RURAL POLICY SUB-COMMITTEE'S
RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT STUDY COMMISSION
FINAL REPORT
DECEMBER 12, 2000
Governor's Charge
In Executive Order 2000-196, Governor Bush asked the Commission to consider:
"Development of a state rural policy that includes mechanisms for rural
economic development and the continued viability of agricultural economies
while protecting the unique characteristics of rural areas. Such mechanisms may
include a program of innovative planning and development incentives, economic
incentives, and other measures, such as incentives to reward best management
practices, providing cost-efficient delivery of public services, and a
statewide system for transferring or purchasing development rights through a
rural lands stewardship program".
Rural Policy Sub-Committee Questions Assigned by Chairman:
1. How can we preserve the State's agricultural heritage and promote rural
economies in the face of escalating growth?
2. What factors should be the guiding principles for future development of
rural areas?
3. Determine the best methods that can be utilized to meet these guiding
principles by considering all relevant topics.
Overview
The Rural Policy Sub-Committee recognizes the long-term value of retaining
rural lands for agriculture, open space and conservation uses. A thriving rural
economy with a strong agricultural base, healthy natural environment, and
viable rural communities is an essential part of Florida's present and future
vision. Rural areas also include the largest remaining intact ecosystems and
best examples of remaining wildlife habitats as well as a majority of privately
owned land targeted by local, state and federal agencies for natural resource
protection.
The growth of Florida's population and the demand for low density and
moderately priced housing to serve it create increasing pressure to develop
rural lands. Florida's growth management policies have not successfully
controlled, and have in many instances accelerated rather than reversed this
trend. Further, current land use policies designed primarily for urban
situations, have dominated comprehensive planning in Florida. Rural
infrastructure needs have been widely ignored and rural counties have
struggled, without adequate infrastructure support, to comply with the
requirements of the state's current growth management laws.
There is a direct relationship between land values and the ability of rural
landowners to keep their properties in agricultural production. Florida's
agricultural economy is land rich and cash poor. The value of agricultural
lands as collateral for borrowed capital needed to support agricultural
operations is based in large part on the underlying development rights for
non-agricultural uses. These underlying development rights have been reduced
over time as a byproduct of ineffective land use policies.
As the alternative uses of rural lands are reduced, so to is the asset value
and options available to rural residents to diversify the rural economy and
accommodate rural oriented development. The unintended consequence of Florida's
current growth management process, which has primarily focused on downzoning as
a means of controlling rural density, has resulted in diminished private
property rights and decreased land values. Declining land values encourage the
conversion of agricultural land to other uses. There is little objective
evidence to suggest that policies that encourage conversion of rural lands from
working forestry or agriculture to widely dispersed very low density
residential tracts in itself achieves any protection for habitat or ecosystems.
Regulatory controls do not stop growth or permanently assure the protection
of habitats or ecosystems. Where permanent protection and management has been
achieved, this has occurred primarily through programs such as voluntary land
and conservation easement acquisition programs, and incentives based on
cooperation by landowners.
Even with the best efforts at urban infill, the pressures for development will
impact almost every rural county. Florida lacks a comprehensive growth
management policy, which proactively and realistically addresses both the
pressures of population growth and the unique characteristics and multiple
needs of rural Florida.
Vision
The Sub-Committee suggests the following vision for the future of rural
Florida:
"A thriving rural economy, with economically robust agriculture, a
healthy natural environment, effectively protected ecosystems and
complimentary, viable rural communities containing well-planned, clustered
patterns of development surrounded by extensive areas of open space."
Rural Policy Sub-Committee Questions
1. How can we preserve the State's agricultural heritage and promote
rural economies in the face of escalating growth?
a) By changing the emphasis of Florida's growth management and comprehensive
planning process so that it:
1. Addresses the different needs of both urban and rural areas,
2. Is primarily based on incentives and applies constraints that are
constructive and known to work well,
3. Restores rural land values and the ability of landowners to obtain
economic value from their property and respects private property rights, and
4. Takes maximum advantage of the flexibility provided by existing Florida
Statutes relating to innovative planning and development strategies within
rural areas.
e) By coupling and coordinating improved environmental protection with a
more viable agricultural economy to the benefit of rural areas and the State as
a whole.
f) By assisting rural communities in developing and diversifying local
economies.
2. What factors should be the guiding principles for future
development of rural areas?
The guiding principles for future development of rural areas should be restoration
and maintenance of the economic value of rural land, identification and
protection of ecosystems, habitats and resources that are areas of compelling
state interests, promotion of rural economic development, maintenance of the
viability of Florida's agricultural economy, control of urban sprawl, and
protection of the character of rural areas of Florida.
3. Determine the best methods that can be utilized to meet these
guiding principles by considering all relevant topics.
The challenge of reforming Florida's Growth Management laws is to change the
entire dynamic of government's relationship to rural land and its intrinsic
property values. We must design a two-fold system which offers economic rewards
and regulatory incentives to help keep land in agricultural production. At the
same time, we must both allow and offer incentives to clustered, compact urban
development in the rural setting. The Sub-Committee proposes the following
changes in Florida's Growth Management Statutes, Policies, and related laws to
meet these guiding principles:
Restoration and Maintenance of the Economic Value of Rural Land and
Control of Sprawl
Local decisions about the most appropriate location and type of growth that
occurs in rural areas should be part of a program of planning and development
incentives for the consolidation of development into discrete clustered
patterns that provide ample open space for agriculture, recreation and regional
environmental protection. Such a program will require:
· Criteria for the identification of
areas in which innovative planning and development strategies may best be
applied
· Guidelines for the implementation
of innovative planning and development strategies within rural areas
· Taking full advantage of
provisions of the Florida Statutes which allow flexibility in planning and
development decisions, such as section 163.3177(11).
· A process which assures that
innovative planning and development strategies comply with applicable local
plans and development regulations
· Allow local governments in rural
areas to restore property values and control sprawl through innovative growth
patterns based on clustering and traditional community design
· Assignment of a special overlay of
transferable density allocations for rural property to be used for the
implementation of clustered development in appropriate locations and innovative
planning and development strategies.
Promotion of Rural Economic Development
· Acquire development rights from
lands intended to remain in agriculture in the long term, allowing landowners
to reinvest payments for those development rights in the rural economy.
· Ensure adequate funding for
infrastructure in rural towns, including but not limited to water, sewer, roads
and telecommunications, and providing for mobility between rural and adjacent
urban areas.
· Resubmit SB 1934/HB 1951, the
Rural Heritage Act version as of April 4, 2000
· Amendment of the revenue sharing
provisions of Chapter 212, Florida Statutes, to provide a disproportionate
increase in the allocation of state revenue to rural counties in recognition of
their inherently lower ad valorem tax base.
· Legislative adoption of a
resolution urging Congress to lift the inheritance tax on agricultural and
conservation lands.
· Consider other initiatives to
support rural communities in economic development such as:
directing Enterprise Florida and OTTED to include rural communities in their
out reach efforts for expanded and improved economic development; establishing
a technology outreach program to support rural local governments, farmers and
small businesses in taking advantages of Internet and other technology
advances; supporting and further publicizing the Main Street Program (Florida
Department of State); offering technical assistance and other support services
for small business development and entrepreneurism in rural areas; providing
tools to rural communities for fiscal impact analysis of planning, development
and economic development decision-making; encouraging environmentally sensitive
ecotourism and heritage tourism in rural areas; capitalizing on and enhancing
the sustainability features of rural areas, including local food productions,
environmental resources and the potential for distributed energy resource
technologies.
Identification and Protection of Areas of Compelling State Interests
Clearly identify, map where appropriate, and prioritize State involvement in
land use decisions upon those areas with compelling state interests. Maps
should be developed to a high degree of accuracy, and should not impose
additional regulatory burdens. The state should invest sufficient resources to
assure the development of the degree of accuracy required.
Identify ecosystems, habitats and resources that merit overriding state
protection as compelling state interests and acquire an interest in those lands
in either fee or easement through fair compensation payments leveraged by
appraisals which reflect the natural resource values.
Dedicate a new, source of additional revenue for public purchase of
conservation and agricultural easements, prioritized on clearly identified
areas of compelling state interests. It is suggested that initial funding to
start the program be provided in an amount of at least $__ million annually.
· Easements could include
sustainable yield timberland easements, unimproved pasture easements, wildlife
management, etc.
· Prioritize different levels of
conservation easements with varying levels of protections. Establish simplified
statutory easement forms easily understandable and suited for use by a wide
variety of property owners.
· Agricultural easements vested to
DACS; high habitat, species, wetlands value easements vest in DEP/TIITF
· Scientific information on resource
values and the relative pressure for conversion of valuable natural resource
lands should guide the priorities for using public money for acquisition and
less than fee mechanisms.
· Develop bridge mechanisms
involving incentives or payments to property owners in exchange for services to
maintain and enhance wildlife values on property prior to and in anticipation
of eventual state fee or easement acquisition.
Develop a collaborative process between cities and counties for designating
"urban growth areas" with review by DCA in collaboration with DEP
WMDs, FWCC and DOT, and final approval by the Florida Land and Water
Adjudicatory Commission (Governor & Cabinet). Criteria for approval of the
areas would be based upon the avoidance of conflicts with clearly identified
resources and interests of statewide significance. Within such areas:
· Local government land use
decisions would be exempt from DCA review
· The DRI process would not be
applicable
· Enhanced and prioritized
infrastructure support and funding would be provided
Maintenance of the Viability of Florida's Agricultural Economy and
Protection of the Character of Rural Areas
Develop incentives which reward landowners for good stewardship of land and
natural resources.
Recognizing and rewarding the natural resource values of rural property will
counter the current tendency to convert land to other economic activities for
which a higher value is assigned. Incentives could include:
· Appraisal of land based on natural
resource values; purchase appraisals should reflect the value of wildlife
habitats, unique ecosystem components, and the benefits of natural system
productivity.
· Funding for land acquisition, with
title vested in either fee or easement, should be sufficient to assure that
inclusion of property on land acquisition lists or in mapped designations of
compelling state interests enhances, rather than reduces, land values.
· Resource conservation agreements
which compensate or provide other incentives to landowners for specific
services to enhance wildlife or habitat values of land
Where appropriate, promote the use of best management practices or whole
farm plans, developed by agricultural producers in conjunction with regulatory
agencies and local governments, to replace the appropriate permitting processes
for agricultural operations, in order to remove or reduce the financial and
bureaucratic obstacles to keeping land in agricultural production.
Long Term Implementation
The Rural Policy Subcommittee acknowledges that full implementation of the
above recommendations - statutorily or otherwise - is a multi-year task and
encourages the Florida Department of Community Affairs and the Florida
Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services to enter into a Memorandum of
Agreement which provides for the development, in conjunction with the Florida
Association of Counties, Florida Legislature, and other affected agencies and
interests, a process including pilot programs for continued implementation of a
comprehensive planning strategy for rural Florida.