply and he is not convinced it should be.

Already, St. Johns officials have discussed the possible construction of an approximately 100-mile pipeline from a point north of State Road 40 on the Ocklawaha to supply rapidly developing areas of Lake and Orange counties with 39.7 million gallons of water a day.

"The design of this whole exercise is an effort to provide water to jurisdictions that are in imminent danger of losing their public water supply," County Commissioner Jim Payton told SJRWMD Assistant Executive Director David Fisk. " Marion County citizens don't have that problem unless you take our water and give it someone else .Ê.Ê. If you'd just leave us alone, we don't have that problem."

Fisk tried to alleviate commissioners' concerns. He said SJRWMD still follows the "local sources first" policy and that means Marion 's future water supply will have to be provided for before water may be transported from here. He also said the district will pay for 30 percent of the alternate sources study even though it is not required to fund it by state law.

It remains to be seen if commissioners decide at a later date to put money toward the study. Commissioners Barbara Fitos and Stan McClain and the county's Water Resources Manager Troy Kuphal said participation might be necessary for Marion to be able to secure future supplies.

"There's a saying, you're either at the table or on the menu," Kuphal said. "I think it's important for us to be at the table in this process from the very beginning."

County Administrator Pat Howard said Marion might not be able to block transfers because water is considered a state-owned resource.

"The law looks at that as not our water and they are not taking it from us," Howard said.

Christopher Curry may be reached at chris.curry@starbanner.com or 867-4115.

Golf courses hit with fines for water usage

Thirteen golf courses have been slapped with fines by state water officials after failing to meet irrigation targets.

BY CURTIS MORGAN

cmorgan@MiamiHerald.com

State water managers have hit 13 golf courses in South Florida with drought-restriction fines, saying they failed to make the water-use cut.

The Country Club of Miami in Northwest Miami-Dade carded the single worst water-use score, reducing irrigation by 0 percent in April, according to figures released Tuesday by the South Florida Water Management District.

The target cutback for each of the 177 courses in Miami-Dade, Broward, Palm Beach and Monroe counties had been 24 percent.

Grande Oaks in Davie , Jacaranda in Plantation , Don Shula's Golf Club in Miami Lakes and nine courses in Palm Beach County also face fines ranging from $1,500 to $6,000 depending on how badly they whiffed.

Country Club of Miami course superintendent Robert Montesino blamed a paperwork ''screw-up,'' not excessive sprinkling.

He said the county-run course had already petitioned to appeal the $6,000 violation notice, which arrived Tuesday in the mail.

The fairways, Montesino said, prove irrigation has been cut dramatically. ''Oh yeah, you can take pictures. It's brown,'' he said.

Overall, golf courses did better than asked on water cutbacks, said Jesus Rodriguez, spokesman for the water district.

Courses typically pump about 2.5 billion gallons in April, but beat the target number by a half-billion gallons, cutting back to 1.4 billion.

''They ought to be, as an industry, applauded for their water conservation efforts,'' said district spokesman Jesus Rodriguez.

It was the second round of fines the district has levied against golf courses.

More than 80 were charged $500 in April for failing to file reports showing weekly water use, which were required when the first drought restrictions went into effect on March 22.

Golf courses aren't the only affluent playgrounds getting dunned.

Owners of some of Palm Beach 's impeccably manicured mansions also have been written up by local police enforcing the strict one-day-a-week watering restrictions in place because of a drought stretching back about 18 months.

James Clark, co-founder of Netscape Communications Corp., received a written warning, then was fined $100 after he was accused of breaking rules on lawn watering.

Palm Beach police also wrote warnings for hedge fund manager Doug Kass and Robert Nederlander, a limited partner in the New York Yankees.

Clark , 63, said he hadn't been aware of the violations and his property manager has stopped watering.

''The lawn is pretty much dead,'' he said. ``Next year, we will have to plant a new lawn if we want one.''

Kass, founder and president of Palm Beach-based Seabreeze Partners Management Inc., was given a warning for hand-watering of some new plantings at the building, said Christopher Brandon, who handles the firm's operations.

Kass wasn't aware of the restriction, he said.

Nederlander didn't respond to phone messages left at his Palm Beach home or his office in New York .

Similar ''blatant'' violations prompted Stefan Ferentz, a Miami Beach guitar instructor, to start videotaping watering violations and post them on YouTube.

''It is an arrogant attitude,'' he said. ``There is an ends-justify-the-means attitude.''

Montesino said the Country Club of Miami shouldn't be lumped in with scofflaws. He said it appears that when the Miami-Dade Parks Department took over operations from a private management firm several years ago, no one looked at the fine print in the course's water-use permit -- at least until the violation notice arrived.

The permit lists the course as 177 acres. The club's two courses actually cover 288 acres, he said.

''I have two 18-hole courses here, that's one of the main issues,'' he said. ``We're in the process of modifying the permit now.''

Steve Matthews of Bloomberg News contributed to this story.

Martin won't require developer disclosures

Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

Wednesday, June 06, 2007

STUART — Prospective land developers in Martin County will not have to shell out more information about who they are before they can get county approval for their projects.

County commissioners rejected a proposal Tuesday to beef up disclosure The changes would have required developers to reveal who is applying for a land change or a rezoning request for a piece of property. Rules require the name of a company making the application.

Martin County 's disclosure process would have been modeled after Palm Beach County , which required disclosure forms after commissioners were found to have voted on questionable land deals.

Palm Beach County requires everyone with more than 5 percent interest in an application or property to disclose their connection.

Local attorneys Virginia Sherlock and Howard Heims suggested that Martin County implement the disclosure requirements after former Palm Beach County Commissioner Tony Masilotti pleaded guilty to federal charges for not disclosing his connection to a land deal in southern Martin County .

"You know why you need this," Heims said. "You could have corporations, and for all you know, one of the principles in your corporation is one of your staff members."

Sherlock and Heims also have said they want Martin County to force applicants to provide more information about those who own the land or propose the development, instead of simply giving the name of their attorney or a vague company name.

"You can't hide behind a corporation,'" Heims said. "You're seeing applications come in under the name of attorneys or land planners."

Martin County Commissioner Sarah Heard, who supported the disclosure requirements, said they would increase residents' trust of public officials.

"We want to make sure we are not sponsoring developments whose owners are terrorism cells or drug launderers," Heard said.

Commissioner Lee Weberman questioned whether such requirements violate state constitutional privacy laws. State laws do enough to govern the issue, and nothing can stop everybody from breaking the law, he said.

"If you have people intent on breaking the statutes, it doesn't matter how many laws you have," Weberman said. "This is one of the most silliest things I have ever seen."

County Commissioner Susan Valliere called Heard's claims about terrorist cells "absurd." Valliere voted against the proposal because she did not see the public benefit. She called the requirements an excuse to harass property owners.

"Justice is supposed to be blind," she said. "I personally do not want to know who owns the property."

County Commission Chairman Michael DiTerlizzi characterized the disclosure requests as a witch hunt against businesspeople.

"I can see where these insinuations are going," DiTerlizzi said. "Some people who are 'anti-everything' say that if you are a businessperson, you must be a developer and you must be crooked."

Fireworks flew between Heims and Weberman after the meeting.

"You're making our case for us about the lack of trust," Heims shouted at Weberman.

 

4,000 homes to be built in Port St. Lucie

Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

Wednesday, June 06, 2007

PORT ST. LUCIE — Despite a prolonged housing slump, 4,000 new homes will be going up west of Interstate 95 on land that started the city's westward expansion long before Tradition or PGA Village became household names.

New owners of the storied LTC Ranch, whose development roots date to 1992 and a developer's plans for 10,000 homes there, told planners Tuesday they plan to build an active adult community where the golf cart, not the car, is king.

 

Centex Homes unveiled plans for Phase 1 of the 2,068-acre project at a planning and zoning board meeting Tuesday, with a proposed 55,000-square-foot clubhouse with such features as a ballroom dance floor and spa, a fitness center and possibly a small community theater.

Kenneth DeLaTorre of Centex estimated about 2,800 of the 4,000 homes and townhomes on the property west of Glades Cut-Off Road will be restricted to people over 55, a fact that pleased a school district official who sits on the planning board as a non-voting member.

Despite LTC's early entry into the world of western development in Port St. Lucie, plans for the mixed-use development never got off the ground except for a small industrial park.

A contract dispute waylaid plans for homes in 2003, just as nearby landowners like Core Communities, PGA and G.L. Homes were announcing dreams of building their own mega-communities on vast tracts of farmland west of I-95.

With the court battle settled and Centex paying $110 million for the land last year, developers said they are eager to break ground next spring despite the slumping housing market.

"We think we'll have a unique product to offer the active adult who wants to be surrounded by nature," DeLaTorre said. "There's a lot of lakes and wetlands, and we're going to use that as an attraction."

Three-fourths of the 4,000 homes will be single-family, with the others townhouses and owner-occupied apartments. No price range has been set, but DeLaTorre said value will be a key factor in attracting buyers in a lackluster market.

Previous owners secured the right to build up to 4,000 homes, 2 million square feet of industrial space and 725,000 square feet of retail space. Centex is seeking some changes to the non-residential figures and will present its overall plan this summer.

The developer also must donate 120 acres to the city and school district for a regional park and a school. The proposal will be discussed by the city council later this month.

 Couple requests rezoning to build home

BY JESSICA RAYNOR
FLORIDATODAY

TITUSVILLE — A Titusville couple is asking the city to approve a permit to build a single family home on property zoned for open space.

Peter and Lynn Pearson will appear at the planning and zoning commission meeting at 7 p.m. The two have regularly attended city council meetings within the last several months, questioning the council on the city’s methods for determining wetlands by using seemingly outdated maps.

The Pearsons’ previous attempt to build on the property failed. The city will discuss the issue at its June 26 meeting.

In other business, the planning and zoning commission will discuss naming a street in the Timber Trace apartment project, look at a Tire Kingdom project, and discuss an ordinance that would transfer development rights within the central business district.

Contact Raynor at 360-1016 or jraynor@floridatoday.com

 Impact fee vote delayed as builders ask for time

Joshua Davidovich
Staff Writer

TAVARES - A controversial vote on the first of several proposed increases in impact fees won't happen until at least August.

The Lake County Commission voted Tuesday to delay action on transportation impact fees for 60 days at the request of the Lake County Home Builders Association, which asked for the time to review and challenge the study supporting the fee increases.

"We just received the final report from Tindale Oliver on May 21. We have a consultant on board," HBA president Jim Bible said. "It's just really become known in the last week or two what the significance of the numbers are."

The vote was taken before a standing room-only crowd of builders and others at the county commission chambers in Tavares.


Many were on hand to oppose the proposed rate increases which would make Lake County among the most expensive places in the state to build. If fully implemented, the fee to build a single-family home would become $11,396, up from $2,189. Fees for constructing offices, stores, restaurants, factories and other buildings would also increase significantly, in some cases by more than 400 percent.

Commissioners expressed hope that with the delay, they would be able to vote on both transportation and school impact fees at the same time.

"By then the school impact fee should be ready," Commission Chairman Welton Cadwell said. "By then the special session will be over."

The state Legislature will determine how to provide property tax relief during the special section. How that is accomplished, and to what extent, may affect county revenue.

The initial school impact fee study called for similar fee increases that also would be the highest in the state. Though that study had already been approved by the school board, it is under re-review by the study's authors.

Commissioner Debbie Stivender drew large applause when she told the crowd she opposed the fee increases.

"I came into this meeting wanting to deny this proposal," she said.

Officials had originally hoped to have the fees in place by Oct. 1, the beginning of the fiscal year, but said they may have to delay that until Jan. 1.

Bible said he would deliver a list of homebuilders' concerns to the county commission later this week and hoped to meet with them to discuss the issues before the vote in early August.

"It's not our intention to delay getting something adopted," he said. "We don't want to let this languish."'

Commissioner Linda Stewart waited until the end of the meeting to voice her support for the fees, which she said were being presented in an unfair light.

"I'm rather sick of the grandstanding and scare tactics," she said. "The fact about impact fees is that they are necessary."

County Allows ApplicationFor Stewardship Program

By JIM KONKOLY

Published: June 6, 2007

SEBRING - Highlands County Commissioners voted 4-1 Tuesday to allow the county's two biggest landholders – Atlanticblue and Lykes Brothers – to apply for the state's new Rural Land Stewardship program as a development option.

RLS allows development of a new, self-sustaining town in a rural area if the landowner makes permanent commitments to preserve surrounding areas for conservation and agriculture.

Atlanticblue, which operates the 65,000-acre Blue Head Ranch west of Lake Placid, and Lykes Brothers, which farms on 68,000 acres surrounding Fort Bassinger , now need approval from the state Department of Community Affairs to seek RLS designation.

Spokesmen for both companies said they have no immediate plans for development of a town but want RLS as an option to concentrate development in a confined area while maintaining large portions of their land for agriculture and conservation.

Commissioner Barbara Stewart cast the lone "no" vote on declaring the county's intent to consider the two sites – which collectively account for 20 percent of the county – for RLS development.
Stewart said she supports RLS as a planning tool for rural development and land conservation but wanted more detailed information in the county's letter to the DCA.

Lykes Brothers and Atlanticblue have agreed to pay the county's costs for reviewing their RLS applications. J. Ross Macbeth, county legal counsel, said details of those agreements are being worked out while county officials look into hiring transportation, environmental and planning consultants for RLS review.

Macbeth advised commissioners to invite the cities of Sebring and Avon Park and the town of Lake Placid , plus all organizations involved in rural land use, to review and comment on the RLS applications when they are made later this year.

The DCA has said development of large-scale RLS projects could decrease the amount of development allowed by the state in other areas of the county, Macbeth said.

"How much that (RLS) precludes moving ahead with other development plans is not known," he said.
Mark Morton, senior vice president of Lykes Brothers Land Investments, Inc., said the company has no immediate plans for a new town but wants RLS designation in case such a project becomes viable in the future.

"This (RLS) is a long range planning tool," Morton said. "If there were a market for somebody to want to do a new town, if a new town made sense, we would be able to react to it. And the county would be in a position for lands to be be in conservation and for agriculture lands to be set aside."

Lisa Jenson, executive vice president and chief operating officer for Antlanticblue, said her company views RLS as an important development option but has no immediate plans to develop a town.

Mobile home parks given reprieve from development

 

Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

Wednesday, June 06, 2007

STUART — Mobile home parks cannot be bulldozed into condominiums in Martin County , at least for now, the county decreed Tuesday.

Commissioners unanimously approved a temporary moratorium barring the owners of any mobile home parks from applying to change the use of their land or rezone it in order to redevelop it.

 

Mobile home parks provide affordable housing for low-income and retired residents. Commissioners instituted the moratorium because owners of several mobile home parks have expressed interest in closing their parks and turning them into more expensive permanent homes and condos.

"We need low income housing," said Susan Tower , a resident of the Bloomfield Meadows park in Hobe Sound.

Bloomfield Meadows park owner Art Palma is evicting residents such as Tower because he wants to redevelop the park into condos. Tower said the moratorium is needed because lower-income residents like her deserve a place to live in the county.

"People who live in parks are not white trash or poor people," she said. "I work every day, so I don't consider myself a poor person."

Some mobile home parks in the county's seven community redevelopment areas will not have to follow the moratorium. Mobile home parks in Rio and Port Salerno have zoning classifications that allow them to redevelop into residential and commercial projects, County Planner David Quigley said. Redevelopment areas in the county's old downtown areas are designed to use tax revenue to revitalize the areas.

Commissioner Doug Smith supported the moratorium but said it may not do much to help low-income residents because it does not stop a park owner from evicting residents and closing a park, only from trying to redevelop it.

"This won't stop an owner from dissolving a park," Smith said.

Quigley agreed that Palma could continue to evict residents even with the moratorium but he could not do anything with the park during the moratorium except put mobile homes in it.

The moratorium bars any new applications for at least 15 months, Quigley said, and commissioners will use that time to create ordinances to preserve mobile home parks or create affordable housing.

Terry McCarthy, Palma 's attorney, said the developer would go ahead with his plans to evict residents and close the park. Palma may reopen the park with newer mobile homes or he may wait out the moratorium so he could pursue his original plans to develop condos, McCarthy said.

Commissioners have proposed solutions that would require owners who redevelop mobile home parks to build more mobile homes elsewhere.

"In the end hopefully we'll have some solutions for housing," said Commissioner Lee Weberman.

Resident Debbie Cooper, reading a letter for Indiantown mobile home park resident Art Madsen, said elderly retired residents living in mobile homes deserve to be protected as an "endangered species" just like rare animals.

"Suddenly they have become expendable and the land is getting sold out from under them," Cooper read from the letter. "They do not have as much protection as a tree frog or a turtle."

 

Fertilizer laws to get hearing

By PATRICK WHITTLE

patrick.whittle@heraldtribune.com
SARASOTA COUNTY -- The county could enact new, tougher fertilizer laws on July 11.

That is the date of a public hearing for Sarasota County 's proposed fertilizer law, which would be one of the strictest in the state.

According to county records, the ordinance would:

Prohibit residents from using fertilizers that contain nitrogen or phosphorous between June 1 and Oct. 1.

Create a fertilizer-free buffer zone within 10 feet of any body of water.

Create a "no-mow zone" within 6 feet of any body of water.

Require completion of a training course for all professional fertilizer applicators.

Require rotary fertilizer spraying devices to include a special shield.

County leaders have spent more than a year crafting the new law.

County Commissioner Jon Thaxton said the law, if approved, is a move in favor of the county's water quality. Phosphorous and nitrogen, two of the main ingredients in fertilizer, can cause harmful algal blooms.

"There's no way we're ever going to be able to restore the bays to the state which they were before" the widespread use of fertilizers, Thaxton said. "We're shooting for the best that we can get."

The county's proposed law takes some cues from an ordinance passed by the city of Sanibel in March. Like the Sanibel ordinance, the county's proposed law prohibits the use of fertilizer on "impervious surfaces" such as driveways.

Sanibel and Sarasota are two of several localities that have worked to create local fertilizer laws. The state House and Senate have also approved a state law that would help create minimum standards for fertilizer.

The county's proposed law also encourages residents to use slow-release fertilizers rather than quick release fertilizers that are prone to wash down drains.

The county commissioners added an exemption that allows residents to use fertilizers in the rainy season on "damaged, diseased or new landscaping."

The commissioners capped the use of nitrogen at five pounds per 1,000 square feet per year.

The commissioners also put a 2 percent cap on the amount of phosphorous that can be used in fertilizer blends.

Fertilizer industry representatives have expressed concern that Sarasota 's law could force companies to pass the cost of compliance on to consumers.

The ordinance states that a strong law is necessary as "part of a multi-pronged effort by Sarasota County to reduce nutrient leaching into runoff."


Good roads don't come cheap

By JOHN DAVIS

john.davis@heraldtribune.com

NORTH PORT -- Experts are telling North Port's leaders the city will have to charge people more for upkeep if it wants to stay ahead of maintenance on hundreds of miles of roads and the city's massive drainage network.

This is the latest proposed fee increase in North Port , which is dealing with budget cuts after years of massive revenue growth.

In the past, the City Commission has been reluctant to increase city taxes and fees, even when experts and city staff recommended it.

But North Port is relying on almost $6 million from its savings to stay afloat this year. And City Manager Steven Crowell has said the city is likely facing a second year of deficit spending, since it has seen growth slow to a crawl in the past year.

Today, two consulting firms will tell city leaders that North Port will have to increase its road and drainage fees to keep up with the costs. Commissioners could vote on the fee today, but they say it is not likely, meaning the road fee will be added to a list of budget decisions now facing the commission.

"It's a difficult thing for people to see and us to do," said Commissioner Fred Tower of increasing fees.

According to Public Works Director Branford Adumuah, if North Port wants even a modest repaving program, the city might have to more than double the road tax next year.

Today, Adumuah will likely recommend an increase of about 30 percent for most homeowners, who now pay the city $120 a year for repaving.

"We're going to advance slowly," said Commissioner Richard Lockhart of the road fee proposal.

Last month, the consultant Government Resources Group recommended that the city increase garbage pickup fees to $300 next year for residents, up from the $209 residents now pay.

The commission has yet to make a decision on what next year's garbage fee will be or whether the whole department will be turned over to a private company.

This month, the commission will also talk about whether to go through with a planned increase in construction impact fees. Beginning in October, the impact fees the city charges to build a house will go from $6,861 to $9,809, but with the massive slowdown in home building, city leaders are rethinking the plan.

The city is spending $13 million on an unprecedented road repaving and drainage rehabilitation program that will cover about 130 miles of roadway. The city has hundreds of miles of roads and drainage networks left to rehabilitate, but is short of the money to do it.

Lake Wales approves annexations

 

 

By Shelly Godefrin

News Chief staff



LAKE WALES - The Lake Wales City Commission approved on first readings eight annexations at the meeting Tuesday night.

The annexations total approximately 914 acres and more than 90 percent of the property is proposed for residential development.

Of the remainder, 47 acres is city property proposed for the expansion of the Rapid Infiltration Basin site for final effluent disposal from the wastewater treatment plant.

Eleven acres is proposed for commercial or industrial development and a 9-acre site on Hunt Brothers Road next to the new soccer fields is proposed for construction of a church.

Other plans for property includes a business park development and a real estate office facility.

Second readings for the proposed ordinances will be scheduled for the next meeting June 19, along with the first readings of ordinances assigning future land use and zoning map designations.

In other business, the commission has put to rest an issue that's been a topic of meetings for at least two months.

The issue was first broached at the Feb. 20 meeting, when it was made known that the contract for preventative maintenance and repair of heating, ventilation and air-conditioning equipment and controls for the city was erroneously awarded to Gill's Heating and Cooling. The award should've been given to the actual lowest bidder, Natural Air Heating and Cooling.

At the March 21 meeting, the commission decided to rescind the bid and put it up for a rebid.

On April 4, Natural Air Heating and Cooling Systems threatened to sue the Lake Wales City Commission for rescinding the bids.

The decision by the commission at the April 4 meeting was to rebid the contracts.

Tuesday night's meeting brought forth yet another decision with the maintenance contract.

The commission decided to reject all bids received on May 8 for preventive maintenance and direct the purchasing agent to prepare a request for proposals.

Commissioner Jack VanSickle met with city staff because he has expertise in evaluating these types of contracts and he recommended that all of the bids be rejected.

"This is a methodology of arriving at a fair evaluation of the bids," said Mayor Alex Wheeler.

During talks about the issue, it was decided that preventative maintenance would be done in-house and in August, a city staff member will attend a 49-week air conditioning, refrigeration and heating technology class at Traviss Career Center in Winter Haven .

"We're trying to improve the process," said City Manager Tony Otte.

Jonathan Carson, president of Natural Air Heating and Cooling, said that he was glad that the commission knows what the contract evaluation was.

"I understood it from the beginning and I tried desperately to earn your business," Carson said. "The end result now, because of my persistence, you guys are now saving quite a bit of money."

The commission unanimously agreed to reject the contract bids and adopt the procedure for maintenance repairs.

michelle.godefrin@newschief.com

 

Bunnell annexation 'alive and well and moving forward'

By LAUREN SONIS

BUNNELL -- Flagler County 's largest city -- area-wise -- may soon nearly double in size.

City commissioners voted 5-0 Tuesday night to approve an ordinance that would add 42,329 acres by voluntary petition to Bunnell's roughly 75 square miles.

If commissioners approve the ordinance on second reading, scheduled for 7 p.m. June 19, that would make Bunnell about 145 square miles, about 30 percent of Flagler County , according to city estimates.

"Everything is going wonderfully," Elbert Tucker said outside City Hall. Tucker, who owns some of the land, later said, "The annexation issue is alive and well and moving forward."

He said he does not know of anyone who has plans for development.

The potential annexation, running northwest of the city's current boundaries, would be the third large annexation in two years for Bunnell.

In 2005, the city annexed 10,500 acres extending five miles south of downtown.

And in 2006, Bunnell annexed 37,000 acres south of the 2005 annexation, down to the Volusia County line.

Bunnell's community development director Mick Cuthbertson said the city has more than 2,500 people in the current boundaries, according to the University of Florida 's Bureau of Economic and Business Research.

While Cuthbertson does not know how high the population would jump if the city annexes the proposed properties, he doubts it would be much because the land is mostly agricultural.

Agricultural zoning has taken a hot seat in Bunnell's annexations. The city recently hired planning consultant Roger Wilburn to work on a future land-use map amendment that could help Bunnell meet state standards for growth management involving the 10,500 acres annexed in 2005.

Department of Community Affairs regional administrator Mike McDaniel met with city officials in January and raised concerns about urban sprawl and the city's agricultural zoning, which allows people to build one unit per acre of land.

While city officials and landowners have said most of the land would remain open, McDaniel said the department didn't want people to come in and develop however they wanted.

City Manager Richard Diamond said Tuesday afternoon the policies Wilburn develops for the 2005 annexation could apply to other annexations.

And Diamond said if the city approves the newest annexation, there would not be much demand on services because the additional population would be so small.

"But it will increase the demand for services, there's no question about that," he said.

Diamond said there is potential for development, and the question is whether the tax base would cover the cost for additional services.

For now, Palm Coast remains the most populated city in Flagler County . Jennifer Ingels, long-range planning manager for Palm Coast , said as of May 1, the city had 73,060 residents. As of May 8, Palm Coast measured 66.46 square miles, and there have been small annexations since then, she said.

The county is 845 square miles with 89,075 residents, said Flagler County spokesman Carl Laundrie, who referenced the University of Florida 's Bureau of Economics and Business Research.

lauren.sonis@news-jrnl.com

 Development will be harmful to city

By St. Pete Times LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Published June 6, 2007

The Dade City Commission will vote Tuesday, June 12, regarding annexation of 60 acres south of the city. The developer wants to put 360 units on this property. Approximately 30 percent of the parcels are wetlands, resulting in the remaining land having nearly 9 units per acre. The county zoning maximum is 5.8 per acre.

The impact of this development upon the city will be extensive. First, the entrance will be on U.S. 301, accessible from the north only, the exit will be right turn only onto U.S. 301. This clearly will result in hundreds more cars making U-turns. This is presently the most congested section of road in the town.

The development will not be able to contain its runoff in holding ponds, thus requiring the city to pump extensive volumes of water into a system that presently is overloaded and has in the past flooded sewage into Hester Lake, and ultimately into the Withlacoochee River.

The developer, out of the goodness of his heart, has persuaded the city to "give" more than 3 acres to the development, thus relieving the city of any potential liability. Potential value of this gift is possibly over $1-million.

It appears that one cannot only get the keys to the city, but a gold MasterCard at the same time.

Patrick Lawhead, Dade City

Preserve meeting has telling details

County hears options for ballfields May 23, story

I wish to thank St. Petersburg Times staff writer Theresa Blackwell for her concise reporting of the May 22 County Commission meeting regarding the fate of Brooker Creek Preserve. It was heartening to see a packed room of residents who sacrificed a work day to be heard and support the rightful future of the preserve.

There were some telling reactions to offers and alternative solutions. First off, Commissioner Susan Latvala's dismissal of Tarpon Springs Mayor Beverley Billiris' offer of land for the ballfields. Apparently, 3 miles is too far to travel for those soccer-starved kids from East Lake .

I also found it odd that there was any discussion with regard to the water blending plant, considering it appears to be a foregone conclusion that this facility is being built on preserve land. It is already shown on the county Web site !

And while I don't care if there's a soccer field for every child in East Lake, the county can't afford to lose more natural resources to meet that end. I take issue with the last speaker at the commission meeting who damned all pro-Brooker preservationists because we didn't appear to be inclined to bear audible witness to the decibel-breaking, teeth-grinding screech of children at play. Odd but true, there is a segment of the human population that is not a parent or grandparent. It is not remotely pleasurable, delightful, or even entertaining to be subjected to that noise.

Kathleen Finnerty, Largo Brooker Creek

 

Let's keep pristine land

Land was set aside for a preserve at Brooker Creek. This decision was official, and we citizens expected it to be binding. Any action that changes the preserve changes the spirit of the meaning "preserve" and is not the desire or the intention, nor does it have the approval, of us citizens.

Greed and corruption have depleted our natural resources. Inappropriate use of natural resources has caused the extinction of plants and animals. When will we stop?

Years from now, do our county commissioners want to be known as the persons responsible for the loss of this preserve by beginning to allow the preserve to be used for other purposes? Are they going to be the example for destruction or the example for preservation?

Now is the time to stop all destruction of pristine land. Now is the time to curtail development.

Do we really need that golf course (condominium, new mall, bridge, etc.), or does someone just want to sell some land for a good price? Who benefits? The few or the many? If many, then allow it. If only a few, preserve it for the future of all life currently using it.

Should we rebuild on land that has to be replenished after a natural process such as a storm? Let's get smart and stop the destruction of the land and start conservation of all natural resources.

Susan E. Tanner, Seminole

Wetlands figure into South Daytona condo plan

By WILLIAM COVERT
Correspondent

SOUTH DAYTONA -- A condo developer has substantially changed plans for the Malaga project on South Ridgewood Avenue to accommodate wetlands at the site, adding more public access, a park and an elevated walkway over the environmentally sensitive lands.

At the May 16 meeting of the Land Development Regulation Board, board members reviewed a revised proposal from Malaga Investments of Daytona Beach, regarding the 3.4-acre parcel at 3109-3115 S. Ridgewood Ave. , near the former Sandy Point Progressive Sports building.

Assistant City Manager/Community Development Director John Schoch told the board the riverfront Malaga project was approved by the City Council in May 2005, but since then the site plan was revised because of wetlands in the northeast corner of the property.

After negotiations with the Army Corps of Engineers and the state Department of Environmental Protection, Malaga enlarged the size of the protected wetlands, reduced the buildable portion of the site and moved the project closer to Ridgewood Avenue .

Also, the developer has pledged to acquire the vacant McBride property on the south side to develop into "parkland" for public use and public access to the shoreline walkway, which will travel over the wetlands and along the river.

Schoch told the board the developer had done his best to reconfigure the site, including reducing minimum unit size from 1,500 square feet to 1,178 square feet.

"These proposed changes are reasonable and they will result in a more attractive project," he said.

"However," he added, "the city would still like to find a way to increase the building setback off of Ridgewood Avenue and to minimize impacts on neighbors to the south."

Thomas Wright, an attorney for South Daytona resident Val Fiano, expressed concerns about the project's setbacks, or distance from other structures and roads, and about increased density.

City Attorney Scott Simpson replied that the density had not increased, and the McBride property would be totally dedicated as a park for public use.

Board member Shawn Goepfert voiced a concern that with a building height of 184 feet, the condo would tower above Ridgewood Avenue , since it was now only 60 feet from the sidewalk.

Malaga Investments owner Felix Amon countered that he had opened up as much space as he could between the multiple buildings in his project, as well as incorporated aesthetics, a more Mediterranean design and public access.

The board voted 5-2 to recommend approval of the project to the City Council, with Goepfert and Rick Sita dissenting.

City Manager Joe Yarbrough said the item would not be on the agenda for the next council meeting on June 12, but that city staff was receiving the changes well.

"They acquired the land to provide access to the wetlands, which effectively reduced the density and gives the public a chance to have access to the river and the wetlands," he said.

Rather than seeing Malaga 's move as a compromise with the city, Yarbrough said, "I think it enhances the development and is a complement to the community."

Judge orders Yankeetown government to respond

By Jeff M. Hardison

BRONSON — A judge on Monday ordered Yankeetown officials to respond within 30 days to a lawsuit accusing them of refusing to produce public records.

An action filed May 20 in Levy County civil circuit court accuses the government of Yankeetown of “willfully and knowingly” refusing to produce public records, which is in violation of Florida Statutes requiring public records to be accessible to inspect and/or copy by any person.

Circuit Court Judge David Glant ordered the town to respond to the accusation within 30 days “to show good cause why this court should not grant the relief Petitioner seeks.”

The petitioner is Izaak Walton Investors (IWI), a developer that wants to build a few marinas, a dry dock, and residential and recreational living facilities along the Withlacoochee River .

Attorneys for IWI are seeking a writ of mandamus for injunctive relief to force Yankeetown officials to comply with public records laws and compensation for their client’s attorney fees. Mandamus is an order from a judge to a government to abide by the law.

As part of the action, the developer asked Judge Glant to advance the cause on the court docket. Izaak Walton Investors wants the town to be enjoined from continuing to fail to comply with public records laws.

The suit seeks this case to be decided by a jury trial.

The accusing party says the town has failed, as of May 20, 2007, to produce records that were sought as follows:

n On March 31, 2006, IWI sought “… all zoning official records; and all Planning and Zoning files related to B’s Marina , Yankeetown Marina, Riverside Marina and Izaak Walton-owned property.”

n On Oct. 13, 2006, IWI requested copies of 12 categories of public records, which were never produced.

n On Nov. 17, 2006, IWI made another request, and the majority of those documents were never provided.

n On April 4, 2007, IWI requested “… a copy of the agenda, handouts and memoranda provided for the Town Council meeting of April 2, 2007; and a copy of the tape recording” of that April 2 meeting. Those records were not in the plaintiff’s hands as of May 20, according to the suit.

IWI also noted it had requested town budgets, but had not been provided with those.

Yankeetown Mayor Dawn Marie Clary said she believes the town will prevail, because the town has records of it providing copies of materials requested by IWI. She said the law allows the town to ask for payment for copies in advance of providing them, and IWI has not paid that money in advance.

The developer contends it has been precluded from seeing those records.

When complete, the proposed IWI work would include three projects next to the Withlacoochee River in Yankeetown. The construction of the marinas, restaurant, resort and residential projects promises to include between $50 million and $60 million worth of construction.

The main developers are Peter Spittler and his partner Jim Sherwood of Gulf to Bay Developers of Clearwater.

This action is one of four active suits against the town and various individuals by IWI. Three other cases were dismissed completely.

On May 2, Judge Glant dismissed a lawsuit against individuals in Yankeetown but he gave attorney Lewis 20 days to amend the suit. As of June 4, that amended suit had not appeared and would therefore be beyond the 20-day limit.

Jeff M. Hardison is a reporter for the Chiefland Citizen.

 

Crystal River site giving up its secrets

By BARBARA BEHRENDT
Published June 6, 2007

 

CRYSTAL RIVER - Spread beneath the towering oaks and magnolias is a lush rolling lawn that backs up to the sparkling Crystal River .

But a grassy hill tucked away in one corner hides what could have been an upscale neighborhood for royalty hundreds of years ago.

For 16 centuries American Indians trekked to what is now known as the Crystal River Archaeological State Park . They traded goods, held ceremonies and buried their dead.

Soon many of those ancient secrets could be revealed thanks to technology previously reserved for architectural, engineering and manufacturing.

Virtual map

In recent months, University of South Florida archaeological researchers Lori Collins and Travis Doering have used computers, a Global Positioning System and laser scanners to create a virtual map of the Crystal River site.

"While Crystal River is a really important site, very, very little work has been done on it, " Collins said.

During one visit, she sat in a truck watching as the results of a laser scan unfolded, filling her laptop screen with a blizzard of dots. As the minutes ticked by, the dots assembled into the shape of the adjacent landscape. Doering adjusted the equipment on the nearby mound to make the next laser sweep.

The laser scan provides the texture of the landscape while the high-definition GPS plots the geographic features in their global location.

Every indentation and slope of the land appeared on the screen, creating a virtual blueprint of the knoll. Where the naked eye sees a rolling field, laser scan images showed walkways, foundations and mounds.

The scanning also protects elements of the site. One of the most popular features at the Crystal River park are two limestone markers known as stelae. One, which was erected about 440 A.D. shows the crude outline of a man's face.

3-D puzzle

But time is threatening to wipe it out forever. By laser scanning it, "at least we'll have it preserved, kind of a time freeze of it the way it is now, " Collins said.

"The laser scanning itself is a very good interpretive tool and, more than that, an archival measurement of the structures themselves because over time they change, " said state park manager Nick Robbins.

He knows. Years ago his father managed the site, and he has in his own lifetime seen the deterioration in features of the stelae.

On another recent weekend, Collins and Doering brought a short-range scanner to the Crystal River site again, training it on the stela with the face carving. Doering explained to students helping with the project how to adjust the scanning device to measure each section of the large rock.

Nearby, Collins sat on the pavement with other students gathered around her. Piece by virtual piece, the details of the stela displayed onto her screen. Then she began assembling the pieces correctly - like a three-dimensional jigsaw puzzle.

Barbara Behrendt can be reached at behrendt@sptimes.com or 352 754-6117.

Clear Springs hosts plant grand opening
BARTOW - More than 300 people turned out from all over the world for a grand tour of the new Clear Springs Distribution Center at a grand opening on Tuesday. The former Florida 's Natural Growers facility at 6105 Spirit Lake Road in Bartow is now considered one of Florida 's most state-of-the-art packing and distribution facilities for fresh fruits and vegetables, including blueberries.

Dorn Wenninger, vice president of Clear Springs, guided the tour through the 100,000-square-foot facility, explaining each phase that the blueberries go through. From the time the growers deliver the fruit to Clear Springs, each berry is graded, cooled and packaged before being distributed to stores throughout the United States marked proudly with a "Fresh From Florida" label.

"We have a grower room where we have complete transparency," said Wenninger, pointing to windows where workers are in the packing house with thousands of blueberries on conveyor belts. "Growers can see everything that we're doing at all times. We don't want to hide anything. We want the growers to come in here at all times and watch their own fruit going through. There is a computer in the corner where they can go online and look up everything about their fruit, from the time it enters our facility until the time it's sold. They can check on their fruit 24 hours per day by logging on to our server, as well."

The facility has an 18,000-acre farm in Bartow where planting has begun. Currently, there are 150 acres of blueberry bushes in the ground and producing fruit. The farm is 10 to 15 minutes south of the packing facility, and the public is welcome to view it. This is the first year the plants have produced, and Clear Springs was able to harvest its own fruit. Blueberry plants are known to produce berries for up to 10 years or longer.

The tour included a glimpse into the packing room where the berries are sorted and packed into clear plastic clamshell containers and labeled by weight with a bar code for safety and tracking. The code allows for tracking the package once it leaves the facility and also provides the date it was packaged as well as the grower. State-of-the-art infrared cameras examine every berry before it is packaged. As the berries go up the conveyor belt, the camera will spot and cause the machine to reject berries that are soft, green or flawed and not suitable for packaging. The rejected berries are sold to outside plants that use them in the making of products such as yogurt. There is also a size grader that separates the jumbo berries from the smaller fruit.

The facility has refrigerated airlock chambers to ensure the cooling process isn't disturbed as people enter and exit. Special cooling devices keep the berries at their ideal temperature to ensure freshness. The state-of-the-art cooling device can cool 12 pallets down to 34 degrees in only 20 minutes. From there, the berries are held in cooling chambers, which are hermetically sealed.

Clear Springs has 33 growers for blueberries, ranging from small single growers with up to two acres who deliver their fruit to the facility in their own cars to massive 100-acre farmers who pull up in a freightliner and drop off berries. Blueberry season goes from the middle of March until the end of May.

"We're very lucky to have blueberries right now," said Wenninger. "Normally in Florida , the blueberry season would have finished three or four weeks ago. In the beginning of the year, Florida had a lot of frost, so it allowed for our beautiful long season."

Visitors were treated to a video presentation of the new facility before the ribbon-cutting ceremony.

Charles Bronson, Florida agriculture commissioner, spoke to the crowd about the importance of what Clear Springs has to offer.

"People are getting more concerned about food safety," said Bronson. "Look at what's happening in China . Look at that one small spinach farm in California last year. When you have the type of process going on like you have here, you have a higher standard of food safety. I'm happy to see that 'Fresh From Florida' sticker on these berries. Agriculture is what keeps us all alive."

Jerry D'Amore, vice president of Clear Springs, reminded people that the impressive facility they were touring started with just one person.

"At times like this, you get caught up in the spirit of a new facility," said D'Amore. "But look back. It was one man's vision. One man's commitment."

Stanford Phelps, a Wall Street investor with no experience in produce, came up with the concept of Clear Springs and acquired the property from Florida 's Natural Growers for an undisclosed sum.

Terry Atchley, director of operations, was introduced by D'Amore as "The man of the hour" for taking the facility and turning it into an operating phenomenon in only six months.

"This was a major undertaking, but we had a heck of a team working on this," Atchley said. "We're real proud. Especially since we were told by two different engineering groups that this wouldn't happen, so that's why we're so proud. Fortunately, we were able to prove them wrong and they were big enough to come to us and admit they were wrong. So, today is a real accomplishment."

At the end of it all, Jura Zibas, president of Clear Springs, officially cut the red ribbon to kick off the official grand opening.

"In this room there are dozens of farmers, husband and wife teams, and family units," said D'Amore. "We really, really appreciate our growers. We would not have a business without you. These are people who know what they're doing and let us represent their crops. I want to say thank you and tell you that you're my heroes."

You may learn more about Clear Springs Distribution Center by going to their Web site at www.clearspringsco.com.

diane.nichols@newschief.com

 

Taylor County votes in favor of coal plant
By Bruce Ritchie
DEMOCRAT STAFF WRITER

PERRY - The Taylor County Commission voted Monday to allow a coal-fired power plant on nearly 3,000 acres adjacent to the Buckeye Florida pulp mill.

Tallahassee is a partner in the proposed 800-megawatt plant near Perry.

Most speakers during a three-hour public hearing spoke against the project, saying it could worsen air pollution in the region cause traffic problems or harm the rural quality of life.

Holding up a paper air mask and then a rubber gas mask, Janet Monroe of Perry said, "I ask you: One coal plant or seven coal plants? I say no coal plants."

But some county commissioners and project supporters cited the 180 full-time jobs and economic spin-off they say the plant would create.

"Without a plant like this coming here, there are zero jobs coming here," said Jim Moody of Perry.

The project still faces a hurdle on the state level: The Florida Department of Community Affairs has raised objections and could file a legal challenge to block approval.

Burning coal contributes to heart and lung diseases and unhealthy levels of mercury in fish, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The partnership said the project will use state-of-the-art pollution controls while providing affordable, reliable energy to meet growth needs.

The Taylor County Commission voted 4-0 to create new land-use categories for power plants. At about 11:30 p.m. the commission finished debating a proposal to apply the power-plant designation to the proposed site near the Buckeye Florida pulp mill along the Fenholloway River , voting in favor of the site 4-0.

Taylor County commissioners got into an exchange during the meeting with Dr. Ronald Saff, an allergy and asthma specialist, after he reiterated that approving the plant represents "redneck politics."

"I would never say I thought of you as a pointy-headed intellectual, so don't refer to me as a redneck politician," Commissioner Rudolph Parker said.

"I'm not a redneck either," said Commissioner Pat Patterson, who is black.

DCA has raised concerns about 25 percent of the site being wetlands and half being in a flood plain. The department also has raised concerns about the availability of water and sewer at the site.

In response, the partnership proposes requiring a 250-foot setback from the Fenholloway River . The partnership also proposes offsetting "unavoidable" wetlands losses with mitigation and allowing development in those areas that is in the public interest.

The department also raised concern about the availability of water and the undetermined number of plants that could be built there.

The partnership also says it will reuse wastewater from the Buckeye Florida mill, reducing the power-plant's groundwater pumping by 80 percent to 1.5 million gallons per day.

The partnership also proposed limiting the number of plants to four in one category and three in another. That proposal touched off concerns among some environmentalists that Taylor County was inviting even more power plants to the county.

Taylor Energy Center representatives said they have no plans to build more than the one proposed power plant on the site. Additional plants would require Taylor County approval and state review.

The Florida Public Service Commission still must determine whether the plant is needed and whether it will be cost-effective.

The governor and Cabinet could be asked to approve the project in early 2008. The site certification application was filed last month with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection.

The other plant partners are the Florida Municipal Power Agency, the Reedy Creek Improvement District and JEA, the former Jacksonville Electric Authority. The partners say they expect to start construction on the $2 billion plant next year and begin operation in 2012.

PSC debates FPL coal plant; one commissioner opposed

 

By Kristi E. Swartz

Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

Tuesday, June 05, 2007

TALLAHASSEE — Whether Florida Power & Light Co. will be able to build a coal-fired power plant in Glades County hangs in the balance before utility regulators today, but already one commissioner said he won't support it.

"There is little doubt that the growth in FPL's territory warrants electricity, but does that electricity need to come from pulverized coal? No, FPL can generate this from natural gas," Florida Public Service Commissioner Matthew Carter II said early this afternoon during a hearing in Tallahassee .

 

Carter's take on the project - a twin-unit 1,960-megawatt ultra-supercritical pulverized-coal plant that would open in 2013 - came after a deluge of questions from newly appointed commissioner Nathan Skop to the PSC staff about whether building one large coal plant would do anything to help diversify FPL's fuel, the majority of which comes from natural gas.

If the proposed plant is built, the percentage of fuel that FPL gets from natural gas will be around 60 percent. If the plant isn't built, the percentage will be 70.

"Going from 60 to 70 percent is a big swing," PSC staffer Tom Ballinger said. "We're not going to change fuel diversity overnight, but FPL is going to have to start somewhere."

Skop continued the argument later:

"We're still exposed to fuel volatility, that's not going to go away, " he said.

The Florida legislature has been pushing the PSC and the state's utilities to look at coal, nuclear and renewable forms of energy to get away from pricey natural gas.

Still, it was clear that the regulators are in for a long day of discussion on FPL's project.

"This is a landmark decision that will have a profound impact on Florida 's energy policy," Skop said, then asked later: "What are we going to do to bridge the gap to nuclear?"

FPL must still secure permits from the state's Department of Environmental Protection as well as a final OK from Gov. Charlie Crist and the Cabinet before building the plant, which will sit on 5,000 acres about 5 miles northwest of Moore Haven.

The PSC hearing continues this afternoon. The other newly appointed commissioner on the five-member panel, former Sen. Nancy Argenziano, has asked not to vote today because she has not had enough time to review the case.

 

Crew Finds More Tortoises, Glue In Locks At Mall Site

Published: Jun 5, 2007

WESLEY CHAPEL - The developers of Cypress Creek Town Center got more than they expected Saturday morning when they began moving gopher tortoises from their property at State Road 56 and Interstate 75.

They found vandals had injected glue into the padlocks on the gates leading into the property. The locks had to be cut off to get into the site.

They found protestors from Citizens for Sanity videotaping their comings and goings from the shoulder of S.R. 56 and from a tree on the bank of Cypress Creek.

Then, after biologists began digging up tortoise burrows, they found more than the 10 adult tortoises they had set out to relocate.

Crews also uncovered two clutches of eggs and a number of newly hatched tortoises.

Gary Morse, a spokesman for the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, said Monday that biologists moved 10 animals and left behind the animals beyond that limit.

Mall builder Richard E. Jacobs Group filed the paperwork to amend its relocation permit Monday, according to wildlife officials in Tallahassee .

Those documents ask to move 40 more tortoises, allowing for four hatchlings for each adult on the site.

A state wildlife law enforcement officer called to monitor the relocation Saturday issued the crew a warning because it had not posted its permits, as required by law.

The crew had the permits in hand, but the weather prevented them from putting them on display, Morse said.

Shirley Denton, vice president of Biological Research Associates, the firm that handled the relocation for the Jacobs Group, said her firm will return for the remaining tortoises after state wildlife officials amend the existing relocation permit. That process could take a week or more.

Some of the young tortoises may fall prey to raccoons and other predators in the meantime, she said.

Citizens for Sanity members Dan Rametta and Clay Colson, who were among the half-dozen people watching Saturday's relocation work, say Jacobs should do a more thorough study to find undiscovered tortoises.

Rametta said last week the mall site held nearly three dozen tortoises, not the 10 Jacobs claimed.

"It flies in the face of common sense that there's no more than 30 tortoises out there," Rametta said.

Colson said Jacobs doesn't have the permits it needs to do the relocation, a claim wildlife officials and county development officials deny.

Colson and Rametta denied having anything to do with the vandalism to the locks on the property's gate.

"It wasn't us," Rametta said. "We try to take the high moral ground on this."

Jacobs plans to open its 1.3-million-square-foot regional mall in October 2008.

Reporter Kevin Wiatrowski can be reached at (813) 948-4201 or kwiatrowski@tampatrib.com.

Wildlife officials defend killing of bear
By Gerald Ensley
DEMOCRAT SENIOR WRITER

The Tallahassee Museum would have given him at least a temporary home. A woman who raises bear cubs said he should've been left alone.

But state officials Monday defended their decision Sunday morning to euthanize a young black bear that wandered into Tallahassee and cruised the midtown neighborhoods.

The 200-pound male bear was shot with a tranquilizer dart while in a tree in the 1100 block of Thomasville Road , near the Whataburger restaurant. He was caught in a tarp when he dropped and was euthanized by an officer with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission.

Commission officials said the bear was euthanized because he had been captured and returned to the wild twice in South Florida during May, before being relocated to the nearby Apalachicola Forest two weeks ago. He also had ear tags dating to 2005, which indicated he had been captured and relocated before this year.

Fish and Wildlife rules allow a bear to be euthanized after its third foray into an urban setting. Once this bear was tranquilized to remove it from the tree, his record of urban visits was discovered from the computer chip in his ear.

Commission spokesman Stan Kirkland acknowledged the agency got several calls of complaint Monday following news coverage about the bear. He said wildlife officials normally would have allowed the bear to leave on his own, but he was wandering in a high-traffic area during church hours.

There has never been a recorded attack on humans in Florida by black bears, but they have killed livestock and domestic pets.

"We don't use (the euthanasia policy) on a whim," Kirkland said. "But where bears repeatedly come back (to urban areas), we have no choice."

It was the sixth bear euthanized in the state this year. State officials have euthanized a total of 27 since 1979. Florida is home to between 2,000 and 3,000 black bears, most of which live in six main populations in federal forests and state wildlife areas.

Callers to the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission and the Tallahassee Democrat suggested the bear could have been donated to a zoo or nature museum. Kirkland said most zoos and nature museums will not accept black bears because the bears become distressed in captivity.

Yet Russell Daws, executive director of the Tallahassee Museum , said his facility would have given the bear a home - temporarily, if not permanently.

The museum has two bears, which were captured as young nuisance animals in Louisiana several years ago. If the bear that was killed Sunday could have co-existed with those two, Daws said, the museum would have kept him. Failing that, he said, the museum would've sought a home for him with other museums or zoos.

Kirkland said Fish and Wildlife didn't call the Tallahassee Museum on Sunday because of its previous experience with such requests.

Daws said he appreciated the commission's policies, but thought the decision to euthanize the bear was made too quickly.

"You always have the option of making the decision they did (Sunday) at any point down the road," Daws said. "I don't know if any place has a vacancy for a black bear. But you don't know until you make the effort."

Betsy Knight said the bear should not have been euthanized unless he showed aggression - such as charging humans or baring his teeth. Knight has raised 40 orphaned black bear cubs at her compound near Blountstown and released them into the wild.

She said bears wander into urban areas because humans keep "paving over" their natural habitat. Florida once had a reported 12,000 bears, whose numbers have shrunk because of development and hunting (though Florida banned bear hunting in 1993).

"The answer is you've got to learn to co-exist," Knight said. "Leave them alone. They're not hurting anyone. If you don't want them in the garbage, put it up until the garbage man comes."

Kirkland agreed that Fish and Wildlife generally advises residents to allow a foraging bear to return to its natural habitat. But he said bears that discover urban food sources return repeatedly, a situation often exacerbated by humans who purposely feed bears. Kirkland said the commission has relocated 464 bears over the past 30 years - but the "recidivism rate is mind-boggling."

"Moving a bear is just a temporary solution many times," he said. "They will come back."

Adam Warwick, the Fish and Wildlife biologist who euthanized the bear Sunday, said in an e-mail that "every reasonable effort was made not to euthanize this bear." But Warwick wrote that the bear's history made the decision unavoidable - and painful.

"I haven't spoken with a single FWC employee who enjoys euthanizing bears or any animal," Warwick wrote. "We chose this field to help perpetuate the enjoyment of nature for future generations, not to destroy animals. It pains us more than people understand."

Coalition: Briny Breezes Redevelopment Plan Vague, Incomplete and Irresponsible

What Independent Experts Are Saying About the Proposed Briny Breezes Redevelopment Plan Under State Review

DELRAY BEACH , Fla.-- (BUSINESS WIRE)--The Florida Coalition for Preservation today said independent reviews of the proposed Briny Breezes redevelopment plan now before the Department of Community Affairs show the plan is “vague, incomplete and irresponsible.”

Those reviews, by the South Florida Water Management District and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, raise doubts about the Briny Breezes plan to radically increase the population density on an environmentally fragile, hurricane-prone barrier island.

“These are yet two more expert, independent agencies whose professional staff have serious concerns about deficiencies in the Briny Breezes redevelopment plan,” said Florida Coalition for Preservation Chairman Tom Evans. “This lends yet more weight to our Coalition’s contention that the Briny Breezes plan is ill-conceived, irresponsible and does not meet state standards.”

The following are samples of comments made by official agencies that have reviewed the Briny Breezes redevelopment plan:

South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD):

“Our review has determined that the proposed land uses are not adequately defined, and their maximum allowable densities and intensities are not properly specified. Further, we have found that the amendment proposal does not adequately address the availability of water supply facility planning, nor provide a capital improvement schedule for water supply infrastructure.” June 1, 2007 Letter to DCA from P.K. Sharma, Lead Planner, SFWMD Water Supply Planning Division.

“The proposed land uses are not adequately defined with maximum allowable densities and intensities specified for all proposed land uses. This information is directly connected to the projection of future water and sewer demands and the capability of proposed utility providers to commit to future service provision. Additionally, needed associated land use impact analyses or other necessary water resource related data and analyses are inadequate or missing in several instances.” Source: SFWMD Review of Briny Breezes Redevelopment Plan, June 1, 2007.

“Our review has determined that the EAR (Evaluation and Appraisal Report submitted by Briny Breezes to the DCA) does not adequately assess the future availability of water supplies and water supply facilities, and does not adequately assess the capital improvement schedule for future needed water supply infrastructure.” Source: June 1, 2007 Letter to DCA from Henry Bittaker, Senior Planner, SFWMD Water Supply Planning Division.

Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP):

“The Department found several major deficiencies in the proposed comprehensive plan. For example, none of the proposed land uses have been adequately defined and all fail to provide maximum allowable densities and intensities for the proposed uses. …The submittal package also did not include the data and analysis necessary for a determination of land use suitability.” Source: June 1, 2007 Letter to DCA from Sally B. Quinn, Director, DEP Office of Intergovernmental Programs.

“Based on the information and analysis submitted, the Department finds that proposed comprehensive plan amendment does not meet the requirements of Chapter 163, Part II, F.S., and Chapter 9J-5, F.A.C. and is therefore objectionable. With regard to the following items, the data and analysis provided by the Town is insufficient: the extent and impact of the land use categories; availability of potable water, wastewater and non-potable water services; proposed marina facilities; and the CIE (Capital Improvements Element).” Source: June 1, 2007 Letter to DCA from Sally B. Quinn, Director, DEP Office of Intergovernmental Programs.

For more information about the Florida Coalition for Preservation, please visit www.PreservationFla.org.

Martin imposes moratorium to protect mobile home parks

By Jason Schultz

Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

Tuesday, June 05, 2007

STUART — Martin County today put the kibosh on the continued destruction of mobile home parks.

County commissioners unanimously approved a moratorium on any requests to rezone or change the land use on properties zoned for mobile homes.

Several owners of mobile home parks are in the process of closing their parks with plans to turn the land into permanent homes in condominiums.

Mobile home parks provide much of the housing for low income and retired residents in Martin County .

Commissioner Lee Weberman proposed the moratorium after developer Art Palma evicted residents from the Bloomfield Meadows mobile home park in Hobe Sound in order to develop it. County Planner David Quigley said the moratorium will not stop Palma or any other park owner from evicting residents and closing their parks. But because Palma has not yet applied to rezone his property, he is now barred from applying.

The moratorium will remain in effect for 15 months for land use change requests and for 18 months for rezoning requests, Quigley said.

The county will use that time to try to create policies that preserve mobile homes or other forms of affordable housing in the county.

Mobile home park residents praised the moratorium.

"We need low-income housing," said Bloomfield Meadows resident Susan Tower .

"People who live in parks are not white trash or poor people."

Public to have a say after all on St. Johns River project in DeBary

Tanya Caldwell
Sentinel Staff Writer

June 5, 2007

For weeks, DeBary officials have been fighting a legal battle to derail a public hearing about a controversial marina proposed on the St.Johns River .

But officials just announced that residents finally will get to tell the Volusia Growth Management Commission what they think about Country Estates at River Bend, a 330-acre development with upscale homes and a private yacht club.

Monday's public hearing could determine whether the project passes a key hurdle or whether DeBary taxpayers will continue funding a legal battle for a project environmentalists say will hurt manatees.

Staff planners for the growth commission, a countywide oversight agency with 21 voting members, say the development should be rejected because of such problems as inadequate protections for manatees and unanswered questions about traffic, school capacity and wastewater.

DeBary said the developer will follow all the rules, including those aimed at saving manatees, and preserve about 213 acres, as well as provide other needed amenities, including paving Fort Florida Road and extending water and sewer lines.

City officials and developer St. Johns Partners filed a lawsuit in April to stop the growth commission from holding a public hearing on needed land-use changes.

Now, because of settlement talks, DeBary is allowing the public hearing, though the city has vowed to continue fighting if the growth commission rejects the project.

The public hearing is set for 7 p.m. in the County Council chambers on the second floor of the Thomas C. Kelly Administration Building , 123 W. Indiana Ave. , DeLand.

Enterprise resident Sandy Walters opposes the project and said environmentalists will restate their problems during the hearing.

"The worst aspect of this whole thing is the marina," Walters said. "It's in the Wekiva River Aquatic Preserve, and that would set the wrong precedent. It's a horrendous idea."

If DeBary doesn't like the outcome of Monday's hearing, it has the right to resume its lawsuit and argue that the commission missed a deadline months ago to respond when asked to review the proposal, City Manager Maryann Courson said.

Tanya Caldwell can be reached at tcaldwell@orlandosentinel.com or 386-851-7910.
Our view: Saving Old Florida

Florida Today Editorial

Local doctor deserves award and gratitude for conservation work

The lifelong commitment of Melbourne ophthalmologist William Broussard to saving part of what's left of Florida 's vanishing wilderness has won him a much-deserved award:

Later this month, he'll be named Land Conservationist of the Year by the Florida Wildlife Federation.

The honor comes as a result of his work to conserve the Crescent J Ranch and adjacent Forever Florida nature preserve in Osceola County .

At Forever Florida -- which Broussard bought in memory of his son, Allen, a wildlife biologist who died in 1990 -- visitors can camp, hike, ride horses and birdwatch.

The 3,500-acre preserve is rich with native wildlife, including endangered species. At night the stars are visible in a profusion that stuns city-dwellers and helps teach many the value of keeping as much unspoiled land as possible.

Now Broussard is working with state lawmakers to sign over his family-owned ranch, bought in the 1960s, so it can be maintained as a working historical cattle ranch.

With more of Florida 's natural stretches -- including farms and ranches -- morphing into shopping plazas and planned communities each day, Broussard's strong stand for conservation is beyond commendable.

His generosity and wise stewardship ensure future generations have access to at least a glimpse of Old Florida's beauty and mystique.

Delray developer gets OK on 7,000-square-foot home

By Dianna Smith

Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

Tuesday, June 05, 2007

DELRAY BEACH — City Commissioners will allow a developer to build an estimated 7,000-square-foot house in a neighborhood where some residents are battling to keep its quaint charm.

Living Color Property Development Group plans to build the house at 706 S.E. Second St. in the Marina Historic District, which sits along the Intracoastal Waterway downtown. City Commissioners voted 3-1 Monday, approving the plans; Mayor Rita Ellis voted against them and Commissioner Brenda Montague did not attend the meeting.

"When this property was demolished, it was clearly stated that any new development would be under strictest guidelines. This does not meet those," Ellis said. "It is one of our most pristine historic districts. It is a jewel."

The original plans brought by Living Color included a house that was an estimated 11,000 square feet, which included a three-car garage and terraces. The size of the home infuriated some residents because they said it was not compatible with the rest of the neighborhood, so commissioners asked the developer to decrease the size.

Building in the historic districts has been a hot button issue in the city the past two years. The city has been working the past year to create new guidelines for historic districts. The guidelines have not been approved.

Resident Claudia Willis, who lives within 500 feet of the property, said that the largest home in that district is less than 6,000 square feet. "Compatible means similar," Willis said.

Commissioner Gary Eliopoulos, the only architect on the board, said that the developer made significant changes and that the plans do meet city requirements.

Tom O'Reilly, of Living Color, said that the property is hidden and can only be seen from the Intracoastal. But residents have argued that if the commission allows one developer to build a large home in the historic district, other property owners will follow suit.

Deltona OKs apartments for industrial land

By SARA KIESLER

DELTONA -- Despite numerous dissenting residents, commissioners OK'd changing the zoning of industrial land in the planned Activity Center near Interstate 4 to allow 2,000 apartments or condominiums.

Impassioned opinions -- and a little campaigning from the dais -- helped bring about the change by a 4-3 vote because a majority of commissioners said the economic engine at I-4 and State Road 472 will not bring office and industrial jobs without the apartments.

Apartments keep residents living, working and walking within the development, which reduces traffic trips, City Manager Steve Thompson said.

The center's Development of Regional Impact -- required for any large development that affects surrounding communities -- only allows for 20,000 generated traffic trips each day.

Those trips, Assistant City Manager and Economic Development Director Sally Sherman said, are the equivalent of what two Wal-Mart-size commercial buildings would generate -- leaving a whole lot of unused space.

But Mildred White, who was on the committee that helped plan the future of Deltona's 900-acre portion of the Activity Center , said the acreage planned for industrial use were supposed to be just that.

She was one of seven speaking against the zoning change.

"Build it the way it was supposed to be built and get infrastructure in there," White said. "That was going to be our tax base, we don't have one right now."

Commissioners David Santiago, Michael Carmolingo and Zenaida Denizac voted against the change. Carmolingo, who is running for re-election in November, said his vote was purely for the residents because he feels without apartments, the Activity Center will be "stunted growth."

Santiago also said his job was to give residents what they want.

"I'm satisfied that it was passed," Carmolingo said. "But I will go with the will of the residents."

However, Vice Mayor Bill Harvey said while there is an obligation to residents, there is also an obligation for commissioners to make the best judgment for the city.

"Clearly it needs to be some sort of multi-family land use if we expect the Activity Center to be a success," he said.

sara.kiesler@news-jrnl.com

Protesters gain victory of sorts: Deltona OKs 1,000 fewer homes

Denise-Marie Balona
Sentinel Staff Writer

June 5, 2007, 2:21 PM EDT

DELTONA -- Numerous residents say they don't want apartments built in an area earmarked for commercial development, but elected officials decided Monday to allow them anyway.

City commissioners agreed to a compromise, though: Instead of allowing as many as 3,000 multifamily units -- apartments, condos or town houses -- they approved 2,000.

The vote was 4-3 in favor of changing a long-standing plan that would have developed about 900 acres near Interstate 4 into a commercial hub.

Mayor Dennis Mulder said he did not support the change at first, but he knew it would help jump-start the area known as the "activity center" by providing customers for stores and restaurants.

"I'm not going to slow this up," Mulder said. "Slowing the activity center up would be, in my opinion, the most irresponsible thing the commission could do."

Jamie Jessup, an outspoken government critic, was one of several people who urged commissioners to stick with the original plan.

Many residents at a recent forum the city put on to gauge public opinion argued against apartments.

"The citizens don't want it, and they made it clear to you at that workshop you did with us," Jessup said. "They didn't equivocate."

New apartments would mean an enormous increase in the city's multifamily-housing inventory, which is dominated by single-family homes.

Community leaders have complained for years about Deltona's apartment shortage.

They say apartments would serve young people, families and others who can't afford single-family homes.

Commissioners had planned to have the final vote on the apartments last month, but they tabled the issue at the last minute.

They wanted to give city staff more time to gather information, including feedback from the public.

They also wanted to explain to residents how apartments would be beneficial. At the recent public forum, however, city leaders did not seem to win over many residents.

More than 100 residents signed a petition opposing the development. Several people have fought it through fliers in neighborhoods and e-mail.

Officials have said the homes would come in phases, with the first 500 opening within several years.

They also have insisted that because the work is not expected to be completed for 20-plus years, they have plenty of time to work out details.

Denise-Marie Balona can be reached at dbalona@orlandosentinel.com or 386-851-7916.

Tallahassee Democrat Letters to the Editor, June 5, 2007

Local government turning a deaf ear

Re: "Threat to economy, property rights, affordable housing" (My View, June 4).

It is obvious Leonard Gilroy does not live in Jefferson County .

In the past we have been very involved in local affairs in our community. We have seen up close how developers, planners and commissioners work. Usually it isn't for the good of the community, but what is best for a select few.

People should have a voice, but all too often it falls on deaf ears.

If government officials would listen to the concerns of citizens instead of dismissing them, the need for the Hometown Democracy group wouldn't exist.

DON and CINDY LEE
cindon@earthlink.net

 

 

Area citizens group is hoping to stopper water-bottling permits

NATHAN CRABBE

Sun staff writer

A citizens group is calling for a moratorium on water-bottling permits on the springs of the Santa Fe River , saying water withdrawals threaten to drain the river and nearby wells.

While just one bottler now uses water from those springs, as many as four more projects are in the works. The five permits combined could mean more than a billion gallons pulled each year from springs feeding a three-mile stretch of river.

Members of the citizens group, Our Santa Fe, are going before the Suwannee River Water Management District next month to ask for the moratorium.

Martha Strawn, a Gilchrist County resident and co-founder of the group, said falling river and groundwater levels show the need to restrict bottling.

"We don't think we can afford to take any water out of the river that we don't have to," she said.

A flurry of new water-bottling proposals on the springs feeding the lower Santa Fe led to the group's formation. The proposals come as the water district is still more than a year away from establishing minimum flows and levels for the river and springs, which will guide future water permitting.

In March, separate proposals were made to bottle water from Lilly and July springs. Last week, Tampa businessman Stephen Cheeseman said he might start using a long-dormant permit allowing him to withdraw water from the Santa Fe .

Cheeseman said he's still weighing his options, but could seek to build a bottling plant in Fort White . He said opponents of water bottling should understand it has a small impact on groundwater when compared to farming and other uses.

"The impact of bottling water is almost nil," he said.

The Suwannee River water district has issued nine bottling permits, representing about 1 percent of the water it has allocated, according to district figures. By comparison, the district has issued more than 2,200 agriculture permits representing about 32 percent of water allocated.

But Strawn and other members of the Our Santa Fe group say irrigating crops returns some water to the aquifer, while bottling can remove the water completely. They point to low river and well levels as showing the need for limiting groundwater withdrawals.

The Santa Fe River at Fort White was measured last week at 21.09 feet above sea level, approaching a record low of 21.02 feet recorded in November 2002.

Groundwater levels are dropping but haven't yet reached record lows set in 2002, said Chris Bird, environmental protection director for Alachua County . He said the average level of groundwater is still about 2.5 feet above that level.

But some residents are seeing the effect of falling groundwater levels.

High Springs well contractor Chester Sheffield said he's been getting three calls a week since March from people with well problems. Their wells are either dry and need to be lowered, he said, or the low water levels have caused limestone to cave in.

"We're already in a bad situation with our water," he said.

The district can limit groundwater withdrawals when water levels are dangerously low, said Jon Dinges, the district's director of resource management. But he said the district has determined the lack of rainfall is behind the problem, a situation that wouldn't be improved by restricting water use.

"We haven't felt that mandatory restrictions are appropriate at this time," he said.

He said the public interest in water bottling doesn't equate with the amount used by bottlers.

On the Santa Fe springs, Coca-Cola's water-bottling plant in High Springs has the only permit actively being used. The plant is permitted to withdraw an average of 1.15 million gallons a day in the Ginnie Springs area.

Other operations are still seeking all the permits they would need to bottle water. The district is now evaluating applications for water-withdrawal permits at July and Lilly springs, though legal questions remain about the ownership of the land around both springs.

The owners of Blue Springs Park have an active permit but haven't yet used it. In 2003, Gilchrist County commissioners rejected a zoning change that would have paved the way for a bottling operation.

Kim Davis, whose family owns the property, said she has no plans to seek another change at the moment. But she said she might again try to use the permit in the future, if she could find an interested bottling company that would provide well-paying jobs to the community.

"We're very picky," she said.

She said she views water bottling as compatible with the swimming and camping at the park. Bottling companies take a "mere pittance" of the water and have a vested interest in preventing pollution, she said.

"It protects everyone's water," he said,

Cheeseman has received permission to withdraw an average of 150,000 gallons a day from Santa Fe springs. He said the operation would take water representing 4 percent of the flow of the springs.

He said he owns a home on the Santa Fe where he said he stays several days a week, so he is interested in protecting the river.

"I'm not there to destroy the environment," he said.

He must still obtain permission to build facilities allowing the water to be pumped and bottled. While his water permit requires such a plant to be adjacent to the property, he expressed interest in a bottling facility in Fort White .

Dinges said the district typically requires bottling to be done at least in the same county as the water is extracted.

He said the district's other restrictions are also being put on bottling permits. He said the latest two applications must submit biological information on the river, so environmental impacts can be assessed.

The district is also setting minimum flows and levels for the Santa Fe River and springs as a way of evaluating water use on a large scale. The limits will ensure the total amount of water withdrawn doesn't cause significant harm to the environment, he said.

The district is scheduled to complete the Santa Fe River and springs levels by fall 2008.

Bird said he'd like to see a halt on permits until that process is complete. The flurry of permits seems to be coming before that happens, he said.

"There seems to be a rush of these permits now," he said.

Growth referendum backers, critics girding for intense campaign

By Dave Williams

dave.williams@graypub.com



ATLANTA — Last November, more than 80 percent of Georgia voters decided to protect hunting and fishing, safeguard private property rights and give the elderly a break on their property taxes.

Akin to seeking support for Mom and apple pie, those referendum questions were no-brainers that were expected to pass by wide margins and didn’t disappoint.

But next year, Georgians showing up at the polls to cast their vote for president will be confronted with something more nebulous further down the ballot.

They will be asked whether the state should allow developers to form something called “infrastructure development districts” — modeled after a concept popularized in Florida — with the power to finance large planned communities across Georgia .

As with any vaguely worded ballot question, the potential that voters will be confused and, as a result, skip it is huge, said Kerwin Swint, a political science professor at Kennesaw State University.

“People have never heard of it, don’t understand it and don’t want to screw up,” he said.

With nothing clearly at stake to voters in the referendum, Swint said it will be up to the proposal’s backers and detractors to show why people should care enough to weigh in on the question.

After Gov. Sonny Perdue signed the legislation last week, leaders in both camps vowed to step up to that challenge.

“We no doubt have a lot of work to do on an education campaign,” said Jay Walker, president and owner of MMV Consulting, which lobbied hard for the measure during this year’s General Assembly session.

Environmental advocates and consumer groups who lost the legislative fight against what they derided as “private cities” say they’re equally determined to prevail in the court of public opinion.

“We’ll be educating Georgians in how this will result in more sprawl and more taxes,” said Jill Johnson, land conservation program manager for the Georgia Conservancy.



Controlling growth



The bill’s supporters, which include developers and timber companies with large land holdings, say infrastructure development districts would provide a way to steer Georgia ’s rapid growth to areas that aren’t already overcrowded and need an economic stimulus.

Developers would seek permission from local governments to form districts with the authority to finance roads, water and sewer lines and other amenities through tax-free bonds and homeowners’ fees.

“The city and county governments will be a partner to make sure these projects are good projects and the growth is something everybody is going to be happy with,” said Sen. Johnny Grant, R-Milledgeville, who introduced the bill and accompanying constitutional amendment.

But the Georgia Conservancy and other environmental groups say the legislation would allow land-hungry developers to gobble up pristine portions of the state that wouldn’t be able to accommodate rapid growth.

“We see it as a real threat to the rural heritage of this state,” Johnson said. “It’s going to encourage growth in places that aren’t ready for it yet.”

Decades ago, before the ever-worsening traffic congestion that has metro Atlanta in its grip, voters tended to buy into the pro-growth mentality of political and business leaders.



Voters skeptical



But the referendum’s opponents say the problems associated with growth have made urban and suburban voters more wary, a reality that could give them an advantage in the coming campaign.

Take Gwinnett County ,” said Rep. Brian Thomas, D-Lawrenceville, who led the fight against the legislation on the House floor, calling it an attempt to make Georgia a colony of Florida .

“With the constant increase in traffic we face ... people in developed areas realize we need to get a handle on growth and grow smartly.”

Walker said a challenge for the referendum’s backers will be to convince urban and suburban voters that growth is coming to their communities with or without infrastructure development districts.

“We believe that controlled positive growth is going to be the word of the day from now into the future in Georgia ,” said Walker, who served as chief of staff to House Speaker Glenn Richardson, R-Hiram, before forming his consulting firm. “We believe we’ve brought something to the table to control that growth.”

Walker said that for rural areas, infrastructure development districts represent an opportunity to grab economic development that otherwise would go to cities and suburbs.

In fact, he said the campaign for the referendum will start with city and county officials from rural areas.

Once the effort moves on to voters, he said the toughest task will be overcoming the “private cities” moniker opponents have hung on the legislation.

“Whoever the first critic was that called it ‘private cities’ did a good job,” he said. “We have to go in and show that this is not private cities but a financial tool to have people moving in pay for the growth instead of the people who are already here.”


For the other side, the biggest challenge will be overcoming the resources the referendum’s deep-pocketed supporters are expected to bring to bear.

A coalition of timber and paper interests, bankers, builders and developers pushed the bill through the Legislature, represented by high-powered law and lobbying firms.

“There’s a lot of money behind it,” Thomas said. “I’m hoping some of the consumer advocates and environmental groups will use their networks ... to try to explain to people why it’s not a good thing.”

 

Minneola to weigh new pitch for homes

A developer wants to put 678 houses on a site first targeted for 485.

Robert Sargent
Sentinel Staff Writer

June 4, 2007

MINNEOLA -- The developer of Palisades Country Club will go before the City Council on Tuesday with plans for a new community in an area already planned for thousands of new homes.

Representatives for The Metrontario Group recently met with individual council members to get their initial impressions about a development with 678 homes squeezed onto 206 acres east of U.S. Highway 27.

KB Home originally had targeted that site for 485 houses before the builder walked away from a development agreement with Minneola. Metrontario now could honor much of that agreement if it can get council support.

The meeting begins at 7 p.m. at City Hall, 800 N. U.S. Highway 27.

The biggest change is that Metrontario proposes nearly 200 more homes than KB. The new project also could have different proposals for town homes.

"The new proposal has higher density, but it's got some unique products that I think the council could embrace with detached garages and mother-in-law-suites," Mayor David Yeager said.

Metrontario also could agree to many terms that Minneola had negotiated in its agreement with KB, city officials said.

If approved, KB would have provided the city 3 acres of land and about $1 million to help build and maintain public facilities and infrastructure. The city also would have received $130,000 to offset effects on fire, law-enforcement, emergency-medical and parks services. Another $50,000 would help cover costs of reviewing the project.

One thing Metrontario is dangling before council members is that the company would build a two-lane road from U.S. 27 east along the southern boundary of the proposed site.

The estimated $2 million road could be constructed long before the community begins building, some city officials said. But the builder also could request credits on government impact fees charged to the development to recoup the road-construction costs.

Yeager said the road is vital. It is needed to provide a direct route to U.S. 27 and to limit traffic on other roads in that part of the city. It also would help to handle vehicles from two elementary schools set to open later this year.

"On a scale of one to 10, it's a 3,000," Yeager said about the need for a new road there. "We've killed the old Minneola forever trying to get trucks in and out of there -- that road is imperative for the future of Minneola."

That area of south Lake County is proposed for immense growth, including the 689-unit Reserve at Minneola and the 963-unit Founders Ridge. Minneola has annexed and granted preliminary approval for the nearly 4,000-home Hills of Minneola.

The city also is looking to annex the Sugarloaf Mountain development, which is proposed for 2,200 homes.

Metrontario has developments in Canada , the United States and Israel . It also has several Central Florida communities, including Palisades , which is approved for 519 homes. Urbana in Hunter's Creek in Orange County is proposed for more than 230 condos.

Robert Sargent can be reached at rsargent@orlandosentinel.com or 352-742-5909.

 

Clear Springs Unveils Plans For 18,000-Acre Development

By S. L. FRISBIE, IV, Associate Publisher

Clear Springs Land Co. unveiled the first draft of its plans for an 18,000-acre development plan in and around Bartow Tuesday evening to a small group of citizens, including city officials, agriculturists, and environmentalists.

The workshop - the first of several planned by the company - showed a conceptual plan that may be revised as Clear Springs gets feedback from the public and from city, county and state agencies.

About 20 people attended the workshop, held at the Bob Crawford Agriculture Building .

Jura Zibas, president of Clear Springs Land Co., said that the tract consists of 11,000 acres inside the Bartow city limits, plus 7,000 acres in unincorporated areas of the county.

The city annexed the 11,000 acres in 2001.

The plan is based on economic development for the area, and includes residential, industrial, and agricultural uses, and will include a research corporate park, a town center, plus schools and recreation/open space property.

A new training center to be operated by Polk Community Center is key to providing a trained workforce for the development.

“Science and technology is the future of the country,” Ms. Zibas said.

The estimated build-out is 15 to 20 years.

Among features depicted on a series of maps of the proposed development:

€ Two industrial sites, one east of Bartow Municipal Airport , the other southwest of the city.

€ Sites for two schools: one an elementary school, east of Bartow and south of State Road 60, the other an elementary or middle school, east of the south side of Bartow.

€ A large residential area, generally east of Bartow, starting between U.S. Highway 17 and Bartow Municipal Airport at the northern end and stretching down to Six-Mile Creek south of town.

€ A research corporate park, straddling State Road 60 east of Connersville .

€ A district park and a golf course east of the south side of Bartow, near the southern school site.

Georgianne Ratliff, a planner with Wilson Miller, said her firm will handle planning, engineering, environmental work, and transportation planning. The development will be processed as an “optional sector plan.”

The optional sector plan process that Clear Springs is using to win approval of regulatory agencies differs from other development options.

The optional sector plan process is ideal for large developments, particularly when more than one government (in this case, Polk County and the City of Bartow) have jurisdiction. Florida law requires a minimum of 5,000 acres for the optional sector plan process.

The process begins with development of a “conceptual overlay,” followed by detailed specific area plans. It includes designation of areas that will remain rural in nature and areas to be left as recreation and open space.

The sector plan will be submitted in a memorandum of understanding to the Bartow City Commission, the Polk County Commission and the Florida Dept. of Community Affairs.

The memorandum will include a transportation network plan and specific design guidelines.

Water resources are a key to the development, Ms. Ratliff said.

A master plan for the entire 18,000 acres will be created up front, she said.

Major issues developed thus far are water resources, protection of the Peace River, the transportation network, the relationship with the city of Bartow , schools and parks, and a plan for “sustainable development.” The latter term refers to avoiding urban sprawl, with retail outlets and employment available to the people who buy the homes.

“It's not going to be a gated community. It will have a variety of types of housing,” she said.

An on-site reservoir is planned south of town at the CS 11 mine site.

“We're making a commitment to keep part of the property agricultural,” Ms. Ratliff said.

Clear Springs has 150 acres of land in blueberry production at present, and plans to expand to 750 acres.

Pat Steed, executive director, Central Florida Development Council, said that Clear Springs wants to insure that as new communities are developed, connections will be established to the present city of Bartow .

Philip Bryan, a member of Bartow's planning and zoning board, expressed concern about the adequacy of water supply to serve the developments.

Pete Hubbell of Water Resources Associates said that capture of storm run-off and use of reclaimed water figure into the planning to reduce the consumption of groundwater.

Irrigation of blueberries will be highly efficient, he said.

More workshops will be conducted as planning progresses.

The next public workshop probably will be held around the end of the summer or early in the fall, Ms. Zibas said.

Bear visits once too often
Had history of wandering too close to humans
By JacqueLynn Hatter
DEMOCRAT WRITER

A Florida black bear was euthanized Sunday after it was captured in the 1100 block of Thomasville Road by local law-enforcement officers.

"He was going through people's backyards," Sgt. James Fairfield of the Tallahassee Police Department said. "We got reports of him crossing Seventh Avenue , near Ninth and Grape, near Miracle 5 (Theater), Los Robles and Sixth Avenue."

The bear had a history of wandering too close to humans, state wildlife officials said. He had ear tags dated from 2005, suggesting that he had been captured and relocated before.

According to Mike Crisfield, a regional biologist for nuisance wildlife with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission, the bear had been captured twice in May.

On May 4, it was captured in South Florida and relocated to Babcock Webb Wildlife Management in Punta Gorda. He resurfaced May 20 in Fort Myers and was then relocated to Mudd Swamp in the Apalachicola National Forest near the Liberty/Franklin county border.

He was first spotted in Tallahassee around 6:30 a.m. Sunday.

The male bear, weighing more than 200 pounds, was finally trapped in a tree near the Whataburger restaurant on Thomasville Road by local law-enforcement officers and firefighters. Staff from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission arrived and shot the bear out of the tree with a tranquilizer before removing him, ending the four-hour encounter.

"Standard protocol in most rural areas is to leave the bear alone and let it wander back into its own area, but based on this bear's history we made the decision to dart it," said Adam Warwick, a biologist with the FWC.

Black bears are not new to the area and sightings are not unusual for Tallahassee . In fact, TPD received reports of a black bear being seen in this same area last week.

"Black bears are native to North Florida and the Apalachicola National Forest ," said Mike Keever, a Fish and Wildlife Commission officer who was at the scene. Bears are naturally fearful of humans, but when a bear becomes accustomed to people, it becomes a threat, Warwick said.

FWC officials did not want to euthanize the bear, but felt that his history left them no alternative.

"We don't like doing it," Crisfield said. "But when they travel down that road (and get accustomed to people), we have to act."

Songbird shooting results in felony

Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

Monday, June 04, 2007

STUART — Wildlife officers were having an early-evening squad meeting in the Allapattah Flats area in western Martin County in March when they heard the sound of gunfire from the southwest.

Several officers and supervisors got into their trucks and followed the sound, which seemed to come from a shotgun and a small-caliber rifle. They got to an area about 3 miles south of State Road 714 near a sod farm that also includes property owned by the South Florida Water Management District.

 

That's when Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission officer Ray Woolrich realized shotgun pellets were hitting his truck.

A few minutes later, officers confronted three men who first said they were target shooting and later admitted they were shooting at birds.

Two dead songbirds were found in the area, and parts of a third were recovered, prompting charges of "taking of non-game migratory birds" and "willful and wanton waste of wildlife" against all three.

Matthew Bustin, 19, of Palm City was one of them. He accepted his misdemeanor citations and was ready to plead no contest, but on May 18 prosecutors filed a felony charge of armed trespass against him and he had to surrender at the Martin County jail to face the new, more serious case.

"I already paid on the birds," Bustin said Friday. "Now they want me to do weekends in the jail."

From the date of the initial citation, officers recommended that the trespass charge be pursued, but prosecutor Linda Bach said one of the things that persuaded her to file was the fact that Bustin had just finished a probationary sentence for killing a deer out of season in January. Court records show his probation was officially terminated March 6 and the bird shootings happened March 11.

Wildlife officials applauded the decision.

"It was just an absolute disregard for wildlife," wildlife commission spokeswoman Dani Moschella said. "He was lucky the first time with the deer case."

Wildlife commission Capt. David Sterman, who did not participate in Bustin's case, said he has seen a number of repeat offenders in his 35 years with the agency.

"The question is: Do you want to have a quality outdoor experience? Do you want to have fish and wildlife to enjoy in the future?" Sterman said. "If you just want to live for the moment, that's your choice, but the majority of Floridians have a very serious concern about environmental issues."

Bustin said Friday that he knows what he did was wrong and that he will likely make a plea deal in the case.

"It's taught me a lot," he said, adding, "I'm fixing to move out of Martin County ."

 

Down In The Dumps

By NICOLA M. WHITE The Tampa Tribune

 

Published: Jun 4, 2007

 

DADE CITY - They pledged that if they built the landfill, they wouldn't accept asbestos or treated biomedical waste.

 

But the permit application the would-be landfill operators filed with the state told a different story. In it, next to the boxes marked "asbestos" and "treated biomedical waste," Angelo's Aggregate Materials checked "yes."

 

Local activists balked. Alarmed about the idea of asbestos and treated ash filtering through the soil and into the water supply, they have waved the application like an antilandfill banner. Angelo's, they claim, isn't telling the truth about the kind of landfill it wants to build in rural northeast Pasco County .

 

The developers say they will honor their promises for the 90-acre landfill they have proposed for a 900-acre ranch off Old Lakeland Highway , about three miles southeast of Dade City .

 

Although the state Department of Environmental Protection allows landfill operators to accept asbestos and treated biomedical waste, Angelo's will not take in these items, said John Arnold, the project engineer, echoing a pledge he made at a packed community forum last month.

 

"I was adamant that it was prohibited, and it is prohibited," Arnold said.

 

So, why the discrepancy with the application?

 

Largo-based Angelo's Aggregate Materials, which operates a construction debris landfill across the road from the proposed household waste landfill, first applied for a landfill permit in October. The state Department of Environmental Protection reviewed the application, which was several hundred pages long, and sent back 60 pages of questions. In January, Angelo's submitted a revised application, which the DEP reviewed and sent back with more comments and questions.

 

Angelo's is expected to respond and update its application by the end of this month. In that response packet, Angelo's will make sure to uncheck the "biomedical waste" and "asbestos" boxes, Arnold said.

 

Technically, a household garbage landfill can accept treated biomedical waste and asbestos. But if an applicant wants to cater to community concerns and limit what it wants to take, it can do that, too, said DEP spokeswoman Pamala Vazquez.

 

"They can come to us and say, 'We have promised the community we won't be taking Product X. Could you write that into our permit?' And we could," she said.

 

Angelo's, which has hired a public relations firm and printed user-friendly fliers advocating the environmental benefits of building the landfill, has been touting the landfill as a cheaper, more environmentally friendly alternative to dealing with the county's growing garbage crisis.

 

As it is, Pasco County 's population growth has overwhelmed the waste-to-energy incinerator in Shady Hills, and garbage is being trucked to a landfill out of county. Angelo's has dubbed its proposed landfill an "organic composting and recycling center" and said it would offer free recycling services to county residents.

 

Still, the landfill has proved to be a tough sell, and residents near the proposed facility have been more than vocal in expressing their opposition.

 

Carl Roth, a local resident representing a newly formed group called Protectors of Florida's Legacy, is skeptical, despite the promises from the company.

 

"Our level of trust in what they say and what they do is not very high," he said.

 

AT A GLANCE:

PROPOSED: Angelo's Aggregate Materials of Largo wants to build a 90-acre landfill on 900 acres off Enterprise Road , near Dade City .

 

THE ISSUE: As Pasco County 's population grows, the county is running out of space to put residents' garbage.

 

COMPLAINTS: The proposed landfill site sits less than a mile from the Withlacoochee River and the Green Swamp , a protected no-growth area.

 

WHAT PROPONENTS SAY: The garbage has to go somewhere. Layers of clay and special plastic liners would protect groundwater and the river. Furthermore, the facility would act as an organic composting center.

 

WHERE THINGS STAND: Angelo's is revising its permit application, which is expected by the end of the month. If the state Department of Environmental Protection approves the application, Angelo's would have to secure approval from the county.

 

Reporter Nicola M. White can be reached at (813) 779-4613 or nwhite1@tampatrib.com.

 

Pasadena Hills Vision Is Focus Of Workshop

Published: Jun 4, 2007

DADE CITY - The future of the Pasadena Hills section of Pasco County will be on the agenda Tuesday when county commissioners meet at the historic Pasco County Courthouse.

County officials will hold an informal workshop at 9 a.m. to discuss the 50-year vision for one of Pasco 's most bucolic areas.

Pasadena Hills covers 22,000 acres between Curley Road and U.S. 301. The region is known for its rolling landscape, lakes and agricultural nature.

But suburbia is encroaching as subdivisions sprout near Curley Road and State Road 54 in the region's southwest corner.

With an eye toward controlling future growth, county planners convened a series of meetings with Pasadena Hills residents to craft a strategy that would allow growth while preserving rural neighborhoods and scenic areas.

The result of those talks calls for concentrating growth in about a dozen village-style developments scattered through the region. The plan would preserve land around Lake Pasadena , allow for new roads crisscrossing the region and protect established neighborhoods.

The planning meetings drew hundreds of supportive residents from the region. The final plan, however, has drawn criticism from people who see it as letting suburbia devour more of rural Pasco County .

Trilby resident Nancy Hazelwood worries the proposal, which could add tens of thousands of residents over the coming 50 years, will overwhelm resources such as water.

"Any time you bring in more people, you're going to have demand for more water," she said recently.

Reporter Kevin Wiatrowski can be reached at (813) 948-4201 or kwiatrowski@tampatrib.com.


Oysters Reveal Waterway Pollution

The Associated Press

Published: June 4, 2007

SARASOTA - The oysters of Lemon Bay are telling scientists a story, and it is not a happy one. Too many are dying, a sign that pollution may soon threaten the bay's other inhabitants.

Scientists say oysters are more efficient than water quality tests at pinpointing pollution. Oysters, which filter impurities from the water, serve as an early warning system for waterways: When oysters die in large numbers, fish usually follow.

'You can be doing a lot of things fine, but if you have one thing wrong it will show up in the bay,' Jono Miller, an environmental studies director at New College, told the Sarasota Herald-Tribune.

Sarasota County is using oyster studies to direct its water restoration programs. Scientists are monitoring 28 oyster beds in bays surrounding the community. A study in September found that only seven of 28 oyster beds met the county's goal of at least 70 percent live oysters. Results of a recent study are still being tabulated, but early indications show the county needs to work harder to prevent pollutants from flowing into the bays.

Much of the problem stems from drainage ditches dug years ago that channel fresh water and contaminated runoff into the waterways. Both kill oysters.

'If we're putting more fresh water in the bays, the problem is we are increasing the pollutant loads as well,' said Jack Merriam, Sarasota County 's environmental manager.

The county first recognized the value of oyster studies in 2003 and used that research to start projects to reduce freshwater flow to two bays.

Merriam said Lemon Bay is another likely candidate for restoration. Oysters in the bay are healthier than in other spots in the county, but still need improvement. And the land surrounding the bay is mostly undeveloped, which makes restoration easier, Merriam said.

 

No Coal Plant For Everglades

The Tampa Tribune

Published: June 4, 2007

It's tough to imagine a more inappropriate project than Florida Power & Light Co.'s plan to build a coal-fired plant near the Everglades, the hydrological heart of South Florida that has been drained, polluted and abused to the brink of destruction.

The project would spew about 13 million tons of carbon dioxide and 190 pounds of mercury into the air a year. It would undermine efforts to reduce carbon emissions, which contribute to global warming, a concern for our low-lying state. And it would put a smudgy thumb in the eye of the $8 billion Everglades restoration project.

Dan Kimball, superintendent of Everglades National Park , warns it also will worsen mercury contamination in the park's fish and wildlife.

FP&L wants the coal-fired plant to build capacity and ensure reliable electricity for its 4.4 million customers. It also wants to diversify its power sources and become less reliant on higher-priced natural gas.

Indeed, Florida power companies are too reliant on natural gas. But Tampa Electric Co. is charting a better path to diversification. TECO wants to expand its capacity by building another coal-gasification plant in Polk County , using a relatively clean technology that captures most of the carbon emissions.

A worse location couldn't be found for a conventional coal-fired plant than near Lake Okeechobee .

Gov. Charlie Crist, a champion of Florida 's natural resources, should repel this assault on the River of Grass .

Use science, not politics on state's water emergencies

Palm Beach Post Sunday, June 03, 2007

By NATHANIEL P. REED

The five new members of the South Florida Water Management District governing board face awesome challenges, such as Everglades restoration, growth and potential natural disasters. Managing drinking water, drainage and the priceless environment of South Florida for future generations demands honesty and resolve.

 Many policy areas need new thinking, new purpose and new resolve. Excessive growth and water mismanagement have led to a crisis in the Everglades . Fortunately, a cadre of the brightest, well-trained, articulate scientists within and outside the agency can help the board address these problems - if board members agree to be led by science and not politics.

First, the new board should repair the relationship between Florida and the federal government. "The feds aren't doing their part" has become a mantra that is counterproductive, demoralizing and intellectually dishonest.

When Everglades restoration began in 2001, the plan was based on a solid partnership between the state and the federal government. But a lack of strong direction from elected and appointed officials at all levels of government has left affected parties, once again, to fight it all out in court.

All parties must recommit themselves to the agreements made in 2000, reached after years of negotiations. The district's unilateral decision to abandon those agreements to focus on an "accelerated" restoration process substitutes fast policy for good policy. The governing board should pull the state-federal partnership back together for the good of the Everglades and the people of South Florida .

Next, the district must address water storage in the vast Okeechobee basin. Too much water is being drained from private lands into state waters. Lake Okeechobee 's reduced capacity has been repeatedly overwhelmed, forcing massive releases of billions of gallons of polluted water down the St. Lucie and Caloosahatchee rivers. The beaches and fisheries are despoiled, leading to endless litigation. People have lost faith in the agency's board and staff.

There must be a third outlet for lake water, from the lake's south shore. Water flowing south through cleansing marshes and water storage in man-made reservoirs may be the only hope for restoring the Everglades to a semblance of its once-natural system.

The Everglades restoration plan called for hundreds of underground wells to store lake water and retrieve it later. But scientists continue to question the practicality of that plan. The governing board must confront the reality that more land is needed to save Lake Okeechobee, the estuaries and the Everglades .

Major problems also exist in the design and construction of projects in south Miami-Dade to clean water to send to the Everglades and Florida Bay . These are resolvable conflicts, but real solutions are not easy or inexpensive.

The board members should be prepared to work with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Department of Interior and the superintendent of Everglades National Park . They should seek advice from Gov. Crist before committing themselves to any accelerated approach that will result in litigation rather than in a healthy Florida Bay .

Finally, the board must work with leaders from the state departments of Environmental Protection, Community Affairs and Agriculture. Most of the problems north of Lake Okeechobee that generate high levels of polluted water flowing into the lake are caused by the responsible agencies' failure to get together and act to stop pollution.

The five new board members will have a great opportunity to change the direction of the agency, to make it genuinely responsive and deeply concerned with environmental quality. This board can resurrect the great sense of optimism, mission and purpose all parties felt in 2000 when the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan was approved.

 

Cities, counties due to take big hit on taxes
Originally posted Southwest Florida News Press June 02, 2007

Tax Reform will fuel no growth and increase the likelihood of the passage of Hometown Democracy (the ballot initiative that restricts land use plan changes to local referendums).

It is difficult to state what the Legislature will do, but what they will do will be law, so "waiting and seeing" is a consensus to have those who talk, debate, and lobby determine the outcome. Since the stated outcome is to punish cities and counties, cities and counties should not take a "wait and see" attitude.

If the press reports are a reasonable guide, school districts and independent fire districts will not face a rollback because of the harm it would cause them. By that one statement, over half of the average tax bill just got exempted, and it is admitted that the purpose of the rollback is to harm who is left — cities, counties (including county constitutional officers that depend upon property taxes for revenues, such as the sheriff and the supervisor of elections) and independent taxing districts that aren't fire districts. (And fire districts that aren't independent—such as city fire departments—have no such protection). There are reports that somehow the sheriff would also be exempted (although how this would work given his budget revenues come in large part from the millage levied by the county commissions, as is the supervisor of elections, is unclear), and if that occurs, over 60 percent of property tax levies would be exempt.

GROWTH WAS SOUGHT

Which leaves cities and counties as the primary providers of "tax relief." It seems to have been overlooked that Florida actively pursued a program of population growth to increase the value and income of the state, so that jobs would be created and taxes levied to provide — better health care, better education, better public safety, better quality of life. That growth has been enabled by city and county actions in providing services, and in regulatory actions (such as building and zoning codes). And these services and regulatory protections and requirements have acted to improve property values. In other words, Florida and its cities and counties achieved what they set out to get from growth.

In many areas, population increases were so great that congestion and deterioration of service resulted, leading to public anger and distrust of growth. In response, local governments developed new revenue sources that moved much of the growth costs from the tax rolls. That movement also resulted in legal restrictions on how and where such money can be spent. However, essential community service operations still remain funded by the property tax, because the property tax has less variability than other revenue sources—and the services are essential.

The property tax is levied by elected persons (with legislatively created exceptions). These persons campaign commonly on the knife edge of the lowest millages that can meet governmental responsibilities, with the highest achievable services such funds can provide. Achieving the promises of those campaigns is an art, not a science. The common remedy for failure is the ballot box. A brief historical note: In the past the ballot box established the statewide millage caps under which localities have been operating for decades.

SAVE OUR INEQUITIES

Now the proposals are for rollbacks of property taxes — for nonresidents, absentee landlords, limited responsibility corporations, and non-homesteaded property. This will result —and is intended to be a result —in service reductions for all inhabitants. Homesteaded residents are not intended to see a tax reduction, particularly the longer term residents, just service reduction.

The inequality in assessments was known to be an outcome of the "Save our Homes" amendment. The rapid rise in property values in the last few years is not a result, though, of "Save Our Homes" but is the result of the belief that Florida has good governance that makes investing in Florida property a good investment. The innocent bystanders are those who weren't engaged in the transactions, but whose paper valuations went up. And whose taxes went up, since Florida 's local governments also buy land, and build facilities to meet population growth, and pay wages so workers can afford to live in the community where they provide the services — all of which are also affected by the increased assessments and cost of construction and land.

Which pretty much closes the loop. The residents who get services will see services cut, and will then wonder why more growth will make their lives better, for the benefit of nonresidents and those absentee investors.

Usually, such discussions take place locally. However, a statewide rollback will provide a statewide stimulus to no- and limited-growth initiatives.

The impact of Save Our Homes was predicted, and the legislation was passed anyway. The impact of "Tax Reform (for a few)" is predicted, and ...

      Wayne Daltry is Lee County Smart Growth Director.

Attorney: Let citizens make land decisions



Wendy Wills
wwills@pnj.com

 

Lesley Blackner, an environmental attorney from Palm Beach , believes residents of Florida should have a major say in decisions regarding land development.

As president of Florida Hometown Democracy Inc., a nonpartisan group, she offered her ideas at The League of Women Voters of the Pensacola Bay Area's 57th annual meeting Saturday at New World Landing.

Blackner and her group are working to pass a constitutional amendment, the Florida Hometown Democracy Amendment, that would give residents, rather than local government officials, the direct power to approve a county's comprehensive plan.

Blackner discussed how important it is for Florida voters to have a voice in local government comprehensive land use plans. Comprehensive plan amendments allow for more development on a particular portion of land.

So far, the group has collected 300,000 signatures on a petition to put the amendment to a vote in 2008, but the group needs to collect 311,000 more by the end of the year.

Blackner said putting approval of such plans in residents' hands would give them confidence that their votes count.

"Who gives the most money to these local commissioner campaigns? It's the developers," she said. "Why is it so hard to fight city council in court? Land use decisions are political decisions made by city and county commissioners." Blackner said her years of studying the law taught her that voters have more power than they might imagine.

"I've come across cases that say if voters are dissatisfied with the way their representatives are voting, the voters delegated power to their representatives. Guess what -- they can take that power back."

 

TCoast growth groups just keep growing

 

By Jason Schultz

 

Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

 

Monday, June 04, 2007

 

STUART — A new slow-growth supergroup wades into the county's ongoing battle over land development tonight.

 

The Martin County Consensus will have the first of what its members say will be monthly public meetings with speakers to educate people about issues dealing with development in the county.

 

 

 

"It's just a coming together of the movers and shakers," said group board member Dave Shore , who also runs a group that advocates shortening Witham Field airport's main runway. "It's just to bring together all of the good guys, or who we call the good guys, the environmentalists and people who want responsible growth."

 

The group's board of directors is a who's who of slow-growth and environmental activists in Martin County . Members said they became involved in the group because they realized they have better chances at success in numbers if they share information about their different problems.

 

"If you are having a problem, you can come to the Consensus and there is such as wealth of experience there," said Chairman Tom Fullman, founder of the Jensen Beach Group, a collection of activists who are fighting a housing project in that community.

 

Former County Commissioner Maggy Hurchalla and Virginia Sherlock, the attorney for the Jensen Beach Group, will speak at tonight's meeting, though neither was sure what they would speak about. The group is nonpartisan and nonpolitical and is intended mainly to educate people, Fullman said.

 

Future meetings would have speakers about community redevelopment areas and water use.

 

"Each month we'll introduce a new theme and a new speaker," he said. "It's working very well and over time we expect to grow."

 

Another board member, Linda Grand, said the group plans to draw most of its funding from the $25 fee members pay when they apply to join the group and won't be accepting financial backing from any other groups.

 

The group put out a 15-point position paper with all the beliefs it plans to support. The Consensus will oppose clustered pockets of homes in rural areas and support a requirement for a four-commissioner vote for any amendment to the county's comprehensive plan, its blueprint for growth. Three votes are sufficient now.

 

It also will support revisiting recent plan amendments that may have hurt the area's quality of life.

 

Commissioner Lee Weberman questioned several of the group's positions and said it is a lot more politically minded than it lets on.

 

"It's loaded with politically inflammatory buzzwords instead of dealing with issues," Weberman said.

 

Mary Dawson, an environmental activist who has been on opposing sides of the clustering debate from most of the members of the Consensus, said she agrees with all of its positions except the stance against clustering. Dawson said she would be interested in joining the group if she didn't have to endorse that item.

 

"I hope you don't have to toe the party line on everything," Dawson said. "The real test will be if they are really trying to help or just whip up a frenzy for political purposes. If they really want to build a consensus, I'm in."

 

The group is looking for people who would work to support all of its positions, Fullman said.

 

For months he has been considering running for the District 1 county commission seat next year, but he said the Consensus would not be connected to any eventual campaign and is not political in nature.

 

"This is about educating the residents about quality of life," he said.

 

Shore said Fullman will have to step down if he runs.

 

"We're not here to provide a political platform for anybody," Shore said.

 

Weberman said that, if the group tried to influence which candidates will run or which other groups will support which candidates in next year's commission elections, it will smack of "election manipulation" andprobably will backfire.

 

"It's been my experience that when people try to orchestrate the outcomes of elections it never works out the way they planned," Weberman said.

 

Fullman said the group is still too new to think about any involvement in the 2008 elections and that was not its main goal right now.

 

"It's way too early for that," Fullman said. "We have to unite the community first."

If you go

 

What: Martin County Consensus public meeting

 

When: 6 p.m. today

 

Where: Blake Library, 2351 S.E. Monterey Road , Stuart.

 

Information: (772) 334-0122

 

Martin County Consensus' board of directors

 

Chairman Thomas Fullman: Founder of the Jensen Beach Group slow-growth activism organization thatopposes a housing development in Jensen Beach .

 

President Bill Summers: Member of the Martin County Conservation Alliance and a frequent speaker at county commission meetings against proposed developments.

 

Secretary/Treasurer Al Forman: Stuart West neighborhood resident, publisher of the Martin County Defender slow-growth newsletter.

 

Linda Grand: Member of the Guardians of the Martin County Comprehensive Growth Management Plan, a group of slow-growth activists founded by Jupiter Island residents.

 

Jay Honan: Rocky Point resident who opposes the proposed expansion of the Hinckley Yachts boat-building facility. Also a frequent speaker against proposed developments at county commission meetings.

 

Tony Parkinson: Key member of the Jensen Beach Group.

 

Lynne Pine: Airport activist who has worked to get the county to shorten Witham Field airport's main runway. Also opposed fluoridation of the county's drinking water.

 

Paul Shidel: Jensen Beach resident who sued a developer and forced him to tear down an apartment complex.

 

Dave Shore : President of the Witham Airport Action Majority group that advocates shortening the airport's runway.

Fewer mobile home parks affordable housing problem

BY LISA ARTHUR

larthur@MiamiHerald.com

The saga of the Blue Lake Mobile Home Park appears to shape up as a classic tale of rich vs. poor.

Park owner Bruce Rapee told residents six months ago that they had to vacate the park at 1001 W. Flagler St. by June 1 because he has other other plans for the property.

The park's residents are mostly low-income working class immigrants who had sunk much of their savings into buying their trailers. They own their homes, but not the ground underneath.

But this story is more complicated than one dusty mobile home park of 278 trailers that have fallen into disrepair and -- like every other mobile home park still in business -- is ''low-hanging fruit'' for redevelopment in land-starved South Florida .

It's about the region's affordable housing crunch. It's about political will. And it's about finding an answer to a vexing question: Who is responsible for creating a safety net for the tens of thousands of residents displaced by redevelopment?

The story of the Blue Lake Mobile Home Park is an example of why finding an answer hasn't been easy.

Housing advocates concede private property owners such as Rapee ultimately have the right to sell their land. They say it's the government's role to step in to help those people on the wrong end of redevelopment.

One example: the city of Davie in Broward County . Earlier this year, the city placed a one-year moratorium on the rezoning of mobile home parks while a task force scours the state and the country to find what other regions have done.

Housing advocates want Miami-Dade to follow Davie 's lead and declare a moratorium.

At the state level, a bill proposing placing most of the burden for relocating the residents of mobile home parks squarely on local governments failed to pass last session.

Such ideas do little for the 85 families still living in Blue Lakes . Rapee extended the eviction deadline until today, and is expected to file papers for court-ordered evictions in the next few weeks.

When Rapee first told residents he intended to sell the park last September, its residents looked to a civil rights attorney who had been working with them to deal with a flurry of code violations the county issued to them six months earlier.

John de Leon, who is also an at-large board member of the ACLU's local chapter, said Rapee acted in bad faith. He has filed a lawsuit against Rapee.

''He should have never let these people spend money to fix their trailers just months before he told them they had to move out,'' he said. ``No one thought these folks would fight back.''

Larry Goodman, Rapee's attorney, said his client has followed all the laws and has done nothing wrong. ''I can't comment anymore than that because of the lawsuit, and a courtroom is the place to make statements now,'' he said.

While lawsuits play out and government bureaucracies try to find solutions to the affordable housing crisis, Blue Lakes resident Hernan Gavidia's main concern has been finding housing for his family.

His options are limited.

Gavidia, a 47-year-old fleet service attendant for American Airlines, has been living at Blue Lakes for four years with his wife and two children. He said he invested $34,000 into his trailer, with $10,000 going for repairs in the past year after county inspectors cited everyone in the park for violations, including electrical hazards.

'' Miami is too expensive, now. To buy a house you need a big down payment,'' he said. ``I could afford $1,000 a month for rent, but I need two or three bedrooms, and you just can't find that.''

For now, Gavidia will move into a relative's empty duplex unit for $900 a month.

County agencies have been trying to help the Blue Lakes residents, visiting the park on a regular basis. Their best offer so far to Blue Lakes families: a one-time Housing Assistance Grant of $700 to $1200 depending upon their incomes.

That doesn't buy much in the Miami housing market.

''A family of four or six who is living at Blue Lakes right now is paying $450 a month to rent the land their trailer is on,'' said Alyce Gowdy Wright, an organizer with Justice With Jobs, a non-profit group that has taken up the residents' cause. ``You can't find anything like that for them in Dade County .''

Public housing, for decades the biggest government safety net available, is not an option.

There are 40,000 people on the waiting list, which has been closed for a year and won't open again until next year, said Kris Warren, director of the Miami Dade Housing Agency.

''I don't know if there will ever be enough options,'' she said. ``No matter how much we build.''

All the more reason, argue housing advocates, that Miami-Dade County needs a one-year moratorium against mobile home park rezoning.

''There are 90 mobile home parks still operating in the county, and the people who live in them have not been on the radar of the county as far as affordable housing,'' she said. ``They have to be part of the new affordable housing master plan the county is drafting.''

County Commissioner Katy Sorenson has asked the county manager for a report on a possible moratorium.

''I don't know the answer to this problem, but I do know we have to include it in the conversation,'' she said. ``Rezoning is not a right and land use policy is the government's responsibility. We have a huge affordable housing crisis and we have to be asking ourselves `Do we want to get rid of affordable housing that does exist?'''

Trailer parks do present an added complexity, she said, because generally mobile homes aren't the best housing solutions in a hurricane-prone area.

''We should come up with solutions that create the safest affordable housing possible,'' she said.

Jaimie Ross, affordable housing coordinator of 1000 Friends of Florida, a Tallahassee-based non-profit sensible growth advocacy group, said it's urgent that counties find solutions.

''State growth management laws say it's the responsibility of the local government to make sure there is housing for all its residents, and there is incredible pressure on mobile home parks right now all over the state,'' she said. ``It's like low-hanging fruit to developers because it is some of the last chunks of open land left in places like South Florida .''

A study by the Florida Manufactured Housing Association estimate that between January 2005 and June 2006 about 7,600 mobile home lots were lost when 58 parks closed.

But Ross and local advocates say local governments have to step in and stop rezoning the parks for now.

''By changing land uses and rezoning away existing affordable housing, local governments are facilitating homelessness and urban removal,'' Ross said. ``They have to have the political will to be progressive like Davie and other places, and take a time out and figure out the right thing to do.''

 

CSX, In Creating Railroad Hub, Could Transform Its Public Image

The Tampa Tribune

Published: June 3, 2007

CSX Transportation wants to build a first-rate, rail-to-truck distribution center in Winter Haven that could dramatically increase business at Florida ports and bring thousands of well-paying jobs to Polk County and the region.

That's the good news.

The bad news is that this powerhouse railroad company, which is so used to getting its way, tried to skirt a comprehensive review of its facility by suggesting the venture wouldn't have a regional impact on this part of the state.

Poppycock.

If ever a project had regional sweep, this state-of-the-art facility would.

As Tribune reporter Billy Townsend reports, CSX has envisioned a 1,250-acre complex in Winter Haven ever since officials began talking about the project 18 months ago. But because the state requires a multi-agency review for any project of 320 acres or more, the railroad decided to submit a 'first phase' plan that would only cover 318 acres.

Nice try.

The railroad is not proposing to build a strip shopping center. It's proposing a major industrial complex that will send trains through the heart of Lakeland and Auburndale. It's expected to add 1,150 trucks to roads in Bartow, Lake Wales and Mulberry. Major improvements will be needed to handle the additional traffic on State Road 60, U.S. Highway 27 and U.S. Highway 98.

Fortunately, the state Department of Community Affairs told CSX last week that the project meets the threshold for a 'development of regional impact,' meaning all stakeholders - Polk County, area communities, environmental agencies and the state Department of Transportation - will have a say in whether the hub is right for Winter Haven.

It may be humbling for CSX to work in partnership with state and local governments, but it's a perfect opportunity for the railroad to serve its shareholders while improving its standing as a corporate citizen.

As a gesture of good will, it should start by ending pricing strategies that gouge regional taxpayers, as reported recently by The Tribune's Lindsay Peterson.

For example, whenever government agencies work near CSX rails, the company charges taxpayers as much as $25 an hour for a flagman to watch the tracks and warn of an approaching train - even if the road workers are well away from the crossing. Hillsborough and Polk counties paid at least $3 million to CSX for flagmen between 2003 and 2006, including $160,000 to a flagman who sat in his truck, drank coffee and watched a road crew over 14 months.

For another, the railroad charges local governments millions to maintain railroad crossings on public roads, but offers no accounting for how these tax dollars are spent. Hillsborough spokesman Steve Valdez said: 'They give us a lump sum total and say, 'Pay this.' If we don't pay them, we won't get any more work done.'

CSX has kept local governments over a barrel because most of its tracks existed before most county and state roads.

However, the rail-to-truck distribution center represents an opportunity to get some concessions for regional taxpayers.

CSX could decide to walk away from the land deal, which hasn't yet closed. Or it could appeal the state's decision. But a wiser course would be to accept the state's rightful conclusion.

Like the rail lines that wind through so many Florida communities, CSX's success is deeply entwined with the state's success.

This is a perfect opportunity for the railroad to serve its shareholders - and its home state - by working better with its neighbors, participating in public reviews and taking the time to get this project done right.

 

Developers At Impasse On Sunlake Boulevard

By KEVIN WIATROWSKI The Tampa Tribune

 

Published: Jun 4, 2007

 

 

LAND - O' LAKES - When it's finished, Sunlake Boulevard will give drivers in central Pasco an alternative to increasingly crowded U.S. 41.

 

But it has to get built first.

 

The souring of a deal between two companies that share responsibility for building the road has raised questions about how and when it will be built.

 

The dispute has embroiled two of the Tampa Bay area's most prominent builders - Lennar and Newland Communities.

 

The developers have struck deals with Pasco County requiring each to build two lanes of the road from State Road 54 to Tower Road . Amprop Development, which plans a shopping center along S.R. 54, also must build two lanes along its portion of Sunlake.

 

The trouble comes north of Mentmore Boulevard , where Lennar and Newland share responsibility for the road.

 

The county's deals with Newland and Lennar don't spell out who builds which lanes. And that's driving the developers' disagreement.

 

Newland President Don Whyte said his understanding has been that Lennar would build the first two lanes. Lennar President Ken Wagner said that's not practical, given the current pace of home construction.

 

Sunlake Boulevard is crucial to opening up development of Newland Communities' landlocked Bexley Ranch project. The developer must have its portion built before it can sell its first house on the sprawling 6,000-acre project.

 

"We have to have it before we can start selling houses," Whyte said.

 

Lennar, however, doesn't have to build its part of the road until it reaches its 601st new house. So far, Lennar has relied on nearby Mentmore Boulevard for access to more than 400 homes at Concord Station.

 

The road also is important for access to two schools slated to open this fall.

 

School officials say they will build their own driveway to access the schools from Mentmore until Sunlake is finished.

 

As part of its deal with the county, Lennar agreed long ago to do the initial earthwork needed to build the roadbed through its development. Now, company officials are asking to be released from that part of the deal.

 

Wagner said the company can't justify the cost of building its portion of the road now, given that it's not building houses in the part of Concord Station adjacent to Sunlake.

 

Lennar has given Newland access to its designs for Sunlake and permission to build on its land, Wagner said.

 

"They have a need, and we weren't ready to build," Wagner said. "So we've made it as practical as possible."

 

That will leave Newland to do all the work itself - work that includes building drainage ponds on Lennar's land to take runoff from the road. That's something Newland says it doesn't want to do.

 

The developers recently met with county officials to try to find common ground. Whyte said the two companies will continue to try to reach a deal on the issue.

 

Neither developer would quote a price tag for the road work, which would require Newland to build a roadbed large enough to handle the two lanes Lennar would eventually add.

 

Whyte described the costs as "astronomical."

 

"You're building a drainage system to benefit another builder," Whyte said.

 

Reporter Kevin Wiatrowski can be reached at (813) 948-4201 or kwiatrowski@tampatrib.com.

 

Living Off The Land

Published: Jun 4, 2007

Thinking of a career in agriculture?

If you are, images of pitching hay, slopping hogs and small paychecks probably come to mind, chilling your penchant for work in the field.

But agricultural jobs have moved well beyond the farm into the worlds of high finance, science and marketing.

Today, those who specialize in agriculture can end up in well-paying jobs managing golf courses, analyzing financial markets for Wall Street and developing new breeds of plants to improve food production.

Opportunities in agriculture-related jobs are abundant and those with the right skills are in high demand, experts say.

In fact, the number of job openings in agriculture exceeds the number of qualified college