More good news

 WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- Vast areas of snow in Antarctica melted in 2005 when temperatures warmed up for a week in the summer in a process that may accelerate invisible melting deep beneath the surface, NASA said on Tuesday.

A new analysis of satellite data showed that an area the size of California melted and then re-froze -- the most significant thawing in 30 years, the U.S. space agency said.

Unlike the Arctic, Antarctica has shown little to no warming in the recent past with the exception of the Antarctic Peninsula , where ice sheets have been breaking apart.

Son Nghiem of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena , California , and Konrad Steffen of the University of Colorado in Boulder measured snowfall accumulation and melt in Antarctica from July 1999 through July 2005.

They found evidence of melting in several areas, including high elevations and far inland in January of 2005, when temperatures got as high as 41 degrees Fahrenheit (5 degrees Celsius).

"Increases in snowmelt, such as this in 2005, definitely could have an impact on larger scale melting of Antarctica's ice sheets if they were severe or sustained over time," Steffen said in a statement.

"Water from melted snow can penetrate into ice sheets through cracks and narrow, tubular glacial shafts called moulins," Steffen added.

"If sufficient melt water is available, it may reach the bottom of the ice sheet. This water can lubricate the underside of the ice sheet at the bedrock, causing the ice mass to move toward the ocean faster, increasing sea level."

Copyright 2007 Reuters. All rights reserved.This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

 

Callery's 'new town' in Acreage rejected

By Mitra Malek

Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

Wednesday, May 16, 2007

WEST PALM BEACH A quick and sudden vote Tuesday night wiped away a Loxahatchee citrus grove's carefully crafted plan to build what amounts to a new town in the midst of The Acreage.

With a 4-2 vote, the Palm Beach County Commission shot down Callery-Judge Grove's 10,000-home project in its entirety.

Many had expected commissioners to debate the project into the late evening and delay voting on any aspect of the plan until June 26, a date the county had reserved in case commissioners couldn't wrap up Tuesday.

Callery's plan was so big and multi-faceted that county staff split the hearing process into three parts, the second Tuesday night.

But after hearing an hour's worth of testimony from a triad of municipalities vehemently opposed to its project, Callery asked for a postponement of the vote until June 26 to analyze a whopping prediction of needed road construction the three gave, totaling a billion dollars. Callery also said it wanted the extra time to see if it could cut the project's size - a concession it had dismissed in the past, saying a density reduction likely would ruin the project.

When commissioners denied the grove's postponement request, Callery said it wanted to cut to the chase and hear a straightforward "yes" or "no" on the whole project. No need to belabor each agenda item, sending the meeting into the wee hours, Callery representatives said.

Commissioner Karen Marcus, a long-standing critic of the project, made a motion to reject it. If Callery wants to scale back, let it start with a new application, she said.

Commissioners Jess Santamaria, Addie Greene and Warren Newell voted with Marcus. Commissioners Burt Aaronson and Mary McCarty dissented. Commissioner Jeff Koons left early because of a family medical emergency.

"I feel the people have spoken," Santamaria said after the meeting.

Santamaria, who represents the district including Callery, had listened for months to hundreds of residents beg him not to let the project go through. A former developer himself, Santamaria time and again said Callery should be entitled to density no greater than that permitted by the county's growth blueprint for the central-western communities known as the sector plan. State officials still haven't signed off on the sector plan, which under recent revisions would allow 4,708 homes on the 3,900-acre grove.

"Now we have uniform guidelines for all future development," Santamaria said. "Follow the sector plan, and you'll be approved."

The news wasn't as easy for Callery's general manager, Nat Roberts, to swallow.

"I'm clearly disappointed," Roberts said after the meeting. "We and the neighbors have worked hard to get to this point."

Roberts, who has been with the grove since 1990, has constantly taken care to note the resident feedback that went into the project through a neighbor advisory committee. Callery spent millions of dollars creating, revising and promoting the project. It brought on board top-notch lawyers and planners and assembled a team so deep it included former state and regional planning staff.

It also caught some flak along the way for lobbying commissioners and the state too hard. Many critics said the grove exaggerated public support for the project, pointing to Callery busing in last week to a hearing of proponents from distant parts of the county less familiar with - and less likely affected by - the project.

To be sure, though, the project had its backers. They hailed its 3.8 million square feet of office, research and retail space as a way to bring more business opportunities to Loxahatchee. They also liked the project's "new urbanist" layout and 600-acre water-polishing flow-way.

Yet opponents outnumbered the proponents. Several dozen showed up Tuesday wearing uniform green shirts that slammed the project and holding up signs that spurned it.

Tuesday had been set aside for Palm Beach Gardens , Royal Palm Beach and West Palm Beach to present their case against Callery. The three had spent hundreds of staff hours on fighting the plan. They completed an independent traffic study - traffic being their biggest bone of contention.

Tuesday they said Callery would create a need for $1 billion in road improvements. They painted a grim picture of urban interchanges on rural roads, along with miles and miles of clogged lanes.

"We don't see any solutions," Royal Palm Beach Engineer Ray Liggins said.

In the end, the surprise billion-dollar figure, Koons' unexpected absence and the presence of an FBI agent throughout the hearing appeared to change the pace of a meeting that had been expected to last well into the night.

County commissioners last May had preliminarily approved Callery's plan with a 5-2 vote. Marcus and former Commissioner Tony Masilotti dissented. Santamaria in November was elected to replace Masilotti.

On Tuesday it was unclear what Callery might do next. In the past it has said it plans to build 3,000 homes under an agricultural enclave law it helped get passed.

 

Charlotte says no to landfill proposal

Concerns about potential harm to wildlife and water.

By KATE SPINNER

kate.spinner@heraldtribune.com

CHARLOTTE COUNTY -- Omni Waste has lost its first official bid to turn part of a citrus grove near Babcock Ranch into a regional landfill.

In a unanimous vote Tuesday evening, the Charlotte County commissioners denied Omni permission to build a 300-acre landfill, which would have risen 318 feet about a mile from a nature preserve that cost the state $340 million.

The potential for Charlotte County to tap part of the 74,000-acre ranch for drinking water swayed commissioners against the proposal.

But Omni is not likely to go away. The company has spent years planning the landfill and winning favor with Charlotte community groups and politicians.

The company also came to Tuesday's commission meeting armed with three attorneys, a court reporter and a gaggle of engineers and land-use experts.

Environmental groups and an attorney representing one of the state's most prominent landowners vowed to continue fighting against the landfill if necessary.

Counties have little say over how landfills take shape, but they do have control over where they are located.

Commissioner Patricia Duffy said she would have approved the landfill in any other location, but she did not feel comfortable putting a known drinking water resource at risk.

The county's decision thrilled environmentalists and nearby landowners, who opposed the landfill because of its potential to bring up to 500 trucks a day into habitat used by the endangered Florida panther.

"We're happy they did the right thing," said Cari Roth, attorney for the Lykes Brothers, one of the largest landowners in the state.

The Lykes Brothers own 300,000 acres of ranch land, part of which borders the proposed landfill site.

State and federal wildlife officials have been working with the Lykes Brothers on a land conservation deal that would create a wildlife corridor between Lake Okeechobee and the Gulf of Mexico .

Wildlife officials say the only way to save the panther from extinction is to provide breeding habitat north of the Caloosahatchee River . Male panthers have been crossing the river from their base territory in the Everglades and stopping off near Babcock Ranch before they disperse farther north.

Because of that threat to the panther, Roth said, the landfill's location would damage the environmental value of her client's land and jeopardize the conservation deal that is in the works.

Roth and environmental groups said they are not letting their guards down.

"I hope they don't choose to challenge the decision in court," Roth said of Omni.

A court reporter working for Omni diligently took notes during Tuesday's four-hour hearing, an indication that the company is covering all its bases in preparation for possible legal action.

Omni Waste owner Tim Salopek and his attorney, Robert Berntsson, said they did not know what step they would take next.

Berntsson said he needed to review what happened at the meeting to decide whether his client had grounds for a suit.

If Omni does take the county to court, it will not be the first time it has sued to get permission to build a landfill.

Omni sued after Osceola County leaders denied the company permission to build a 200-acre landfill in Holopaw, a ranching town about 15 miles south of St. Cloud .

Osceola County settled, won over by Omni's financial incentives and promises that the garbage hauled to the landfill would only come from Osceola and bordering counties.

But now the landfill is owned by Waste Services Inc. and accepts garbage from all over Central Florida . The new company also got permission to raise the landfill to 330 feet, from the originally approved 187 feet.

The land in Osceola was not on the state's radar as panther habitat. Holopaw is home to the endangered crested caracara, a type of hawk.

Nancy Payton, the South Florida representative for the Florida Wildlife Federation, said environmentalists will also use the power of the court system to protect the panther.

The Florida Wildlife Federation has already had success in battling large projects in Lee and Collier counties that would have put the rare cat in danger.


Charlotte County rejects Cape Haze condos

Data from foes of the Wildflower project changes officials' minds

By ZAC ANDERSON

zac.anderson@heraldtribune.com

PLACIDA -- Residents of the Cape Haze peninsula are fed up, and they are fighting back.

Over the last few months, property owners in the rapidly developing region near Charlotte Harbor have organized against a variety of new development proposals.

On Tuesday, they finally scored a victory when county commissioners voted against a plan to put 290 condo units on an old golf course.

"Hopefully, a precedent was set today," said Stephan Shaffer, who lives near the golf course.

The region already experiences water shortages and crowded roads that would be exacerbated by more condos, residents told the commissioners.

They also argued that the previous property owner had agreed not to develop the Wildflower golf course when an earlier set of condos were built in the 1970s.

The residents did extensive research and were able to produce letters and other documentation to help prove their points.

The project already had been approved by the County Commission , but the new documentation changed the minds of some commissioners.

"I think there was egregious misinformation" presented by the developer at an earlier meeting, said Commissioner Tom Moore.

Miami-based developer Rani Ben-David said he likely would give up the project after Tuesday's vote.

"There are a few developers who are sick and tired of this county and don't want to develop here anymore," Ben-David said. "It's our impact fees that will improve the roads and sewers and water service."

The Cape Haze area has been a hotbed of anti-development sentiment in recent years as hundreds of new condo units have been built.

More than 100 people attended a county workshop in March to protest what they saw as giveaways to developers in the form of exemptions from a county land use law that is supposed to push growth away from rural and environmentally sensitive areas.

Some community members believe that commissioners have become too cozy with developers.

"Maybe they're finally getting smarter," Shaffer said.

Cape Haze residents want wider roads to improve hurricane evacuation and a solution to the water pressure problem -- which has left some residents unable to cook or shower at certain times of the day -- before more developments are approved, said Percy Medintz, who helped research the history of the Wildflower project.

"I hope this means the" commission "will start paying attention to the infrastructure problems we all know we have," Medintz said.

Last modified: May 16. 2007 4:50AM

 

Home Sales Slide In Tampa Area, State During First Quarter

Published: May 15, 2007

Existing home sales in the Tampa Bay area slid 37 percent in the first quarter compared to the same period a year ago, the highest sales drop in the state, figures from the Florida Association of Realtors released Tuesday show.

Statewide, existing homes sales dropped 26 percent, according to the association.

Sales of existing condominiums in the Bay area also experienced a big drop in the quarter – 47 percent, the second largest slide in the state behind Orlando, which saw a 51 percent drop in sales.

Median sales prices for existing single-family homes and condos also fell during the quarter. The median price for a single family home in the Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater area fell to $212,200, or 2 percent lower than the median sales price of $217,300 in the same quarter 2006. Statewide, the median sales price slipped 3 percent.

In the Bay area's condominium market, the median price slipped 3 percent to $171,900, compared to $177,100 in the same three months last year. Statewide, the median sales price for existing condominiums was unchanged.

Nationally, the pace of existing home sales slowed in the first quarter by almost 7 percent compared to a year ago, the National Association of Realtors said Tuesday.

In the latest indication of the housing market's slowdown, the NAR said home sales reached a 6.4 million annual rate compared to 6.9 million in the same quarter of 2006.

The report came on the same day that RealtyTrac Inc., an industry research firm, said mortgage lenders foreclosed on 62 percent more U.S. homes in April than a year ago.

"We expect foreclosure activity to at least stay above last year's levels for the remainder of 2007, fueled by a combustible mix of risky loans taken out in the last few years — many in the subprime market — and slowing home price appreciation," James Saccacio, chief executive officer of Irvine, Calif.-based RealtyTrac, said in a prepared statement.

Home prices are also still falling. The national median existing single-family home price in the first quarter was $212,300, down 1.8 percent from a year ago when the median price was $216,100, according to the NAR's quarterly survey of housing market conditions. The median is a typical market price where half the homes sold for more and half the homes sold for less.

At least part of the decline in the median prices of homes is because sales have shifted away from more expensive homes, a release from the NAR said.

There are some signs of hope in the housing market.

Existing home sales rose at a 2.4 percent higher annual rate than in the final quarter of 2006. Fourteen states and the District of Columbia showed an increase in the rate of home sales last quarter compared with only six states showing gains a quarter earlier, the NAR said.

"It appears the worst of the price correction is behind us," said Pat V. Combs, NAR's president and vice president of Coldwell Banker-AJS-Schmidt in Grand Rapids , Mich. , in a prepared statement.

Regionally, existing home sales took the biggest hit in the West, where the sales pace fell 11.9 percent to an annual rate of 1.3 million units and the median home price was 1.8 percent below a year ago at $336,200.

Existing home sales in the South fell 7.3 percent to an annual rate of 2.5 million units and the median home price was $177,800, just 0.6 percent below a year ago.

In the Midwest , existing home sales fell 6.1 percent to a pace of 1.5 million units. The median single-family home price was $154,600, down 2.8 percent from a year earlier.

The Northeast fared the best with sales rising at a 1.2 percent annual rate to 1.1 million units last quarter with a median price of $268,900, down 2.5 percent from a year ago.

As home prices slump, there has been a jump in the number of borrowers unable to meet higher payments and unable to sell their homes.

Irvine, Calif-based RealtyTrac said foreclosures in April spiked to 147,708, compared with 91,168 in 2006, as lenders moved to repossess one of every 783 homes. The April figure was 1 percent lower than in March, when foreclosures hit a two-year high.

Nevada , Colorado , Connecticut , California and Ohio had the highest foreclosure rates nationwide, RealtyTrac said.

Foreclosures — defined by RealtyTrac as default notices, auction sale notices and bank repossessions — have been rising nationwide, partly due to too many loans given to people with shaky credit. And during the real estate boom of the past few years, many so-called subprime borrowers were issued adjustable-rate mortgages that are now beginning to reset at higher rates.

Material from The Associated Press was used in this report.

Residents file lawsuit to block Sunset Landing Marina expansion

Published: May 16, 2007

PORT RICHEY - A simmering dispute between a marina owner and his neighbors over a plan to expand the waterfront business has moved from city hall to a courtroom.

A group of Sunset Boulevard residents led by former Councilman Jim Priest has filed a lawsuit against the city to prevent the project from going forward.

In the writ of certiorari filed last week in Pasco-Pinellas Circuit Court, the residents ask a judge to overrule the city council's approval of a rezoning request from the marina's owner.

Their attorney, former Mayor Eloise Taylor, contends that the council violated zoning laws and its own land development code by giving a green light to the owner's request.

"This thing violated every quasijudicial procedure," she said. "They didn't look at any of the criteria that's necessary for rezoning a property. This request was rubber-stamped."

Frank Perrott's attorney, Steve Booth of New Port Richey, could not be reached Tuesday, and city officials were not willing to comment on the pending litigation.

For several years, Perrott, who lives in New Port Richey, has been attempting to expand his marina by adding a new office, boat docks and other business upgrades.

On April 10, the council signed off on a request from Perrott to rezone two separate properties - at 5108 and 5126 Sunset Blvd. - from residential to commercial.

The request was approved despite the concerns of city building officials and opposition from residents in the waterfront neighborhood, who packed city hall for the meeting.

Residents oppose the marina expansion plan as proposed, saying it will add to traffic congestion and destroy the small-town residential character of the neighborhood.

Office Space Was Recommended

The Perrott family bought the marina about four years ago from the Korman family. The Kormans had run the operation near Miller's Bayou for more than four decades.

In January, the city's planning and zoning board recommended approving the rezoning for 5108 Sunset Blvd., adding a condition that the property be used for office space.

The board wasn't able to reach an agreement on the other request.

Building official Ed Winch recommended that the council reject both rezoning requests because they conflict with the city's building code.

Dispute Isn't First For Area

Opposition to the marina's expansion is part of a broader clash between homeowners who live on or near Sunset Boulevard and encroaching development in that area.

Taylor recently filed another lawsuit against the city on behalf of residents seeking to block a housing subdivision they say was rushed through the approval process.

They have asked a county judge to block a plan by a West Palm Beach developer to build seven single-family houses off Limestone Drive . The project was approved Jan. 9.

Two years ago, the Perrott family clashed with previous council members, including Priest, and a group of residents over plans to replace the marina's boat docks.

The expansion plan comes at a time when family-owned marinas across the state are disappearing as developers buy up waterfront property for residential development.

Depending on the outcome of the litigation, the council still must approve a preliminary site plan for the expansion and amend the city's land-use map to provide for the changes.

Reporter Christian M. Wade can be reached at (727) 815-1082 or cwade@tampatrib.com.

Water regulator quits over conduct questions

By Stacey Singer

Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

Wednesday, May 16, 2007

The South Florida Water Management District's top water-use regulator has resigned after the agency's inspector general cited him for "insubordination" and "inappropriate conduct" in the handling of a controversial county golf-course irrigation permit.

Robert Moresi Jr. was living in the home of county water consultant Robert Higgins when he endorsed the county's request for up to 1 million gallons a day from the stressed freshwater aquifer, an internal investigation confirmed. Meanwhile, Moresi's employees applied a more lax set of rules to the South County Golf Course review than other applications, the district's inspector general found.

 Moresi's living arrangement was revealed by The Palm Beach Post on April 12, triggering the internal investigation. The district yanked the county's permit the same day, putting the golf course on hold. The permit had been approved a month earlier, the same day that drought restrictions were imposed on the public.

Moresi had no comment. His rental agreement with Higgins was "informal, unwritten and month-to-month," according to a report released Tuesday. It "created an appearance of impropriety and indicated poor judgment on the part of Mr. Moresi."

Still, an outside lawyer hired by the district found no laws were broken and no water-district ethical standards breached, the report said.

State ethics rules forbid public employees from having recurring conflicts of interest, and the district's ethics policy says its employees cannot take anything of value from firms doing business with the district.

"Although the living arrangement created the appearance of impropriety and indicated poor judgment on the part of Mr. Moresi as it relates to the south county permit application, we found no evidence indicating that the arrangement impaired Mr. Moresi's independence or that he showed favoritism towards Higgins Engineering, Inc. in processing this permit," the inspector general wrote.

Higgins said Moresi was forced out for political reasons. "I think that it was very unfair," he said. "As far as I'm concerned, there was nothing that was done that was incorrect. I'm still on the payroll with the county, and it's because I'm a professional with good ethics."

Moresi's chief failings were twofold, the report said: Moresi's supervisor had learned of his living arrangement in January and ordered him to recuse himself from all permits involving Higgins Engineering. Yet two months later, Moresi signed off on the staff recommendation to approve Higgins' golf-course permit.

That amounted to insubordination, the inquest found.

Meanwhile, Moresi's staff failed to apply a new Regional Water Availability Rule to the project. The rule requires new permittees to use more costly reclaimed sewage or purified saltwater, rather than drawing down the same overtapped freshwater source that feeds the Everglades and public wells. Although the rule did not technically go into effect until April 23, it had been required of other applicants since April 2006.

The county's estimates found that using reclaimed water would have added $10 million to a park project with a price tag of more than $40 million, including debt service. The project west of Boca Raton is to be a 500-acre expansion to South County Regional Park , including 27 holes of golf, an amphitheater and festival area.

"Mr. Moresi, in his position as director of the Water Use Regulation Division, should have known the rule criteria and applied it to the South County permit, particularly in light of the current water shortage the district is experiencing," the inspector found. "Mr. Moresi's failure to apply the rule criteria represents inappropriate conduct."

It added that his staff never felt pressured to do anything unethical or illegal.

The inspector general blamed confusion among permitting staff for the inconsistent application of the new rule, noting that the division of 34 employees and nine contract workers processed 250 permit applications per month since January 2006.

In the future, the report suggested, permitting staff should receive additional training on how to apply new rules. Plus, directors above Moresi's level should review permits headed for board approval, it added.

A spokesman for the district said Moresi turned in his letter of resignation on Monday, after hearing the inspector general's findings. Before he was hired by the district, Moresi worked for civil engineering giant Black & Veatch, a firm frequently retained by the district for major engineering projects. Although Moresi is on leave, his resignation is effective June 13, just over one year after he was hired. District spokesman Randy Smith said Moresi, paid $102,000 a year, is not being paid severance.

"It was a very thorough investigation conducted by the inspector general," Smith said. "Other than that, we're not going to have much comment."

Higgins has stressed that he and Moresi were longtime friends, and said that despite appearances, the living arrangement had no effect on Moresi's working relationship with him.

One month after issuing the permit, the district's governing board rescinded it, blaming "ambiguity, "gray areas" and "a few other problems."

Palm Beach County is now winding up a monthlong investigation of the costs of using reclaimed or deep-aquifer water in southwest Palm Beach County . It's also discussing the possibility of using credits for water conservation in other parts of the county, where it's less costly to tap into reclaimed sewage water.

The inspector general, John Williams, reports to the governing board, not the agency's executive director. Williams' report praised the board for "acting prudently when they discovered that all of the consumptive use permitting rule criteria may not have been applied to the South County permit and requested that the permit be reconsidered."

At the time the county permit was granted and rescinded, the board was chaired by Kevin McCarty, managing director of Bear Stearns of Boca Raton and the husband of County Commissioner Mary McCarty. Some environmental activists questioned whether the golf-course permit was rushed through the process so that the county could skirt drought restrictions and the costly new water-use rule. McCarty, who had been appointed by former Gov. Jeb Bush, withdrew his application for reappointment and presided over his final water district meeting on May 10.

The inspector general found that "favoritism was not a factor in taking this permit to the governing board for approval before the legally required date."

From January 2005 to the present, Williams wrote, 95 out of 535 individual permits also went to the board before the required date.

"Our review of the permit database indicated that this is a common occurrence."


Fires test animal instinct, survival of the fittest

By DAVID HUNT,
The Times-Union

Wildfires have sent deer running as birds and foxes die on the smoking forest floor.
Songbird and wild turkey nestlings barely stand a chance.

"It sounds cruel, but it's really part of nature," said Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission spokeswoman Karen Parker.

Wildfires in Florida and Southeast Georgia are common enough that animals have adapted and rely on the flames to keep the ecosystem in check.

"Some animals might die, but others will have an improved condition," said Steve Johnson, an assistant professor of wildlife ecology at the University of Florida 's Plant City campus. "Right after a fire, you get regrowth and animals take over in a hurry."

While animals' instincts will tell them when it's time to run or burrow into a safe spot, the escape often leaves the weakest to perish. Parker said the fires now being battled broke out during nesting season for the region's songbirds and wild turkeys. Those unable to fly or scurry on their feet won't be able to get away.

"Birds are probably going to suffer the biggest toll," Parker said.

Controlled burns are done each year at the Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge in Southeast Georgia to clear underbrush and protect endangered red-cockaded woodpecker habitat, said Jim Burkhart, a refuge ranger.

As a result, many areas where the woodpeckers live that have burned in the swamp were prepared before the ongoing wildfires started, he said.

Longleaf pines, the preferred trees for the woodpeckers' nests, stand up well to fire and most of the birds in the burned areas are expected to survive, Burkhart said.

Wildlife biologists rescued a bear and its cub Sunday from a charred portion of the Osceola National Forest in Columbia County . Parker said the mother is being treated for burns at the University of Florida 's veterinary school and the cub was not seriously hurt.

For the most part, wildlife officials have turned their attention toward helping people and their houses survive the fires, Parker said.

"We can't save everything. I wish we could," she said. "Nine times out of 10 the animals are going to get out of there."

Karen Hamerslag, a veterinarian at Oaks Veterinary Hospital in Gainesville , said she's treated a few pets for minor ailments that appear to have been set off by wildfire smoke. Her office is southwest of a wildfire burning primarily in Bradford County .

Veterinarians said pet owners should be cautious of the smoke.

"It could trigger a coughing attack, but likely there would be no long-term damage," said Charles Athey, a veterinarian at Fort Caroline Animal Clinic in Jacksonville . "Pets are going to experience similar problems to what we experience as people."

Times-Union writer Gordon Jackson contributed to this story.

david.hunt@jacksonville.com,(904) 359-4025

Now here’s some twisted optimism for you…

Good news found in Brevard's dry spell

Drought conditions lessen flooding chances in event of a hurricane

BY JIM WAYMER
FLORIDA TODAY

Months of drought delivered one silver lining: ample room for rivers and reservoirs to swell this hurricane season before they flood.

Experts say the extra-dry months have made Brevard County and much of Florida less flood-prone than in the past two hurricane seasons. And even if the region sees several severe downpours during the next few weeks, inland waters should have plenty of space to spare.

"Everything around is dry, so even when it starts to rain, it's going to take a good bit to saturate the ground," said John Richmond, a supervisor with the St. Johns Water Management District, which covers Brevard and 17 other counties. "It just soaks in."

About 3,800 public officials are gathering this week to talk about the best ways to respond to floods and other hurricane hazards. The general session of the Governor's Hurricane Conference begins today at the Greater Fort Lauderdale-
Broward County Convention Center and ends Friday.

Hurricane season begins June 1.

In 2005, Hurricane Wilma flooded west Cocoa and elsewhere in Brevard. During the 2004 hurricanes, creeks that lead to the Indian River Lagoon lapped into yards, eroding lagoon banks and collapsing sea walls.

Turkey Creek in Palm Bay swelled into yards during that time, soaking yards on School Drive and even spilling into a swimming pool near Jersey Waterway, a canal off the creek.

Flood waters gushed into the creek from canals at record pace, said John Mongioi, chairman of Friends of Turkey Creek, a group of residents along the creek who push for dredging projects there.

"It might have come eight foot higher than it is right now," Mongioi said of the creek and Jersey Canal . "From what I heard, it didn't get into any homes, but it came close."

A recent dredging of the creek added more room for flood relief this year.

"It's looking a lot better now than it ever has," Mongioi said.

Throughout Central Florida, water levels in key storage areas such as Taylor Creek Reservoir west of Cocoa and the St. Johns River Water Management Area, also known as "Stick Marsh," remain about three feet below normal.

When inland water bodies exceed seasonal normal levels, water managers must begin releases from a series of levees along the St. Johns upper basin into the Indian River Lagoon, to ease flooding in cities such as Malabar, Palm Bay and Cocoa .

As of Sunday, Brevard well levels were about 36 feet above mean sea level, compared with the long-term average of about 41 feet. Taylor Creek reservoir is about 38 feet above mean sea level. District officials must begin releasing water when the level crosses 41 feet.

"We're in fabulous condition," Richmond said. "We haven't made flood-control releases for over a year."

Lower water levels are good news for the Indian River Lagoon, too, because water managers won't likely have to release much fertilizer-laden water from Lake Okeechobee as storms approach.

The district tries to avoid releases from the St. Johns because too much fresh water can dilute salt content in the lagoon and carry in pollutants that harm wildlife. Farm fertilizers can trigger excess algae that kills fish.

The last time the district made major water releases from Canal 54, south of Palm Bay , was during the 2004 hurricane season.

With Melbourne 's yearly rain at 6.74 inches as of Tuesday, 4.68 inches below normal, C-54 releases aren't likely anytime soon, district officials said.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration also expects a shift to the La Nina climate conditions, which could further suppress rain.

The worst flooding spots in Brevard tend to be near tributaries that lead to the Indian River Lagoon, such as Crane Creek in Melbourne and Turkey Creek in Palm Bay .

But northern Brevard cities such as Mims and Scottsmoor also can flood, said Bob Lay, the county's emergency management director. That can be even more dangerous than storm surge at the beach.

"Inland flooding can certainly create perhaps even worse problems," Lay said. "People tend to walk or drive through water, (when) in fact you don't know how deep it is."

Contact Waymer at 242-3663 or jwaymer@floridatoday.com.

 

Cargill Closing Has Officials Worried

By Bill Bair
The Ledger

FROSTPROOF - The announced closing of the Cargill Citro citrus plant has sent city officials back to their calculators to figure out a rate increase for city water and sewer users.

Interim City Manager T. R. Croley said she had been getting close to a proposal that was less than the $25- to $30-a-month increase recommended by city auditors.

That increase would have pushed Frostproof water and sewer rates to about $80 a month.

The closing of Cargill Citro changes the picture substantially.

Cargill accounts for almost 25 percent of the revenue generated by the city's water and sewer departments, said Melody Zobel, the city's finance manager.

Cargill paid $225,000 for water and sewer services last year. The city's total revenue from water and sewer was $903,000.

"You don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure out what a blow it will be to us," Mayor Larry Sullivan said.

Cargill, which employs 150 to 200 people in its juice plants in Frostproof and Avon Park , announced this week that it would shut down the two operations within 18 months.

Cargill President Tom Abrahamson said this past season was the last season the plant will be operated.

That means the city will receive less water and sewer revenue than normal until the closing is completed and the bill cut to nothing.

It all comes at a time when city auditors had already recommended the major rate increase to meet legal requirements of a bond issue used to finance a $2.2 million treatment plant and construct $2.3 million worth of sewer lines.

The base rate for sewer service is now $44.73, while the base rate for water is $9.

The $25 to $30 increase auditors recommended, which officials had hoped to decrease, would have put monthly water and sewer bills into the $80 range.

Croley said officials are now reworking the numbers and hope to have a recommendation by the time the City Council meets May 21.

Meanwhile, Croley and Zobel said the city has not yet looked at the impact Cargill's closing would have on city property tax revenue.

Cargill is now the city's largest taxpayer.

Zobel said she had not yet determined the total in tax revenue generated by Cargill. Nor did she know how much the closing would affect the assessed value of the property.

Bill Bair can be reached at bill.bair@theledger.com or 863-676-7118

"Buy land. They ain’t making any more of the stuff."

Will Rogers

How to Make $8,700 a Month Selling Grass

By Justin Ford

One of the great things about rental property of any kind - apartments, office, industrial, or retail - is that, after you’ve built up your portfolio, there comes a point where you have thousands of dollars pouring into your mailbox each month. And it’s truly passive income. Management takes care of your properties and the net income takes care of you.

But the fact is, you can also generate real estate income without being a landlord. In fact, you can do it without owning a single building. You can do it with raw land.

I was first introduced to this idea on an investment tour in South America seven years ago. While touring vineyards, oceanfront condos, and cranberry bogs (yes, cranberry bogs… in Patagonia !), I met Hal, an 80-year-old Californian who had made a fortune subdividing timberland.

It was from Hal that I first learned the "pizza principle" of real estate.

A pizza generates more money when sold by the slice. Bubble markets notwithstanding, the same usually goes for selling individual condos as compared to selling an entire apartment building. And the same goes for subdividing land.

So how do you generate ongoing income from this? You sell on "terms" (meaning you provide the financing and hold the mortgages).

Let me explain…

Land by itself usually can’t generate enough rental income to pay for any significant mortgage - so you don’t get the benefit of leverage, the key wealth builder in real estate. Even if you have 100 acres of prime corn-growing land in Nebraska , you probably can’t rent it for more than a couple percent of what you’d pay for it - even in today’s corn-craving, ethanol-delirious market.

But when you buy right in the first place, then subdivide and sell your land with owner financing, you can create a big profit margin and a steady stream of income that lasts for decades. To see what I mean, consider the case of my friend Richard.

Richard is from New Jersey . About 20 years ago, he decided to try sunny Florida . So he moved there, and proceeded to build a successful business and a portfolio of investment properties. After a time, his properties were worth a lot more than he ever dreamed they would be. Meanwhile, he noticed that South Florida had become as crowded and expensive as the Northeast he’d left behind.

So he became a "halfback."

Halfbacks are people who moved from the Northeast to Florida 10, 20, or 30 years ago… and are now moving "halfway back" to the mid-Atlantic states. Once again, they’re finding places to live that are far less crowded and a lot less expensive, and where the pace is less hectic.

Richard sold a few of his properties in South Florida for a nice profit, and began to buy properties in an area of Tennessee he fell in love with. He also began to move his business there.

About three years ago, he bought a five-story 10,000-square-foot 1920s bank building on the main street of a small post-bellum city rife with neoclassical architecture. The building is large enough to house his business, and there is room left over for him to collect some rental income to boot. (He already has tenants.)

He bought the building for just $120,000. It’s worth at least three times that much today, though it’s become nearly impossible to find anything of that character and quality at any price.
 
And yet, perhaps his best buy was 85 acres of pastureland a few miles outside of town, which cost him just $2,000 an acre. These days, land like that is selling for $11,000 to $15,000 an acre - and the market is rising steadily as more halfbacks flee high-priced, high-tax, high-insurance Florida, California, and other pricey parts of the U.S.

If he so chooses, Richard can now turn his one-time investment into a steady stream of purely passive income of $8,700 a month for the next 20 years. And he can do it without dealing with toilets, trash, and tenants… or even taxes, for that matter.

Here’s how…

If Richard sells on terms, it’s likely he can get the higher range of the market, since, when you offer terms, you are usually able to command a higher price. That’s especially the case with raw land, because financing is not as readily available for raw land as it is for income-producing property.

What’s more, he could subdivide the land into smaller parcels of a half-acre, maybe even a quarter-acre. That could result in a higher average sales price per square foot and a greater sales price overall than even $15,000 an acre.

But let’s suppose he subdivides his 85 acres into 85 one-acre parcels at an average sales price of $14,000 apiece.

And let’s say he takes just $2,000 as a deposit from each buyer. With 85 acres, that’s $170,000 he gets upfront. That covers the initial investment he made in the land. And since Richard happens to have used an equity line of credit from another property to buy this land, he can now pay off that line in full. But he now also has 85 people who each owe him $12,000. That works out to $1,020,000. That’s his gross profit. And he’s going to take it - with a hefty interest rate - over the next 20 years.

Let’s say Richard lends the money to his buyers on a 20-year amortization schedule at an average rate of 8.25 percent. In today’s market, that rate would be quite reasonable for land. For each $12,000 borrowed, that works out to a monthly payment to Richard of $102.36. Multiply that by 85, and you have gross monthly inflow of $8,700!

And from that money, does he have to pay insurance? No…

Does he have to pay property tax? No…

Does he have to pay a property manager? No…

Does he have to repair roofs or sinks or toilets or windows? No, no, no, no…

It’s all his. What’s more, a portion of each monthly payment he receives qualifies as long-term capital gains. So, for someone in his income bracket, it will be taxed at a much lower rate. Only the interest portion would be taxed at his regular income tax rate.

Now, before you run out and buy your swath of paradise, a few points to keep in mind…

You always have to buy right first. You can overpay for raw land, just as you can overpay for any other kind of property. It’s even more of a concern with land, since your purchase price isn’t supported by rental income. And especially if you’re a lazy outsider, you’ll end up paying far more than the locals if you don’t do your research first.

You can also buy at the wrong part of a market cycle. What you want to look for is an area with growing jobs and employment, and where the fundamentals of the other local real estate sectors (single-family homes, apartments, offices, etc.) still make sense on a price-to-rent and price-to-household-income basis.

And remember that while this is a great strategy, the mortgages are wasting assets once you’ve sold the land. Richard might create over a million dollars in extremely passive income over the next 20 years - and with favorable tax treatment. But at the end of that 20 years, the party’s over.

With rental property, on the other hand, your income tends to grow over time. And so does your equity. Your tenants pay down your mortgage and give you net income each month, and every dollar of appreciation in the building and land is yours for as long as you own it.

Nonetheless, both of these strategies can fit into your real estate portfolio. The key is to learn the fundamentals of creative real estate investing - and to always apply them with a sharp eye toward value.

[Ed. Note: Justin Ford is an active investor in real estate and global stock markets and the author of Main Street Millionaire, a value-focused real estate investment program. To learn more about creating multiple streams of passive income through creative real estate investing, check out Justin’s just-released special report.]

 

Insurance industry report refutes Crist
Spokespeople claim that governor has downplayed risks of reform plan
By Paige St. John
FLORIDA CAPITAL BUREAU

Mounting a campaign to erode public support for Gov. Charlie Crist's reforms, the Florida insurance industry claims he has overstated the rewards, and underplayed the risks.

A report produced Tuesday by the Property Casualty Insurers Association contends Floridians will see only an average 12 percent drop in home insurance rates by doubling of the state's catastrophe funds. Regulators originally forecast a 24 percent savings.

The flip side of that, according to PCI's analysis by Milliman consultant Nancy Watkins, are the potential of increased home and car insurance bills statewide if hurricanes wipe out those funds.

The bottom line: coastal residents save the most, everyone else faces the prospect of paying.

For example, the owner of a $150,000 home in Tallahassee can expect a $43 cut in property insurance but would pay $180 a year more to insure two cars if a $56 billion hurricane hit the state this year.

But a Key West resident would save $1,956 a year in home insurance and face the risk of only $188 more in car insurance if the winds blow.

''This amounts to a regressive tax,'' said Greg Heidrich, senior vice president of the national insurance lobby, after Watkins' presentation of modeled hurricane losses, deficits at state funds, and the extra charges on home and auto policies that would follow to pay them off.

PCI plans to take the thick report on the road - starting with Tallahassee 's main business lobbyists, and then newspaper editorial boards across the state.

Crist retorted Tuesday, ''I don't put a whole lot of stock in what they have to say.''

''This industry, in my humble opinion, has taken advantage of people and needlessly taken out of their pockets enormous profits,'' Crist said.

''They are greedy, let's face it. How can we reach a different conclusion when they made over $63 billion in profit last year, $3 billion of that on the backs of my people here in Florida?''

The PCI study is part of a larger press by the industry, which has opposed Crist's campaign to unleash the state-run company, Citizens Property Insurance, to compete with private companies.

In forecasting the consumer bail-out required if a major hurricane hits Florida this summer, the study assumes Citizens state-frozen rates will make it so attractive it will have swelled to 1.8 million policies by August. The company now has 1.2 million policyholders.