This idea is about 60 percent arrogant

By HOWARD TROXLER, Times Columnist
Published November 5, 2006

When we vote Tuesday, we'll be asked to give up some of our future power.

If we approve Amendment 3 to the Florida Constitution, it will be harder for us to pass future amendments.

Future amendments would need at least 60 percent of the vote, instead of a simple majority.

Kind of ironic, isn't it? A simple majority on Tuesday can take away the power of up to 60 percent of Floridians in future elections.

Who wants Amendment 3?

First of all, the Florida Legislature wants it. The Legislature put Amendment 3 on the ballot. The Legislature does not like voter petition drives. The voters have gotten too bossy about wanting smaller class sizes and such.

Second, a big part of the business community backs Amendment 3. They are worried about petition drives that hurt business. Past examples include a smoking ban and a higher minimum wage.

There's a group supporting Amendment 3 called "Protect Our Constitution Inc." It has raised $2.3-million as of its last report. The report of contributors is a business who's who. Here are a few:

U.S. Sugar, Blue Cross Blue Shield, Publix, the St. Joe Co., TECO Energy, the Florida Association of Realtors, the Florida Chamber of Commerce, the National Restaurant Association, the Florida Apartment Association and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

Their main arguments for Amendment 3 are that (1) it is too easy to change Florida's Constitution, (2) "special interests" can buy their way onto the ballot and (3) the topics of some petitions just don't belong in our Constitution.

First of all, it's not easy. Any yahoo can start a petition, but it's hard to finish. It takes a statewide effort and must overcome legal hurdles.

As of Tuesday, there will have been 25 amendments on the ballot from 2000 onward. Of these, 13 were placed by voter petition, and 12 by the Legislature.

So, 13 is too many, but 12 is all right? When you hear a statistic about how many amendments there have been, be sure and ask how many were the Legislature's.

In the past three elections we passed 18 of 19 amendments. Five would have failed under the 60 percent rule. The five are high-speed rail, statewide prekindergarten, smaller class sizes, hog-farming rules and gambling in South Florida.

Maybe you think some amendments are bad ideas. Maybe you thought, just as I thought when I voted against some of them, that they weren't proper subjects for the Constitution.                

And yet a majority of Floridians said they were. The difference between me and the Amendment 3 backers is that when my side lost, I didn't boo-hoo and say, "The voters are dumb! We need to change the rules!"

Finally, about this "special interest" thing.

Yes, sometimes a "special interest" has persuaded enough Floridians to sign a petition or to pass its idea.

Yet I am not sure that a smoking ban, smaller classes, a higher minimum wage and keeping hog farming from spreading were such wicked "special interests."

Besides, if I have to choose between the "special interests" that want me to keep on voting, and those that want my vote to have less power, the choice does not seem hard.

Suspicious Property Deals On The Rise

Published: Nov 5, 2006

TAMPA - State agencies are investigating potential mortgage and title fraud involving 36 unorthodox real estate deals in the Bay area.

The deals aren't an anomaly.

A Tampa Tribune investigation into the questionable practice of inflating home sales prices so a third party can walk away with tens of thousands of dollars has resulted in the discovery of other suspicious contracts across Florida.

Lenders rank Florida first in the country for mortgage fraud, and experts say rapid appreciation in home values has made the state even more ripe for fraud and questionable real estate deals. Now that the market is cooling, lenders fear they will be on the hook for a flood of bad mortgages.

"The reports we're getting are incredible," said Doug Pollock, president of Information Data Services, which investigates problem mortgages. "This scheme is hitting every county in Florida. It's like people are going to classes to learn how to do this."

Adding to the problem, state real estate experts say, is that Florida might not have the broad regulatory authority to root out suspect mortgage arrangements. They point to complaints by industry professionals to state officials that went unheeded. Contrast that with states such as Georgia, once the nation's leader in mortgage fraud, where authorities now routinely raid property closings, sometimes with guns drawn.

"We have laws on the books, but we need a higher level of enforcement at the level of attorney general and chief financial officer," said Joseph Falk, legislative chairman for the National Association of Mortgage Brokers.

More Local Cases

How widespread are the inflated deals?

The answer, industry experts fear, is that they're everywhere, but there's no way to determine the extent.

"This is prevalent in some areas," said Brad Monroe, president of the Greater Tampa Association of Realtors. "It just makes you wonder how many of these deals are going on that we don't know about yet."

Local listing agents and sellers shared with the Tribune details of some recently proposed initial contracts. The documents show sellers being asked to transfer large sums of money to someone else during or after closing. Here is a sample of some deals that have not closed:

•A widow in Riverview was presented with an offer for $55,000 more than her asking price. But it came with a catch: The real estate agent was to inflate the official list price, and the $55,000 was to be paid back to the buyer after closing.

•Purchase prices on two south Tampa homes were bumped up by a total of $830,000. The sales contracts stipulate sellers would pay the money to an overseas construction company.

•Two sales contracts were created for one home in Seminole Heights. The one presented to the seller shows a sales price of $180,000. Without the knowledge of the seller, a different cover page, showing a price of $286,600, was sent to the lender.

•A frustrated seller in Lutz dropped hissales price by $50,000 and was then presented with an offer contingent on a $70,000 "payoff" to an investment group.

Such examples follow a Tribune investigation of 36 similar transactions that involved the same real estate agent, title company and group of buyers. In all of the cases, the sales price was inflated by thousands of dollars. In total, $2 million more than the sellers received for the homeswas paid to two local companies. In two of the transactions, separate copies of settlement documents were created. The lender's copy omitted the large payoff.

The state attorney general's office, regulatory boards and lenders have since launched investigations.

Getting An Offer

Jody MacPherson, the widow who was offered her asking price in exchange for inflating the sales price by $55,000 and returning that money to the buyer at closing, recently canceled the contract on her Riverview home.

First, her real estate agent refused to change the listing price of $233,000. Then, she discovered that the lender listed on the contract couldn't be verified.

"I'm heartbroken," MacPherson said. "I've been waiting to move on. Now, I have to unpack and start showing the house all over again."

Kent and Mary Miller listed their south Tampa home for $1.2 million. An offer came from an investor for $1.5 million. The contract included two addendums: One stated the offer was contingent upon the property appraising for the higher price; the other said $435,000 was to be paid at closing to an overseas construction company for "remodeling."

The Millers said no.

"This just doesn't look right," Mary Miller said. "It makes me furious because I know people will be willing to sell like this because they'll feel desperate to move."

Loans made on homes with inflated sales prices are problematic. If the loans go into default, the lender could be stuck with a mortgage worth more than the property.

Also, investors who purchase some of these homes through investor groups may not be able to make mortgage payments or resell the home at the inflated value. Also, sellers could discover they've fraudulently signed federal loan papers.

Neighborhoods can be harmed as well when potential buyers can't afford homes and tax increases based on the inflated sales. If those homes are foreclosed on, sellers of nearby homes may have to lower their prices.

Lenders nationwide say they expect mortgage fraud cases to rise this year. Countrywide Home Loans, the nation's largest mortgage lender, sued various defendants for mortgage fraud on properties in Indiana in June. The loans, estimated at $80 million, could make it the largest such case in U.S. history.

Closer to home, Lehman Brothers Holdings, a global financial services corporation, filed a suit last week against a group of companies and individuals involved in a case of potential mortgage fraud at a Pasco County condominium complex. Overvalued appraisals were used to justify loans worth more than the property, according to the suit.

Appraisers and real estate agents say their warnings to state and federal officials have gone nowhere.

"There's a big problem with enforcement," said Tom Gregg, a Pinellas County real estate agent with Marie Powell and Co. His office received a questionable offer from people involved with last month's Tribune investigation. He reported it to the state agency that regulates licensed agents. The office also called the local Realtors board, Gregg said. No one seemed interested, he said.

Scattered Authorities

Part of the enforcement problem in Florida is that there isn't one central agency devoted to investigating mortgage fraud. Instead, an array of state agencies investigate pieces of mortgage and title company activity.

The state Department of Business and Professional Regulation oversees licensed agents and brokers. The Office of Financial Regulation monitors lending institutions, and the Department of Financial Services handles oversight of title companies.

Many within the industry don't know where to file complaints to get results. Pollock, the mortgage investigator, said there have been several efforts over the years to concentrate state investigations.

"The bottom line is that the private and public sectors have to work together," he said. "And you have to have the political mood in the Legislature to find funding for investigations and prosecution."

The Mortgage Asset Research Institute in Virginia rates the top 10 states for mortgage fraud, based on reports of suspicious activity by lenders. Florida has been first on the list for the past two years, up from ninth in 2001.

Georgia, which held the top position in 2003 and ranked second in 2004, has slipped to fifth.

Georgia's Tough Stance

What is Georgia doing? Ann Fulmer, co-founder of the Georgia Real Estate Fraud Prevention and Awareness Coalition, said the state's regulators, real estate professionals and law enforcement officers now work together.

That wouldn't be possible, she said, without Georgia's Residential Mortgage Fraud Act, which was passed in May 2005. The statute makes mortgage fraud a crime and encourages federal and state law enforcement officers to investigate and make arrests promptly instead of waiting for loans to default.

In Georgia, authorities can arrest suspected mortgage fraud participants even if the transactions haven't reached the settlement table. Before the statute, Fulmer said, state and federal agencies were reluctant to take on such cases. Now the FBI and local authorities are more likely to investigate, she said.

"Under most state laws, you have to prosecute this as a theft case," Fulmer said. "The charges are things like bank fraud, mail fraud, money laundering. The problem is that it takes a village to commit mortgage fraud, and it's very difficult to prove what law all those people broke."

Reporter Shannon Behnken can be reached at (813) 259-7804 or sbehnken@tampatrib.com.

TRIBUNE INVESTIGATION

Research showed that 36 homes - 34 in working-class Pinellas County neighborhoods - were sold for an average of $60,000 more than the asking price. The sellers received near or below the original asking price.

The rest of the money was paid to investor groups involved in the deals.

In two cases, two sets of settlement documents were created: one for the lender, and one for the broker. Federal and state laws prohibit misrepresenting where the money goes in closing documents.

Since the story was published last month, four state agencies, including the state attorney general, began investigating the deals, and dozens of listing agents have said they've been approached on similar deals by other investor groups.

In a separate case, global financial giant Lehman Brothers Holdings filed suit in Tampa against investors and real estate companies, saying they worked to defraud the lender on 13 New Port Richey properties.

Developer's secret $250,000 gift to woo neighborhood group splinters residents

Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

Sunday, November 05, 2006

WEST PALM BEACH — On the eve of a city commission vote to allow more units in its 21-story luxury condo on Flagler Drive, the developer The Related Group secretly bestowed a $250,000 gift on the area's neighborhood association.

The next day, smiling residents walked to the podium in city hall and showered praise on Related and the project just before city commissioners approved Icon, granting it waivers that allowed Related to add two stories and build more units than otherwise permitted.

Three commissioners say they didn't know about the generous gift and a fourth, Jim Exline, said he'd "heard just rumors." Mayor Lois Frankel found out about it long after the initial commission votes. But she didn't tell commissioners because, she said, the city attorney told her the gift wasn't illegal.

Within months, the leaders of the homeowners group were ousted by their neighbors, who now can't figure out what happened to $30,000 of the money. The former leaders won't share the receipts.

Since then, like the story of a failed marriage, the money intended for neighborhood improvements has divided residents in the north end of town. New leaders of the Northend Coalition of Neighborhoods are trying to get access to the roughly $220,000 that's left even as they question whether the gift was proper to begin with.

New coalition President Bob Beaulieu says it's fishy.

"Because information was not forthcoming, you can't help but wonder, 'What the hell did happen?' "

Former coalition Chief Operating Officer Iangelic Batista said the cash gift "did not buy our support" for the condo.

"It doesn't mean that we were going to like their project," Batista said. "Some liked it, some didn't."

Batista wouldn't give out a copy of the agreement with Related — saying, "It's private" — but The Palm Beach Post obtained a copy elsewhere.

Under the agreement, Related pledges that $1 million in streetscaping will be done on roads near Icon, which was announced at a public meeting on Dec. 5. It also mentions the quarter-million-dollar gift, which was not. Normally, such gifts are disclosed, but it isn't considered illegal not to disclose them.

The agreement says the money must be spent on public safety, landscaping, lighting, advertising, hurricane supplies and other items for the neighborhood. It also says the money would be put into an escrow account for the group within 14 days of "final unappealable approvals".

Related says that, in giving the money, it was just following the advice that governments often give to developers of projects that might draw opposition: Appease your neighbors.

Barbara Salk, a Related Group vice president, said she couldn't recall another example of an undisclosed cash gift from Related to a neighborhood.

But developers often publicly provide perks for neighborhoods, such as agreeing to plant trees or support neighborhood events. And this was no different, she said.

"The city told us to work with the neighborhood and we're working with the neighborhood," she said. "I'm shocked that anyone would think that it was anything but a positive thing."

Related earned its support by having 26 meetings with neighbors and agreeing to move the building so the Intracoastal Waterway views wouldn't be blocked so much and adding landscaping and open space, she said.

The cash gift wasn't disclosed because it wasn't relevant to the project's getting its zoning approval, Salk said. Legally, city commissioners are allowed to consider only how the project fits within the city's zoning code, not gifts to neighbors.

"We really didn't think it was necessary," Salk said. "It wasn't contingent upon an approval."

But approval wasn't automatic.

Commissioners had some choices to make. They could have declared the 3.4-acre condo project to be a "residential planned development," which gives developers more latitude in design and in how much they can build. But a project has to be 10 acres or more to qualify automatically. Or they could decide that the regular zoning — with a shorter tower and fewer units, but perhaps a different design — was better.

In this case, they gave Related the "residential planned development" status.

Another choice was whether to limit Related to the 36 units an acre the city code permitted for a planned development or allow 40 units an acre instead. They allowed the 40 units an acre.

The city planning board recommended denial two months before, in a 4-3 vote, when the project was at 44 units an acre, but never reviewed the 40-an-acre proposal.

Commissioners also allowed Related's buildings to be closer to the road than normally allowed.

Helping make Related's case was Kieran Kilday of Kilday & Associates. At the time, Commissioner Ray Liberti was registered as a lobbyist with the firm, but never disclosed that at the time of the commission votes. He is now in federal prison, convicted of mail fraud and obstruction of justice.

Exline said his motion to approve the project on Dec. 5 was, in part, "based on public support."

And there was plenty of that.

Steve Allred, president of the coalition at the time, thanked Related at the meeting for its interaction with the residents.

"I feel like we're related, no pun intended," he said, standing at the podium. "God only knows all the e-mails and things we put you through."

"The Related Group is beyond generous," said David Romaine, a business partner of Allred. "And welcome to the neighborhood."

Some residents who opposed the plan, worried mainly about the traffic and the long shadows the building would cast, showed up Dec. 19 for the final vote. They included Rick Collette, who signed the agreement with Related. But in all, during the two meetings, comments of support outnumbered those in dissent, 25 to six.

In July and August, the project came back before city commissioners. Related had bought more land to the north, allowing the company to ask for two extra stories, which were approved. After that, the project included just under 30 units an acre. It is not yet under construction.

Frankel at first said she didn't remember when she found out about the gift.

"All I know is, when I found out about it, I was furious," she said.

Later, she said City Attorney Claudia McKenna reminded her that she had found out about it before the second set of votes in July and August. On Sept. 12, she told a city ethics panel about the gift and suggested that the panel review the possibility of a city law requiring such gifts to be disclosed.

"That's a lot of money," Frankel told the panel, which was created after Liberti was charged. "From what I could tell, there was no wrongdoing. However, quite frankly, I was a little bit taken aback because nobody — we didn't know about it."

But Frankel, told by the city attorney that the gift wasn't illegal, didn't say anything about it before commissioners voted to give Related the two extra stories in July and August. She said she would have said something "if I thought it had affected the judgment of the commissioners."

Commissioners said they would have found the information important.

"I want to know who supports something because they think it's good for the neighborhood, not because of other issues," Exline said.

"On every level I think it's the wrong thing to do," Commissioner Kimberly Mitchell said, referring to the gift. "I think that kind of information is relevant and should be discussed as we make decisions."

On Aug. 17, Mitchell wrote a memo to City Administrator Ed Mitchell suggesting the city take control of the money so that it can be publicly monitored.

But what happens to the cash now is up in the air.

Salk said Related would like the neighborhood coalition to form a not-for-profit corporation, as required by the agreement, with the money doled out by a foundation of north-end residents.

She said she doesn't know how much money has been spent. Batista said it's about $30,000.

Related has asked for receipts but hasn't gotten them all, Salk said.

"I've asked them for the past few months," she said.

Batista said some money was spent on an attorney to help the group form a not-for-profit corporation, and on computer software, lawn equipment and hurricane supplies such as gas cans, tarps and flashlights that were distributed to neighborhood leaders.

In June, other residents — those who helped run the coalition before Batista and Allred left under pressure — staged a takeover of the group, saying Batista and Allred weren't being tough enough with the city on crime and code enforcement.

In March, Allred's business partner, Rod Tinson, sold land to the city for $1.2 million, about half of which the city had sold to Tinson six years earlier for $5,000.

The new neighborhood coaltion leaders wonder whether that deal led Allred and Batista not to press the city for better crime-prevention and code-enforcement.

Batista said that's not true. She said she and Allred simply had a friendlier approach, while the others "do nothing but criticize."

Allred, the coalition president at the time, didn't return a phone message or a written message delivered to his antique restoration shop. Tinson also didn't return a phone message.

Batista said the new group ousted her and Allred only to get control of the $250,000. And she wants the coalition to get nothing. Instead, she hopes to use the money for Can Do, another group she has started that she says would be more of a partner with the city, not a rival.

"All of a sudden, they smelled money," Batista said. "They didn't want people to succeed where they failed to succeed."

The new president, Beaulieu, accused Batista and Allred of refiling the group's paperwork with the state under new bylaws reading, "This corporation shall have no members," against the group's tradition of giving all of the coalition's neighborhood leaders a voice.

Batista said an attorney advised her that there were "way too many board members with way too much voting power" and who don't do enough work.

Now, Beaulieu wants to know where the money went.

"I received a gas can, I received a radio and that's it, nothing more and nothing less," Beaulieu said. "I would like to see the receipts and the inventory of everything that's been purchased."

But the arrangement doesn't sit well, he said. When he found out the agreement was signed the day before the vote, that sent up "some red flags."

"You just have to be transparent," he said. "When you keep things from the public, that's when things start happening."

Real estate slump has started hitting home

It's not just the homeowners who are getting pinched by the downturn in housing. Real estate agents are suffering, too.

By DAN DEWITT
Published November 5, 2006

SPRING HILL - Jeanne Gavish, co-owner of Exit Gulf Shores Realty in Land O'Lakes, met with clients Ed and Earlene Young last week to tell them the housing market would soon come back to life.

Politicians will be able to take on the high taxes and insurance rates that are discouraging buyers, she said. Winter will drive northerners south, as it was always does.

And though the Youngs' house in Wellington at Seven Hills has been on the market since August, Gavish said their asking price is reasonable and that the privacy of their back yard would draw buyers.

Earlene Young barely said a word.

"You're staring daggers at me," said Gavish, 54, sitting in the Youngs' living room.

"No I'm not," said Young, 58. "It's just that we had this great expectation of selling in a heartbeat and we can't believe we've found ourselves in a market that's bottomed out."

Gavish knows how she feels.

The ongoing depression in the real estate market has transformed the lives of brokers and agents, said Gavish, the former president of the Hernando County Association of Realtors.

Fewer sales naturally mean fewer commissions. Many of Gavish's own investment properties have lingered on the market without buyers or renters. Attendance has plummeted at some classes at the real estate school she owns in Spring Hill.

But at least, she said, there is a renewed appreciation for what an experienced agent can do.

Builders who once blanched at the idea of sharing commissions with outside agents, she said, are now enticing them with $10,000 bonuses to sell houses in their developments and luring them to bring potential buyers with offers of seafood and barbecue.

"We could eat for free every day if we wanted to," Gavish said.

Sellers like the Youngs - who want to move closer to family members in South Carolina because 72-year-old Ed has been diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease- need agents with the connections and knowledge to sell a house.

"We're relevant again," Gavish said.

They probably will be for a while, said Per Berglund, a senior economist with Moody's Economy.com. The housing slump in the Tampa Bay Area began earlier than many real estate agents realized, he said, and the current conditions will likely be more persistent.

Many agents and brokers noticed the slackening demand for new homes about a year ago. Sales began to drop after May 2005, when 5,482 houses sold throughout the Tampa Bay area, which includes Pasco and Hernando counties, Berglund said.

That figure has since fallen to about 2,600 per month, he said.

"This thing has almost collapsed," Berglund said.

The median sale price of houses in the area did not begin to fall until June, but has since slid more than $10,000. Though Berglund said it is impossible to say when the market will recover, the current market is closer to normal than the frenzy of last year.

"We're not going to be seeing 5,000 sales per month any time soon," he said.

Treading water

Gavish, former wife of Brooksville real estate broker Jack Gavish, has several strategies to make the best of it.

She and her partner, Kerry Bullerdick, look for bargains from owners desperate to sell

Gavish - who has been selling property in Hernando County since 1990 - opened an agency on State Road 52 in Pasco County with Bullerdick in July.

Though their new stucco office is surrounded by pasture, it is within a few miles of several large new developments, including the 4,800-acre Connerton on U.S. 41. This will be perfect, Gavish said, when the market rebounds.

Though attendance in a beginning real estate class at her Nature Coast Real Estate School "dropped off a cliff" in February, she said, she now caters to established agents using their free time to study for additional qualifications.

But Gavish says she and other agents do not have that much free time because each sale takes more work. A year ago, marketing houses was so easy that agents and their 6 percent commissions were widely resented, she said.

"A homeowner could post a sign in the yard, put it up upside down, forget to write the phone number on it, and buyers were still stomping down the door," she said.

Not now, said Gavish, who added that she is feeling extra pressure to sell the Youngs' house.

They are anxious not only because of Ed's health, but because of their offer on a house in South Carolina depends on selling the Spring Hill house.

Also, Gavish said, she sold their previous house, in northern Hernando, when they moved to Wellington in 2001.

"They have an expectation I will perform again," she said.

So far, Gavish has advertised in two local real estate brochures and bought space on an Internet site that allows prospective buyers from throughout the country to view photographs of the house.

She also set a good price, based on sales of comparable properties, which almost became a lost art during the "volcanic" market of the previous four years, she said.

Buyers snapped up properties at seemingly outrageous sums and banks agreed to finance them because property values were climbing so rapidly.

Not any more, she said, and that has forced many inexperienced brokers out of the profession.

"The people who couldn't justify their prices found out this is not a fun place to be," Gavish said.

Whether or not that is the reason, membership in the Hernando Realtors association has dropped to 1,099 from about 1,300 in 2005, said Ed Carr, executive vice president.

Pulling out the stops

The next step in selling the Young's property, Gavish said, will be holding an open house, where her experience will also help. Because of her connections, she said, she can ensure fellow agents will bring in prospective buyers.

If that does not work, she said, then maybe she will consider dropping the price.

Agents and sellers may have to adjust to the way things were before the boom, she said, when returns on home sales were modest, and houses typically remained on the market for several months.

"It used to be, if we sold a home in six months (the length of the standard contract), we were doing our job," Gavish said.

But she isn't ready to drop the price of the Youngs' house. They bought it for $145,000. Their asking price of $229,000 is still valid, Gavish said, based on recent sales in Wellington and the added benefit of being on a cul-de-sac.

Neither were the Youngs ready to accept a long stay on the market. When she was asked when she needed to sell the house, Earlene Young had a ready answer:

"Three months ago."

Dan DeWitt can be reached at dewitt@sptimes.com or (352)754-6116.

Tampa's condo market softens

By JANET ZINK, Times Staff Writer
Published November 5, 2006

TAMPA - With sangria, tuna tartare and a raffle for a bright blue Vespa, the developers of the Slade in the Channel District celebrated the grand opening of their condominium sales center last month.

A guitarist plucked out Latin music, waiters circulated with trays of roast pork on black bean bread, and real estate agents, land use lawyers and Channel District champions gazed at a model of the development. Backers of the Slade say they have presold 100 of 280 planned units.

But by all accounts, the party is over for most other condo developments in and around downtown Tampa.

Weeds, not construction cranes, are spouting in more than one expensive empty tract. Tampa's long-sought dream of a vibrant residential core, while not gone, appears to be seriously diminished, at least for the time being.

Pinnacle Place, once slated for 41 stories and 408 units, is on hold.

The developers of C near Platt Street and Bayshore Boulevard, opened and closed their sales offices within a few months.

SimDag bagged its plans for the 280-unit Plaza at Channelside and is looking for a hotel chain to partner with on the site.

And Wood Partners, the Atlanta team behind a condo tower on Kennedy Boulevard, have canceled contracts with 30 buyers and are seeking a new way to finance their project. Their plans to build a 32-story condo tower on the site of the old Maas Brothers building, which has been demolished, are on hold indefinitely.

Rising interests rates, sagging home sales and climbing construction costs have put the brakes on some of the most significant projects planned in and around downtown.

All told, about a dozen projects with more than 4,100 planned units have either been delayed, put on hold or are simply dead.

The only sure bets at this point, developers say, are those that already have construction financing or the means of financing projects themselves.

Banks have stopped lending money for condominium projects, said Mark Huey, manager of economic development for Tampa. "You see that happening throughout the state and the country," he said.

That means many projects still in the planning stages downtown either won't happen or will have to wait until the market changes to start construction.

Jeanette Jason was part of a group that planned to build three high-rises with nearly 1,000 units on the block occupied by the old Kress department store. The property is now for sale. "A lot of banks aren't touching condo projects at this point," Jason said.

Ken Stoltenberg is one of the lucky ones.

He's the developer behind Grand Central, now under construction in the Channel District. Almost all of the 392 units have been sold.

There's still a market for condos priced below $500,000 a unit, he said. "I wouldn't want to be selling $1-million units right now, but the moderately priced stuff, my thinking is going to do just fine," he said.

Frank DeBose, part of the group behind the defunct 02 at Pinnacle Place, agrees.

"We've put too much housing in the higher end," he said.

Buildings with high-priced units now under construction will probably have to drop their prices, he said.

"Five years from now, the discussion is going to be about all those $700,000 and $800,000 condos downtown that you can buy for $300,000," he said.

Meanwhile, those with projects in the planning stages are waiting for the price of construction materials to level off so they can build reasonably priced units to attract the young professionals who are most likely to be interested in urban living.

Even if the boom has ended, developers don't believe downtown is a total bust. Most see the change in the real estate market as a correction that will result in condos being built at a slower pace and bought by people who will actually live in them instead of investors.

Janet Zink can be reached at jzink@sptimes.com or 813 226-3401.

Sheriff links 6% increase in crime to county growth

Gary Taylor
Sentinel Staff Writer

November 5, 2006

While serious crime continued to decline statewide during the first six months of 2006, several Central Florida counties -- including Osceola, Orange, Seminole and Volusia -- bucked that trend with increases in crime rates.

The exception was Lake County, where the number of serious crimes fell 2.9 percent, despite a 66.7 percent increase in robberies, according to the Florida Department of Law Enforcement.

The FDLE tracks murders, forcible rapes, robberies, aggravated assault, burglaries, larcenies and auto thefts for its major-crimes index. Collectively, those crimes have declined statewide every six months since the second half of 2002.

Although Florida's overall crime rate was down three-tenths of a percent for the first six months of 2006, compared with the same period in 2005, many violent-crime numbers rose. The number of murders, for example, was up 27 percent, robberies rose 10.7 percent and aggravated assaults increased 1.7 percent.

In Osceola County, the total number of crimes increased 6 percent. Sheriff Bob Hansell said the report is a useful tool for deciding where to direct law-enforcement resources.

"We've seen increases in several areas [of crime] because of many reasons," Hansell said. "The No. 1 contributing factor is growth, which brings an increase in population."

Putnam County, where crime rates rose just 4.7 percent in 2005, had the largest increase in the state -- 137.4 percent -- during the first half of 2006. That was fueled, in part, by burglaries, which increased 246.3 percent to 502 incidents.

In Central Florida, Volusia County posted the biggest increase in serious crimes -- 17.2 percent -- followed by Brevard County (8.7 percent), Orange County (6.7 percent), Polk (2.2 percent), Osceola (1.7 percent) and Seminole (0.7 percent). Polk County figures did not include crimes reported by the Winter Haven Police Department.

The FDLE did not release a detailed county-by-county crime analysis. But statewide, of 518 murders in the first half of the year, 340 involved firearms, up 43.5 percent; and 79 involved knives or other cutting instruments, up 31.7 percent.

It categorized 100 of the homicides as domestic violence, up 47.1 percent. Of those, 31 victims were spouses, 17 were children, eight were parents and four were siblings.

While agencies in the state reported 36,835 auto thefts, they also reported 53,955 recovered stolen vehicles.

Elaine Aradillas of the Sentinel staff contributed to this report. Gary Taylor can be reached at gtaylor@orlandosentinel.com or 407-324-7293.

Impact fees a likely reality

By TONY BRITT tbritt@lakecityreporter.com
Saturday, November 4, 2006 11:10 PM EST

The population influx over the last several years in Columbia County has resulted in a strain on infrastructure needs and local services designed to serve residents.

According to Columbia County Sheriff Bill Gootee, the number of calls to the sheriff's office has increased roughly 30 percent in recent years.

Columbia County Emergency Medical Services statistics indicate there were 6,011 calls in 2000 and the number of calls increased to 7,915 by 2005.

During the same period of time, the Columbia School District has also reported a increase in the number of students, as the school district population passed the 10,000-student mark. Then, during the 2005-06 school year, the school district gained more than 300 new students and had to hire more than 50 new teachers.

As a way of dealing with the costs associated with the additional strain put on services, several local governments are looking at the possibility of implementing impact fees.

Impact fees are fees on new real estate development to help defray costs of infrastructure improvements needed to support and serve new growth.

Impact fees can also be imposed by local governmental entities, including city councils, but cannot be imposed by other governmental entities unless the entities are given the express authority to do so.

The Columbia County Board of County Commissioners and the Columbia School District have both made plans to implement impact fees in 2007.

However, each has had to put its plans on hold due to changes being considered in the state legislature.

Dale Williams, county manager, said more than a year ago the county commission began a study relating to impact fees and invited the school board to participate.

“In between the time the study was initiated and now, we had one legislative session,” he said. “The legislature, in the previous session, was discussing a bunch of changes. Had we gone ahead with our original schedule and had the legislature implemented changes, then the work that had been done would have had to been redone at additional costs.”

Williams said the county could still impose impact fees by early 2007 and the impact fees would apply to all new construction, residential as well as commercial and industrial.

“Impact fees are generally made a part of the building permit application process, but that will all be decided in the enabling ordinance and we're not there yet,” he said.

School District impact fees

Sam Markham, Columbia County Schools' superintendent, said the school district plans to implement impact fees.

He said the school

board has already done an impact fee study and has

used the Urbanomics Inc.

consulting firm to conduct a feasibility study.

“We've done our part for impact fees,” Markham said. “We can't actually impose impact fees, that comes from the board of county commissioners. In fact, the board of county commissioners will ultimately tell the school board how much they will receive from impact fees when that time comes.”

According to information from the study, based on growth rates and the value of property in the county, a good figure for impact fees that will go to the school district is approximately $3,400 per land sale per new development.

School district officials also plan to levy the impact fees on mobile home purchases because the feasibility study showed that more Columbia County school-aged children came from mobile homes than site-built houses.

According to state guidelines, impact fees for a school district can be used for new school buildings and new construction - including additions. However, impact fees cannot be used to correct existing deficiencies or the maintenance and repair of existing schools or for operations. Impact fees can only be used for capital improvements.

For a school district to implement impact fees, the impact fee technical study must be completed and adopted by the school board, passed by resolution and submitted to the county commission, which is the only legal entity that can enact impact fees by way of ordinance.

Columbia County

impact fees

Ron Williams, Columbia County Commission chairman, said the county also plans to continue its work with implementing impact fees.

“We are definitely going to add impact fees,” he said. “It's only a matter of when.”

Williams said county officials were hoping the legislature would have cleaned-up some of the concerns about impact fees in the session last year, but hopefully they

will address that in this year's legislative session.

“When this is done, we'll definitely have to impose impact fees,” he said. “It's no more than right that the newcomers help share the burden of the growth in the county.”

Williams said when the actual impact fees are collected will depend on the legislature's decision.

From the county's viewpoint, impact fees cannot be used for personal services and salaries, but can be used to purchase equipment for several county departments.

“We know the guidelines we must work under, but once we free up money that impact fees can go toward, that means that we'll have the ability to maybe roll back the millage rate in that upcoming budget year,” Williams said.

The county has hired consultants to perform an impact fee feasibility study and research guidelines. Those findings were scheduled to be returned to county officials earlier in the week, but were not available.

“They're the ones that recommended that we should look and see what the legislature does and they would clean that up before we implemented impact fees,” Williams said.

Williams also noted that concerns have been voiced during public hearings about approving subdivisions without impact fees in place. However, he said those are preliminary plats and there could be a six- to eight-month period before the final plats are adopted.

“Once that is done, hopefully we'll have those impact fees online to soften the tax burden on the property owners,” he said. “Impact fees can make a tremendous amount of difference for the ad valorem taxpayer. Simply, that's less money that needs to go into the county coffers to provide the services that Columbia County needs. With impact fees, we are not dependent solely on ad valorem taxes.” 

Santa Fe River littering crackdown?

By NATHAN CRABBE

Sun staff writer

An increase in tubing on the Santa Fe River has caused the water to be littered with bottles, cans and other trash, leading to calls for a crackdown.

River neighbors say groups of college-aged tubers sometimes numbering in the hundreds could be found on the river this summer, often floating with coolers full of beer. Neighbors say some tubers trashed the stretch of river from the Gilchrist County landing where they typically launch to the State Road 47 bridge where they pull out of the water.

"They're people who should know better," said Pete Butt, who lives next to the landing.

He joined members of the Gainesville-based group Current Problems/Adopt-A-River in a river cleanup on Saturday. Using scuba divers and snorkelers, they pulled about 730 pounds of trash from the water.

Gilchrist County Coordinator Ron McQueen said trash and other problems have spurred talk about closing a park where tubers congregate or posting a sheriff's deputy there. Others have suggested that Florida Fish and Wildlife officers aggressively police the river for underage drinking and littering violations.

Fritzi Olson, executive director of Current Problems, said tube-rental businesses should bear the responsibility for keeping the river clean.

"If you're a bar owner and your parking lot gets trashed Saturday night, you're going to be there Sunday cleaning up," she said.

The situation mirrors past trouble on the Ichetucknee River, another popular tubing run. Ichetucknee Springs State Park banned food and drink on the water in the mid-1970s, effectively solving the problem.

Now some Fort White businesses that rent tubes for use on the Ichetucknee are offering trips to the Santa Fe, where users aren't bound by such rules. Jim Wood, owner of the Santa Fe Canoe Outpost, said the result has been a free-for-all on a five-mile section of river.

"These kids just don't care," he said.
Craig Harper, whose family owns Lowe's Tubeland in Fort White, said he gives tubers an inflatable raft to put their trash in. He said he also gives a speech about keeping the river clean. "Once they start drinking, they pretty much forget everything you say," he said.

Littering on the river typically carries a fine of $50, said Karen Parker, spokeswoman for fish and wildlife. She said issuing such citations is difficult because officers must witness someone in the act.

The river cleanup was conducted on a section just south of Ginnie Springs Outdoors, a private business that owns land around seven springs along the river and rents tubes for use there. Ginnie Springs also allows tubers to bring food and drink on the river and has received criticism in the past for its own trash problems.

Ginnie Springs conducted eight cleanups this year alone, said owner Mark Wray. He said he's considering posting signs about littering at the entry points for tubers to further address the trash problem.

Dan Rountree, co-founder of Current Problems, said Ginnie Springs has done a better job of cleaning trash than ever before.

"This is the first year that Ginnie has really started stepping to the plate," he said.

Trash throughout the river has been more noticeable this year, he said, due to a lack of rainfall. As a result, spring waters constitute much of the river flow and offer a clear view of the cans and bottles on the bottom.

McQueen said the increase in tubers has caused other problems. Some tubers waiting for their rides jump from the State Road 47 bridge into the water and cause a safety hazard, while vandalism has been an issue in a nearby park.

He said county commissioners considered moving a sheriff's deputy into a trailer at the park, but found people are restricted from living there because of wetlands. He said commissioners are now considering fencing the park and locking it after dark, or closing it entirely.

Butt said he hopes the problems don't prevent people from using and enjoying the river.

"I love it - as long as they're not littering," he said.
Nathan Crabbe can be reached at 352-338-3176 or crabben@gvillesun.com.

Overfishing researcher sees hope amid gloom

Meanwhile, a local fish market owner says red tide hurts Gulf.


SARASOTA -- Brett Wallin knows the game fish trophies on every wall in his restaurant and the bonanza of fresh fish, shrimp, crabs and clams in his cold cases don't paint a true picture of how sea creatures are faring.

The trophies hanging in Walt's Fish Market are from another era, and fish, especially local ones, have been hard to come by in recent years.

Not too long ago, Wallin turned away local fishermen trying to sell him their catches. These days, he looks long and hard for Gulf fish to fill his cases for the busy weekends and relies more heavily on fish flown in from distant places.

So Wallin, a sixth-generation fisherman, wasn't surprised at a study published in the journal Science on Thursday that said fisheries are in a nosedive on a global scale. The study says there will be little left to catch by mid-century if people continue overfishing with abandon.

The first-of-its kind study looked at global catch since 1950 as well as 1,000 years of information from archives, fishery records, sediment cores and archeological data.

Scientists from four countries and 10 institutions did the research.

Researchers consistently found a downward trend for fish stocks, though there are pockets where good management and clean water make for sustainable fishing.

Collapses, defined as the loss of 90 percent of a fishery, are also hastened by the decline in overall health of an ecosystem. Fish rely on the clean water, prey populations and the variety of habitats found in more biologically diverse systems.

That points to a need for ocean managers to consider all species together rather than continuing to focus on single-species management.

Boris Worm, the lead author of the study, says he is glad about the attention focused on his research but disappointed that the focus fell on what could happen rather than what needs to be done.

What could happen if people don't stop overharvesting the ocean on a grand scale is the collapse of most fish stocks by 2048.

But it's a trend, not a fact, meaning the oceans have a shot at recovery if people make good choices.

Right now, they don't.

Overfishing is a global problem. Less than 1 percent of the world's oceans are effectively protected. And consumers are infatuated with fish such as orange roughy and Chilean sea bass that are the verge of collapse.

"With the loss of species, we are losing the ability to recover what's been lost, so we have to act quickly," Worm, a biology professor at Dalhousie University in Halifax, Nova Scotia, said in a telephone interview Friday. "With every loss of a species, you are losing a working part of the ecosystem, and it is less and less able to recover."

Wallin, 27, stepped into his father's shoes when Tom Wallin Sr. died in August. And like his father, who was adamant about protecting the oceans, Wallin blames water quality, including red tide, more than overfishing for problems in the Gulf.

Worm says he has a point.

"It's a very serious factor, and the closer you are to the coast, the more serious it becomes," he said of declining water quality.

But away from the coast, overfishing is the main problem.

"In the open ocean, it's entirely exploitation as far as we can tell," Worm said.

In international waters, outside of the regulatory areas of the United States and other countries, commercial fishermen use huge nets and miles-long line hooks to comb the oceans for fish. Stopping the abuses there is considered critical to saving many species.

Wallin's menu doesn't carry the fish choices that are bad for the oceans. There is no orange roughy, no Chilean sea bass, no tiger shrimp farmed in environmentally unfriendly ways.

But they are in the cases.

Wallin never recommends them, but he says customers ask for those fish, and he has to compete.

"I'm tired of seeing my friends in the grocery store buying from someone else," he said.

But he'd rather not carry them at all.

That's where locally based Mote Marine Laboratory says it can help.

The answer to consumer demand is education and environmentally friendly aquaculture, says Kumar Mahadevan, president of Mote.

"Aquaculture becomes a very key way to really fill the gap a lot more than people realize," he said. "We don't hunt buffalo anymore. Why don't we do that to get our beef, but seafood, we just go out and collect."

Mote is working on cheaper technology that will make it easier for fish farmers to make environmentally sound choices.

Classes breathe life into farming

EDDY RAMIREZ
Published November 5, 2006

INVERNESS - At Citrus High School, students in agriculture classes will soon be raising cattle in a new barn and cloning citrus trees in a modern greenhouse.

The two facilities will sit on more than 5 acres of precious real estate that the school district has committed for the school's expanding agriculture program.

Citrus High teacher Randy Kegler has taught agriculture for 24 years. He said the planned expansion is an encouraging sign that agriculture education is thriving in Citrus County.

Elsewhere, high school agriculture programs have buckled under an assortment of pressures. Students with low FCAT scores must fill their elective slots with remedial classes, leaving no room for agriculture. Fast-growing counties must build more schools, quickly gobbling up available land. And nationwide, high schools are having trouble recruiting experienced and qualified agriculture teachers.

Citrus is trying to stave off those pressures by investing in agriculture education.

The greenhouse at Citrus High will be a "state-of-the-art" facility when it opens sometime in 2007.

It will allow students to grow flowers, vegetables and plants that will then be sold to the public.

Crystal River High is also receiving a greenhouse; Lecanto High already has one.

Students will become familiar with some of the same farming practices being taught at Central Florida Community College and the University of Florida.

In the near future, students could graduate from high school with a diploma as well as a special certificate that will allow them to work as professional landscapers.

The goal, Kegler said, is to better prepare high school students and make them more desirable to agriculture employers upon graduation.

"We're not trying to make this a profitable enterprise," Kegler said. "We just want students to become well-rounded."

Growing the agriculture program at Citrus High has required patience.

At times, the program appeared to be under siege.

First, part of a cow pasture at the school was turned into a home for the Renaissance Center's portable classrooms.

Then, in 2002 when the school built a new cafeteria, what remained of the cow pasture was lost to a baseball field that had to be moved.

Around the same time, the former School Board was toying with an idea to consolidate the county's three high school agriculture program into one agri-science academy. It meant busing hundreds of students to one site - a major logistical headache.

Local agriculture leaders and students in 4-H and FFA clubs reacted angrily.

At packed board meetings, they gave impassioned speeches in support of agriculture education. They argued that the classes offered valuable life skills.

When a principal at Inverness Middle School threatened to cut agriculture in order to offer a dropout prevention class, the community cried that agriculture was what kept students in school.

Today's crop of students seems equally passionate about agriculture.

"It's not just about raising animals," said senior Nocona Rooks, who hails from a prominent family of cattle ranchers. "It's so much more."

Rooks is the president of the Citrus High FFA chapter. She is raising two steer to show off at the county and state fairs, but she also participates in public speaking contests and other activities that teach students about leadership, communication, cooperation, decisionmaking and responsibility.

Rooks said the new facilities at Citrus High will allow students to learn even more.

When the barn comes, students will be able to better care for livestock. Gone will be the days of chasing after bulls or cows that wander into traffic or graze outside the nearby Pizza Hut.

Ashley Jefferson, a Citrus High senior and FFA chapter historian, said she will no longer struggle to weigh her steer because the new barn will house a squeeze shoot with a digital scale.

"We just kind of winged it at the fair and hope that the steer wouldn't go crazy," she said.

For his part, Kegler is eager to introduce students to innovative farming practices.

Students will learn how to "clone" trees and use a microirrigation system to grow vegetables in a garden near the baseball field.

Students will become familiar with precision farming. They will know where to plant seeds with the help of computers that use a global positioning system.

"The whole idea is that we want to turn out kids who can go to work immediately," Kegler said. "These kids are going to be on the cutting-edge."

Eddy Ramirez can be reached at eramirez@sptimes.com or 860-7305.

America Paying High Price For Sluggish Approach To Energy

Tampa Tribune editorial published: Nov 4, 2006

The nation's timid energy policy is on display this week in Tampa, alongside the fuel-hungry vehicles that dominate the car show continuing through Sunday at the convention center.

Hulking SUVs and trucks share the spotlight with sexy sedans and sports cars. So few boast of their efficiency that a visitor from another country might guess it's U.S. policy to burn as much gasoline as possible.

Just a few changes would have created an entirely different show.

Had the government moved faster to bring cleaner diesel fuel to the market, the show would have featured the high-performance diesel cars and trucks that dominate European roads. Low-sulfur diesel fuel is just now arriving at U.S. stations and won't totally replace its dirty predecessor until 2010.

One of the highlights of the car show is a display by Mercedes of its diesel engine, one of the very few available in a passenger car in this country. The engine costs the same as the gasoline version but is far superior. It gets 37 miles per gallon on the highway and accelerates to 60 mph in a snappy 6.6 seconds.

A saleswoman confides that when she's giving a test drive, she doesn't tell customers they're driving a diesel. U.S. consumers are wary of the stinky, noisy and slow engines that power so many U.S. trucks and buses. Emissions standards were lowered for diesel trucks during the Reagan administration, which was shortsighted economically and bad for the nation's health.

Cleaner truck engines will be required next year, but the rush to purchase old engines before the deadline means U.S. roads will be polluted with outdated technology for many more years. One old diesel engine can produce as much pollution as 60 new ones.

On another energy front, the federal government finally is imposing tighter mileage standards, but the result could be just as unfortunate as the original restrictions on passenger vehicles. Those rules encouraged automakers to redesign unregulated heavy-duty trucks and hunting vehicles to appeal to soccer moms and commuters.

To avoid forcing drivers into lighter and less safe vehicles, the new rules will set mileage standards according to wheelbase. The longer and wider the vehicle, the more fuel it is allowed to burn without triggering federal fines. This is a prescription for longer and wider cars, not more thrifty ones.

Europe offers a better model. By taxing diesel fuel lower than gasoline, governments encouraged a diesel revolution. European motorists are routinely going 100 mph at 30 miles per gallon while the gasoline version of the same car sold in this country only gets 21 mpg at 65 mph.

The lower tax on diesel is smart public policy because it takes less oil to produce a gallon of diesel than to produce a gallon of gasoline. In the United States, diesel fuel costs more than gasoline.

America's half-hearted energy policies have led to higher oil imports, dirtier air, less money for consumers and lower profits for the domestic auto industry. On energy, Congress has no right to toot its own horn

Board OKs power-plant land category

Taylor County officials took the first step in making a home for a proposed coal plant this week.

By a 5-to-2 vote, the board that advises county commissioners on planning issues recommended the creation of a new land-use category allowing for power plants. The board also recommended, by a 6-1 vote, applying the new category to the 3,000-acre tract four miles southeast of Perry where the proposed plant would be located.

The County Commission will vote Monday on the measure.

"There was no reason in the land-development regulations to deny the application," said Taylor County Planning and Zoning Board chairman Ward Ketring.

Along with the city of Tallahassee - which hasn't yet committed to participating in the plant past 2008 - the partners are the Jacksonville utilities, an improvement district linked to Walt Disney World and a coalition of smaller municipal utilities throughout Florida.

Board member Erdman West, the lone "no" vote both times, said he proposed a motion, which was defeated, to delay the vote until the coal partners agreed to build a coal-gasification plant on the site. Gasification plants use newer, cleaner technology than the proposed coal plant would.

West also raised concerns that the rezoning would apply to an area much larger than what's needed for the proposed plant.

"Now they can cover the area with coal plants," he said.

Mark McCain, the spokesman for the Taylor Energy Center, said the partners had said all along that they could eventually envision more plants on the site - probably no more than one or two more, depending on their size. The current proposed plant, along with assorted facilities such as storage buildings, would occupy about a third of the site.

He said that made economic sense, and that any new plant would have to go through the state permitting process, just like the proposed plant is doing now.

The Taylor County Commission will hold a public hearing at 6 p.m. Monday before deciding whether to ask the state for permission to go ahead with the land-use changes. The meeting will be at 201 E. Green St. in Perry.

Win -win situation for everyone

Moving the tortoises means they get a new home and the developer can build.

CHUIN-WEI YAP
Published November 4, 2006

LAND O'LAKES - At 3 months old, the gopher tortoise has a shell that gleams, in patches, the color of the morning sun.

Lee Walton held the baby reptile, only half the size of a grown man's fist, as he walked into the brush to let the critter go.

Nine tortoises, all different ages, had come deep into the Cypress Creek Wellfield on Friday with Walton, an ecologist with Biological Research Associates, and Patty Fesmire, a Tampa Bay Water biologist.

They came so they could live.

"These guys got by by the skin of their teeth," Fesmire said, then laughed at her unwitting irony. "Well, they have no teeth."

If the tortoises had stayed at the 205-acre Terra Bella development on State Road 54 and 20 Mile Level Road, they would have been entombed by bulldozers.

On Friday, they dodged the bullet - thanks to Walton, a Tampa Bay Water rescue mission and a developer willing to afford time and money for the effort. As many as 120 gopher tortoises will be moved from Terra Bella to the central Pasco wellfield.

* * *

Untold numbers of these little vegetarians have died in the crush of development across Pasco.

Until June, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission issued 81,000 "incidental taking" permits, spokesman Willie Puz said.

"Incidental taking" sounds innocuous, but it really means burying the tortoises alive by building over them, even though Puz said not all takings result in entombment.

The tortoises can survive for months even when they are trapped in their burrows, Fesmire said, but this only makes their deaths a slow torture of starvation and immobility.

Gopher tortoises and real estate developers compete for the same dry upland areas. For decades, the tortoise looked destined to lose the contest.

Until late last year, the prevailing wisdom at the state commission was to prevent these tortoises from being relocated.

The critters are susceptible to a kind of respiratory disease, not unlike human influenza. The regulators thought that, once infected, one tortoise could spread the disease to others if moved to different habitats.

So developers found that they could pay the regulators to get a permit for killing the tortoises.

Two factors began to shift the regulatory philosophy.

One was a series of biological studies that convinced regulators that relocation wasn't so bad for tortoises' health after all. The second, at least in Florida, was a case in Lake Park late last year that ignited a national public fury, when Wal-Mart paid $11,409 to entomb five gopher tortoises rather than find a new home for them.

The commission plans to change the rules in June enforcing the gopher tortoise's status as a "threatened species." Until then, incidental taking is still allowed, though biologists say it is now rarer.

* * *

Here's where Tampa Bay Water, Biological Research Associates and Terra Bella's developers, Flagship Development, stepped up to the plate.

The developer could have just killed the gopher tortoises. But it was willing to discuss relocating the animals.

Scrambling to find a suitable place, Walton phoned his friend Fesmire in late August.

Fesmire held the key to 1,200 acres of rich conservation land.

As many as 700 gopher tortoises from other developments might eventually end up on the Tampa Bay Water conservation. If it happens, the move will be gradual and depend on habitat restoration and annual surveys on how the animals are faring, Fesmire said.

"The big winner is the tortoise," Walton said. "They get a nice habitat, and it's managed well."

That's how, at least on Friday, the gopher tortoises won.

Off into the November sun the winners went, like little waddling helmets, nine lucky souls in search - like so many recent arrivals in central Pasco - of a new place to call home.

Chuin-Wei Yap covers growth and development in Pasco County. He can be reached at 813 909-4613 or cyap@sptimes.com.

Flagler begins research for gopher tortoise relocation

By LAUREN SONIS
Staff Writer

FLAGLER BEACH -- Gopher tortoise expert Patricia Ashton walked into the field one day and photographed a tortoise munching on a papaw fruit so delectable, the reptile ate the dirt underneath.

"While I was photographing that tortoise, I wasn't paying attention to what was going on at my toes," Ashton said Friday morning at a gopher tortoise workshop held in Flagler Beach.

Another tortoise had nibbled at her red painted nails.

That told her gopher tortoises may be attracted to foods based on color, said the president of the Newberry-based environmental consulting firm Ashton, Ashton and Associates Inc. They're fans of red, orange, deep maroon and yellow and will travel great lengths, sometimes three football fields, to get to food.

It's one of the observations she and husband Ray E. Ashton shared with environmentalists, and interested state and local government officials.

The couple led a crowd of about 30 through the sandy spoil islands at the Betty Steflik Memorial Preserve, demonstrating techniques for weighing and measuring tortoises. The Ashtons talked over heavy winds that pushed one man a little off-balance.

Patricia Ashton pointed to a burrow where loose sand lay near the opening. She held the shell of a dead baby gopher tortoise. The crowd pointed to nearby raccoon droppings as a possible answer.

Monitors should be careful not to over-handle tortoises, Ray Ashton said -- pick it up for 15 minutes and send it on its way.

Flagler County started a pilot project for gopher tortoise relocation earlier this year, offering Waterfront Development Services Inc. the option of paying the county to move the animals to the Princess Place Preserve rather than purchasing an incidental take permit. Take permits specify the number of animals that can be killed legally.

The Flagler Beach Environmental Preservation Council Inc. sponsored Friday's workshop, and member Bob Mish said he's hoping a county ordinance will soon be in place defining who covers maintenance, management and enforcement for gopher tortoise relocation.

"We have got to have a mechanism in place," he said.

At the workshop, participants raised concerns about any future county law being enforceable. Some speakers said that not until recently did local governments figure out local laws can be made stricter than state laws when dealing with gopher tortoise relocation.

In a 2005 press release, University of Florida researcher Dana Ehret said in practice, relocation has its problems. She said researchers are concerned that tortoises will leave new habitat if it isn't just right, and tortoises may suffer from injury or die anyway.

The county is in the early research stages for gopher relocation, environmental planner Tim Telfer said, getting the permit for the first relocation just last week.

He said two developers told him they're interested in a program, and the county is researching how much land is available to move tortoises, among other questions.

"We're definitely in learning mode, not in implementing mode," Telfer said

Titusville to settle developer's rights

Submerged lands at core of dispute

BY JESSICA RAYNOR
FLORIDA TODAY

The city has started negotiations to settle a developer's claim that a city ordinance excluding submerged lands when calculating density "inordinately burdens" his project.

The city has 180 days to settle the claim before a lawsuit could be filed.

Maurice Kodsi, owner of the River Palms property at Washington Avenue and Riverside Drive, filed a Bert Harris claim against the city in late September claiming the city ordinance dealing with submerged lands and the calculation of residential density reduced the property's fair market value by $5.4 million.

The Bert Harris Act, named for the former Florida lawmaker who drafted it in 1995, allows developers to assert their rights in developing a property when they feel an ordinance "inordinately burdens" that development. Damages can be collected.

The city denied his vested rights claim at a Sept. 27, 2005, council meeting, ruling the ordinance had applied to his property on the date of its passage in February 2005. The ordinance stated submerged lands -- those underwater, in other words --no longer could be used to calculate resident unit density, which indicates how many units can be built.

Kodsi's total property at the time spread over 11.52 acres, more than half of which were submerged. According to Kodsi's attorneys, this allowed him to build 97 units above what the upland acreage would allow at River Landing.

City Attorney Dwight Severs laid out a few scenarios to settle the matter: compliance with existing regulations that allow 46 units at a maximum height of 50 feet; compliance with existing regulations (not counting submerged lands) and allowing a higher building; or allowing some submerged lands to count for density purposes.

Contact Raynor at 360-1016 or jraynor@brevard.gannett.com

Charter amendments mirror 2004 battle over growth

By JAMES MILLER
Staff Writer

Faced with ballot questions that would give the Volusia County Council more control over how Volusia grows, self-described Miami-Dade County refugees Ralph and Vilma Pujol voted "yes."

Giving the council more authority could help avoid a development "mish-mash," Ralph Pujol said, after the couple traveled from Pierson to DeLand to cast their ballots last week.

A few days earlier, at the Deltona Regional Library voting site, city resident and former Pittsburgh firefighter Bill Pflueger took a different angle.

"No. I think they've got enough power," he said of council members.

With their arguments, Pflueger and the Pujols echoed major refrains in an often bitter debate over proposed amendments to the 35-year-old Volusia County charter.

Volusia residents aren't electing a president, but with local officials, builders, environmental and neighborhood activists, Realtors, business leaders and tax reform groups joining the fray, there can be little doubt the stakes are high.

Two proposals to give the County Council more authority over growth in certain parts of Volusia aren't the only county charter amendments that have stirred city leaders, who say they're simply a power grab.

Proposals to direct the council to create a countywide water plan and draw up rules making sure school classrooms are planned to accommodate new development have drawn similar criticism. Supporters of the amendments say they are common-sense measures that will help protect resources and quality of life.

Throw in three races for seats on what could be a more powerful County Council, and for some, this year's election looks a lot like the 2004 elections.

That year, Volusia County voters adopted a ballot initiative that called for boundaries to restrict growth -- a measure later found flawed by the courts -- and elected four council members, including a chairman widely thought to have coasted to victory on his support of the boundaries.

"I think 2004 was a watershed barometer," said Reid Hughes, president of the Volusia/Flagler Environmental Action Committee. "But now people are demanding we do something about it."

Some of the arguments about these growth-related amendments echo that year's debate.

On the pro side, county officials, environmentalists and neighborhood preservationists say they're simply pushing for stronger protections, long overdue, for rural and undeveloped areas.

On the con side, builders argue additional government regulation could cast a cloud over Volusia's economy by sending developers packing, and city officials say they -- and city residents -- will lose control of their cities' futures.

One growth-related amendment -- put on the ballot by the council-appointed Charter Review Commission -- would make county planning prevail for a limited time on roughly 430,000 acres already county-designated as environmentally sensitive or non-urban buffer.

Council agreement would be required for 10 years after any annexation, during which time the city and county should negotiate a plan for development in the area. Then, the council would have no authority. The amendment would also cover a number of low-density communities in the unincorporated area such as Wilbur-by-the-Sea, Samsula, Glenwood and Osteen.

The other growth amendment -- put on the ballot by the council -- would give the council final authority over land use throughout the entire unincorporated area, regardless of city annexations, with no time limit.

Environmentalists had argued the charter commission plan would simply give cities and developers a green light after 10 years. Many county officials say the second amendment would override the first.

Either is anathema, said Kevin Kronk, president of the Volusia Home Builders Association.

He agreed it's an important election -- but because of its potential impact on the economy. Adding additional bureaucracy could simply drive builders away, he said.

"We look at (these) as growth stoppage amendments," Kronk said "The hidden agenda here is not to control or manage growth -- it's to stop growth and don't let anybody kid you any differently."

Charter commission members disagree.

Their amendment was meant to balance private and public property rights and foster cooperation on development between the cities and county, said Bill Scovell, a former council member with a background in city management who served as the commission's chairman.

Many cities as a bloc have opposed both growth-management amendments.

As of mid-October, 10 cities had poured almost $170,000 of taxpayer money into a political action committee dedicated to fighting all the county charter amendments. There are seven on the ballot. The charter commission proposed six of them.

But attorney Scott Simpson, who represents Holly Hill, Oak Hill and Edgewater, said the council's proposal would more significantly undermine city authority.

"It doesn't say anything about stopping growth, it just says now the county makes the decision," he said.

But council members say their growth proposal would address a well-established wish of voters to keep urban development from sprawling into the county's rural areas.

City leaders are looking out for themselves -- not their residents, Councilman Dwight Lewis said.

james.miller@news-jrnl.com

How Do We Grow From Here?

Whatever your leanings, here are seven votes on Tuesday's ballot that could determine whether Volusia goes green:

COUNTY COUNCIL DISTRICT 1: Andy Kelly and Charles Paiva sound a lot alike. They may even vote alike. But home builders have endorsed Paiva, while environmentalists have endorsed Kelly.

COUNTY COUNCIL DISTRICT 3: Jack Hayman portrayed himself in one advertisement as a superhero holding back bulldozers, much to the amusement -- or outrage -- of environmentalists, who consider Barbara Herrin one of their own.

COUNTY COUNCIL DISTRICT 5: Give credit to John Masiarczyk for not trying to claim the environmental vote. Pat Northey has that support.

SCHOOL PLANNING AMENDMENT: Slow-growth advocates like it because it requires cities to consider school capacity before approving increased residential density. Cities, builders and Realtors say no.

WATER PLAN AMENDMENT: Conservationists hope this will give the county the strength to protect the water supply. Cities, builders and Realtors say no.

COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DISTRICTS: Developers worry it will give the county too much power to block development. Cities fear it's a power grab by the county.

COUNTY PLANNING AUTHORITY: Like the planning district amendment, environmentalists hope this will empower the county to slow new development.

Letter raises hackles in Eustis
Mayor, fellow commissioners take umbrage at Rotella's criticism of city

Bill Koch
Staff Writer

EUSTIS - The mayor and several city commissioners sharply rebuked Commissioner James Rotella for a letter he wrote to an Orlando newspaper.

"I'm just getting so disgusted," Mayor Jonnie Hale told Rotella near the end of Thursday's regular City Commission meeting. "It really bothers me."

Rotella's letter, which appeared recently on the newspaper's opinion page, lays out a litany of complaints against the city and city officials. Among them, it says: "The most egregious failure is the one most critical to our future: The commission has failed to manage growth well enough to preserve the charm of Eustis and its surroundings."

Rotella warned residents "to vote carefully in this election."

"We've had unnecessary rate hikes on water and sewer fees; the commission has for the most part ignored residents' pleas to slow growth; Tavares has been allowed to annex a valuable tax base; City Hall management is stagnant; businesses face too much red tape; code enforcement is overzealous; staff is not well managed; and the city continues to provide precious water resources to developments many miles outside our city."

Hale disputed, item by item, every claim Rotella made and said newspapers are not the appropriate forum for commissioners to air their grievances.

"That's not where things are resolved," Hale said, sometimes angrily raising her voice after Commissioner Evelyn Smith objected to her comments.

Hale said Rotella skewed his facts and wrongly took credit for board efforts. At times she became sarcastic with Hale's remarks. "How wrong you are," she said of Hale's reference to the Commission's effort to set aside open space.

Rotella tried to defend parts of his letter, saying the newspaper's editor changed several words. "They put in words I didn't use," he said. "I don't have final editorial control."

Hale responded by urging Rotella to seek a retraction from the newspaper for supposedly substituting inaccurate words in his column. "You need to talk to the editor," Hale said.

Rotella said the intent of the letter was misinterpreted.

"I have no problem with the city staff doing their job," he said, and added that he "resented that characterization" of being malicious.

Smith objected to Hale's comments, which were made during the portion of the meeting at the end referred to as commissioners' reports.

"I don't think this is the place to hash it out," Smith said.

Hale insisted she had a right to address Rotella's comments. "But we're going to have to listen to it."

Hale also questioned Rotella's contention that the newspaper changed his words.

"Do you think the (newspaper) picked that up on their own?" Hale asked.

Commissioner Gwen Manning joined Hale in criticizing Rotella's letter.

"We're supposed to team players," she said. "I think (the letter was) unprofessional and unethical. I think it's awful."

Several residents at the meeting said they found Rotella's letter offensive and his defense inadequate.

"All these things he talks about are from someone who has been around (on the Commission) for a year and a half," said Eustis resident Ottmar Olsen.

Lobbyist charged in Masilotti case

By Tom Dubocq, Jane Musgrave

Palm Beach Post Staff Writers

Saturday, November 04, 2006

WEST PALM BEACH — Political fallout again shook Palm Beach County government Friday when William Boose, a powerful lobbyist and former planning director, was charged as a co-conspirator in the federal corruption case against former County Commission Chairman Tony Masilotti.

Boose, 62, founding partner of a prominent downtown law firm, is accused of helping to conceal Masilotti's $1.3 million profit from a government land deal. If convicted, he faces a maximum three-year prison sentence and $250,000 fine. He also could be disbarred and stripped of his right to vote.

A grand jury accused Boose of helping Masilotti cover up a scheme to secretly profit from a 2003 land deal in Martin County.

When FBI agents started asking questions, Boose allegedly lied and falsified legal bills to disguise the fact he didn't charge Masilotti full price for legal services. He worked on Masilotti's deal while lobbying the county commission for other developer clients. His business relationship with the commissioner never was disclosed, the grand jury reported.

The grand jury issued the criminal charge against Boose in an information, a federal court document typically used when the defendant is negotiating a plea bargain. Boose hired attorney Jack Goldberger, who has a reputation for arranging plea deals for high-profile clients.

Goldberger said Boose hadn't decided whether to fight. "We really don't know," he said. "He's cooperating with the authorities. We've had frank discussions with the authorities. We hope to resolve the matter."

Masilotti reached out to Boose in 2002 as the commissioner plotted a scheme to profit from a Martin County land purchase by the South Florida Water Management District, a well-publicized acquisition to help clean up the Loxahatchee River. Masilotti wanted to secretly own land that the district would buy. Prosecutors allege Boose provided the vehicle: a secret land trust.

The land deal hit a snag when the district required disclosure of who was behind the land trust. Boose, according to the grand jury, helped engineer a land swap that would hide Masilotti's $1.3 million profit.

Assistant U.S. Attorneys John Kastrenakes and Stephen Carlton alleged that Boose, while representing the former commissioner, knew Masilotti was abusing the power of his public office for personal profit. Boose's participation in the scheme broke a law called "misprision of a felony."

"A law degree is not a license to assist public officials in violating the law," U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta said in a statement. "Indeed, of all professions, attorneys and law enforcement officials have a heightened duty to take all possible steps to uphold the law."

Boose is to surrender Monday at the federal courthouse in Fort Pierce, where Masilotti, at an initial hearing Friday, was handcuffed and stripped of his necktie and belt in preparation for fingerprinting and mug shots. Masilotti, who resigned last week and said he planned to plead guilty, faces up to five years in prison and forfeiture of $9.5 million.

The charge against Boose culminated a week of stunned reaction to county government's worst scandal in at least 90 years:

• In West Palm Beach, Masilotti's official portrait was stripped from the walls of public buildings and his image digitally erased from a group photo of the commission posted on its Web site. County Administrator Robert Weisman on Friday ordered an internal investigation into the sale of the county's "Posse" property to Masilotti's pal Bruce Rendina, another deal cited by the grand jury. "I ask you to consider this in the light that it was Commissioner Masilotti's intention to rig the process to help Mr. Rendina," Weisman wrote in his staff directive.

• In Royal Palm Beach, where Masilotti served as mayor before his 1998 election to the commission, the government has put on hold the annexation of the 10-acre Posse property, at Belvedere Road and State Road 7, until the federal investigation subsides. Officials also plan to strip Masilotti's name from a village park, an honor he sought from the village council for providing county money for village services.

• In Wellington, Masilotti's brother, Paul, quit his job as a village building inspector Thursday. His bosses had threatened to fire him for accepting a free seven-day cruise and gambling trips from Rendina while signing off as an inspector on the construction of Rendina's office buildings.

• Wellington also asked the county commission to retract its rezoning of 1,200 acres bordering the village that are owned by Palm Beach Aggregates. The zoning, approved in 2004, allows construction of 2,000 homes where only 120 had been allowed. Tony Masilotti is accused of receiving $7.7 million worth of property for engineering the zoning change.

• Across the county, politicos were unnerved by a Palm Beach Post report Sunday that Masilotti had been tailed for nearly a year by a private eye code-named "Cobra," who sifted through his trash and watched from a helicopter as Masilotti visited Rendina's home in the Breakers West gated community. Cobra's cover was blown when sheriff's agents traced a tracking device found beneath Masilotti's county automobile.

The caper prompted County Commissioner Karen Marcus to demand an explanation from the Lewis, Longman and Walker law firm. According to billing, the law firm and shareholder Robert Diffenderfer repeatedly had been called from Cobra's cellphone.

Many in political office said the Masilotti scandal has further eroded the public's trust of its servants. Still not fathomed: how voters will react at the polls Tuesday, particularly toward Republicans.

Masilotti's meltdown followed that of two other prominent Republican politicians. Former West Palm Beach City Commissioner Ray Liberti is serving an 18-month sentence for accepting $66,000 in bribes, most of it delivered in a shaving kit. Former U.S. Rep. Mark Foley resigned and checked into an Arizona alcohol rehabilitation facility after his electronic sexual banter with underage congressional pages surfaced.

"I've been in government 30 years and I've never seen a year like this one," Wellington Village Manager Charles Lynn said. "It hasn't been a good year for public service in general."

Well-connected in political circles, Boose in the 1970s worked as an assistant county attorney and later as the county's first planning director. He is a University of Florida law school graduate and a founding partner of Boose Casey Ciklin Lubitz Martens McBane & O'Connell, a 33-lawyer firm founded in 1985.

The firm had no comment on Boose's trouble. Goldberger said Boose has no immediate plans to quit the firm. But partner Alan Ciklin wrote late Friday to the county attorney that the firm had resigned as counsel on a county bond issue — a job that Masilotti voted to approve without disclosing his business relationship with Boose, the grand jury pointed out.

Foes and friends alike noted that Boose, with his sense of humor and easygoing style, seemed too smart to become embroiled in such a mess.

"I can't imagine a man of his stature and his intelligence finding himself in this situation or allowing himself to be placed in this situation," said Joanne Davis, an environmentalist who heads the West Palm Beach office of 1000 Friends of Florida. "These are supposed to be our county leaders?" she said. "That's scary."

Peter Sachs, a Boca Raton attorney who often represented homeowners opposed to projects Boose championed, described the events as "sad, very sad."

"He's always been known as one of the top two or three land use attorneys in the county," Sachs said. While cautioning that all the facts have yet to come out, he said he is confident Boose's law firm will survive.

"It will be a loss. It will be a blow," he said. "But my understanding is that they have multiple partners who bring in business. They'll reorganize. They'll change the firm's name. All firms have to reorganize from time to time."

Days before the charges were announced, Boose's friends said they knew ill winds were blowing.

"I talked to him about 10 days ago, roughly when he realized something major was up," said George Elmore, a longtime friend and lobbying client. "He's shook. He doesn't know what to do."

Like scores of major landowners in the county, Elmore, the multimillionaire founder of Delray Beach-based Hardrives construction, credits Boose with getting government agencies to approve large, problem-plagued development projects that would have flummoxed other attorneys.

Land use attorney Martin Perry said the impact from Boose has been muted somewhat by previous events. "The Liberti issue was more bewildering to me — the sheer stupidity of it all," Perry said.

Still, he added, the Masilotti case hit hard. "There's the sense that the whole structure is threatened. From a community perspective, it will be a much better place when the final curtain drops."

County probes 'Posse' land deal in village

By Mitra Malek , Lester J. Davis

Palm Beach Post Staff Writers

Saturday, November 04, 2006

WEST PALM BEACH — County Administrator Robert Weisman is investigating the sale of the so-called "Posse" property to Bruce Rendina, a close friend of former County Commission Chairman Tony Masilotti.

Weisman said that a story in Friday's Palm Beach Post about Masilotti's involvement with the deal made clear the need to fully review how Rendina Cos. won the right to buy the 10 acres from the county and develop it.

"You have this hanging out there," Weisman said. "It raises questions about whether the land sale was properly handled or inappropriately influenced by Masilotti."

Masilotti on Friday surrendered to federal authorities on corruption charges stemming from secret land deals that earned him millions of dollars, including the Posse property. According to the grand jury, Rendina gave Masilotti and his family $100,000 worth of free trips and gifts.

A committee that included two county employees and Royal Palm Beach Village Manager David Farber in 2003 chose Rendina's plan to build office and commercial space at the corner of State Road'7 and Belvedere Road. Royal Palm Beach was expected to annex the land at a future date.

On a motion by Masilotti in January 2004, the county commission awarded the property to Rendina.

Rendina won the bid at $2.8 million, when another developer offered to pay the county $3.6 million for the land. Masilotti inserted Farber onto the selection committee, but bidders were told county employees would fill those ranks. Farber played a key role in Rendina Cos. winning because he gave the highest-bidding proposal a zero, elevating Rendina's rank when the committee averaged its scores.

"Why would this outsider have veto power by giving zero points?" County Commissioner Mary McCarty said. "That's really sabotaging the person who was going to give us $1 million more."

Farber says that at no time during his stint on the selection committee did he feel pressured by Masilotti to award the deal to Rendina.

McCarty, who has long been at odds with Masilotti, wants to know why planning consultant Kilday & Associates assisted with the evaluation when the firm was a registered lobbyist for Rendina Cos.

Weisman on Friday asked Palm Beach County's division of real estate director Ross Hering, who also sat on the selection committee, for the following:

• A narrative describing any and all ways Masilotti influenced the process.

• How each of the committee members voted and explanation of why the high bid wasn't accepted.

• How Farber's participation did or didn't affect the process.

• Copies of backup material for the vote.

• Examples of how similar processes worked with other properties.

County attorneys are researching whether it's legal to reconsider the land votes. Weisman said it's not unusual for the county to work with cities.

"You can get attacked for ignoring them," Weisman said.

Farber said he didn't think twice about Masilotti asking him to join the committee. "I took the job very seriously," Farber said. "I had no reason to believe there were any irregularities with the decision."

Farber said he supported Rendina because the developer's plan would generate the least amount of traffic of the proposals. He rated the $3.6 million offer, from Faison Capital Development, zero because it included 128 homes, and village officials had said they wouldn't support a plan that included housing.

"Mr. Rendina's bid was the one that made the best sense for the village," Farber said.

Village officials say they are undeterred by the land deal investigation.

"As far as I'm concerned we have the best manager in the county," Councilwoman Barbara Isenberg said.

Councilman Matty Mattioli, who pursued Farber to fill the village manager post over a decade ago, said that he's standing by him.

"There's only one of him (Farber) and they're not making any more like him," Mattioli said.

Consumers, beware McCollum

A St. Pete Times Editorial
Published November 4, 2006

Bill McCollum, the Republican candidate for state attorney general, is a lobbyist for big business and spent much of his earlier congressional career supporting anticonsumer legislation that would benefit banks, insurance companies and the credit card industry. For him to claim now that he would serve the interests of Florida consumers more so than his opponent, Walter "Skip" Campbell, is quite the 11th-hour conversion.

McCollum would like to ignore the record he compiled over his 20 years in Congress. His campaign Web site doesn't even mention some of McCollum's most conspicuous congressional priorities, such as his aggressive attempt to make it harder for people to declare bankruptcy and get out of debt or his support for breaking down privacy barriers and allowing large banks and insurance companies to share the personal information of their customers without consent.

The most recent revelation is that McCollum, while in Congress, tried to protect pharmaceutical companies from allegations of Medicaid and Medicare fraud by partially immunizing them from the False Claims Act. Later, McCollum was hired as a lobbyist for AstraZeneca, one of the drug companies under investigation. McCollum says he will prosecute fraud, even if it involves one of his former clients, but there is little reason to trust his assurances.

McCollum's record in Congress vacillates between carrying the water for corporate interests, which rewarded him with lavish campaign contributions, and devising ways to undermine civil rights and civil liberties.

McCollum introduced a bill that would give law enforcement the ability to conduct illegal searches of American homes as long as they did so in good faith. It would have eroded our Fourth Amendment right to be protected against unreasonable searches. Now he wants to be in charge of upholding the constitutional rights of Floridians. Again, can he be trusted?

Campbell, McCollum's opponent, is not a perfect candidate. Serious questions have been raised about Campbell's candor regarding his record in the Terri Schiavo case. But on balance, Campbell would make a superior attorney general.

The attacks against Campbell coming from McCollum and his supporters are almost laughable. Campbell was a leader in the Legislature trying to rein in the abusive lending practices of payday loan companies; yet McCollum tries to paint Campbell as a pawn of that industry. Funny thing, it is McCollum and not Campbell who has benefited most from payday loan industry dollars, albeit with money funneled indirectly to groups supporting McCollum's campaign.

There is an intriguing money trail leading from the payday loan industry to a group named the Republican State Leadership Committee to an organization that ran anti-Campbell radio ads.

Nearly $100,000 in contributions to the RSLC in 2006 can be traced back to businesses and other interests associated with the payday loan industry, including a $45,000 contribution from the Community Financial Services Association - the industry's trade group. Then the RSLC turned around and contributed more than $400,000 to Citizens Speaking Out, a group that broadcast misleading ads claiming that Campbell sold out consumers by allowing exorbitant interest on payday loans.

It doesn't get much slimier than that. In no statewide race is the choice clearer.

Deed Woes Put Man At 'Wit's End'

By JULIA FERRANTE The Tampa Tribune

Published: Nov 4, 2006

NEW PORT RICHEY - William Magee didn't know how long he would live with a heart condition that sometimes makes it difficult to breathe. He expected his next home would be his last, and he wanted to keep his children from fighting over the estate when the time came.

So in 2000, when Magee moved from Tampa to a three-bedroom house in Fairway Springs in Pasco County, he sought advice from an attorney, he said. The attorney recommended Magee put the home in his sons' names. Magee paid cash for the house and listed sons Joseph and John on the property deed. He also claimed a $25,000 homestead exemption, a tax break for full-time residents, in Joseph's name.

Six years later, circumstances have changed, and Magee, now 73, finds himself fighting the county to keep his taxes from doubling.

Pasco County Property Appraiser Mike Wells said the case is an unusual one, but also an unfortunate example of "homebuyer beware."

The trouble began for Magee a year ago, when he learned that his son, Joseph, intended to become a full-time resident of New Jersey, thus making him ineligible for a homestead exemption.

State law limits yearly property tax assessment increases for those who qualify for homestead exemptions. Once the home is sold or the homesteader name changes, however, a new assessment is made, and the property owner is subject to pay taxes at the current market value.

Magee again sought advice from the property appraiser's office, he said, and was told he could swap his name for Joseph's and still be eligible for the tax break. Wells said that information was incorrect, and his staff must not have been told Joseph was the homesteader.

Magee received an estimated tax bill in August showing the value of his 1,677-square-foot house had jumped from $102,471 last year, to $184,166 this year - minus a $25,000 homestead exemption. Estimated county, school and other taxes doubled from $1,290 to $2,463. His homeowners insurance soared from $1,074 to $1,261.

"I can't afford my homeowners insurance. I had to cancel it," Magee said. "Something's got to give. I'm at my wit's end."

Officials Say Their Hands Tied

Magee wrote to state Sen. Mike Fasano, R-New Port Richey, who, in turn, wrote a letter to Wells.

Wells wrote back that Magee had a hearing scheduled on the matter, but the complicating factor was that the original homestead qualifier, Joseph Magee, "discontinued his address" in 2005. That triggered a new assessment and reset the clock on the homestead exemption. The letter said there were no "extenuating circumstances that would cause such action to be reversed."

In most cases of ownership change, a new assessment is triggered according to state law, said Renee Watters, a spokeswoman for the Florida Department of Revenue.

What Magee should have done was to list his name on the property deed when he purchased the house and to claim the homestead exemption in his own name, Wells said. Had he done that, Magee could have removed from or added to any other names on the property deed without penalty, according to a law enacted last year.

"So long as the homesteader is there, it doesn't make any difference," Wells said. "What's key here is that you stay in the house, and it's still your homestead. Those are the rules."

Magee said he was afraid to put his name on the property deed because he did not want his three sons and daughter to fight over his estate. A will may have taken care of that, but Magee feared his daughter, from whom he is estranged, may contest his wishes.

Son John claims a homestead exemption in Pasco and thus was ineligible.

"I feel bad for this man's situation, but it's an error he committed," Wells said. "His name should have been on that deed, and he should have been a homestead qualifier &hellip unfortunately, there's not a lot I can do for him."

The property appraiser's office reviews complaints about property assessments each year and sometimes makes adjustments, Wells said.

Special Magistrate Hearing

In some cases, assessments are reduced to reflect a costly home repair or poor property sales because of proximity to a highway. If the issues cannot be resolved, the cases proceed to a hearing before a special magistrate, who makes a recommendation to a panel of county commissioners and school board members called the Value Adjustment Board.

The property appraiser must provide to the petitioner information that will be presented in a hearing within a certain time period, much like information must be provided in court cases.

Pasco County assessed more than 300,000 properties this year, of which about 1,000 were contested, Wells said. That's a slight increase over previous years, most likely due to rapidly rising assessments. Of those, 693 petitioners filed for late homestead exemptions, and most were granted. Another 108 petitioners claimed they were unduly denied homestead exemptions; half prevailed. The appraiser also received 178 petitions, including Magee's, contesting home values. Of those, 42 resolved their concerns or withdrew their petitions.

Magee hopes he will be able to convince a magistrate that his case is a special one. He bought his house for $108,000 and invested another $35,000 to renovate it, thinking the home would be his last.

"When I bought it, it was in very bad shape," Magee said. "I gutted it and totally renovated it. I plan to die here. That's what has got me so upset."

He argues that the substitution of his name for Joseph's was a formality and that no money changed hands.

'Caught In The Wheels'

A retired automobile business consultant and a Korean War veteran, Magee lives on a tight budget. He receives $1,086 per month in Social Security benefits, and that is about the extent of his income.

He moved from Tampa to a smaller house in Pasco to save money on property taxes and insurance. Yearly property taxes were about $900 when he moved to the Carrollwood area in 1986 and about $2,500 when he left.

"You talk about getting caught in the wheels of the wagon," Magee said. "This is everything I need. I'd love to stay here."

Even if Magee wanted to move, he surmises that with the downturn in the real estate market and skyrocketing insurance premiums selling his house would be difficult.

"How can I move?" he said. "Did you see all the houses for sale in here?"

HOMESTEAD EXEMPTIONS

For information about homestead exemptions, call the Pasco County Property Appraiser's Office at:

Dade City: (352) 521-4433

Wesley Chapel: (813) 929-1390

Land O' Lakes: (813) 929-1280

Gulf Harbors: (727) 847-8151

New Port Richey: (727) 847-8151

Reporter Julia Ferrante can be reached at (813) 948-4220 or jferrante@tampatrib.com.

Running on slower growth

By PATRICK WHITTLE

patrick.whittle@heraldtribune.com

VENICE -- Ernest Zavodnyik knows he has to paint Venice as a city growing out of control if he has a chance to become the newest City Council member.

His odds aren't good. His opponent, incumbent John Simmonds, has 16 years of elected office experience to Zavodnyik's zero. Simmonds has the backing of the mayor, every City Council member, and a powerful local political action committee that has a history of endorsing winning candidates.

Zavodnyik's status as a newcomer and relative unknown -- he moved to Venice three years ago -- does not help. Earlier this year, he lost a state House primary by more than 60 percentage points. But Zavodnyik knows growth is a hot issue, especially in a city that has grown by more than 4,000 residents and 2,700 acres in recent years. He hopes to tap votes from Venice residents who have voiced misgivings about plans for more than 4,000 homes on East Laurel Road.

Zavodnyik points to a Sarasota County poll that shows population growth and new development as the issues that most concern residents. He's encouraged by the successful candidacy of Joe Barbetta, who won a County Commission primary on the strength of a slow-growth platform.

So far, Zavodnyik has succeeded in getting Simmonds talking about growth issues. His candidacy illustrates that winning the growth debate is key even for a long shot candidate in a local race.

"Clearly ... voters are very concerned about it," he said. "They are looking to say 'Let's slow this thing down and see where we are at.' Many people feel that it's not sustainable."

Zavodnyik's slow-growth approach isn't just empty criticism of a City Council he believes has jeopardized Venice's environment and small-town charm. He has proposed a host of solutions, including a city-wide review of Venice's policies to assess which practices are environmentally friendly. He thinks the city could benefit from utilizing hybrid-gas vehicles and enacting fertilizer restrictions.

Some residents are listening. Two citizens groups, the Venice Taxpayers League and the Venice Neighborhoods Coalition, have endorsed Zavodnyik. So has the Sierra Club.

Sue Lang, president of the neighborhoods alliance, believes her group speaks for the majority of residents when members say they don't want to see Venice altered by expanding boundaries and an exploding population.

"We feel that Ernie has a commitment to really do something about the wrong type of growth that's been going on here," Lang said. "What's been going on here is what some housing developers think they can make bucks on."

Uphill battle

Clad in a blue checkered shirt, pleated pants, loafers and socks that straddle the line between purple and brown, Zavodnyik tries to flag down early voters outside a Sarasota County administration building.

The grass around Zavodnyik is peppered with political signs, including a few for David Shapiro, the state House candidate who clobbered him in the September primary. Most passers-by show little intention of talking to the few pols hocking campaign literature. Some walk past Zavodnyik and engage a woman who is handing out fliers about a charter amendment concerning paper ballots.

One man stops and asks why he should vote for Zavodnyik. He gets an answer immediately.

"Problems with growth," Zavodnyik answers, before explaining how the man's property taxes and insurance are tied to growth and development. Indeed, Zavodnyik has used growth as an entree into debates about the environment, infrastructure and taxes. But beyond the local issues, he bears the stripes of a traditional Democrat.

Changing the discourse

Zavodnyik's personal politics were heavily influenced by Franklin Delano Roosevelt's New Deal. He also counts Robert F. Kennedy and Eugene McCarthy as inspirational figures.

The son of an immigrant coal miner from Hungary, Zavodnyik grew up in West Virginia. He earned his undergraduate and law degrees at the University of Notre Dame and served on the staff of the American Bar Association in Chicago for more than 20 years.

Zavodnyik touts his record of working with Chicago's city government to improve the quality of life for families.

He cites his efforts to rehabilitate run-down apartment housing.

Locally, he thinks Venice needs to make strides to prepare for the arrival of more working families, and believes population growth will shape public education and affordable housing.

Zavodnyik knows he might not wrestle the City Council seat from Simmonds. But if nothing else, he believes he's laid groundwork for future candidates to push for a City Council that enacts growth controls.

"Whether I win this race or lose it, next time around there are going to be a greater number of candidates that take on the incumbents," he said. "If nothing else, we started a dialogue about what's going on."

Most seafood may be gone by 2048, study finds

Almost 30 percent of edible species have 'collapsed' from overfishing, toxins

STAFF AND WIRE REPORTS

Ninety percent of the fish and shellfish species that are hauled from the ocean to feed people worldwide may be gone by 2048, according to a report in today's edition of the journal Science.

Even now, 29 percent of those species have "collapsed," meaning a 90 percent decline in the amount being fished from the sea, says Boris Worm, lead author and a professor of marine conservation biology at Dalhousie University in Halifax, Canada.

"It is a very clear trend, and it is accelerating," Worm says. The paper represents four years of work by an international team of researchers at various universities who analyzed oceans species diversity during the past 1,000 years.

The report held no surprises for Jon Shenker, associate professor of marine biology at Florida Tech in Melbourne. "Very few of our fisheries stock are being managed efficiently," said Shenker. "But with proper attention it might be possible to get these stocks back."

Striped bass, he noted, have made a comeback in New England and the mid-Atlantic states.

Overfishing is a big part of the problem.

"Every year it's estimated that human beings remove 150 million metric tons of life from the seas," says Joshua Reichert, environment-program director at Pew Charitable Trusts in Philadelphia.

But fishing isn't the only problem, the report states. Destruction of coastal areas, estuaries and reefs by dredging, building and pollution destroys nursery habitats for young fish. Global warming and the changes in water temperature and salinity are thought to play a role.

As marine species disappear, the ability of others to survive is further harmed by the drop in the ocean's overall productivity and stability, the researchers found.

Some Brevard County fishermen are skeptical about the study.

"The claim seems astounding," said Ron Rincones, retired charter boat captain who lives in Valkaria. "I know they are doing lots of things to protect stock and over-fishing."

Fisheries management in the rest of the world needs to be brought up to standards used in the United States, added Jerry Sansom, executive director of the Organized Fishermen of Florida - a statewide organization of commercial fishermen based in Cocoa.

"Most fishing is at sustainable levels," Sansom said. "But given the level of fisheries management in the rest of the world, we might not be too far off from what the study is predicting."

Fish and seafood are key protein sources for a world that's expected to add another 3 billion people by 2050. But it's also problem for people who don't eat fish. Sixty percent of Americans live within 60 miles of a coast. Declines in marine biodiversity can:

- Increase coastal flooding because of loss of floodplains and erosion control provided by the wetlands, reefs and underwater vegetation that have a symbiotic relationship with marine life.

- Reduce water quality by destroying the plankton, plants and shellfish that are the ocean's biological filtering ability. A single oyster, for example, can filter 50 gallons of water a day.

- Increase beach closures because of harmful algae blooms, such as red tide, facilitated by the diminished filtering.

The good news is that it's not too late to turn this around, Worm said. When marine ecosystems are protected, the trend can be reversed, he says. Scientists studied 48 areas worldwide that have been safeguarded and report dramatic recoveries in the variety of species and stability of the ecosystem.

"We know how to do this. But it must be done soon," he said. "With each species that is lost, the opportunity for the system to repair itself is diminished. The oceans define our planet, and their fate may to a large extent determine our fate, now and in the future."
Staff writer Kaustuv Basu contributed to this report.

Support for wind power picking up speed

By Gary Nurenberg
CNN

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- You don't have to be in the path of a hurricane to understand the power of wind.

While such storms can cause death and destruction, there is a growing conviction that wind can help fill the country's energy needs.

Wind advocates see modern turbines and wind farms as the metaphorical pot of gold at the end of the rainbow.

"I recognize the importance of wind power," President Bush said in February. "It's possible we could generate up to 20 percent of our electricity needs through wind."

That would be a huge jump from the 1 percent of power wind generates this year, according to figures from the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA).

"There's as much energy within our wind resource as there is in a Saudi oil reserve, and the wind resource is not depleted over time," says AWEA executive director Randall Swisher.

According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, U.S. wind energy consumption more than doubled between 2000 and 2004, from 57 trillion Btus to 143 trillion.

The amount of total installed wind capacity also grew, from 10 megawatts in 1981 to more than 10,000 by August 2006 -- enough to power more than 2.5 million homes on a typical day, according to AWEA.

As advocates urge the rapid construction of new wind farms, skeptics want a more cautious approach.

"We don't know enough at this point, nor do we have enough unbiased studies out there to evaluate what the impacts are," says Lisa Linowes of the Industrial Wind Action Group.

Plans to build a wind farm off Cape Cod, Massachusetts, have met with strong opposition from critics, who say the big wind turbines are ugly, kill birds and bats and damage property values.

"It's the proper siting and the proper review of these facilities," Linowes said. "And if we can see to it that that's happening, I think you would see opposition to wind drop off."

Wind has become an additional crop for Midwestern farmers who put turbines on their land and sell electricity to power companies.

My Organic Market -- MOM's -- in suburban Washington, D.C., is one of a growing number of businesses that get electricity from wind -- and approval from customers.

Using wind, MOM's may pay 2 or 3 percent more for electricity now, but in a typical contract the price is fixed -- which customers say saves them money in the long run against fluctuating energy costs.

Similarly, Whole Foods Market decided in January to use wind for all of its power -- making the Austin, Texas-based supermarket chain the largest buyer of wind energy in the nation, according to Time magazine.

The second largest is Vail Resorts Inc., a Colorado ski and recreation company that recently said it would also buy all of its power from wind farms.

To do so, the companies buy "wind power credits" from Boulder, Colorado-based Renewable Choice Energy, which in turn pays wind farms across the country to produce electricity.

The credits and wind power created offset the actual energy the companies use. Individuals can sign up for similar plans.

While wind credits are becoming popular, the question now is whether the industry can sell itself as a viable alternative to more conventional means of power generation over the long term.

"This industry has gone from a science project to something that is viable, on a utility scale, in the past five or 10 years," Steve Zwolinski, president of GE Wind Energy, told Fortune magazine last year.

"Will it get to 50 percent (of total energy use) in the U.S.? Probably not," Zwolinski said. "But will it get to 10 percent, 15 percent long-term, maybe a little more in the Midwestern states that are wind rich? Yes, I think it can."

Building America's State Parks

By MICAH DYAL
mdyal@highlandstoday.com

SEBRING — It was the midst of the Great Depression, and Oliver Malcolm was a tall and lanky teenage farm boy living in Georgia.

It was a time of soup lines, widespread unemployment and deep despair, he recalled.

Wanting to escape, the 19-year-old fled to Miami in 1936 to live with his aunt – only to find he couldn’t run from the Great Depression in the Sunshine State, either.

“Old man Depression was there too,” he said.

With nowhere left to run, he enlisted in the Civilian Conservation Corps and was sent to work in Sebring at today’s Highlands Hammock State Park. He spent two years removing trees to build cabins, pave roads and construct bridges.

“It was the best two years of my life,” he recalled. “The CCC paid for our living expenses, clothing, medical, and on top of that, gave us money for working.”

The CCC was a work and relief program through which young, unemployed men worked on conservation projects in rural areas for $1 a day. They worked 40 hours a week and were paid $30 a month, with the requirement that $25 of that be sent home to family.

Back then, it would take nearly 30 “boys” to remove a single pine tree. Machinery to do work that we take for granted was not an option then.

But the arduous labor made a man out of a boy, Malcolm said.

“When I first started I weighed only 127 pounds and had a 27-inch waist. That Christmas I went home had the same waist size but weighed 156 pounds – all muscle.”

When people talk about America’s Greatest Generation, the work of the CCC is usually neglected but from 1935 to 1942, millions of young men moved away from their homes to build today’s parks.

Now, 90, Malcolm is among fewer than 500,000 living CCC veterans of the 3 million who built America’s state and national parks, forests, bridges, dams, fish hatcheries, fire towers, roads and lakes between 1933 and 1942.

The era of the CCC is a time the surviving former members of Camp 453 in Highlands Hammock State Park remember well, even as America’s subsequent generations have all but forgotten, or never knew about those desperate times in history.

Normally, about 200 men were located at the camp at any given time. They are still proud of the work they did for their families and their country.

He said they were stationed in log cabins that surrounded Little Lake Jackson near Harder Hall, a hotel he refered to as an old casino. He said the boys would be taken by five or six U.S. Army trucks to the park five days a week.

On Thursday, the 90-year-old drove alone from his home in Douglas, Ga., to Sebring in time for the 21st annual CCC Festival at Highlands Hammock State Park. On Saturday, he will be joined by more than 30 of his fellow CCC friends at the park. Each year, the national reunion celebrates the CCC anniversary.

This year, Malcolm has brought along with him a valuable piece of local history – the 1937 Annual of the CCC Camp 453, the annual of Highlands Hammock State Park. Malcolm happened to come across the old yearbook a few years ago in an old box.

Malcolm will be donating his annual this weekend to the museum at Highlands Hammock State Park for all visitors to see.

“I promised the park a few years ago that I would donate the book to the park,” he said. “From what I know, it’s the only known annual of Highlands Hammock State Park.”

Clouds in this Sky offer no silver lining

A Times Editorial
Published November 2, 2006

Land scams have been a part of Florida lore since the bad old days of slick salespeople selling swampland to unsuspecting Yankees in the 1920s. Greed and deceit never go out of style, and so we have a similar land scandal of immense proportions blossoming in Citrus Springs.

At least three law enforcement agencies are investigating an outfit called Sky Development Group of Miami, which is suspected of having ripped off numerous investors and prospective homeowners of millions of dollars.

Authorities this week uncovered records showing that Sky sold numerous lots it did not own to an Orlando company, the first in what may be a long list of such fraudulent transactions. Sky had nearly 1,000 transactions in Citrus Springs alone, records show.

Factor in the people who are still waiting for Sky Construction to finish building their homes and the people who dealt with the All Title and Trust Company, owned by a principal of Sky Development, and the list of victims just keeps growing.

As investigators peel back the layers of this complicated case, more and more unsavory revelations are emerging, including the hint that this may be an organized scheme with possible connections to the Russian mob. The two main principals, Natalia and Victor Wolf, have skipped town, maybe even the country.

All of which will make the challenge of law enforcement to bring the culprits to justice that much tougher.

If this, indeed, was a premeditated scam, then the con men and women involved may be some of the most brazen crooks to have ever set their sights on Citrus County.

Sky Development arrived more than a year ago with banners flying and handshakes all around. The moment was tailor-made for such a venture, at the height of the real estate boom. Citrus Springs was an inviting target, with scores of long-neglected lots fetching prices exponentially higher than their original costs.

Everyone, it seems, had dollar signs in their eyes, clouding their judgment and driving them to make speculative bets they might otherwise have resisted. Like all get-rich-quick schemes, this one required willing buyers as well as wicked sellers, and there was no shortage of either.

As the Citrus County Sheriff's Office, the FBI and other law enforcement agencies unravel this mystery and try to find some justice for the victims, people everywhere should pay attention. This should serve as a cautionary tale to anyone looking to make a killing in the turbulent real estate market.

It should also serve as a wake-up call to government agencies, real estate professionals and those in related fields, such as title companies, that handle these transactions. Hindsight is likely to reveal red flags that should have been noticed when the bogus sales were being recorded. And if not, then this case shows that greater arm's-length oversight is needed.

When the market was red hot and the dollars were flying, many people threw caution to the wind and tried to catch the wave. Now, as the exuberance ebbs, the dark side to the boom is being revealed in the form of skyrocketing property taxes, mortgage foreclosures - and what may turn out to be the largest land scam in Citrus County's history.

Allstate rate hike request challenged

By TOM ZUCCO, Times Staff Writer
Published November 3, 2006

State regulators had reviewed Allstate Floridian's rate increase request and were ready to pounce. Thursday afternoon in Tallahassee, they got their chance.

In one of the most contentious rate hearings for a major insurer in recent memory, actuaries and attorneys from the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation grilled Allstate officials for more than three hours about justifying a double-digit increase.

Regulators said later that many of the answers they got were incomplete or vague and that they will have to go at it again.

Allstate Floridian and Allstate Floridian Indemnity are seeking average statewide increases of 22.5 and 33.2 percent, respectively, for homeowners policies.

But in some areas, the hikes could be as high as 73.5 percent. In parts of Pinellas and Pasco counties, rates could rise as much as 70.4 percent.

Homeowners in Florida have faced higher rate increase requests than what Allstate proposes, most notably a 71.5 percent average statewide increase by Nationwide that was denied last month, and a 52.7 percent increase by State Farm that was approved in July.

But Allstate differs in that it has dramatically cut back the number of homes it insures. Once the second-largest insurer in the state behind State Farm, Allstate has canceled about 240,000 policies since the 2004 hurricane season, leaving the company with about 390,000 policies. Moreover, Allstate's request comes on top of a 16 percent average increase granted last year.

Allstate officials said there are no immediate plans for cuts, but warned that unless they get rate relief to cover higher reinsurance costs, the Florida company could become insolvent.

In formulating their request, Allstate officials also cited a computer model they used that predicted a series of more active hurricane seasons.

By law, insurance companies cannot raise rates based on past losses. They can, however, seek higher premiums based on projections of future losses.

From the start Thursday, regulators tore into Allstate's plan.

Even before the questioning began, George Grawe, Allstate Floridian's general counsel, acknowledged his company would submit an amended filing that would lower the rate.

Regulators gave Allstate until noon Monday to amend its filing.

However, Allstate didn't back off the methodology for putting its request together, giving regulators plenty to pick apart.

At one point during the hearing, OIR general counsel Steve Parton asked Allstate's senior actuary, Ryan Michel, about the computer model the company used to determine its rates. By law, the models used must be approved by the state.

Parton: "The model is out of date, is it not? Aren't you, as an actuary, supposed to understand the law?

Michel: "I rely on our legal advice."

Another exchange between OIR actuary Bob Lee and Allstate regional manager Bonnie Gill resembled a courtroom showdown:

Lee: "You support a 75 percent cap on premiums, but there's no support here. Why?"

Gill: "We chose that judgmentally."

Lee: "But how did you arrive at it?"

Gill: "Purely judgment."

Lee: "You didn't do any fiscal testing other than it looked like a good number?"

Gill: "It had a lot to do with the 2005 filing. 75 percent was the maximum last time, so we chose that again."

When it was over, Parton characterized Allstate's performance this way:

"Amongst the numerous shortcomings in this filing, Allstate is asking to charge for reinsurance that it has not yet purchased; it is relying on an outdated hurricane model which is not approved and feeding it outdated data; it seeks to use any unexpected gains produced by policyholder premiums to further compensate its agents rather than compensate policyholders; and it says its expense ratio has increased despite the fact it has cut 240,000 policies."

OIR spokesman Bob Lotane said regulators were most frustrated with Allstate's "lack of support in the filing and the inability to answer questions about that lack of support.

"They promised to provide us with many of the things they have not been providing us with." Lotane added. "But we have until Nov. 28th to act on the filing. If not, it is automatically approved, and we're not going to let that happen."

In all, Thursday was not a good day for the insurance industry. Earlier in the day, OIR added United Services Automobile Association to the list of companies that has been denied a rate request.

Lotane said the increased number of rate hike denials are not an indication regulators are cracking down on insurance companies amid a growing public outcry and a pending election. "If anything," he said, "we're getting more filings that just are not supportive."

Tom Zucco can be reached at zucco@sptimes.com or (727) 893-8247.

Neighbors worry development may worsen flooding problem

CHUIN-WEI YAP
Published November 3, 2006

WESLEY CHAPEL - As the 611-acre Grantham Ranch development heads to the Planning Commission on Monday, neighbors are alarmed that it may worsen flooding in their old neighborhood.

Grantham Ranch, proposed by the developer DR Horton, envisions 474 homes straddling Old Pasco Road just north of Overpass Road. The development sits just west of Interstate 75.

It also sits in sensitive flood zones.

Neighbors there, especially in the old Wesley Chapel neighborhoods of Saddlewood and Quail Hollow, are afraid that the new development would tip a flood-prone area over the environmental edge.

"Our property ... was mainly dry until three years ago," Heidi Goss and Suzanne Chandler wrote. "Since then, the property has been continuously flooded. Any new development in this area will only worsen the flooding problems."

With every new development, stormwater runoff is channeled toward these old neighborhoods with ever greater destructive intensity, resident Jennifer Seney told officials.

Residents wrote at least seven letters to the county, warning that the neighborhood has already seen flooding for the past several years.

Officials have tried to allay their fears.

The developer met at least three times with residents earlier this year.

After Horton got its first round of official approval in September, county engineer Jim Widman recommended strengthening the official permit to include conditions that would require Horton to design drainage to higher-than-normal standards.

Horton had also tried to address environmental conservation needs by clustering single-family homes on one side of Old Pasco Road. The move preserves open space on the western edge of the property.

The Development Review Committee approved the proposal in September, after rebuffing an earlier incarnation of the proposal in July 2005 when the developer sought a land use amendment to put more than 1,400 homes on the property. The county committee said no.

If the Planning Commission agrees to its latest proposal, it is scheduled to head to the County Commission on Dec. 5.

Chuin-Wei Yap covers growth and development in Pasco County. He can be reached at 813909-4613 or cyap@sptimes.com.

Ethics complaint filed on Jacksonville mayor

The Associated Press

TALLAHASSEE - A state ethics complaint has been filed against Jacksonville's mayor, accusing him of trying to boost the value of properties tied to his family by opposing efforts to give a former jet base back to the Navy.

Mayor John Peyton called the allegations "outrageous and totally without merit."

The complaint was filed Wednesday, said Richard Hoffman, a supporter of Vote Jacksonville, a group that wants the Navy to return to Cecil Field. It says Gate Petroleum Co., in which Peyton's family has a controlling interest, would benefit if the former Jacksonville base remains a business park.

"I'm suggesting that there are some disclosure issues here that would help the city of Jacksonville understand his motivations. This is just very curious to me," Hoffman said.

Peyton said Gate Petroleum's property holdings are not a factor. He initially supported the plan to reopen the Jacksonville base, but withdrew his support after those living near the base opposed it. "I was advocating for the jet base in August, and Gate owned the property then. That hasn't changed. I've been very diligent, and this is nothing short of a last-ditch campaign gimmick," he said.

Ethics complaints are confidential while under investigation, and under state law the commission is not even allowed to acknowledge receipt of a complaint.

Vote Jacksonville started a petition drive to have voters on Tuesday reverse the city's decision. It claimed the reopening of Cecil Field would bring more jobs to the city than using the former base as a commercial and industrial center.

The Navy base closed in 1999, but the Base Alignment and Closure Commission recommended that it should be reopened because of encroachment problems at Oceana Naval Air Station in Virginia.

High Springs Tree Board works to protect city's tree population

By Christa Desrets
Herald Writer

HIGH SPRINGS – High Springs resident Lys Burden is now part of a High Springs group that fights to protect the very thing that caused tragedy in her family three years ago.

In 2003, Burden’s mother, Rae Brant, died after seven months of medical complications that were from a tree that had fallen on her.

The tree, which was mostly on city-owned property, fell after a storm left its branches heavy with rain. Although it was not on the city’s list of potentially hazardous trees, the giant Laurel Oak tree was mostly rotted through.

But now, Burden said, she can help prevent such events from happening again.

The recently appointed High Springs Tree Board is charged with the duty of creating a tree plan that would call for the replacement of trees that tend to rot and become dangerous.

The plan, which the board has until mid-next-year to complete, also will include amendments to the city’s comprehensive plan.

If adopted by the city commission, the plan would provide more specific regulations on how many trees need to be included in certain zoning classifications, what trees can and cannot be cut down without a permit, how much shade should be in downtown areas and how the city should provide for the health, longevity and maintenance of trees on public property.

City Planner Christian Popoli said that such a plan would make enforcement of tree-related code issues much more effective because the city will have clearer guidelines to work around.

“You’re actually giving us the tools to do our jobs better,” he told the board.

But to get to that point, the board, which had its third meeting Oct. 10, has a lot of work and research ahead.

Sue Weller, chair of the board, said that one of the most important aspects of getting organized will be coordinating with other city departments that deal with trees.

The parks and recreation department, public works department and the building, planning and codes department all work with trees in some aspects of their work.

High Springs Public Works Director LaVerne Hodge said that her department is in charge of the maintenance and removal of hazardous trees, as well as granting permits for residents who want to remove a tree.

But the department has done more removal of trees than planting of trees, she said. And she already has plans this year for the removal of about 30 city trees that are either dead, fallen, rotting, hollow, diseased or otherwise dangerous.

Replacement trees are in the plan, she said, but perhaps not as many as the number of trees that will be removed.

Joanne Tremblay, vice chair of the board, said that one of the Tree Board’s first priorities should be completing an inventory of city trees and working on public awareness on why trees are so important to the city.

Once that inventory is taken, the board can implement a tree planting program, beginning with the “gateways” or entrances to the city, for enhancing tree growth.

Burden, the third member of the board, said that trees are vital to the city because of the positive environment that they create.

Cities with a healthy tree population are more likely to attract more visitors and new residents and businesses, she said, while also keeping down heating and air conditioning costs for the current residents.

Tree Board members also said they were interested in creating more tree-oriented events for the city.

Both statewide and national Arbor Days should be celebrated with events such as tree contests and walking tours, they said, that could be coordinated through the High Springs Farmer's Market.

Weller said that she hopes her work with the Tree Board will help make the city more attractive and bring more people to the area.

As a former resident of South Florida, she said, she doesn’t want to see the High Springs area become as barren as that of her former home.

“This city needs to pay attention to its environment,” she said. “There needs to be a tree canopy.”

Burden said that the city had always tried to maintain its canopy but didn’t always go about that process in the best way.

After a devastating hurricane struck the area in the 1930s, she said, the city had planted fast growing Laurel Oak trees, the same kind that fell on her mother and are known to commonly rot out, to replace all those that had been destroyed in the storm.

But now those trees are reaching the end of their life-cycles, she said, and the city is left with many dangerous trees that should be replaced.

“I love trees, just like my mother did,” she said, adding that her work with the tree board was, in a way, a tribute to her mother. “I just don’t want to see that happen to anyone else.”

Cypress Creek Mall Hearing Set For March

By KEVIN WIATROWSKI The Tampa Tribune

Published: Nov 2, 2006

WESLEY CHAPEL - Bob and Shirley Jones will get their chance in March to challenge plans to build the Cypress Creek Town Center in their back yard.

The state Department of Administrative Hearings has set March 6 to open six days of arguments challenging the Southwest Florida Water Management District's review of the regional mall complex. The hearing will be at Swiftmud's Tampa office.

Cleveland-based Richard E. Jacobs Group plans to build the town center on 510 acres straddling State Road 56 west of Interstate 75. Plans call for a 1.3-million-square-foot "Main Street"-style mall, 1.5 million square feet of retail space, 420,000 square feet of offices and 700 hotel rooms.

Jacobs spokesman Bill Fullington on Wednesday said repeated legal challenges have pushed the planned opening into 2008.

"This is the third attempt to use the legal system to block this project," Fullington said. "We're confident we'll prevail."

If built, Cypress Creek Town Center would include the second-largest mall in the Tampa area, just behind University Mall. Jacobs plans to draw shoppers from most of Pasco County and from University Mall and Westfield Citrus Park mall in Hillsborough County.

Jacobs' property lies on the north bank of Cypress Creek, an Outstanding Florida Water and a contributor - via the Hillsborough River - to Tampa's drinking water.

Jacobs expects to fill 67.5 acres of wetlands for its project. That proposal remains under review by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which oversees wetlands linked to surface waters.

Environmentalists argue the mall will ruin the creek. Mall officials say they'll take extensive precautions to prevent that.

Swiftmud appeared ready in September to approve the mall's development permit. The permit was put on hold after the Joneses, whose land backs up to the mall site across the creek, filed their last-minute challenge.

The Joneses are the only residents of Cypress Creek Road to challenge the mall. Several of their neighbors have drafted plans to develop their land should the mall clear its hurdles.

A previous 6th Circuit Court suit and appeal failed when judges ruled the Joneses lacked standing to challenge the county's rezoning of the mall site.

In the pending challenge, the Joneses say Jacobs didn't do enough to reduce its environmental effects.

"The goal would be to have the water management district apply their rules to have the applicant minimize its impacts," said Marcy LaHart, one of two attorneys representing the couple.

The Joneses' lead attorney, Ralf Brookes, has highlighted Jacobs' refusal to condense acres of asphalt into a parking garage. Jacobs Vice President Tom Schmitz has said a garage isn't financially feasible.

Reporter Kevin Wiatrowski can be reached at (813) 948-4201 or kwiatrowski@tampatrib.com.

 

210 Acres In Aripeka May Go To Bears

By JULIA FERRANTE The Tampa Tribune

Published: Nov 2, 2006

ARIPEKA - The developers of Aripeka Heights may drop plans to build more than 200 houses between U.S. 19 and the Gulf of Mexico in favor of a Florida black bear preserve.

Aripeka of Pasco LLC, a partnership involving Inland Homes Inc. and LandBuilder of Tampa, is seeking to sell 210 acres to Pasco County's Environmental Lands Acquisition and Protection Program.

A county committee examined the property and found it includes critical wetlands and is adjacent to a "bear corridor" stretching from Citrus and Levy counties to the Sea Pines neighborhood in Hudson.

The committee recommends that county officials negotiate with Aripeka of Pasco to buy the land and preserve it. The county commission will consider the move at a meeting next week.

County property records show that Aripeka of Pasco bought the land from the Berdeaux family in December, after another developer secured approval to build 235 houses on it.

The houses were to be separated by a wildlife corridor to promote the migration of bears. The previous developer, Steve Thompson of Dunedin, sought to build 600 houses, but after he met opposition from neighbors he worked with state officials on a management plan to protect the bears.

State officials approved the plans, but residents still had concerns about wildlife and flooding. A study conducted between 1997 and 2002 by the University of Kentucky found one female bear living in Aripeka and several males traveling through the area.

Aripeka also is low-lying and vulnerable to hurricanes.

The Berdeauxes sold an adjacent 20 acres to another group of developers led by New Port Richey lawyer Chuck Kalogianis. That project is slated for 25 homes.

The county's preservation committee awarded Aripeka Heights the highest score of any parcel nominated for consideration in the two-year life of the program.

The score is based on the amount and type of wildlife and wetlands on property, proximity to other preserves and costs for management and restoration.

An Aripeka residents group called the Gulf Coast Conservancy tried to get the Southwest Florida Water Management District to buy Aripeka Heights, but a deal has never been reached. The conservancy has actively opposed development on the property since 2002, according to Mac Davis, a conservancy trustee.

"Our opposition remains based on the scarcity of suitable wildlife habitat in the face of ever-increasing development," Davis wrote in an e-mail to The Tampa Tribune on Wednesday.

The conservancy nominated Aripeka Heights to the Pasco preservation program before, but the property was dropped from consideration because the Berdeauxes had not been notified and were not interested in selling.

John Buehler of LandBuilder, who nominated the property this time, and other Aripeka of Pasco partners could not be reached for comment. A slowing real estate market may have contributed to the decision to try to sell the property for preservation, although the strict conditions on the development also may have contributed.

Another parcel slated for development in central Pasco was added to the county's preservation list last month.

That parcel, part of the Tierra del Sol development west of U.S. 41, was slated for town houses but contained wetlands and wildlife habitat.

Reporter Julia Ferrante can be reached at jferrante@tampatrib.com or (813) 948-4220.

Scientists Say White House Muzzled Them

WASHINGTONTwo federal agencies are investigating whether the Bush administration tried to block government scientists from speaking freely about global warming and censor their research, a senator said Wednesday.

Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., said he was informed that the inspectors general for the Commerce Department and NASA had begun "coordinated, sweeping investigations of the Bush administration's censorship and suppression" of federal research into global warming.

"These investigations are critical because the Republicans in Congress have ignored this serious problem," Lautenberg said.

He said the investigations "will uncover internal documents and agency correspondence that may expose widespread misconduct." He added, "Taxpayers do not fund scientific research so the Bush White House can alter it."

Messages left Wednesday at the offices of the inspectors general, which serve as the agencies' internal watchdogs, were not immediately returned.

Kristen Hellmer, a spokeswoman for the White House Council for Environmental Quality, said Wednesday night that the administration has supported the scientific process in its approach to studying climate change.

"We have in place the most transparent system of science reporting, and claims that the administration interfered with scientists are false," Hellmer said. "Our focus is on taking action and making real progress in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The nearly $2 billion worth of climate science we publish annually leads the world and speaks for itself."

Carbon dioxide and other gases primarily from fossil fuel-burning that scientists say trap heat in the atmosphere have warmed the Earth's surface an average 1 degree over the past century. The White House has committed to reducing the "intensity" of U.S. carbon pollution, a measure of the amount of carbon dioxide emitted per unit of economic growth.

But the total U.S. emissions, now more than 7 billion tons a year, are projected to rise 14 percent from 2002 to 2012.

In February, House Science Chairman Sherwood Boehlert, R-N.Y., and other congressional leaders asked NASA to guarantee scientific openness. They complained that a public affairs officer changed or filtered information on global warming and the Big Bang.

The officer, George Deutsch, a political appointee, had resigned after being accused of trying to limit reporters' access to James Hansen, a prominent NASA climate scientist, and insisting that a Web designer insert the word "theory" with any mention of the Big Bang.

A report last month in the scientific journal Nature claimed administrators at the Commerce Department's National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration blocked the release of a report that linked hurricane strength and frequency to global warming. Hansen had said in February that NOAA has tried to prevent researchers working on global climate change from speaking freely about their work.

NOAA has denied the allegations, saying its work is not politically motivated.

An Earth-Friendly Fuel

By JO-ANN JOHNSTON The Tampa Tribune

Published: Nov 2, 2006

The bulldozers and road graders rumbling through the Withlacoochee State Forest are a little more Earth-friendly these days.

The heavy equipment is running on biodiesel fuel, an alternative to the traditional diesel, fuel made solely from petroleum sources.

Biodiesel is blended from plant sources - soybean, corn or other harvestable resources - along with traditional diesel. Its use reduces the need for fossil fuels, and it burns more cleanly than regular diesel, so it doesn't pollute the air as much.

Those advantages are prompting government agencies across the country to try the new fuel blends, including the state road crews who build and maintain roads in the Withlacoochee State Forest.

The test started in October and will go for several months, said Melvin Reese Jr., maintenance administrator for the Withlacoochee Forestry Center.

About 300 off-road vehicles, regularly used on more than 1,000 miles of forest roads, are involved in the test.

"There's no difference that we've noticed so far," Reese said recently, while overseeing a road crew working in a pine forest outside Brooksville.

The equipment starts and runs as smoothly as with diesel, and the biodiesel matches the traditional fuel in cost and fuel efficiency, he said.

Reese stores the biodiesel in separate tanks from the regular diesel, to make sure he can track biodiesel fuel use accurately.

Long-term, he wants to see whether the fuel filters on the vehicles using biodiesel need to be changed more often or other maintenance adjustments are required. To Reese, those are the major questions about using the alternative fuel source. Other matters are secondary.

Oil From Soybeans

"It's 80 percent regular diesel and 20 percent biodiesel," Reese said. "As far as whether it's peanut oil, vegetable oil or old McDonald's oil, we don't know."

Actually, we do know.

"It is soy," said Aaron Evanson, general manager of Ward Oil Company in Tampa, which supplies biodiesel to the state Division of Forestry.

Soybeans are one of the more popular "feedstocks," though many other plant products can be harvested for use in fuel.

Ward Oil has been promoting the use of biodiesel in the Southeast for seven years, Evanson said.

Though biodiesel remains a tiny percent of overall sales, Evanson supports the idea.

New Market For Farmers

In addition to biodiesel being a cleaner fuel for the environment, broader use would create a new market for American farm products, he said.

That idea has won the backing of Florida Agriculture Commissioner Charles Bronson.

Bronson has been promoting a "Farm to Fuel" program in Florida for months, trying to match fuel refinery companies with potential feedstock producers, including timber owners, sugar cane producers and citrus growers.

The state Division of Forestry also falls under Bronson's agency, giving him the authority to order this long-term biodiesel test in the Withlacoochee State Forest, which includes land in Pasco, Hernando, Citrus, Lake and Sumter counties.

The test also is happening in the Blackwater State Forest District, which spans several counties in the Florida Panhandle.

Reese and his counterparts in Blackwater are collecting data on how their equipment performs while running on biodiesel.

"I'd say within three to six months we should know about its reliability," Reese said.

Reporter Jo-Ann Johnston can be reached at (352) 521-3062 or jfjohnston@tampatrib.com.

A natural classroom

By MARYAN PELLAND
Published November 2, 2006

The Springs Coast Environmental Education Center, west of Weeki Wachee Park on State Road 50, can be thought of as a school unto its own.

That would make Mark Weaver the instructor, principal and guidance counselor, not to mention a park ranger and conservationist.

The center opened in the second half of the 2004-05 school year to enhance school curriculum, particularly for fourth-graders. The brianchild of West Hernando principal Joe Clifford, the idea became a pet project for educators, community members and some parents. They hashed out a plan to give Hernando County schoolchildren a new way to commune with nature.

Pun fully intended, Weaver believes the center is a wild success.

"The best thing about teaching here is we rarely, if ever, see a child who isn't totally excited," he said. "Every teacher's dream."

The most difficult thing? Maintaining focus for what seems like 20 "baby birds" clamoring for information.

Picture it. A tall adult surrounded by not-so-tall pupils, some of whom have never been to the outback before.

Every one of them chirps a dozen questions, sometimes simultaneously.

Weaver laughs aloud, envisioning it, but his calm and his almost unlimited knowledge of outdoor science win the day. He's good at maintaining order.

"I usually tell them I do this every single day, and if they're patient, I'll probably answer their questions as I go," Weaver said. "That does the trick for while."

A Brooksville native, Weaver went through the Hernando County school system and graduated from Hernando High.

The Weeki Wachee River is nothing new to him; he grew up with it. Weaver's degree, from Eastern Mennonite University in Virginia, is in physical education with a biology minor. It's a combination that works well in his job.

He taught science and physical education in Polk County for six years. For nine years, he taught at Central High School - physical science, biology and marine science.

Weaver jumped in on the earliest planning for the environmental center. He thinks every community needs a safe place for children to experience the outdoors.

"In today's world, lots of things prevent kids from being able to run off in the woods. We get inundated by information about West Nile virus, animals in the wild," Weaver said.

His goal is to dispel myths about nature, to instill a sense of inclusion and to help kids develop a lifelong interest in preservation. It's evidently working.

Though fourth-graders are the primary focus because age and curriculum make them an excellent audience, every age group has been welcomed to the four classrooms and conference room at the center. This month, high school seniors came out. Some went kayaking; others explored the Bayport coastline.

There's hardly a school day from now until May that isn't booked with classes. Students begin their day with a discussion about expectations and rules. With nets, clipboards and collection containers, they hit the trails to explore and identify plants, animals and animal tracks.

They set plaster of paris molds of tracks they find, which they'll take back to their school at the end of the day.

They dip nets into the river, collecting macroscopic (tiny, but visible to the human eye) animals to study later. They learn about algae on the river, then explore life in the water and on the shore.

They're apt to see animals they have never seen before. Maybe a pelican fishing. Perhaps a strolling stork. On a great day, a manatee comes near.

Then it's back to the picnic grove for lunch and conversation about the morning. In the afternoon, students study their collected species under real microscopes.

"That's a big hit. Again, most of these kids have never used a real microscope and they're blown away," Weaver said.

At day's end, students, teachers and parent chaperones peruse a collection of life-size animals and plant specimens. One group goes eye-to-eye with a 4-foot tall shorebird. Another carefully inspects a bobcat. In a week or two, they'll be able to practically shake hands with a Florida bear.

The animals are real. They have their feathers, fur, claws and tails, all preserved by a professional taxidermy expert. All met their demise because of human interventions like car accidents.

The schoolhouse in the woods was funded and built by the Southwest Florida Water Management District. It's staffed and maintained by Hernando County School Board. Last year, about 3,400 students visited. This year, every fourth-grade class in district will come out. Once upon a time, Weaver's expectation was that the program would sprout, blossom slowly, then catch on.

In reality, Weaver and his assistant are busy five days a week, from 7 a.m. until late in the afternoon.

He loves his job, though.

"I miss the connections you make with students in a regular classroom," Weaver said. "But I wouldn't trade the excitement on all those faces or knowing I might be teaching them something to carry through life."

Bad PR threatens toll-road projects

A spending scandal may delay toll increases and the expressway agency's construction plans.

Dan Tracy, David Damron and Jay Hamburg
Sentinel Staff Writers

November 2, 2006

Reeling from controversy over how it spends money, the region's road-building agency is unlikely to replace the $1.7 million-a-year marketing company it fired last week.

"It's not the norm to hire a public-relations firm. The question is: Can that be done in-house?" asked Orange County Mayor Rich Crotty, who serves on the Orlando-Orange County Expressway Authority board.

The agency canceled a specially called meeting today to figure out what to do after last week's firing of the Winter Park public-relations firm Pecora & Blexrud. The authority's director said he terminated the firm because it gave bad advice and billed for work it didn't do -- something founder Ron Pecora says was not his fault.

Pecora's company also acted as the authority's go-between with political consultant and frequent toll critic Doug Guetzloe, who was paid $107,500 by the public agency for opinion research. He did not have a written contract and produced a two-page report on why people dislike tolls -- a situation that angered toll payers and helped prompt two audits that are set to begin soon.

The authority's troubles threaten its ability to get future road projects completed that depend on toll increases. The scandal has damaged its public image and political capital. Agency officials have agreed to postpone increasing tolls on its roads -- State Road 408 and parts of S.R. 417, 429 and 528 -- until the crisis abates.

Dealing with its public-relations problem is the first step in addressing the agency's problems and rebuilding trust with toll-road drivers.

"The Expressway Authority is clearly in a state of crisis right now," Crotty said.

Crotty's staff surveyed other public agencies in the area and found no similar public-relations arrangements. The mayor favors not replacing Pecora's firm, as does authority Chairman Allan Keen. Their stance essentially kills the idea of hiring a public-relations firm unless the board decides to revisit the issue later.

"We should carefully evaluate what roles can be more efficiently handled internally by staff, versus externally by consultants," Keen said.

Word of the ongoing controversy has reached Gov. Jeb Bush, who appointed three of the board members, including Keen.

"The Expressway Authority has been very well run over the years," Bush said. "It's very efficient. It's done a great job. The question of hiring Mr. Guetzloe through the PR firm I thought was inappropriate."

Keen was frustrated Wednesday at the agency's predicament: "We really have a significant business to run, and we need to continue running it."

Road plans on hold

The strife means about $1.4 billion worth of critical highway widening and interchange plans will remain on hold because they are predicated on higher tolls. Authority Executive Director Mike Snyder said the projects in jeopardy include planned interchanges at S.R. 528 and S.R. 417 that would link to a collection of proposed high-tech developments in east Orange, plus three other interchanges and five road widenings.

To get those projects back in the agency's five-year work plan, Snyder said, the board would have to begin raising tolls -- likely by a quarter -- by spring. Otherwise, he said, "they sit indefinitely until the board takes a different tack."

That specter does not please Orange County Commissioner Bill Segal, a development expert who said Wednesday: "The biggest concern we have right now are the interchanges we need in east Orange County. Assuming the authority is well-run, outside a few small [contract] amounts, it would appear they need more money."

A special authority session is set for Nov. 17 to talk about the effect of delaying toll increases.

The authority's planned meeting for today also would have addressed the loss of authority spokesman Bryan Douglas, who quit Monday after reading comments critical of him by Snyder in the Orlando Sentinel. Snyder said Douglas, a former Pecora employee, had not done enough to monitor the firm's contract. In his resignation letter, Douglas defended his work but said he had lost the support of his boss, making it impossible to continue on at the authority.

Keen canceled the session after realizing he and Crotty were in agreement on holding off on hiring another PR company and that Snyder already had brought on a temporary replacement for Douglas.

20 years of PR deals

The authority first hired an outside PR company in 1986, when it was trying to find a slogan to encourage more use of the East-West Expressway, now the 408.

Then-Chairman Phil Reece said the agency spent $15,000 for the motto "The Expressway is the Best Way." But, Reece said, he now "apologizes" for the move because that small amount snowballed, creating woes plaguing the authority today.

Like others in the community, Reece said the No. 1 priority should be restoring public confidence in the agency, particularly among the tens of thousands of drivers who pay $550,000 daily to travel nearly 100 miles of toll roads.

"I do not trust them," said Jim Tillman, a 63-year-old retired telecommunications technician who lives in Chuluota and has ridden authority roads for more than 20 years.

Trying to win back people such as Tillman will not be easy, said Jay Rayburn, a public-relations professor at Florida State University.

"You don't get out quickly," said Rayburn, who suggested audits of the agency must come up clean before the authority can begin to make a case for higher tolls.

An internal audit and one conducted by the Orange County comptroller's office will investigate whether agency officials have made any other questionable expenditures.

The State Attorney's Office also has requested records from the agency but has not revealed why. Pecora told prosecutors what he knew about the agency's relationship with Guetzloe earlier this week following his firing. Prosecutors are pursuing an unrelated criminal case against Guetzloe.

Rayburn said it's urgent the authority now be an open book.

"The key word is they have to be transparent in everything they do," he said.

Former Orange County Chairman Linda Chapin, who served on the expressway board from 1991 to 1998, said the authority's main public outreach should be nothing more complicated than keeping commuters informed of how the agency is spending toll money, rather than trying to change opinions about tolls or the need for more roads.

"The Expressway Authority should get back to the simple notion of communicating what they do for their constituency and put aside any notion of trying to influence that constituency," Chapin said.

Dan Tracy can be reached at dtracy@orlandosentinel.com or 407-420-5444. David Damron can be reached at 407-420-5311 or ddamron@orlandosentinel.com or 407-420-5311. Jay Hamburg can be reached at 407-420-5673 or jhamburg@orlandosentinel.com.

Protest of Wal-Mart must follow rule book

Times editorial
Published October 31, 2006

Opponents of a proposed Wal-Mart Supercenter on the banks of the Anclote River in Tarpon Springs got a delicious whiff of second chances and now, with their appetite whetted, are upset that the opportunity they relished might not materialize.

After the Army Corps of Engineers admitted that it had improperly awarded Wal-Mart a permit to build over a wetland, Wal-Mart faced three options: drop the project; redesign the project, which would require a new review by the City Commission; or make minor changes to avoid affecting the wetland - changes that could be approved by a city staff group called the Technical Review Committee.

Wal-Mart chose to make minor adjustments - move some items, reduce pavement here and there - and thereby avoid a repetition of the all-night public hearing in January 2005 that led to a split City Commission vote to approve the project.

Wal-Mart opponents have howled over the city staff's conclusion that the site plan changes are minor. They want a City Commission review, and they have been assisted by Commissioner Peter Dalacos, who asks the commission to discuss the staff's findings at tonight's commission meeting.

However, the city attorney and acting city manager say that if the commission intrudes in the process, they will violate the city charter and open the door to a claim by Wal-Mart that it is treated differently from other applicants. Acting City Manager Mark LeCouris has asked the City Commission to refuse to discuss the item tonight.

City law is clear on who has the right to determine whether site plan changes are major or minor: the city staff. The City Commission allowed public comment on that issue at its Oct. 17 meeting, which was important.

City law also is clear that the group charged with approving or disapproving minor changes is the Technical Review Committee, not the City Commission.

City law spells out the appeal process for those who disagree with the staff's decisions. "Aggrieved parties" can appeal to the city's Board of Adjustment. City Attorney John Hubbard said the aggrieved party in this case normally would be Wal-Mart if its site plan changes were rejected.

For anyone else to be an aggrieved party, they would have to be "some other person with a special interest in the property who has suffered an effect from the decision that is greater in scope and nature than that of the general public," Hubbard said. An adjoining property owner who will be directly impacted by the store construction? A river watch group interested in the protection of the river and its surrounding ecosystem, perhaps?

Lawyers will have to sort that one out.

Wal-Mart opponents may be disappointed if they lose the opportunity for another full hearing before the City Commission, but they have nothing to gain by attempting to subvert the city's code-defined procedures. In fact, doing so could make Wal-Mart's position even stronger.

That doesn't mean there is nothing they can do.

Hubbard has made a good suggestion that the Technical Review Committee take testimony from opponents and supporters of the project at its meeting. Opponents can closely question the committee about its findings on the minor revisions and present any evidence they have that the revisions are major. If they don't win, they can attempt to build a case for an appeal.

Meanwhile, the City Commission has plenty of issues related to this whole dispute that it should be discussing, with public input, short of trying to take over the Technical Review Committee's job.

Those issues include whether the code's description of "minor changes" should be broadened and whether another level of appeals from staff decisions should be created.

And if any member of the City Commission thinks the staff decision on minor changes was incorrectly or illegally reached, they should speak up at tonight's meeting so their commission colleagues can decide whether the argument has merit.

That's a better approach than just choosing not to talk about it, which does little to represent the public's interests.

Test the waters

All regional authority members should consider 'exclusive' status

DeSoto County took the first leap. Now Charlotte County is poised to take the plunge.

Wednesday, Charlotte gave official notice that it will seek a new relationship with the Peace River/Manasota Regional Water Supply Authority. Currently, Charlotte buys water from the four-county regional authority. Under the proposed arrangement, Charlotte would continue that practice but would become an "exclusive provider customer."

Under the arrangement, exclusive customers agree that all new sources of water will be developed through the water authority. The authority is responsible for calculating and meeting the counties' water needs. Exclusive customers retain control and ownership of existing water production facilities and transmission lines, but could opt to sell or lease infrastructure to the authority in the future.

Last year, DeSoto became the first county in the region to change its customer status. Charlotte has recognized the benefits of a similar arrangement, in part because most of its water comes from the plant owned and operated by the authority.

Each county in the region has different needs, but all four counties, including Manatee and Sarasota, should seriously consider pursuing the exclusive customer status with the authority, at least as new sources are created or existing ones are significantly expanded.

For the authority to develop an equitable, affordable and sustainable system, new sources of water should be developed regionally. Doing so would help avert water wars, leverage financial investments, reduce pressure on environmental resources and further the progress toward connecting pipelines. This approach would put the region in sync with Southwest Florida Water Management District policies -- increasing the chances of attracting investments by the district.

Charlotte's decision follows many years of contentious dealings with the authority, which supplies 95 percent of the county's water. It won't be easy for the county and authority to negotiate a final agreement, which must be approved by the Charlotte County commissioners and, subsequently, by all of the authority's members.

But it's in Charlotte's interests, as well as those of the region, to make a deal that could maximize resources while reducing costly infrastructure and administrative redundancies. And what could be good for Charlotte could also be good for the authority's other members.

Mote opens larger wing for research

By MIKE SAEWITZ

mike.saewitz@heraldtribune.com

SARASOTA -- When Tony Tucker joined Mote Marine Laboratory's sea turtle conservation and research program, his office was like a storage closet with no windows.

It didn't get more spacious as the sea turtle program grew to include five staff members, a half-dozen seasonal workers and eight interns -- all of whom were crammed into three rooms.

"It didn't work," said Tucker, the program manager. "We were sardined in there."

Oh, how Tucker's world has expanded.

He and his staff moved last week from an old 8,000-square-foot building into a new, 19,000-square-foot wing of a research center that will also house those who study wild dolphins, whales and manatees.

The move is representative of a marine mammal and turtle rehabilitation and research program that has grown "tenfold" since 1994, said Mote President and Chief Executive Officer Kumar Mahadevan.

He hopes the $8.4 million expansion to the Ann and Alfred Goldstein Marine Mammal Research and Rehabilitation Center will help the program grow even more.

"If you don't give them (researchers) the right facilities, they can't do the kind of research that needs to be done," Mahadevan said.

Researchers such as Tucker enjoy the new space.

In the old building, Tucker said, "we were all right on top of each other, living in each other's pockets."

It's not that people didn't get along. In some programs, Mahadevan said, four people shared one desk.

Tucker said his shelves were stacked as high as they could go. Finding anything was like a scavenger hunt.

He and his staff had to walk 10 minutes to find a space big enough to meet.

The new wing is so spacious that there's a giant conference room.

The public will be allowed to go on the balcony for a better view of two rehabilitated dolphins, Moonshine and Harley.

It will also allow more room for the longest-running program to study wild dolphins.

Tucker said that the new space has already made working conditions more comfortable for those who are trying to produce meaningful research about sea turtles, especially the graduate students who work in his program.

"They have desk space for a change," he said.

New Buyers Shocked By Tax Bills

By KAREN BRANCH-BRIOSO
The Tampa Tribune

TAMPA - After Marine Col. Mike Greer moved from Boston to work at U.S. Central Command, he and his Colombian-born wife took to Tampa’s climate – and decided to make the move permanent.

They paid $105,000 in 2004 for a vacant lot on a river that runs into Mobbly Bay.

Their 2005 tax bill, on a $102,596 assessed value, was $2,338.

This year, with their dream home near completion but not yet on the tax roll, they got a nightmare of a proposed tax bill: $8,000, for the land that the property appraiser’s office says is now worth $360,000.

“It’s just wacky, actually,” Greer said. “In Massachusetts, the property taxes are not so high. But here, it’s a huge thing. Before I made the decision (to build), I didn’t quite know that.”

Recent buyers in Florida’s housing market are learning hard lessons, come tax time.

The year after a home qualifies for a homestead exemption, it is shielded from the double- or triple-digit assessment hikes that have been the norm in the sellers’ market of the past few years. That shield comes courtesy of a Save Our Homes cap that limits such increases to a maximum 3 percent a year.

But before that kicks in, the reassessments that take place when property is sold can yield astounding changes in taxable value.

For Jamie Tingen, the surprise came with this year’s tax bill. A Florida resident for a half-century, she traded up from a two-bedroom to a three-bedroom townhouse on the same street.

Her tax bill more than tripled.

“I have a granddaughter and I wanted to have a place for her to stay when she visits,” Tingen said. “I moved right down the street, just a few buildings. At my old place, I think (the property tax bill) was $500. I just got the (new) bill, and it’s $1,800.”

Just last year, Tingen, as a longtime owner of a homesteaded property, was on the enviable side of the street of Florida’s property tax system. Her smaller townhouse, which she bought in 1980, had an assessed value last year of $45,305 – held down for the past decade by the Save Our Homes cap.

Its market value was far more. She sold it for $137,000. The tax bill for the new owners leaped to $2,200 from the $500 Tingen paid last year.

She says such disparities are unfair: “Everybody seems to be in the same boat, and nobody seems to be doing anything about it.”

The issue, however, is the focal point of a number of groups studying Florida’s tax system.

Gov. Jeb Bush created a Property Tax Reform Committee this summer and charged its members with offering solutions for the uneven tax burden that resulted from the Save Our Homes cap and the heated real estate market of recent years.

The committee will offer suggestions to the Legislature, the Department of Revenue and a Florida Tax and Budget Reform Commission – which will be established next year.

There are efforts afoot to ease the tax burden of longtime Florida property owners. An ongoing petition drive for a constitutional amendment would allow homeowners to transfer part of their Save Our Homes cap to another home if they want to move as Tingen did.

But newcomers are also begging for relief.

Aldegonda Caris and her husband, Glenn Smith, moved from Long Island, N.Y., to Tampa last year after Smith accepted a job as an assistant professor at USF’s College of Education. They heard the cost of living in Florida was lower. Then they bought a house.

“We have a smaller house and pay more taxes,” said Caris, who said their property taxes on a larger home in New York stayed at about $5,500 a year. “The taxes increased gradually, while in Florida, every time the house is sold, it goes up significantly.”

Between last year and this year, the tax bill on their Tampa Palms home nearly doubled to $6,300.

Caris was shocked to see neighbors in a similar home pay $2,500.

“We get the same benefits. Why would we need to pay so much more?” Caris said. “I don’t see what the goal for Florida is. Why do they give a higher burden to newcomers? Maybe they want to chase them away. I definitely think they should do something about it.”

So does John Sarver.

The civilian strategic planner at U.S. Central Command moved to Brandon late last year from Colorado Springs. That recent arrival earned him the not-so-enviable position on the block as the man with the highest property tax bill.

He’ll pay almost $9,000 this year in property taxes. That’s more than he paid for both property taxes and state income taxes in Colorado. Most of his neighbors pay a third or half of that, even though their homes are about the same size as his – or larger.

“I look across the street,” said Sarver, who bought his home for $475,000 at the height of the market late last year. “I know my neighbors have enjoyed all this equity they’ve gained from ’03 to ’05, but I feel like I subsidize their property.”

Greer’s worry is he’ll never be able to enjoy the home he is building.

He and his wife, Martha, are challenging the 250 percent increase in their assessment with the county Value Adjustment Board. In a small conference room Monday, they faced off with two employees from the property appraiser’s office before a special magistrate.

“The sales and listings would support the assessment you have,” said Becky Lopresto, an appraisal manager with the land department who cited a vacant lot down the street priced at $380,000.

Greer said the prices only went up recently after property assessments soared: “I shopped that woman’s lot when I bought mine – and I couldn’t afford it because it was $175,000.”

He also noted that, unlike the other lots, half of his lot can’t be developed because it is wetlands covered in mangroves. Lawrence Langowski, team leader from the Land Department, said he may be able to lower the assessment based on that.

Greer hopes that happens.

“You make reasonable assumptions: The house is going to be about $650,000, the land about $105,000,” Greer said. “Now with this assessment, you’re talking $360,000 and $650,000. It’s going to be a nice house. But it’s not a million-dollar house.”

If the tax rate stays the same by the time his home is built, a million-dollar assessment would cost Mike and Martha Greer almost $22,000 a year in property taxes.

Said Greer: “I’m in a situation where, if the assessment stays as it is, I may not be able to afford the house.”

Reporter Karen Branch-Brioso can be reached at (813) 259-7815

Lehman Bros. Sues Over Pasco Condos

By SHANNON BEHNKEN The Tampa Tribune

Published: Nov 2, 2006

TAMPA - A New York lender fears it is on the hook for millions of dollars in loans that now total more than the New Port Richey properties are worth.

Lehman Bros. Holdings, the global financial services corporation, filed suit in Tampa on Tuesday against a group of investors, title companies, a mortgage company and an appraisal company involved in potential mortgage fraud at a Pasco County condominium complex.

Sunset Bay Club has three-story triplexes that each have five bedrooms and a shared kitchen. The bedrooms, according to the lawsuit, are leased primarily to senior citizens.

Fifteen defendants used overvalued appraisals in a "scheme to defraud" the bank, according to the lawsuit. The 13 properties each were appraised for $733,000. The lawsuit says the triplexes are worth "barely one-third" of that value.

Companies named in the lawsuit are Equitable Title of Florida, based in Orlando; LandAmerica Financial Group, based in Richmond, Va., and its subsidiaries, LandAmerica Gulf Atlantic Title and Lawyers Title Insurance Corp.; Interlachen Residential Mortgage Co., based in Winter Park; and Passarelli & Potts Appraisal Service in Winter Park.

Individuals named in the lawsuit live in California and Minnesota.

A spokeswoman for LandAmerica Financial Group said she could not comment on pending litigation. Representatives at other companies involved did not return phone calls. Lehman Bros. declined to comment.

Lenders across the country are investigating mortgages that may be worth more than the market value of the properties. Some have filed lawsuits. Countrywide Home Loans, the nation's largest mortgage lender, sued various defendants for mortgage fraud on properties in Indiana in June. The lawsuit, first reported last month, involved investor buyers in Martinsville, Va., who discovered they were on the hook for mortgages in their names.

Countrywide would not release details of those transactions, but published reports estimated that the loans amounted to $80 million, which could make it one of the largest mortgage fraud cases in the United States.

Mortgage experts say lenders are bracing to discover such loans this year as the real estate market cools further. Part of the problem, they say, is that lenders usually don't spot problem mortgages until buyers start missing payments.

"These guys are very clever," said Don Effertz, a vice president with Interthinx of Agoura Hills, Calif., which develops software to help lenders detect fraud. "This is a righteous scam because it's so hard for lenders to catch it."

Lenders are discovering overvalued loans now for two reasons, said Doug Pollock, a mortgage investigator in Sanford. For one thing, fraudulent loans were easily overlooked during the past five years' real estate boom. Second, industry professionals may be tempted to participate in fraudulent deals to attract business, Pollock said.

Lehman's suit comes on the heels of investigations byfour state agencies and at least two lenders into 36 inflated home sales in Pinellas and Hillsborough counties.

The sales, uncovered last month in a Tampa Tribune investigative report, involved the same listing real estate agent, the same title company, an appraiser and inflated home prices.

Lehman Bros. Bank was the lender on one of those St. Petersburg properties, which sold for $252,000 in June.

Countrywide was the lender on at least two of the properties and started an internal investigation into those mortgages last week.

Reporter Shannon Behnken can be reached at (813) 259-7804.

Tavares may keep water tower

Joshua Davidovich
Staff Writer

TAVARES - At 150 feet tall, the Tavares water tower has been an imposing presence at the corner of Old Highway 441 and State Road 19 since 1962.

A relic of days gone by, the tower is reaching the end of its useful life. Rather than bring the old giant to its knees, city leaders are considering letting the tower remain standing through its retirement as a "beacon" of the city.

"I'm trying to link the future with the past, and this is an opportune time for the city to save this piece of history," Utility Director Brad Hayes, who is leading the drive to save the tower, said.

The city has switched over to a more modern water treatment system that will soon render the tower obsolete. City staff originally suggested tearing the tower down in early 2007, when it will be disconnected from Tavares' water system.

Tearing the tower down would cost at least $65,000, according to city finance director and interim city administrator Lori Houghton.

Rather than spend that money to destroy a structurally sound tower, Hayes has advocated keeping it, both as a base for communications antennas for the city's police and fire departments and as a landmark for people coming to Tavares.

"We possibly may have some value in keeping it," Houghton said. "It's a beacon to residents or visitors around the area."

Both Police Chief Stoney Lubbins and Fire Chief Richard Keith said they would prefer to put their antennas on the tower, rather than renting space, as they do now.

City leaders directed staff to come back with more information on keeping the tower up.

Because the tower will no longer be functional, the city can paint whatever it wants on the tower. Hayes said new paints may stay for up to 10 years, lowering maintenance costs.

Director of Community Development Susan Jackson said a mural might work on the tower, and said she would bring the issue before the Community Redevelopment Agency Advisory Committee, which leads comment on the downtown area.

Bob Grenier, a local preservationist who is running for city council, said the tower might look good as a lasting testament in the city.

"It's already turning into a historical landmark," he said. "They have things that can make the tower stand long after we are gone."


Citrus Times letter to the editor 

Ugly growth transmogrifies sweet paradise that lured us

Why are we here? Why did we move to Citrus County? For me the answer is easy. I like to hike in the state forest, I love to swim in the springs, fish in the gulf. What a paradise this was when we moved here in 1993.

I did not move here for the money. I certainly could do much better financially in other places. I did not move here for the opportunities for my children. I knew they would grow up and go out on their own. We all have our reasons for living here. I just don't understand some people's reasons.

It seems some people moved here and now want supercenters, superhighways and industrial parks. I don't get it. Why would you want to change paradise into something so ugly? Did you know that housing is much cheaper in Tampa? You can build a new house in Tampa cheaper than you can here. You could be closer to the airport, sporting venues, concert venues, shopping, theater and job opportunities. If these things are important to you, maybe you should consider moving.

It's obvious to me that our local politicians don't care to represent the majority of the citizens here. One county commissioner is a building contractor. Where do you think his loyalties lie?

Our politicians agreed to lower the amount of how much to raise our taxes. Our taxes still went sky high. My taxes tripled on a lot I own. Is that fair? The 6-cent gas tax is in effect. Is that fair? Let's have an accounting. How many millions of gallons of gas are sold in Citrus County? Multiply that by .06 and see how much that brings. Add to that all of the other taxes that were supposed to go to the roads. Where is it? Where did it all go to? Does the road money go only to the rich people's area? Or is it supposed to go throughout the county. My road is still sand.

The impact fee is $6,000, and there were 750 to 1,000 homes built here recently. Where did the money go? This is a small county; where did it go?

Did anybody else's homeowners insurance triple like mine did? Why did our elected officials let that happen? The insurance companies that cried poverty after the storms were only complaining because their profits were down. They still made profits. The same with the gas companies. They made billions of dollars in profits. That's billions with a "b."

Why aren't we the citizens being represented? Whatever happened to "we the people... ?" Everyone repeat after me baaa-baaa. That's right, we are all just sheep and the politicians know it.

It will take a lot more than me to change things, but I'm tired of it. I'm tired of the same old thing, the same old excuses, and the same old pass the buck. I really believe in my heart that what we need is another Boston tea party.

James Corr, Lecanto

[Last modified November 1, 2006, 06:15:34]

Developer files Hickory Hill blueprint

By MICHAEL D. BATES
mbates@hernandotoday.com

BROOKSVILLE — Planning and zoning staffers will spend the next few months drafting a document that could eventually become the blueprint for Hickory Hill, the controversial 1,750-home community proposed for Spring Lake.

That document, called a development order, will be unveiled during a public hearing Jan. 17. County commissioners will consider the order and either approve it, deny it or approve it with conditions.

Deciding they wanted to help the county in the process, attorneys with the law firm representing Hickory Hill have fired off a draft development order that includes much of the “boilerplate” language that will eventually go into that document.

Sebring Sierra, vice president of operations for Sierra Properties LLC of Tampa, said the move is not meant to cause friction between his company and the developer.

Just the opposite, he said.

It’s been more than 10 years since the county has gone through one of these large projects and planners may be a bit rusty when it comes to drafting a development order, Sierra said.

“This is just a starting point,” he said. “I hope it’s going to save the county some time and some money.”

County Planning Director Ron Pianta said he and his staff will review the developer’s draft order but emphasized that the final product would be the county’s.

“We’ll take a look at it and take it into consideration,” Pianta said.

Pianta said the writing of the final document is still in the early stages.

The draft development order, basically a rewrite of an earlier document submitted to the Withlacoochee Regional Planning Council, shows that Hickory Hill will be a private golf course community with 1,750 homes, 50,000 square feet of commercial space and 63 holes of golf.

The project will be built in two phases, with the first phase comprising 800 single-family homes and 36 holes of golf. The majority of the project consists of phase one, which would be built from 2006-2012.

Phase two would have 950 homes, 50,000 square feet of commercial space and 27 holes of golf. Phase two will tentatively be built from 2013-2017.

People will be able to get into Hickory Hill from several locations off Lockhart Road, but there will be no direct access to Hickory Hill Road. Baseball Pond Road borders the western portion of the property and Lockhart Road is the eastern border. The project will also access Church Road to the south.

Other highlights of the draft order

• If development of Hickory Hill has not started in three years of the effective date of the order, county commissioners can decide whether the delay is a “substantial deviation” from the project timetable.

• The developer will create a transition zone from urban to rural along portions of the north, west and south boundaries of the project.

• A minimum of 1,110 acres will be dedicated to open, undeveloped land.

• A clubhouse or recreation center will be built sturdy enough to allow residents to use it as a hurricane evacuation shelter.

Also at that pivotal Jan. 17 meeting, commissioners will vote whether to adopt the comprehensive plan amendment that Hickory Hill would need to get off the ground.

If they approve that move, the matter for a second time goes to the Florida Department of Community Affairs for a compliance review.

However, commissioners could also vote not to adopt the comprehensive plan amendment at that hearing which would essentially kill the project. No sending off to the state for review. No development order. Nothing.

Reporter Michael D. Bates can be contacted at 352-544-5290.

'No' is such a negative word

Sarasota Herald-Tribune

How does the North Port City Commission say no to a developer? At least one commissioner doesn't know.

Last week, Commissioner Richard Lockhart was asking for a "guru of wordage" to help the city tell developer Brian Tuttle he wasn't going to get immediate approval of taxing powers for his Isles of Athena development, now under state review.

"I don't know what words we could use," Lockhart said.

Tuttle wants the city on board with the taxing district before next year, when he plans to get state approval of taxing powers that would pay for infrastructure on his 5,774 acres in the city's northeast corner.

Movement on the Tuttle project could foul up planning talks between the city and county since North Port agreed not to move forward with zoning hearings on Isles of Athena until the joint planning talks are over.

Commission Chairman Rue Berryman characterized Tuttle as "pushing the cart ahead of the horse" on the project.

But commissioners still agreed to ask Tuttle to pay for North Port to get an outside lawyer to look over the taxing district language.

Tuttle wants to put 12,000 homes on the land he bought last year for $61.5 million.

Eustis set to debate growth, open space

City Commission candidates stake out positions on comprehensive-plan changes.

Martin E. Comas
Sentinel Staff Writer

November 1, 2006

EUSTIS -- City commissioners on Thursday plan to discuss one of the most hotly debated topics during the past two years in this city: open space.

The issue has become so contentious in the past few months that it has become one of the main issues between two candidates vying for a commission seat.

"This is all about deciding how the city will grow," said Scott Ales, who is trying to unseat incumbent Frank Royce in the Tuesday election. "I'm fighting for this because I know this is what the residents want."

In 2004, Florida enacted the Wekiva Parkway and Protection Act, requiring several local governments -- including Eustis -- to make changes to their comprehensive plans to protect many areas that recharge the Floridan Aquifer. The comprehensive plan is a sort of blueprint for the city's growth.

On Thursday, commissioners are scheduled to have a first reading on an ordinance putting in place those comp-plan changes, or amendments.

One of those amendments deals with open space. It requires developers to set aside at least 25 percent of land in a proposed subdivision for conservation or for nature trails and public parks. That open space, however, cannot include most private yards or bodies of water -- including lakes, wetlands and filled retention ponds.

The city's regulations require that up to 40 percent of residential developments be open space. But many residents say that definition is vague because it could also be interpreted to include front lawns, lakes and retention ponds.

Royce said that by not including wetlands and private yards into the new regulations it makes it more restrictive than the current regulation.

"We felt that this definition, by not including the wetlands, makes it more restrictive than what we already have," he said. "The urban areas need to grow."

But Ales said the city should keep the current 40 percent designation and also not count the bodies of water as open space.

Ales said he has knocked on more than 1,600 doors while campaigning for the commission and, "I have not heard from one person that doesn't agree with this."

Open space has been a contentious issue in Eustis for almost two years.

It started in March 2005 when a developer proposed building Meadow Walk, a community of almost 300 homes on 132 acres near the northwest corner of County Road 44A and Estes Road. Residents said that many homes on that much land would spoil the rural character of the area.

However, the developer who submitted the plans said he was following Eustis' land-development regulations. The application has since been retracted.

Since then, the city has been reviewing its land-development regulations and trying to more clearly define open space.

Commissioner James Rotella also said he would like to see a uniform 40 percent open space in residential areas.

Commissioners are scheduled to vote on final approval for the ordinance at the Nov. 16 meeting if it passes on first reading Thursday.

The comp-plan changes will then be transmitted to the state's Department of Community Affairs for approval.

Martin E. Comas can be reached at mcomas@orlandosentinel.com or 352-742-5927.

Deeds from developer look phony, investigators say

Sky Development Group of South Florida has the attention of the FBI.

CATHERINE E. SHOICHET
Published November 1, 2006

INVERNESS - Sky Development Group sold at least seven Citrus Springs lots it apparently did not own to an Orlando company in October, according to county records.

The transaction is the first concrete example of an apparently fraudulent sale that the Citrus County Sheriff's Office has pinpointed in its investigation of Sky Development Group that began last month.

Sheriff's Detective Mike Kanter said a representative from Central Florida Homesites contacted him Monday with concerns about the purchase. By Tuesday morning Kanter had confirmed that at least one of the lots was part of a fraudulent sale.

Central Florida Homesites paid $100,000 to the South Florida developer for 10 lots in Citrus Springs. But at least seven of those lots didn't belong to Sky, a fraudulent-deed notice filed Oct. 18 says.

The discovery is a small step in what likely will be a lengthy investigation.

Detectives still must determine how many people bought property in fraudulent transactions and where their money went, Kanter said.

Officials from the North Miami Beach Police Department and the FBI are also investigating the company.

Other unanswered questions include:

- How much property claimed by Sky in official records is actually owned by the company?

- How many deeds recorded by the company are fraudulent?

- Why weren't problems with the developer spotted sooner?

- What recourse will buyers have?

Kanter said his focus now is finding victims of the possible scam. To do that, he is combing through deeds recorded with the Citrus County Clerk in September and October.

"I don't want somebody to have purchased this piece of property from Sky and have them start spending money, having a house built on it," he said.

Central Florida Homesites' registered agent, Robert K. Miller, could not be reached for comment Tuesday.

The deed documenting the Oct. 11 purchase from Sky Development was "prepared without a title search, and the legal description was supplied by the parties," the deed says.

Seven lots listed on the deed are also listed on a fraudulent-deed notice filed by attorney Jeffrey Feinberg on Oct. 18.

That notice claims those lots and 43 others still belong to Igor Komsky of Sunny Isles Beach, not Sky Development.

Central Florida Homesites owns seven parcels in Citrus County, according to the Citrus County Property Appraiser, but those lots were not purchased from Sky Development Group.

Kanter said most of victims were likely clients who previously bought land from Sky Development or sold land to the developer. That would give Sky Development officials easy access to copies of paperwork and notary stamps, he said.

Sky Development Group "acted quickly to get all the deeds put through," he said.

Representatives from Sky Development Group could not be reached for comment.

Kanter said the company's registered agent, Natalia Wolf, used her passport to enter Germany last month.

Property owners who have had problems with Sky Development Group can contact Kanter at 352 726-4488, ext. 224.

Catherine E. Shoichet can be reached at cshoichet@sptimes.com or (352) 860-7309.

Airport community prepares to fight runway extension

By Terry Witt

Leaders of a golf course community met Tuesday and agreed to begin circulating petitions countywide opposing expansion of the Crystal River Airport runway to 5,000 feet.

Barbara Thomas, president of the Crystal Paradise Estates Civic Association, and Ron Neal, president of the Seven Rivers Golf and Country Club, were among 20 residents who approved the petition.

“Our community is definitely opposed, very strongly,” Thomas said. “We are right in the runway flight path.

The move comes two weeks after Citrus County commissioners voted to update the Crystal River Airport master plan and accept a consultant’s recommendation to extend the runway from 4,555 feet to 5,000 feet.

Citrus County has no grant money available to build the runway extension, and has not formally approved the extension, but residents are taking no chances.

“We just want to get the attention of the county commission that there is a group of residents opposed to extending the runway,” Neal said. “We don’t see any value to the citizens of the county.”

Neal, who sees airplanes fly over his house every day, said a few pilots would benefit from the extension, but the average citizen in the community would see no benefit.

He said the extension would destroy wetlands and may push more stormwater into the community. The golf course community was built in a swamp and floods periodically. It opened in 1968. He said the big issue for many residents is the potential to worsen the flooding.

Thomas said other concerns related to safety and environmental damage. She said extending the runway would open the airport to larger aircraft and would destroy irreplaceable wetlands.

Airport responds

Tom Davis, who manages Crystal Aero Group Inc., the company that runs the airport, said there is a misconception that the 5,000-foot runway is needed for larger airplanes.

“This is not the case,” Davis said in an information paper for county commissioners. “The objective is to more efficiently and more safely accommodate those aircraft currently using the airport (medium-size corporate aircraft). Many corporate flight manuals and insurance companies will not permit corporate jet aircraft to operate on less than a 5,000-foot runway.”

He said the 5,000-foot runway would also meet the need for a straight-in instrument approach to the airport during inclement weather. He said the safety factor and the need for an instrument approach landing are the two main reasons for extending the runway.

Davis also said the aircraft using the airport are involved in the corporate business world, such as Progress Energy. He said the company provides “an enormous tax benefit to the county.” He said the airport also provides a landing site for tourists and other recreational users.

Construction of new homes drops sharply

In the Orlando area, housing starts fell 32% in the 3rd quarter this year compared to 2005.

Jerry W. Jackson
Sentinel Staff Writer

November 1, 2006

New-home construction, one of the engines of Central Florida's growth, slowed dramatically during the third quarter as builders adapted to lower demand and focused on moving unsold inventory.

New-home starts in the Orlando area fell during the third quarter to 6,853, down 32 percent from the same three months last year, according to a closely watched industry survey released this week.

housing starts, or the number of new homes getting under way, retreated to levels not seen since mid-2003 in the Orlando area, according to Metrostudy, which tracks new-home markets across the country.

The region's 12-month start total for homes was off by 9.8 percent as of Sept. 30 compared with the same period a year ago, but the new-home inventory, 22,794 units, was actually down slightly and represented an 81/2-month supply. The category of "finished but vacant" homes was up sharply from a year ago for a second straight quarter, surging 123 percent to 8,179 units.

Anthony Crocco, Metrostudy's Central Florida director, said Tuesday that while the inventory of homes has flattened across much of the country -- including Central Florida -- many potential buyers have "effectively withdrawn from the market" as they wait to see if housing prices are going to continue to fall.

"There is a malaise out there" on buyers' part, Crocco said. "But our thinking is that, as spring rolls around, people will begin to buy again. There will be pent-up demand."

The market as measured by Metrostudy includes Orange, Seminole, Osceola and Lake counties -- Metro Orlando -- plus Polk and Volusia counties. The numbers are for subdivisions only and do not include scattered, single-site new homes or "build on your lot" construction.

Nationwide, home builders have been pushing incentives and trimming prices to boost demand. Reflecting that, new-home prices fell last month by the largest amount in 35 years, the U.S. Commerce Department reported last week; the median price for new homes sold in September was down 9.7 percent compared with September 2005 to $217,100.

That was the lowest median home price in two years and the sharpest year-over-year decline since December 1970.

But Metro Orlando's unemployment rate is low, the pace of job formation here remains strong and people continue to move to the area, Crocco said -- all strengths that should help buffer the region during the current slowdown.

Florida continued to outpace the nation in job creation in September, and its unemployment rate was the lowest of the 10 most-populous states. The statewide unemployment rate was 3.4 percent, a full point below the national rate of 4.4 percent.

The four-county Orlando metro area posted an even lower unemployment rate of 3.1 percent and added 38,000 jobs during the 12 months that ended Sept. 30, trailing only the larger Miami-Fort Lauderdale metro area, which added 54,200 jobs.

Crocco said the so-called "move-in rate" -- the number of families occupying new homes -- was improving in the Orlando area, indicating builders are having more success completing deals.

Builders in Central Florida noted Tuesday that housing starts are coming down from last year's record pace, so the actual numbers remain strong despite the sharp percentage decline.

"We're still selling a lot of homes," said George Glance, president of the Orlando division of KB Home, one of the region's busiest builders. "We're on track with what we did last year," when KB Home closed on more than 1,000 homes in Metro Orlando -- about 8 percent of the total market, according to a study by Charles Wayne Consulting.

Glance said that, while he expects some slowing in sales during the first half of 2007, he thinks demand is already starting to come back and that inventory will begin to rebalance itself during the second half.

"We've had a lot of backlog" as a result of "artificial demand," he said. "There was some speculation" -- new-home purchases made by investors hoping to make a quick profit during last year's frenzied sales activity.

Orlando custom-home builder Carmen Dominguez said she noticed an increase in calls and interest in new homes beginning in mid-August -- for homes in the $1 million-plus range.

"People are becoming a little more confident" about the economy, she said, now that interest rates have stabilized, the stock market has gone up and energy prices have declined.

Metrostudy said its latest survey showed that annual new-home closings in the Orlando area declined slightly to 32,135 in the third quarter, from 32,320 in the second quarter. But the pace of closings was still running 6.9 percent ahead of last year's pace.

The huge Solivita community in Polk County was the most active for annual new-home starts in the Central Florida survey area as of Sept. 30, with 743 new homes.

Six of the top-10 developments were in Orange County: Timber Springs with 489, Lakes of Windermere with 482, Spring Isle with 476, Summerport with 391, Avalon Park with 385, and Moss Park with 350.

Legacy Park in Polk was seventh with 354, Plantation at Leesburg in Lake had 324 and Lake Ashton in Polk rounded out the top 10 with 304 starts.

Metrostudy President Mike Inselmann said that, while indicators for housing demand remain mixed, "there are reasons to be somewhat optimistic that the bottom of the cycle in the housing sector will occur during the next six months."

He said the stage appears to be set for a "turnaround by mid-2007" as a result of cutbacks in new-home production, aggressive incentives by builders and "fundamental demographic support" for housing.

He noted that the Federal Reserve has ended its long string of consecutive interest-rate increases, and mortgage rates have dropped in recent months, making it possible for more families to qualify for home loans.

Jerry W. Jackson can be reached at jwjackson@orlandosentinel.com or 407-420-5721

Voters, don't give away clout

A Times Editorial
Published November 1, 2006

If you are happy with the cap on your home's taxable value, you should oppose Amendment 3 to the Florida Constitution. Think students should be taught in smaller classes? Then a no vote on Amendment 3 would make sense. Likewise if you enjoy dining without breathing second-hand smoke, want a prekindergarten education available to every child or believe money should be set aside for Everglades cleanup.

All of those initiatives were favored by a majority of voters, but none would have become law if Amendment 3 had been in place because they didn't get 60 percent of the vote. Amendment 3 would require proposed amendments to win at least 6 votes out of 10 to pass, which would have doomed Save Our Homes property tax reduction and other popular measures.

The powerful development, insurance and sugar industries behind the amendment don't respect simple majority rule - except for themselves. In a hypocritical twist, Amendment 3 would need only a single vote over 50 percent to succeed.

These special interests already control the legislative process with their money and influence. Now they want to revoke a basic premise of democracy because they don't control the voters.

A minimum-wage increase was approved by voters in 2004 after the Legislature failed to act. That would explain why Publix and the Chamber of Commerce want to change the rules. Big Business would rather put money into the Amendment 3 campaign than give it to their employees.

Developers want to make it more difficult for a referendum to pass because they fear a popular movement to let voters have a say in growth-management decisions. Other moneyed backers, including the sugar and insurance industries, have similar selfish motives to keep voters from righting wrongs.

Admittedly, the referendum process can put unwise measures in the Constitution. Yet the situation can be corrected in the same way, as it was with the bullet train. Floridians first approved an amendment to force the state to provide rail travel between major cities, then removed it from the Constitution when they learned that the cost was exorbitant.

So why would voters weaken their own ability to confront the powerful interests that control the lawmaking process? We have no idea, which is why we recommend a no vote on Amendment 3.

Residents push for a Chiefland hospital

By DIANE CHUN

Sun staff writer

FANNING SPRINGS - Hundreds of residents of Levy, Gilchrist and Dixie counties crowded into the Shrine Club Tuesday afternoon to voice their support for a proposed new hospital in Chiefland.

The public hearing opened, however, with a statement from officials at Williston's Nature Coast Regional Hospital opposing the move by Ameris Health Systems to build a 65-bed hospital on a site behind the Wal-Mart Supercenter.

If built, the new hospital would compete directly with Williston's 40-bed hospital for patients among the more than 65,000 residents who live within a 25-mile radius of the site.

Ameris, a firm based in Nashville, has filed a certificate of need with Florida's Agency for Health Care Administration for a 100-bed hospital on the 20-acre site, allowing for expansion at a later date.

Administrator Alan Bird, speaking on behalf of Nature Coast Hospital, said the need for another hospital in the area just is not there. The Williston hospital, Bird said, has difficulty filling 40 percent of its available beds on any given day. The hospital is operated by Cypress Health Systems; it offers general medical and surgical care and has an emergency room.

Bird also pointed out the difficulty in recruiting and retaining qualified physicians to a rural hospital located so close to larger facilities such as North Florida Regional Medical Center, Shands at the University of Florida, or Gainesville's Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

WellFlorida, formerly the North Central Florida Health Planning Council, scheduled the public meeting. The Association for Health Care Administration is the state agency charged with approving or denying the Ameris plan, with a decision set for mid-December.

Those who spoke in favor of the proposal filled the room and spilled out the double front doors, waiting for a turn to speak.

Dr. Bill Martin, an orthodontist with an office in Chiefland, said the time had come for residents to do something proactively about health care.

"Doctors are more than willing to come out here," Martin said. "We are not comparing apples to apples in these two hospitals. Both can certainly survive."

A number of speakers emphasized the rapid growth in population, many of them retirees who have recently moved to the area. Others protested the fact that because the hearing ended at 5 p.m., working residents didn't have the opportunity to speak.

Bob Mount, a Chiefland dentist, described the region as "the last outpost in the state of Florida that does not have access to care."

"It is a crying shame that we have to come here today to defend our rights and needs," added Bobby Wright, a Dixie County resident.

Dominic LaRusso of Fanning Springs described a hair-raising ride to the emergency room at North Florida Regional Medical Center when he thought he was having a heart attack.

"It took 42 minutes with all the bells and lights flashing," he said. "At one point, they had to make a panic stop and I slid right off of the gurney. I could be dead, but I'm here to say we need a hospital here now."

An hour later, residents were still filing up to the stage to take their allotted three-minute turn at the microphone.

As one older resident struggled to maneuver down the steps after speaking, someone in the crowd shouted out, "Watch your step . . . It's a long way to the hospital."

Diane Chun can be reached at 374-5041 or chund@gvillesun.com
Continued from 1BProposal does have opposition
Long and winding road
Construction delays, environmental concerns part of 31st Street picture


BY RICHARD CONN
STAR-BANNER
OCALA - Al Cronkrite said last week that leaving his house on County Road 475 in the evenings had become an increasingly unpleasant task.

"The dust is just horrendous," Cronkrite said at the time. "We can't go out of the house after 5:30 p.m."

What had kicked up all that dust was construction from the 31st Street road project, which county officials hope to have completed by early next year.

The county originally had hoped to have the entire project finished by Dec. 12, but that date has been pushed back because some additional subsoil excavation on the site had to be completed, said Mike Butzer, Marion County's project manager in charge of road construction.

Instead, Butzer said he hopes to have two of the four lanes open - running east and west - by Dec. 12.

Part of the roadwork necessitated that County Road 475, also known as Southeast Third Avenue, be closed from Southwest 35th Street to Southwest First Avenue to through traffic until Nov. 20. That's so a stormwater drainage system can be installed.

Butzer said crews are working hard to get the system installed, and he's not ruling out the possibility that County Road 475 could be open a week to 10 days before schedule.

"If I can get it open sooner I will," Butzer said. "We know it's an inconvenience."

As for the dust, Butzer said crews have a water truck on site to wet down the construction area, but with the recent drought "you can't put enough water on the ground."

This is the second phase of the 31st Street project, which will widen the roadway to four lanes with sidewalks and bike paths on each side. The project begins on the west side of U.S. 441 at the 31st Street traffic light. It will run west across County Road 475 to Southwest Seventh Avenue, connect with Southwest 42nd Street and end just east of Southwest 27th Avenue, where Trinity Catholic High School sits. Southwest 27th Avenue is also known as County Road 475A or Shady Road.

The city of Ocala completed its 1.1-mile stretch of road from Southeast 18th Avenue to U.S. 441 in 2002.

ENVIRONMENTAL
CONCERNS
The construction on the second phase, which began in September 2005, has raised the ire of Darlene Weesner, a longtime environmentalist and now candidate for the District 2 seat on the County Commission.

She said the project was a mistake from the start by damaging some three miles of forest that she said cleansed the spring-fed Lake Louise, which collects much of its volume from seepage.

Weesner said she's worried about the lake's long-term future. "This is very heartbreaking to me, it has destroyed so much," she said.

Her opponent, County Commission Chairman Jim Payton, could not be reached for comment by telephone Monday evening.

However, Shawn Hubbuck, the county's rights of way manager, said the project has been environmentally sensitive, by creating a conservation easement adjacent to the lake on what was private property.

"We're actually enhancing the protection and quality of that area," Hubbuck said. "Because the conservation easement is forever."

Butzer said compensation ponds are being created to compensate for what was lost. At least one of those ponds could have trees planted in it, he said.

Butzer also said that a turbidity barrier has been constructed to prevent a buildup of silt in Lake Louise during construction.

And Hubbuck said water from the roadway would be treated in a retention area instead of flowing directly into the lake.

"What's naturally flowing there today is still naturally flowing there tomorrow," he said of the lake.

Hubbuck said that since Lake Louise wasn't deemed a "high-quality" navigable waterway, the county didn't have to apply for a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Instead, before construction began the county was only required to go through the permitting process of the St. Johns River Water Management District, which included collecting soil samples and identifying wetland species.

As for Cronkrite, on Monday he said that the dust that the project had stirred up had dissipated because a large amount of water had been sprayed.

"I'm not complaining," he said.
Cronkrite also said the current situation is much better than during the summer when he said he saw a steady stream of dump trucks noisily hauling dirt up and down his road.

"There were 50 to 60 dump trucks going by our house during the day," he said.

Richard Conn may be reached at richard.conn@starbanner.com or (352) 867-4045.
Read my lips: We can't live without taxes

By Gerald Ensley
DEMOCRAT SENIOR WRITER

So Charlie Crist and his empty chair (and ridiculous "father and son" actors) have Jim Davis on the run in the race for governor: Davis is now agreeing with Crist that Florida's property taxes are too high.

And thanks to ham-handed stage-managing by county commissioners, some Leon County voters are having second thoughts about the proposed half-percent sales-tax increase for low-income health care.

But every election, it's the same thing: a whole bunch of candidates and voters insisting that taxes have to be reduced. Enough already. Taxes are money collected from all to spend on all. We couldn't get by without them. And those who would make reducing or eliminating them the centerpiece of their political stance are shortsighted.

Everyone understands that taxes pay for police and firefighters and hospitals and roads. But taxes also pay for Veterans Day parades and funerals for the indigent. They pay for sidewalks and stormwater ponds in your neighborhood. They pay for art in the town square and for a boys' choir to go to Washington. They pay to restore the old building you loved as a child and the cemetery where your uncle is buried.

The people who want to reduce taxes are usually the first to complain when government won't spend money on something important to them. Everybody wants government services, but so many don't want to pay the taxes that fund them.

The biggest misnomer by tax complainers is that someone is trying to take "my money." There is no "my money." It's a colloquialism, a figure of speech.

You didn't create the state government that pays you. You didn't create the factory that employs you. You didn't create the trees for lumber, the chemicals for plastics or the computers for accounting. You didn't create the need for people to buy food, live in houses, get electric services, drive trucks or write for a newspaper. Every job and every dollar anyone earns is a product of all of us living together in society. Without society, we'd all still be naked and grubbing for bugs.

To keep society operating, everyone has to pay a share. And as our society gets bigger and more services are created, we often have to pay more than we did in the past.

Yes, there has to be a balance: Too much taxation inhibits private enterprise, which is the engine of economic growth. Yes, politicians should not be given a free hand to raise taxes every time they wish. Yes, honorable people can disagree about the amount and fairness of different taxes.

But by all measures, U.S. citizens rank among the least-taxed of civilized nations - and for that we get the most civilized nation on earth.

So enough with the constant cry to reduce taxes. It's an easy emotion. But it's not responsible.

Landbuy: $1 billion a year or bust

Lofty goal set to help preserve Florida for generations to come

Kevin Spear
Sentinel Staff Writer

November 1, 2006

During the past several decades, Florida has purchased spectacular landscapes for preservation -- from dazzling beach dunes that cradle freshwater lakes to ancient scrub lands that shelter some of the state's rarest plants.

But the state's Florida Forever program, generating $300 million annually for buying land and other conservation measures, expires at the end of the decade.

Instead of just gearing up to plead with the state Legislature to renew that funding, however, a coalition of environmentalists has launched a campaign with a far loftier goal.

The Florida Forever Coalition will attempt to secure an astounding $1 billion a year during a decade to buy and protect critical pieces of prairie, forest, wetlands and desertlike scrub. The increase is needed to keep up with rising land costs, coalition members say.

Proponents of the idea want the additional money to come from the source that now provides for most of the state's current land purchases: documentary-stamp taxes on real-estate and legal transactions.

It would just be a bigger slice of the "doc" stamp cash that now goes primarily to the state's general-spending account for health, education and other services.

"There's no question that this is an ambitious effort," said Andy McLeod, interim state director in Florida for the Trust for Public Land, one of 16 groups in the coalition that includes Audubon of Florida, The Nature Conservancy and Defenders of Wildlife.

Several state representatives and senators said a request for $1 billion a year will face stiff, but not impossible, competition.

"I don't know what the magic number is going to be," said Sen. Paula Dockery, R-Lakeland. "I personally think $1 billion is a very reasonable request."

State Rep. Thad Altman, R-Melbourne, said one argument for increasing spending is to help ensure that Florida is livable in years to come.

"The overwhelming majority of people who live in this state say we need to do more to protect our environment," Altman said. "It sounds like a lot of money, but it's not when you consider the needs and benefits."

While Florida has been accused of allowing development to run amok across rural lands, the ongoing commitment to buy and protect land has done much to block the advance of bulldozers. The state has long had the most aggressive land-purchase and conservation program anywhere in the nation.

The Florida Forever program and the previous Preservation 2000 program in the 1990s have assembled more than 2 million acres of landscapes that will be treasured far into the future.

Today, about 27 percent of Florida land is under some form of conservation, including national forests, open spaces on big military bases, state lands and private lands that have been dedicated for preservation.

A number of scientists think that as much as 33 percent of the state should be under conservation for the long-term survival of native ecosystems.

But now, according to state officials, few of the largest, spectacular or pristine tracts are left. Most already have been set aside for preservation or carved up for rooftops and pavement.

Yet obtaining some smaller or less-pristine parcels will play a critical role in linking larger conservation parcels together, protecting rare species and recharging underground aquifers, which supply drinking water and feed springs, lakes and rivers.

To achieve those goals, a study this year by The Nature Conservancy recommends the state should acquire an additional 2.3 million acres -- which could cost nearly $10 billion.

The classic example of future needs are efforts by state, regional and local governments to buy puzzle pieces of property between the Ocala National Forest and the Wekiva River.

More than 50,000 acres between the Wekiva River and the national forest are in public ownership, including the popular Wekiwa Springs State Park.

But the state park won't continue to be valuable as habitat unless corridors of natural land remain open to black bears, for example, migrating along the Wekiva River, St. Johns River and Ocala National Forest.

There's a huge difference between the more than 2 million acres bought since the early 1990s and the 2.3 million acres identified for future purchases: cost.

In 1990, the average price for an acre in Florida was nearly $4,000. Today, that figure is nearly $30,000, according to coalition figures.

In the past few years, skyrocketing real-estate prices have shriveled the buying power of Florida Forever.

"This is really being realistic about the price of land," said Vicki Tschinkel, director of The Nature Conservancy in Florida, which is part of the coalition and often assists the state in land purchases.

That was made clear last month when Gov. Jeb Bush and Cabinet members approved a $50 million purchase of the 4,569-acre Joshua Creek Conservation Area in northeast Orange County and a small part of Seminole County.

That same land was sold for $17 million less just six months earlier, a difference attributed in part to escalating real-estate prices.

How much time is left to buy more environmentally sensitive lands depends on how fast the state sprawls. The pace varies from blistering in some years to modest in others.

McLeod of the Trust for Public Land said the coalition has no specific strategy in place yet for winning approval of additional land-buying money.

One approach may be to make a formal push for that money as early as next year's legislative session.

Those details will be discussed this week at the Public Land Acquisition and Management Partnership Conference in Jacksonville.

The gathering, which starts today, is expected to draw politicians, state officials, environmental leaders and professionals in land acquisition -- many of the same people who will usher the $1 billion proposal into public and legislative debate.

"It's going to be a very important audience," McLeod said.

Okefenokee Swamp

Kevin Spear can be reached at kspear@orlandosentinel.com or 407-420-5062.

Tortoise protection to toughen

Volusia, state working to prevent live burials

By JOHN BOZZO
Staff Writer

DAYTONA BEACH -- Gopher tortoises face a gruesome death when they're in the way of new construction.

olusia County officials want to join in the effort to stop those deaths.

"The problem is, the most desirable land for development is land the gopher tortoise is likely to inhabit," said Stephen Kintner, Volusia County environmental management director.

Lucky tortoises get relocated, but bulldozers bury unlucky animals to die in the underground burrows where they live -- with permission from the state.

"We've heard scientists tell us it might take three to six months for a gopher tortoise to die after its been entombed in its burrow," Kintner said.

County Council members on Thursday will consider working with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission on a plan to protect gopher tortoises from being buried alive.

"This is a no-brainer for the Council," said Volusia County Chairman Frank Bruno, who expects unanimous approval.

Other counties have taken or are considering similar actions. Flagler County adopted a resolution in August asking the state to severely limit so-called incidental take permits that allow developers to bury and kill tortoises.

"I call them incidental kill permits," said Betty O'Laughlin, chairwoman of the Environmental Council of Volusia-Flagler Counties. "You're covering up live animals."

Florida has issued 2,477 incidental take permits statewide, 47 in Flagler and 69 in Volusia. Money from the permits is earmarked to buy land to relocate tortoises in hopes the species will prosper.

"What's distasteful to people is that the gopher tortoises on a site have to die," said Joy Hill, spokeswoman for the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. "We don't like doing that, either."

But she acknowledges that despite the policy, not enough land -- 10,000 acres so far -- has been purchased. And the gopher tortoise population has declined up to 80 percent over the past century, Hill said.

Gopher tortoises can live more than 100 years. They dig burrows up to 40 feet long and 10 feet deep, which also provide shelter for more than 360 species of animals, including indigo snakes, gopher frogs, skunks, quail and armadillos.

State officials are working on a plan to emphasize relocation and limit incidental take permits. The plan should be ready by June, when tortoises will be upgraded from a species of special concern to a threatened species. Developers are joining the effort.

In Flagler, Harbor Village Marina developers in August withdrew their incidental take permit and announced plans to relocate about 40 tortoises.

Holly Hill developer Parker Mynchenberg bought an incidental take permit for the Plantation Oaks project near Ormond Beach, but contacted the state about relocation after the state lifted a ban against moving tortoises that test positive for a respiratory disease, a fish and wildlife official said.

"Builders and developers have paid a lot of money for gopher tortoise relocation," said Sue Darden, executive director of the Volusia Home Builders Association. "Our developers don't want them killed, either."

Staff Writer Lauren Sonis contributed to this report.

john.bozzo@news-jrnl.com

Scientists Seek Cause of Fish Kill

Scientists were working Tuesday to determine what caused the deaths of about a thousand fish along a two-mile stretch of ocean near the Blowing Rocks Preserve.

"I've never seen anything like this," said Blowing Rocks site manager Bruce Beh, who discovered the dead sand drum fish Sunday morning.

It is extremely rare to see a fish kill that affects just one species, said Theresa Cody, a marine research associate with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Research Institute in St. Petersburg. She speculated the fish might have been killed by disease or dumped from a fisherman's net.

Landlord who cut oak trees may settle

Lauretta plans to replant trees

BY REBECCA ADAMUS
FLORIDA TODAY

A hearing for a Merritt Island landlord who cut down four oak trees has stalled because a settlement is in the works.

Dominic Lauretta, accused of cutting down four live oaks without a proper permit, faces fines of $60,000 because of a tougher ordinance that requires offenders to pay $15,000 per tree. Because he will replant some trees, however, some or all of the fines likely will be waived, said assistant county attorney Terri Jones.

The tree cutting angered members of the Merritt Island Redevelopment Agency, whose main goal is funding beautification projects for businesses on land bordered on the south by Fortenberry Road, north by Lucas Road, and to the east and west by the Indian and Banana rivers.

In August, the county invited MIRA to settle with Lauretta and work out the number of trees he should plant to make up for the loss of the four live oaks, one of which was more than 100 years old.

"The community would greatly benefit from new trees versus a fine going to the county," said agency chairman Ralph Perrone.

Perrone said the number of the new trees to be planted has been determined. But during the course of the negotiations, Lauretta requested two of the smaller oaks be evaluated to see whether they were dead when they were cut.

A determination by the county's arborist could change the agreed-upon number and send everybody back to the drawing board, Perrone said. According to county law, a permit is not required for the emergency removal of a dead or seriously damaged tree, which affects the health, safety and welfare of the property owner or public.

In the meantime, Lauretta will not face the hearing until that number is final. Calls to Lauretta's home were not returned.

A hearing before the county's special magistrate will determine what fines, if any, Lauretta must pay, in addition to replanting the trees.

Contact Adamus at 242-3618 or radamus@brevard.gannett.com.